WRITTEN APRIL 2007. BROUGHT TO THE FRONT NOVEMBER 2009. ON ACCOUNT OF SOME SLOW-POKES FIGURING IT OUT THAT THESE GUYS ARE FRAUDULENT.
They’ve headed up a thread-starter calling it:”Ocean Cooling. Not.”
But in fact the oceans are cooling and they are lying.
Whats happened is someones found a problem with these “ARGO FLOATS”.
Argo is some pretty new system for recording oceanic temperatures all over the world and at different depths. And the floats overestimated the amount of cooling between 2003 and 2005. The floats showed that the oceans lost maybe half as many joules as what seemed to be the case originally.
But realclimate.org (fuckthedata.com) because they are so fucking incompetent and such motivated bullshit-artists….. used this UNDERESTIMATE-OF-THE-COOLING to launch a counterattack on honest scientists and to mislead people that the oceans aren’t cooling.
GAVIN SEZ:
“At the time, we (correctly) pointed out that this result was going to be hard to reconcile with continued increases in sea level rise (driven in large part by thermal expansion effects), and that there may still be issues with way that the new ARGO floats were being incorporated into the ocean measurement network. Now it seems as if there is a problem in the data and in the latest analysis, the cooling has disappeared.”
BUT YOU SEE GAVIN TELLS LIES. The cooling doesn’t disappear. Instead SOME of the cooling dissapears.
Gavin lies again in the very next sentence:
“Ocean heat content changes are potentially a great way to evaluate climate model results that suggest that the planet is currently significantly out of equilibrium (i.e. it is absorbing more energy than it is emitting).”
This is a premeditated lie since its a lie that contains to the laity “plausible deniability”.
Since the planet OSCILLATES in its temperature an energy-deprivation-crusader can always claim the planet is warming, so long as he does not specify the time scale.
Its like some cheap trick that a stage performer might use to “communicate” with your dead relatives. And the DDT-Bureaucratisation-Holocaust-Deniers are just chockers with these cheap tricks.
What they will never debate is the actual science.
This issue is important because the liars have claimed that the sun is basically constant and therefore that CO2 is driving things. But CO2 is NOT driving things and if it was the oceans could not possibly cool down as they have done so.
When the results came out finding that the oceans had cooled the leftists mostly kept quiet about it since of course this had further exposed their fraud.
But now they use this correction in the data to generate a massive swindle in order to neutralise the evidence that has exposed them.
“The OCHA estimate made using all data (thick solid line), including spurious float profiles, shows an apparent cooling of about 48 Ã� 10^21
J (48 zeta joules) from 2004 through 2006. This erroneous cooling arises because of the increasing fraction of spurious profiles in the Argo data stream produced by the WHOI SOLO floats. Another estimate using all data except the spurious float data (thick dashed line) suggests much less cooling, only about 25 zeta joules.”
http://oceans.pmel.noaa.gov/Pdf/heat_2006.pdf
Gavin you are a LIAR.
And you must be thrown off the public tit right this minute.
…….the authors have called it. you’re a stupid……..who can’t read…….
By: Luke from Dr Marohasy's blog sez on April 23, 2007
at 8:52 am
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
1. What does “the author’s have called it” mean?
2. How does that contradict anything I said above you stupid lying cunt?
By: graemebird on April 23, 2007
at 9:36 am
Well third parties. Lets see if we can get an answer from Luke.
Now I think I’ve caught Gavin redhanded lying.
Luke knows I’ve caught Gavin lying also. But he wants to PRETEND that I haven’t.
So do you see his trick. Its a TONE-OF-VOICE-ARGUMENT. He doesn’t explain why I haven’t caught Gavin flat-out-lying.
But instead he creates the impression with his TONE-OF-VOICE argument.
You get used to this after awhile. It takes a great many techniques of this sort to keep a transparent fraud in the air.
By: graemebird on April 23, 2007
at 9:39 am
LOOK LUKE.
If Gavin isn’t lying for the reasons I explain above. Then just tell me where I got it wrong in plain English and then I’ll have to stop accusing Gavin of lying.
I’m not going to accuse him of lying on this score if you can explain how I managed to get it wrong?
So just explain.
But you won’t do it will you?
Because Gavin IS LYING isn’t he!
By: graemebird on April 23, 2007
at 9:58 am
Believe me people. If you just push these guys and will not take no for an answer you will never run out of amazement and wonderment at their ongoing relentless dishonesty.
What is motivating these people?
By: graemebird on April 23, 2007
at 10:00 am
The paper’s authors themselves have corrected their position.
RRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTT.
SEZ SITE DIETY. RRRRRIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTT.
SO IT TURNS OUT THAT YOU WERE JUST BEING YOUR NORMAL FILTHY DIRTY LYING SELF.
SEE THAT THIRD PARTIES. AS USUAL GAVIN SCHMIDT WAS LYING AND LUKE ATTEMPTED TO LIE IN ORDER TO SUPPORT HIM.
By: Luke-Caught-Masturbating-And-Lying on April 23, 2007
at 10:59 am
are the oceans cooling or warming?
By: drscroogemcduck on April 23, 2007
at 1:01 pm
Hows that for both those liars being well and truly busted hey Scrooge?
Both Gavin and Luke busted as bullshit-artists.
By: graemebird on April 24, 2007
at 8:08 am
I don’t know why you tolerate such scum, Mr Bird. They are a blemish upon the very rare intellectual excellence of this blog.
By: Parkos on April 24, 2007
at 8:34 am
energy deniers show their true colors
http://www.cnsnews.com/Culture/Archive/200208/CUL20020826b.html
By: drscroogemcduck on April 25, 2007
at 6:08 am
once again the “Parkos” comment above is not a genuine article..
I will blog here as Mistah Scrunty from now on. Delete and keep it tidy!
By: parkos on April 27, 2007
at 10:38 am
Yeah we know that parkos. Don’t worry too much. I don’t think there is any attempt to disceive here. It started, I think, as a bit of a gag.
But thanks for tipping me off as to your new moniker.
By: graemebird on April 27, 2007
at 3:52 pm
bird,
i just noticed the climate change levy in the UK applies to all electricity that is non-renewable including nuclear. this is a pretty clear cut case of energy deprivation economics.
http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/ccl/intro.htm
By: drscroogemcduck on April 28, 2007
at 4:57 am
Well there you are. Busted. Well and truly busted.
Break-Down, Shake-down, They are busted.
So much for the compromiser myth that a carbon-tax might be a beneficial Trojan Horse for nuclear.
I fucking hate it when conservatives try to ride the lying-tiger, thinking that they can control it once they’ve jumped onboard.
This is why these bastards are so effective. All their efforts are heading in a single direction.
By: graemebird on April 28, 2007
at 5:23 am
Graeme, can you and your mates help us to bring some sense to a climate debate on Phil Plait’s blog here:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/05/05/breaking-climate-scientists-cleared-of-malpractice-by-panel/#comments
We need some extra voices to counter Phil Plait’s warmist lunacy .
By: Plutonium being on May 7, 2010
at 10:55 am
I left a comment but thats one quackademic who is not likely to let me through. I gave him a hard time when he was running Randi’s site.
By: graemebird on May 7, 2010
at 10:07 pm