…. “Once you have given up the ghost, all else follows with total certainty, even in the midst of chaos…”
This, from memory, is the opening sentence of the Henry Miller’s “Tropic Of Capricorn” The Tropic Of Capricorn is a southern latitude, roughly approximating where the nether regions are on a human, in comparison with the earth …. if thats not too convoluted an explanation for the title. I’ll correct the sentence and my memory later. But the sentence is very much like how I’d explain the extra-ordinary emergence of a shadow government which now seems to control almost everything, to the extent of being to write itself out of the history books and its place in contemporary journalism …. and yet be able to control almost everything in the medium term. Not through total hands-on-control, but rather by one million points of small influence. That overall influence amounting to CONTROL (for practical purposes.). How did this come about? Is this “theory” (actually its manifest reality) plausible in face of the commonplace idea that when three people know a secret its a secret no longer?
In retrospect we can say that given enough time, if fractional reserve banking is so much as tolerated, it will lead to global shadow government. Everything will progress with total certainty, even in the midst of chaos.
Fractional reserve leads to a non-market advantage to size, which will lead to a single network becoming dominant. That network will de-monetarize silver when it gets a chance to, will set up and dominate central banks, and once these two objectives are obtained, if not before, will then exert its control over covert operations, soon capturing politics proper thereafter. Its not only not implausible that such a shadow government would develop. Its actually an inevitability. The last chance we had to avoid it was probably during Andrew Jackson’s time. But now that we know better our blood oath must be akin to the oath of Hannibal. We must all set our hearts against it and consider anyone who is weak on this point a traitor to the species.
MORE LATER
My new hero: Randall Carlson
A totally committed scientist. A background in geology …. A BUILDER BY TRADE. I don’t even know whether to agree with him on any of his conclusions. But his methodology so far seems impeccable. And it is THIS that me must demand from a scientist, and only THIS that we ought to expect.
We don’t even want scientists to get it right. We want them to be sound as far as method and process is concerned. We don’t really want anything else from them. This is what separates a true scientist from a public servant, a field worker, or an “expert” hired by the man to tell the man what he wants to know.
By: graemebird on September 18, 2012
at 7:46 am
Sometimes I come across a quote of mine that I’d entirely forgotten about, and I get a bit of a buzz from it, insofar as it comes across as a good piece of prose that I would have liked to have read from someone else. Here’s one now:
“….Default with relish. Default with blood-lust. Default with whatever gets you going. But default default default. Waiting another fortnight ensures more damage from the wealth destroying machine that is bank-cash pyramiding … and government departments … Government departments running amok, like cancer cells jacking off in a hall of mirrors, and splitting-2,4,8,16….”
By: graemebird on September 18, 2012
at 8:04 am
“I’m sure they were working and building anti-gravity machines. They’re called aircraft.
LOL
Bernoulli was an alien!”
Here a Catallaxian is talking about the theory of aerodynamic lift. But the Bernoulli theory as presented to me I’m pretty dubious about. Perhaps I have it wrong. No matter aero-dynamic lift is a real thing whether the Bernoulli explanation is correct or otherwise. But here Infidel Tiger is presuming that there is no knowledge of anti-gravity.
Actually there is knowledge of anti-gravity. At the moment IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, there is enough information for me to start a research program that could get almost guaranteed results for space travel …… from near-earth-orbit to the rest of the solar system …. But NOT for the purpose of getting on or off planets and moons.
Thats as much as is directly available in the public domain. If flying saucers are covert ops blowing smoke at us, and covering for their monopolised technology, then this would mean that the anti-gravity technology actually allowed us to get off and on-planet as well. But thats covert or not at all.
But I can assure Infidel that with the right dictator, we have enough information in the public domain RIGHT NOW to force a study program on our own CSIRO ….. RIGHT NOW …. to use electro-gravitics, to power our ass around the solar system, but not off and on planets and moons.
I’m not saying that electro-gravitics CAN NEVER be used to get off and on planets. I’m saying that what is known in the public domain already tells us that the technology will with massive near 100% confidence, be useful for space travel, from near-earth-orbit onwards.
I’ve actually got step by step instructions for the research project RIGHT NOW.
By: graemebird on September 18, 2012
at 8:18 am
From Catallaxy here is a list of Jews getting the Nobel prize. I myself would not wish the insult of a modern Nobel prize on ANYONE except for someone really really evil or really really stupid. But nonetheless, its not necessarily the case that the Nobel prize was as objectively a character bad-reference as it is now. Here is the list but can anyone tell me which one of these characters is DESERVING? Many Askhenazi Reformed-Jews, though they have no ancestry in the Old Testament, fancy themselves a superior race. They act like white supremacists, in that they tend to only let high-IQ whitey blokes to marry their sheilas. They are a sort of airbrushed version of bigoted white supremacists.
But lets looks at this rogues gallery of Nobel Prize-Winners, and suppose we are REALLY to pronounce them a master race and superior and all that, well can someone tell me which Nobels are actually deserved by this crowd?
1910 – Paul Heyse
1927 – Henri Bergson
1958 – Boris Pasternak
1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 – Nelly Sachs
1976 – Saul Bellow
1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 – Elias Canetti
1987 – Joseph Brodsky
1991 – Nadine Gordimer World
Peace:
1911 – Alfred Fried
1911 – Tobias Mi chae l Carel Asser
1968 – Rene Cassin
1973 – Henry Kissinger
1978 – Menachem Begin
1986 – Elie Wiesel
1994 – Shimon Peres
1994 – Yitzhak Rabin
Physics:
1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 – Henri Moissan
1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
1910 – Otto Wallach
1915 – Richard Willstaetter
1918 – Fritz Haber
1921 – Albert Einstein
1922 – Niels Bohr
1925 – James Franck
1925 – Gustav Hertz
1943 – Gustav Stern
1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 – Felix Bloch
1954 – Max Born
1958 – Igor Tamm
1959 – Emilio Segre
1960 – Donald A. Glaser
1961 – Robert Hofstadter
1961 – Melvin Calvin
1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 – Julian Schwinger
1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
1971 – Dennis Gabor
1972 – William Howard Stein
1973 – Brian David Josephson
1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
1976 – Burton Richter
1977 – Ilya Prigogine
1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
1978 – Peter L Kapitza
1979 – Stephen Weinberg
1979 – Sheldon Glashow
1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
1980 – Paul Berg
1980 – Walter Gilbert
1981 – Roald Hoffmann
1982 – Aaron Klug
1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
1985 – Jerome Karle
1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 – Robert Huber
1988 – Leon Lederman
1988 – Melvin Schwartz
1988 – Jack Steinberger
1989 – Sidney Altman
1990 – Jerome Friedman
1992 – Rudolph Marcus
1995 – Martin Perl
2000 – Alan J. Heeger
Economics:
1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 – Simon Kuznets
1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
1976 – Milton Friedman
1978 – Herbert A. Simon
1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 – Franco Modigliani
1987 – Robert M. Solow
1990 – Harry Markowitz
1990 – Merton Miller
1992 – Gary Becker
1993 – Robert Fogel
Medicine:
1908 – Elie Metchnikoff
1908 – Paul Erlich
1914 – Robert Barany
1922 – Otto Meyerhof
1930 – Karl Landsteiner
1931 – Otto Warburg
1936 – Otto Loewi
1944 – Joseph Erlanger
1944 – Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 – Ernst Boris Chain
1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 – Tadeus Reichstein
1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 – Hans Krebs
1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 – Joshua Lederberg
1959 – Arthur Kornberg
1964 – Konrad Bloch
1965 – Francois Jacob
1965 – Andre Lwoff
1967 – George Wald
1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 – Salvador Luria
1970 – Julius Axelrod
1970 – Sir Bernard Katz
1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 – Howard Martin Temin
1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 – Daniel Nathans
1980 – Baruj Benacerraf
1984 – Cesar Milstein
1985 – Mi chae l Stuart Brown
1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 – Gertrude Elion
1989 – Harold Varmus
1991 – Erwin Neher
1991 – Bert Sakmann
1993 – Richard J. Roberts
1993 – Phillip Sharp
1994 – Alfred Gilman
1995 – Edward B. Lewis
1996- Lu RoseIacovino
By: graemebird on September 18, 2012
at 8:34 am
Joseph Cambria (Scientist)
Its always good for a laugh when that fucking woppy moron Joseph Cambria turns his boot-nigger intuition to the judgement of science…. Here he is again. The stupid fucking boot-nigger who claimed that the Triceratops did not lay eggs. I expect that the dumb fuck thought she looked too damn butch to lay eggs.
“I laughed myself silly when Margot came up with some crap that Boeing was working on an anti-gravity machine for the US military at the height of the leftwing’s paranoia over the Iraq war.”
What the fuck would this dumb fucking organ-grinder know about the state of science?
By: graemebird on September 18, 2012
at 8:44 am
[...] uncensored on “Theory Of Evolution And Inevitability Of Shadow Government“ @ A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe [...]
By: Comment uncensored on “Theory Of Evolution And Inevitability Of Shadow Government” « birdclone on September 18, 2012
at 8:47 am
“White House Must Stop Sony from Releasing ‘Killing bin Laden’ Film
Now that the White House and State Department have made clear that they believe movies compel terrorists to terrorize, it’s time for them to get ahead of this problem. And one thing the White House can do immediately is to pressure Sony to stop the release of director Kathryn Bigelow’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” which celebrates the killing of Osama bin Laden.
I’m only saying this because, you know, the White House and the media told me movies inflame and cause terrorism.”
Don’t people think that they will avoid more violence if they start telling the truth? If they admit that the bin Laden hit was a ludicrous lie?
By: graemebird on September 18, 2012
at 8:48 am
“1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 – Simon Kuznets
1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
1976 – Milton Friedman
1978 – Herbert A. Simon
1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 – Franco Modigliani
1987 – Robert M. Solow
1990 – Harry Markowitz
1990 – Merton Miller
1992 – Gary Becker
1993 – Robert Fogel”
All but one of them full of shit. Becker barely acceptable. Milton Friedman a fine economist sure, but his modern admirers and invokers tend to be utterly useless and mean-spirited, so he tends to be discredited by association, even if he was both a sound economist, and a great warrior for liberty. Actually the greatest economists of the century are all Jews but they were persecuted and ignored by the mainstream. I’m talking about Mises, Rothbard and (perfection-at-last) George Reisman. I say Reisman is perfection at last in terms of showing how economics could work if we got things right. But I’ve now turned away from his and Ayn Rands sympathy for big business. Though Reisman himself sticks up for big corporations his technical economics is fully consistent with aspirations for the sole trader economy. So his sympathies for artificial persons ought not rule him out as the canonical economist for the new century.
I’d have to say that Robert Solow was at least an intellectually honest economic scientist. Unfortunately somewhat one-eye-blind. What have the rest of them done for us? Maybe they are testimony for mainstreamer Jews to promote eachother as vigorously as they rubbish authentic righteousness like that coming from Mises, Rothbard and Reisman.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 5:37 am
Here’s physics:
1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 – Henri Moissan
1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
1910 – Otto Wallach
1915 – Richard Willstaetter
1918 – Fritz Haber
1921 – Albert Einstein
1922 – Niels Bohr
1925 – James Franck
1925 – Gustav Hertz
1943 – Gustav Stern
1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 – Felix Bloch
1954 – Max Born
1958 – Igor Tamm
1959 – Emilio Segre
1960 – Donald A. Glaser
1961 – Robert Hofstadter
1961 – Melvin Calvin
1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 – Julian Schwinger
1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
1971 – Dennis Gabor
1972 – William Howard Stein
1973 – Brian David Josephson
1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
1976 – Burton Richter
1977 – Ilya Prigogine
1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
1978 – Peter L Kapitza
1979 – Stephen Weinberg
1979 – Sheldon Glashow
1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
1980 – Paul Berg
1980 – Walter Gilbert
1981 – Roald Hoffmann
1982 – Aaron Klug
1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
1985 – Jerome Karle
1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 – Robert Huber
1988 – Leon Lederman
1988 – Melvin Schwartz
1988 – Jack Steinberger
1989 – Sidney Altman
1990 – Jerome Friedman
1992 – Rudolph Marcus
1995 – Martin Perl
2000 – Alan J. Heeger
Look I only have a good idea of the direct contributions of two of these guys. Einstein and Bohr. But since modern physics is so comprehensively full of shit, ought we not judge them all full of shit? I mean how can it really be otherwise? At least Bohr had a model which worked for some things but these guys must be really barely reconstructed Talmudic mystics, because they are constantly falling for their own voodoo models. They have really gotten in the way, and made the shadow governments quest to monopolize on technology that much easier.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 5:45 am
Some of the above are Chemists and they look to be very much on the level.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 5:48 am
“While at Manchester University, Bohr had adapted Rutherford’s nuclear structure to Max Planck’s quantum theory and so obtained a model of atomic structure which, with later improvements – mainly as a result of Heisenberg’s concepts – remains valid to this day. Bohr published his model of atomic structure in 1913.[13] Here he introduced the theory of electrons traveling in orbits around the atom’s nucleus, the chemical properties of each element being largely determined by the number of electrons in the outer orbits of its atoms.[14] Bohr also introduced the idea that an electron could drop from a higher-energy orbit to a lower one, in the process emitting a photon (light quantum) of discrete energy. This became a basis for quantum theory.[15]”
Half-baked rubbish. And we are stuck with it. Its not really his fault I guess. I suppose its other forces that lock half-baked ideas in, and build on them.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 5:51 am
All good stuff from Martin Ferguson but oh so one-sided:
“Resources Minister Martin Ferguson blasted the complacency about the boom as he took aim at managers and unions for failing to keep costs down, declaring that wage claims would have to be cut in line with lower prices. ‘Industry itself has got to front up to better managing some of these projects. In terms of construction projects, management has become sloppy,’ he said.”
All true. But on wage restraint, ought not the government get rid of a string of government departments, raise the tax free threshold, and so thereby argue for before tax wage restraint in the context of a lot of poorer workers IMPROVING their after tax income?
Ought not he also call for dividend restraint and salary restraint as well?
Why is it that only the industrial worker has to pay the price for higher employment? Of course if we are to have more employment the industrial worker ought to have before tax wages grow more slowly. But what about everyone else? Almost everyone else is receiving massive protection. Every CEO every corporate lawyer, every pharmacist and Doctor. Almost everyone earning 100,000 plus except for a few exceptionally good small businessmen are part of a protected or subsidised racket.
So why when this valid stuff about improving employment comes up, is it only the industrial worker that has to bear the cold wind of the free market?
We’re not saying you are wrong. But a little more balance please.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 6:42 am
“I would think his sympathies would be with it but as a potential future PM, he’d be wise to avoid the record.”
People shouldn’t talk like this. Its an absolute disaster that Andrew Leigh, an incompetent economist and a fucking economic vandal, got anywhere near Canberra. God he’s useless. The damage he’s done and the shit he talks.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 6:46 am
Finally The Reverend Joseph David Manning finds out about the theory that Malcolm is Obama’s father. Edward Klein, David Maraniss and Joel Gilbert all think this as do I. But I don’t think the Reverend Manning is won over. Just remember that I sussed out who Obama’s daddy was before those three.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 7:58 am
A full breakthrough. The ABC approved it in its entirety. Even the goose-stepping moderators may be getting sick of what we have had to face since 2008.
Graeme Bird :
19 Sep 2012 5:46:34pm
We don’t need to choose between the US and China. Because the Australian people, the people of the United States, the Chinese government, and the Chinese people, all have a common enemy. That enemy is the money-creation/covert operations nexus of the West. You might say the “shadow government.”
Our interests lie in describing our mutual enemy to our friends in Beijing. We would emphasise that in a hot war, no matter who was in charge we would, like it or not, always side with the Americans. But failing that we can work together, with Beijing, to belittle and diminish the shadow government, that bedevils us both, and the human race.
Reply Alert moderator
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 8:09 am
Here is my next one on the ABC:
I’m so sick of this. Why is it any concern of the RBA what foreigners do? We should control interest rates on foreign bank to domestic bank loans such that we always run a trade surplus. But our banking business ought to be our own business and its not the business of foreigners. Nor is foreign bankers actions, all of them idiotic, any strong concern of ours.
This latest fellow we have, Stevens, he’s far less bad then we have gotten used to. But I could do his job as a part-time gig. That he gets a million a year as base salary, and gets to fly ABOVE FIRST CLASS in his own damned room in the air, is just the bankster network payoff. They are paying him off to be a supporter of their international scam.
Yes we were quite lucky with this fellow but he’s part of a scam no matter what. The indignity of this fellow and an underling, flying to Basel to get on one knee and negotiate concessions from these bankers, overpaid manifest failures…… its just disgusting and we ought not stand for it.
We’ve got to get rid of money-as-debt. Its time we Australians struck out for liberation from this unbelievable racket.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 8:17 am
Sometimes you can get in the mood wherein the medicine from Dr James David Manning is just not strong enough. Sometimes you need to go to Dr Phil Valentine. Plus Phil Valentine is a fantastic investigator who was ahead of everyone on many of the facts.
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 9:25 am
The Bari Shabazz death certificate. Read all about it:
http://www.barimshabazz.com/
By: graemebird on September 19, 2012
at 9:42 am
wtf? are you some kind of performance artist? I’ve only recently become aware that you exist, Mr Bird, and have come to the conclusion that you must be some kind of Stephen Colbert on meth style parody or dangerously unbalanced. If you are not in fact a performance artist, seek help. Your philosophy is not ‘deep’, it’s constant mental masturbation, your opinions are not fact, they are the product of a diseased mind, one that seems to think that it’s inane ramblings are more valid than the collective achievements of the history of Human scientific research. I guess I feel sorry for you too, from what I’ve seen you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time trolling websites frequented by people with brains that work and posting comments to your own blog. Hell, I’m the first person to comment on this post and its been up for nearly 2 weeks, Just thought I’d see how long it’d take you to edit it into all caps vitriol. And before you tell me I am lying and ask me for evidence that you are, in fact, insane, I’ll tell you to go back and read your own blog, that would be all the evidence a sane person would need to know the author was insane…
By: exactly100beers on October 3, 2012
at 9:39 am
oh, and nice work on the coupla hundred votes in that election, must be nice to know that there are at least a few hundred people in your vicinity as crazy as you are. If we didn’t have a compulsory democracy I’m unconvinced that they would have had the intelligence to make it to the ballot box…
By: exactly100beers on October 3, 2012
at 9:41 am
You Dirty Jew Bastard
By: Ron Pauline Hanson on October 3, 2012
at 2:08 pm
lol…
By: exactly100beers on October 4, 2012
at 2:29 am