Here are a couple of cut and pastes from the science-daily article that the compulsive liars (Bizbob and Gremlin) are relying on. This is not a small issue. This is important. Because as I point out, either these clowns are lying or I am:
“About 750 million people in Africa, Asia and Latin America rely on cassava as a staple. The starchy tubers are used to make flour and the plant is ideal in dry regions because of its hardy nature.
The good news was that the levels of toxin in the tuber didn’t increase with CO2 ……”
“Gleadow’s group looked at a type of sorghum commonly fed to cattle in Australia and Africa and found it became less toxic at the highest CO2 level…..”
But lets suppose these two are not dishonest. They are then asking us to believe that they are so oblivious to spin, that they have not realised that science-daily is the Pravda of this global warming racket, and that science-daily will typically twist everything in their favour. That is to say in favour of the global warming racket.
A little more careful reading reveals the prosaic facts beneath the dysfunctional sentiment.
Graeme Bird :
16 Aug 2010 8:03:57pm
Finally someone supporting Mark Latham. I thought his 60 minutes segment was excellent. Riveting. And it was courageous, being as Mark pointed out the truth of the matter vis a vis both Bob Brown and Pauline Hanson. As wrong and deluded as some people think these characters are, there is no question that they are principled people.
Plus it was good journalism because Mark talked to so many different types of people about the subject at hand.
So here I am thinking what a good show it was and then this morning I pick up the Australian. And someone was just hanging it on Latham. Reckoned he was boring.
I don’t know whats going on there. I just hope that Mark keeps getting these journalistic segments. I found the person who was taking a shot at Mark incredibly boring. I think she just had matters ass-backwards.
For some reason we seem to be having a hard time getting rid of this constant lying to the effect that higher CO2 levels don’t lead to greater agricultural output. I must repeat. This is an outrageous lie. There is no truth to it at all. Gremlin has charged that higher CO2 levels harm agricultural production via some sort of toxicity effect. This is also a lie.
Here is a couple of exerpts from the rubbish science-daily article that these clowns are hoping to rely on:
“…About 750 million people in Africa, Asia and Latin America rely on cassava as a staple. The starchy tubers are used to make flour and the plant is ideal in dry regions because of its hardy nature.
The good news was that the levels of toxin in the tuber didn’t increase with CO2….”
“Gleadow’s group looked at a type of sorghum commonly fed to cattle in Australia and Africa and found it became less toxic at the highest CO2 level.”
There is no truth to this nonsense Gremlin and Bizbob are telling you. Its just a typically misleadingly worded science-daily article, and they are generalising it to turn it into a big lie.
The absolute fact of the matter is that higher CO2 levels mean higher yields. Lower CO2 levels mean less food, higher prices and therefore starvation.
And what a rotten thing for these people to be lying about? Its like they want people to starve.
God knows doing business with fractional reservists is a nasty business at the best of times, but can you think of any good reason why we shouldn’t contract with Israel to take out the Iranians at Cost Plus Ten Per Cent?
Yes. While I will respect any decision by Israel to surgically hit Iranian facilities, in order to set back their nuclear program, I will not be encouraging any fights with Iran. If the US covert ops and taxeater class were a sane functioning machine it would be quite fine for them to punish the leadership of Iran for any ongoing outrage.
But I won’t be supporting anything like that. Since we have proved 100% that 9/11 had an American overlay to it, and since Washington has proven to be utterly useless in its conduct of war, we simply have no choice but to withdraw support for this sort of thing. The banking-covert ops ascendancy, whose existence is now proved utterly, will use any emergency situation to crack down on its domestic enemies.
It truly is a crime to be a White Christian Woman nowadays. I thought Clarence Thomas was a Righteous Negro but apparently he’s a fractional reservist like the rest of them.
ITS MORE LIKELY THAT CLARENCE FELT THAT IT WAS POINTLESS OF HIM TO ACT ALONE. THAT HE WOULD BE VICTIMISED WITH NO HOPE OF WINNING. OR ELSE IT COULD BE THAT THE CHANNELS GOING IN AND OUT OF HIS OFFICE ARE SUBJECT TO THE VERY POWERFUL ZEITGEIST. I THINK THAT CLARENCE HAS ESTABLISHED THAT HE IS A GOOD MAN, AND WE MUST BE A LITTLE UNDERSTANDING THAT HE MAY NOT BE PERFECT OR ABLE TO STAND UP AGAINST THESE POWERS MUCH GREATER THAN HIMSELF. YOU DO REMEMBER THE CHIEF JUSTICE, UNABLE TO SWEAR THE USURPER IN PROPERLY, KNOWING THAT HE WAS DOING THE WRONG THING, BUT UNABLE TO FACE THE MASSIVE WEIGHT OF SOCIETY PRESSING UPON HIS SKULL.
By: Ron Pauline Hanson on August 17, 2010 at 7:10 am