Lets analyse what the Wiki has to say about this idiocy. Immediately you will see bias and unscience.
- 1823-1835 Velizh blood libel: After a Christian child was found murdered outside of this small Russian town in 1823, accusations by a drunk prostitute led to the imprisonment of many local Jews. Some were not released until 1835.
Accusations by a drunk prostitute? So a witness saw the Jews killing this kid. A drunk prostitute? Say what? Did they not wait for her to sober up. They are lying. Jews were busted murdering a kids and there was a witness.
- 1840 Damascus affair: In February, at Damascus, a Catholic monk named Father Thomas and his servant disappeared. The accusation of ritual murder was brought against members of the Jewish community of Damascus.
Why? No answer? Why assume that this is not true? On what basis were the accusations made. There is no systematic tendency in Christianity to bear false witness for no reason at all.
- 1840 Rhodes blood libel: The Jews of Rhodes, under the Ottoman Empire, were accused of murdering a Greek Christian boy. The libel was supported by the local governor and the European consuls posted to Rhodes. Several Jews were arrested and tortured, and the entire Jewish quarter was blockaded for twelve days. An investigation carried out by the central Ottoman government found the Jews to be innocent.
The LIBEL? WHAT LIBEL? The accusation was made, and we have to assume there was some basis for it. So why is the wiki lying and claiming it was a libel?
- In March 1879, ten Jewish men from a mountain village were brought to Kutaisi, Georgia to stand trial for the alleged kidnapping and murder of a Christian girl. The case attracted a great deal of attention in Russia (of which Georgia was then a part): “While periodicals as diverse in tendency as Herald of Europe and Saint Petersburg Notices expressed their amazement that medieval prejudice should have found a place in the modern judiciary of a civilized state, New Times hinted darkly of strange Jewish sects with unknown practices.” The trial ended in acquittal, and the orientalist Daniel Chwolson published a refutation of the blood libel.
Its no blood libel. The Jews weren’t rounded up for no reason. They must have thought they had evidence.
- 1882 Tiszaeszlár blood libel: The Jews of the village Tiszaeszlár, Hungary were accused of the ritual murder of a fourteen-year-old Christian girl, Eszter Solymosi. The case was one of the main causes of the rise of antisemitism in the country. The accused persons were eventually acquitted.
Why is this a libel. Someone was accused. They got off. Its not a libel. Its a court case.
- In 1899 Hilsner Affair: Leopold Hilsner, a Jewish vagabond, was accused of murdering a nineteen-year-old Christian woman, Anežka Hrůzová, with a slash to the throat. Despite the absurdity of the charge and the relatively progressive nature of society in Austria-Hungary, Hilsner was convicted and sentenced to death. He was later convicted of an additional unsolved murder, also involving a Christian woman. In 1901, the sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. Tomáš Masaryk, a prominent Austro-Czech philosophy professor and future president ofCzechoslovakia, spearheaded Hilsner’s defense. He was later blamed by Czech media because of this. In March 1918, Hilsner was pardoned by Austrian emperor Charles I. He was never exonerated, and the true guilty parties were never found.
Why was the charge absurd? How do they know he wasn’t guilty?
Judaism is a satanic cult. So we can readily assume that Talmudic elitist Jews engage in all sorts of evil. Not excluding child rape, murder and sick rituals. We see the accusations all over the world and throughout all history? Coincidence?
Why? Eventually if you kill enough Christian kids over the centuries people will accuse you of this. But if you never do this, there is nothing in Christianity that would have you accused of doing this, every century, for 2000 years.
“The only child-saint in the Russian Orthodox Church is the six-year-old boy Gavriil Belostoksky from the village Zverki. According to the legend supported by the church, the boy was kidnapped from his home during the holiday of Passover while his parents were away. Shutko, who was a Jew from Białystok, was accused of bringing the boy to Białystok, poking him with sharp objects and draining his blood for nine days, then bringing the body back to Zverki and dumping it at a local field.”
So we have the Jewish passover. A Christian child is kidnapped. His body drained of blood. The evidence is all over his body, which by the writers own admission was dumped back near his community. How can you not blame the Jews for this? Was it Muslims that fucking drained this kids blood during Jewish Passover? So obviously you will blame the Jews until they can be cleared somehow. This isn’t a libel. This is a big problem.
Talmudic Jews are mass-murderers obsessed with blood sacrifice. We know this. Because we had Jewish communism in Russia. We had Jewish Naziism in Germany. We have the testimony of centuries. We had the Crypto-Jewish murder of the Armenians. Where is the libel here? This is a big problem when Jews are murdering Christian kids.
Twenty-Three Centuries of Jewish Ritual Murder:
Expose of Jewish Ritual Murder. A practice which continues unabated.