I used to lament that there wasn’t some good word in the English language for treason-lite. Spooked always by that traumatising scene in King Lear where once the word “treason” is spoken all horror breaks out. Since treason was always the crime that called for punishments more severe than any other.
Now I wish there was such a word but there isn’t. And in this case there is simply no need for any inbetween word. Because Kevin Rudd…………………….. is desensitizing us…………….. to TREASON.
Even twenty years ago he could be forgiven for thinking that a “free trade deal” is actually a free trade deal. But its no free trade deal. Thats a lie. We can never let anyone on the net tell lies and describe this as a free trade deal. Its a treason deal.
We know what happens when you have a bureaucracy created and treaties are signed!!!! We already know that!!!. We have the example of the European Union. It went from a phoney free trade deal to a proto-dictatorship.
Look when these Brussel-loving-USURPERS in Europe… when they hold a plebiscite to expand their illegitimate powers…. when they hold a vote and it comes back positive they just say “onward” and keep grabbing more power. And when they lose the plebiscite they just say “We go on” and they go on expanding their power.
Now WE KNOW THAT NOW. We know that these things aren’t free trade deals. We know that they are anti-sovereignty USURPATIONS.
Imagine if one of the Kings from the house of Plantagenet or the house of Lancaster was putting together a plot like what this bloody bloody milky bar kid is trying on.
Its pretty clear that his relatives would get together and find some way for him to have a fairly short reign.
I mean you think of it. If the Black Prince was trying this sort of thing on, despite his legendary power in the field, his uncle John-Of-Gaunt would have him six feet under in a trice.
This has to be a ONE-TERM-GOVERNMENT. And if we can take some solace in the Reserve Banks ignorance, its likely the case that them messing things up is the only way we can get these latte-leftist wankers out of office.
In a way I’m more of a Labour man. I mean I have a bit of an affinity to characters like Martin Ferguson, Kim Beazley and especially Peter Walsh. Even if I’d disagree with them about labour regulation.
But this bunch of latte wankers running things now must go as soon as possible. And if you are in a room with Kevin Rudd never let him leave without a nasty bruise on his shin.
There is no free trade movement but a movement to unilateral free trade. We do not need to water down the other guys sovereignty in order to get benefits from unilaterally offering most of the world, mostly free trade, most of the time.
AN URGENT STRATEGIC NEED.
We have to salvage the concept of free trade from these preening leftist traitors.
And the only way to do this is to chart a course for persistent TRADE surpluses first and unilateral free trade second. Naturally the two measures could overlap in terms of rolling them out. But clearly charting the course towards trade surpluses is the more urgent matter. We want to get to unilateral free trade without treaties, without excessive patents or copyright requirements, and without restricting our sovereign right to bring the hammer down on some country with a tariff, as a punishment, when we need to punish short of military action.
We want to have trade surpluses and when we get there the general public can be happier and more confident about further tariff reduction. Trade surpluses are important politically (as well as economically) because our economists have convinced the public that free trade means deficits and red ink as far as the eye can see and this is a terrible lie.
We would be doing an enormous favour to the cause of humane civilization if we chartered a course for Australia to typically run large surpluses most years and when we were sure that this outcome was in the works we could THEN offer virtually free trade UNILATERALLY.
There must never be any free trade treaties. Or perhaps there might be a twenty year free trade arrangement in return for materiel aid for a country under seige or something. But we do not want various geographies giving up local sovereignty for this cause.
But if we find ourselves involved in “free trade treaties” (which are NOT free trade treaties and never could be) THERE MUST BE NO ORGANIZATION INVOLVED WITH THIS TREATY. Because this organization is merely a cuckoo baby to undermine both free trade and our own local sovereignty.
And more generally speaking when two countries get together for a common purpose its got to be under the motto ACTIVITIES AND NOT ORGANIZATIONS. And those activities must be sunsetted. And the organizations must not ever be allowed to be set up because its only a matter of time before they will be taken over by latte-wankers and hard-core traitors.
THE MAJOR STRATEGIC PLAN IN THREE STAGES:
1 PULL OUT FROM VIRTUALLY ALL INTERNATIONAL TREATIES.
2. PUT IN PLACE THE PLAN TO GIVE AUSTRALIA PERSISTENT SURPLUSES.
3. THEN CONVINCE AUSTRALIANS OF THE WORTHINESS OF UNILATERAL FREE TRADE TO MOST COUNTRIES MOST OF THE TIME IN THIS NEW CONTEXT. But we would never do this without retaining the ability to be able to act as a nation in our own interests. To bring the slipper down on foreign politicians who displease us.
So you are probably wondering: How do we chart the course to persistent Australian trade surpluses?
Well thats easy to do. But lengthy to explain. And so it will be the subject of another thread.