Not the known truth but a re-ranking of this particular paradigm to now be the leading one. The only way this can be resolved is by a Kenyan goverment raid on Raila that comes out of a clear blue sky.
As I said this is not the gospel truth. But rather the leading paradigm that matters have FLIPPED-to, now that the Hawaiian registrar has come out with her latest statement. What this paradigm does, if you collect all the direct official quotes from Hawaiian officials……. And only those who have claimed to see his documents….. barring maybe 2 white lies at the maximum but perhaps not even that….. What this does is it VINDICATES the Hawaian officials as acting with honest good faith.
I invite all and sundry to come in under false names with all the quotes of the Hawaiians. But only if you have the name, what the official has claimed to have viewed with his own eyes, and the date. The quote must be an official announcements and not some journalists interpretation.
Also to protect Obama’s privacy, since the Hawaiian officials have to do their jobs, and juggle a few balls in the air at once, well its a pretty hard gig for these Hawaiian officials to have to deal with and keep their integrity. So nothing you infer that the officials presumably told the journalists off the record ought to be taken into account.
The officials, going on the hypothesis that they have been about as honest as they possibly could be, given the tight spot that they were in, would have surely lied and lied and lied and lied to the journalists, strictly off the record, until theY risked their faces falling off from all the lying. BUT THIS IS NOT DISHONESTY ON THEIR PART.
I don’t want to hand you these speculative conclusions on a silver platter, I want you to follow the clues that I’m giving you and have a little bit of faith in your own detective work and in my focus on methodology. If the evidence makes me flip paradigms again I’ll let you know.
Below is a comment I’ve made elsewhere that is a bit of a repetition of the above. But I think its good to have things said a number of ways. For sake of comprehension.
“I am about to reveal to you why the paradigm wherein Obama has an American father has just been launched to the position of leading paradigm.
Obama having an American father would not necessarily make him eligible. But it would be close enough for modern norms of constitutional interpretation. So if he came clean with it, and there was a judgement on the matter, and suppose the judgement, on the basis of his American father, ruled in a split decision in his favour……….. This would at least mean that the constitution was at last being respected…. Well not being respected. But respected near to modern norms.
None of this would OBJECTIVELY shame Alan, Phil or Orly. Quite the contrary. Since their position is right and righteous and unassailable as to the need to find out who has assumed such power, nothing subsequent can speak negatively about the position they have taken. This is just a fact of epistemology. Since they are not to be judged on powers of soothsaying.
Every minute this airbrushed Nazi is not coming clean is spitting on the constitution. He won’t come clean. Because whilst the simple honest Hawaiian officials might think that his sensitivity over his paternity (an assumption under this paradigm) is the only thing he is hiding, the matter would be, if he revealed it, only the first layer of discovery about who he really is and what is designs are.
If you ask me his designs are entirely transparent. Its a breath-taking desensitization-assault, on all those norms of Western society that stand between us and a totalalitarian tyranny, the likes of which we thought were no longer possible.
The good thing about this current leading paradigm (foreign birth but American father) is that it lets the Hawaiians off the hook. It shows them to be doing a scrupulously honest job. And under this paradigm false documents haven’t necessarily been planted in various Hawaiian records.”
In light of the recent evidence pointing to an American father and a Kenyan birth, I will paste and copy below a post which mischieviously affects to IDENTIFY Obama’s American father. There were probably ten million possible African-Americans at the time who may have sired Obama. But it has been established that the one mentioned could not be ruled out. And this differs from a lot of other African-American men who might well be verified as being not in the general location of Stanley Ann around the time she conceived.
The fellow mentioned is someone who I cannot hide my admiration for. And yet I cannot quite justify my admiration for this man to all and sundry. I will admit this as a weakness, or a possible one. But if this man is his father then Obama is the greatest underacheiver the world has yet seen. Since this man could think for himself. And this man, when he was right, when he was wrong, when he was keeping his mind the same, and when changing it, was the very epitome of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.
Most of all this potential sire of the new charismatic enemy of all mankind (and particularly the black man) was an astounding example of what can only be called MANHOOD. I say this with all assurance that I have not a homosexual fibre in all of my person. This man was a MAN. This man was a REAL MAN.
This POSSIBLE father of Obama, under my new leading paradigm that Obama had a Kenyan birth but an American father, had one of the most astounding physical presences of almost anyone ever. He looked to be cut from clay just a grade above the rest of the normal run of mankind. It is the impression that a Lincoln devotee must get from considering (or imagining) Lincoln as a sort of being physically and morally superior to the normal exhibits from the wider gene pool.
Anyway here is the post repeated below. Brought to the front ((on account of the idea that I think that new evidence suggests Obama had a Kenyan birth and an American father)) and that more than ever I think every month this fellow is in power will see millions all over the world die way earlier than otherwise.
Degrees of separation are not always of the nature as to be measured by leagues or miles, nautical and otherwise. The generation gap may be large or small. Cassandra gives her warnings in the same room as the people who ignore her. Prisms of the mind can establish a gulf between the guileless many and the intriguer-few that walk the same streets in the centre of a western town. Family feuds can make a mockery of the existence of a billion phones, though each one can call every other.
A gay churchgoer may feel distance between herself and another gay woman of the same congregation. Yet the order of the mutual confession of their orientation may be pre-determined by their relative prominence locally or on a wider stage. During the last glaciation barriers of ice blocked off peoples one from the other so assiduously, and for such lengths of time, that the differences we identify with race were established, and few such differences precede the last glacial period. And yet during those many tens of thousands of years, a bird might have flown between alienated communities in less time than it took to gather the wood in the evening and start a fire.
In the video Elton sees the blue-eyed Nikita on the watch-tower and just metres away. But she might as well have been on another planet, until Reagan emerged to wipe that wall from the face of the earth, along with the conditions that made it necessary.
In those decades and centuries where english-speaking navies hold sway, it is the sea that brings us together and mountain ranges that keep us apart. But this was not always the way. In ancient times the shipping was not as advanced. Yet the world was warmer, and the separation between eastern and western civilisations was indistinct. Alexander crossed no single east-west dividing line, to conquer the world known to him.
Some time before Alexander came to power a fellow called Demosthenes would warn the independent Greek city states that they had to form a coalition devoted to stopping Philip of Macedon and his primitive Macedonian countrymen, from taking away their liberty. Why was he not listened to until it was already too late?
Were the Greeks of that era like the people of the English-Speaking world of today? Did Greeks in those days have a blind spot when it comes to recognising the potential for stealth and ruthlessness in their enemies? What is it that makes people so foolish as to deride the idea that their enemies can be more dedicated and stealthy then their own jaded guileless selves?
Was there a cult of anti-conspiracy back then? Logically speaking; that people who tend to see conspiracies everywhere, may often be deranged, in no way detracts from the potential for conspiracies. It is lazy and mentally sloppy to make such a stupid mistake of logic. YES, people can get deranged and paranoid. YES ITS TRUE that certain individuals can imagine a whole string of phantom-plots and can never be free of them. But it is extremely moronic and illogical for this known fact to lead to the conclusion that stealth is not possible from those who wish to do us harm.
Perhaps the hellenistic mind rebelled from notions of conspiracy. Perhaps they too imagined that their enemies talked things out openly like they themselves tended to do. But everyone reading this ought to know for sure, and without any doubt whatsoever, that the idea of dismissing the potential for stealth in ones enemies, is delusional in the extreme, beyond anything that the blameless paranoid might spout out, in one frenzy or another.
Was there anything good to come out of the Alexandrian conquests? Alexander was not great and he was not good. He was a mass-murderer and a real prick. A person not in keeping with the prior Greek heritage. Might it not be argued though, that in the longer run some sort of utilitarian benefit might have been derived, by the stretching out of the superior hellinistic culture over any number of kleptocracies, tribes, minor kingdoms and base civilisations that the eastern world held?
I don’t think so myself. My imagining of the situation is that rather than helenising all these various orientals that the cultural transmission may have been two-way. And therefore the main lasting effect of helenistic control of the conquered territory, may have been the orientalisation of the Greek-speaking world.
The reason I have this prejudice is that the next era when Greek speakers loom large in my chronology of history is when Constantine moves the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Byzantium. Renaming the existing city Constantinople. This is many hundreds of years after Alexander. So its a slim thing to base an outrageous prejudice on. And I have another prejudice which reinforces this one. And that is the idea that orientals are always up to something. They are always into plotting and intrigue. So that these Greek-speakers, from then on, seemed to fall into a pattern of violence as the preferred method of changing top management. It seemed that with the Byzantines, SECRETIVE PLOTTING was the way to gain power. And the two prejudices together makes me think of these Greek speakers as, by that time, effectively orientalised.
Reading histories of the Byzantium Empire can be grim business. These people seemed to be always having each-others eyes plucked out. And they appeared to be pretty good at killing close members of their own family. No wonder Gibbon got the shits with them. But one good thing they did do was they made Constantinople an unassailable citadel. And so therefore they held off the Muslim advance one century after another.
Many times the Empire appeared to be on its last legs. Right down to where the Muslims seemed to control most of the territory directly outside Constantinoples walls. But then their fortunes would change, because the city of Constantinople itself was so famously strong, and the Empire would reconstitute itself, even as internally one nasty betrayal followed hard upon the heels of another vicious conspiracy, which lead only to more unspeakable acts of brutality at the higher reaches of power
So thats how this world is. Thats how its been outside of Western Europe. And inside Western Europe as well for that matter. But perhaps not to the same degree. This is the way that politics can work from time to time and in various geographies. And its a fact that you dimwitted Catallaxy types ought to get used to.
Now the centre of intrigue, paranoia, conspiracy, stealth and ruthlessness is in the Muslim world. It matters not that you don’t want to believe in the potential for plotting and conspiracy, in matters of all levels of importance and of durations lasting a short time to durations lasting decades. Your non-belief is not central to the issue and merely just naive projection. The main point is that Muslims DO!!!!!!! believe this stuff. Muslims are right into conspiracy. They think this is the way the world works and certainly its the way that their world works. Every Muslim is a hopeless paranoid, by the standards of the centre of politics in this country. They are all paranoid. Not one Muslim isn’t paranoid by the standards of Catallaxy. This is their culture and its better if our side can get a handle on it.
Our dear dear Muslim brothers and sisters are sort of “hyper-Byzantines” in this regard. Once a devout Muslim starts thinking about politics he is likely to conjure three plots before breakfast. He will see plots going on everywhere. This is the way they are. This is their culture. The Muslims and those crafty communist Chinese are always plotting something. They are always up to something.
We see here how the cultural transmission of these conpirationist tendencies might have radiated out from one cess-pool of shame and wickedness to another. For Moscow was conceived of as the third Rome after Rome itself and Constantinople. So from time to time us guileless ocean-rulers have found ourselves awash in these vile intriguers.
It is not productive to look at different people and see yourself. For it might be the case that as individuals we can be similar in some ways. But foreigners are different in the way they act politically. As we have seen by the importation of familism into New South Wales politics. But for this current story the main difference here, is that while mostly only paranoids think about conspiracies in our culture , in the Muslim world they are bigtime into conspiracies and every bit as much as the Byzantines ever were. After all every terrorist attack is a conspiracy. And when they gunned down Good King Malcolm X that was a conspiracy also.
Hitlers father was a customs official and he died when Hitler was about 13 or so. In the movie “The Boys From Brazil”, the plotters behind a conspiracy (one which was designed to be carried out over many decades) went to some trouble to plant their Hitler clones in households that were supposed to be akin to Hitlers own upbringing. So there is one scene where one of the adopting fathers is murdered so that the cloned Hitler can have his father die at the same age as Hitlers own father died.
This is a really far-fetched plot for us westerners. But not so for these intriguers in the Muslim world.
Malcolm X, like Hitler was the fourth child of his mother, although I think his father had already had three children by a previous marriage. If you were hoping that his boy Barry might move to the centre of politics just forget about it. Because he was a first-born. And in accordance with Sulloway the first-borns only change their basic values very slowly. They are deeply conservative by nature. Not conservative in the sense that they will vote Republican. But conservative in the sense that they will rigidly follow their values once these values have been crystalized.
First borns and “functional first borns” do not tend to be able to change their mind as the new information comes in. So for those of you who think Barry will be a new Malcolm, and always be reinventing himself, finding his way closer and closer to truth and righteousness, well this is not going to happen. Barry is a communist and Islamo-fascist partisan and he will stay that way. This is very clear in all that he has done to date. He will be true to his sponsors. He will dutifully trade off short-run tactical gains for long-run strategic ruin. And all this talk about him moving to the centre is just lies, superstition, wishful thinking and delusion.
We see that it is the violent principle of Islam that killed Malcolm and now that same crowd have taken over his boy and his heritage. Perhaps all of us would like to claim Malcolm. For my part, though he probably hung around a bunch of creeps and likely put about some pretty horrible ideas, I see a strong almost-Randian streak in his speeches. I see an attitude towards liberty that is not unlike the Southern American anglo-celts “Don’t Tread On Me” attitude. Its probably a personal fault of mine that I like this fellow. But a generation can be a long time and this Barry is in no way like Malcolm. This Barry is an extremist of the most vicious kind.
Barack Obama surely is Malcolms son which is why Oprah calls him “THE ONE” and why Islamic extremists have been assisting him for three decades at least.
“…Obama is not your BROTHER Fred. I can tell you that…”
“… I’ll talk to you and you can talk to me. But I’m never going to respect you, until you-all repent for killing a brother. You talk about what I’m doing to Obama? But look what you-all did to Malcolm!!!! And Malcolm was INDEED a BROTHER….”
The immense regard that a lot of us have for Malcolm is really something. It may be a bad thing and I cannot rightly justify it in my case. Its almost a prodigal son thing. The historian Paul Johnson mentioned him in passing as a rascist and he had good reasons taking the totality of Malcolms life. But this would be a bit like me dismissing George Orwell as just another socialist. The key with Malcolm seems to be that he followed logic and intellectual honesty. And by the time he was gunned down by muslims he did appear to be someone that many of us could rightly think well of.
A person of astonishing talents. Whereas Barry is just a rotten fraud. Soetoro is an incredible mediocrity and underacheiver. Soetoro is someone who will destroy millions of lives, if he is not somehow stopped, and an whole new election called.
Since Barry has put together a team of Cook county clones, the solution can only be found in an whole new election.
Postscript: To emphasise the above is only a theory I thought I’d post what might be a better theory, and that also may be a rumour. One worth checking out.
“Yes, that if a good point, but would be difficult to prove, It is my understanding that the Democrats visited Indonesian, well a year ago, and bought every record they had on him, with the exception of that Catholic enrollment form. I also heard that Rahm Emmanuel, did the same in Kenya, right after the election. We all know that the man that broke into his passport file, was found in his car, with a bullet in his head, as well as the choir master at Wrights Church.”
This relates to me thinking that there must have been some arbitrage involved in Obama helping Raila into power when he was supposed to be on his own campaign trail. And then speaking to him all the time on his mobile-phone during the campaign up until January 2008. A little after the Donald Young execution-style murder. I speculated that Raila might have been able to get hold of any Obama Kenyan documents. As payback to Obama, to help him, but also perhaps to provide security for himself. But if Immanuel had come to Kenya and bought them all, well thats a good alternate speculation. And it would be certainly worthwhile trying to find out if son of terrorist Rahm ever came to Kenya and if so what he was doing there. Although you would not expect that he’d be able to just go there and buy them all simple as that. He’d have to bribe people to steal them one would imagine. Have to put a couple of people between him and the action.
Anyway. Its all rumours and speculation so far.
A further note about the mischievous Malcolm X idea. Within 15 days of giving birth Stanley Ann was in Seattle attending University there without her husband. When Obama was about seven months old she had a baby-sitter looking after him a lot of the time. Malcolm spoke at some Seattle event about then. And the two of them were also in Seattle around the time of conception. What we are saying here is not that he was the real father. Merely that he cannot be ruled out. But clearly this would be the case for many people. So one would have to look for more and better corroborating evidence to support such a wild idea. Still they look and sound quite similar if you ask me.