Compare this statement to what we see from the Neoclassical Economists:
“The Jews claim that they are “only” a religion. The truth is that the Jews are a RACE. Less than 30% are members of any Synagogue. Whether they are Orthodox religious, atheists, capitalists or communists – they still claim to be Jews – members of the Jewish race! Every race has inherited traits. In the case of the Jews they include trading, money-changing, usury, and a loathing for “productive labor” which is scorned as beneath the dignity of the Jews in their “bible” called “THE TALMUD.”"
Isn’t this very much like the neoclassicals hatred for manufacturing and agriculture? I can remember when John Humphreys claimed on Catallaxy that Australia didn’t need manufacturing. What are we then going to live on if we sell off all our strategic assets as the neoclassicals urge us to do? How will we buy the imports that we need? Perhaps Humphreys thinks we can sell our haircuts and laundry services long-distance? Does it mean we have to all become parasitical international financiers? How can this be done from a position of continual trade deficits?
Its not worth worrying about. The idiocy of these people ought not concern us too much. But its just worth noting in passing that neoclassical economics perversion is something like a Jewification of the science. Bear in mind that these guys never see private debt that they don’t like. They also equate debt creation with capital formation. They are borderline insane but its really partly the poison of Judaism in all things.