Hilarious. This stupid transvestite has come up with an explanation as to why there is no aether and why gravity doesn’t propagate instantaneously. In reality and quite apart from 20th century Jew Science Fraud ….. Gravity propagates instantaneously and we know this or all our orbits would unravel. This property of gravity demands connection between all entities with mass either directly or indirectly. We could assume that this connection IS the aether. Secondly the reality is that light travels in waves. Since a wave is what something does and not what something is this also demands an aether and more then likely the two phenomenon enjoy the use of the one aether. All of this is obvious and could be no other way given what we know about gravity and light.
Now this entity. This person. This girly-man who does not know if it is a guy or a lady has made a comeback. Its all a combination of irrelevancy and circular reason. But the real reason for the lady-boys double talk is that she must believe in this 20th century science fraud. She can do no other. Meanwhile this rubbish is excellent cover for covert operations hogging and monopolising of technology wherein no doubt they have concentrated discovering the MECHANISM FOR GRAVITY and not just gone on Jew Voo Doo or a religious appreciation for formulae.
You’ll love this fucking idiocy.
THERE IS NO AETHER AND GRAVITY PROPAGATES AT THE SNAILSPACE SPEED OF LIGHT BECAUSE:
“The fun thing about Birdbrain is that he’s revealingly wrong about things which have been known problems with theories of light since the late 1500s; various solutions to this problem (such as ‘luminiferous aether’) were tried out from the time of Tycho Brahe onwards. The non-instantaneous propagation of gravity has a very similar analogue in the non-instantaneous propagation of light and the resulting effect of stellar aberration; the earth’s motion around the sun causes a small, systematic, annual variation in the apparent direction of starlight and was one of the pieces of evidence in support of heliocentrism over geocentrism. In the case of aberration, the earth’s motion causes a small angle between the direction from where the sun’s light appears to come from and its actual position – similar to the argument with gravity, that the sun’s gravity would be ‘pulling’ toward a place where the sun was, relative to the earth, about 500 seconds earlier, rather than where it is at the present time.
While this angle (about 20 arcseconds) is comparably easily detectable for light and was measured for the first time by Bradley in 1725, a similar effect for gravity is much less observable; but the presence of very large, concentrated masses (à la neutron stars) will greatly magnify the effect. Thus the energy lost by the binary pulsars results in the measurable contraction of the semi-major axis of their orbits. The dissipation of the energy in the form of gravitational waves is thus similar to the case of energy lost in emission of electromagnetic radiation, which is what Einstein was writing about in 1905.
Just as there had been attempts to explain aberration via means of an aether that allows propagation of electromagnetic radiation, Pierre-Simon Laplace had tried to argue that under similar conditions with a finite speed of propagation of gravity planetary orbits would not be stable, and since the planets haven’t spiralled into the sun, therefore the speed of gravity must be infinite; however Henri Poincaré showed (in the same year, 1905) THAT THIS ARGUMENT IS NO LONGER RELEVANT WITHIN RELATIVITY THEORY ……
…….(capitals inserted in this laughable piece of circular reasoning by site deity.)
In the solar system the gravitational effect that is ‘akin’ to stellar aberration is most noticeable in the motions of Mercury, but complicating the solar system dynamics are perturbations from other bodies, most notably Jupiter and Saturn. Birdbrain described this as ‘taking two to tango’ – a laughable over-simplification – but the solar system isn’t even truthfully an N-body problem; this conceals a mathematical conceit of reducing quasi-spherical bodies with uneven mass distributions, composed of upwards of ten to the power of forty particles, to point sources – which is an understandable simplification long honoured since the time of Newton; I remember grinding through the mathematical proof of Newton’s shell theorem as an undergraduate (grinding being the operative word) and I doubt Birdbrain would have the brainpower to appreciate the subtleties of the arguments, which are highly technical and mathematical. And that’s just to deal with the easy cases.
(In the real world I pointed out that one needs to know the make-up of the sun prior to explaining the mechanism of Mercury’s odd orbit here, so the slut is essentially lying. (site deity))
Nevertheless, provided you can find useful cases – binary pulsars are among the best nature has provided – the observations made turn out to be in striking accord with the mathematics derived under certain principles, and among those principles are that there is no such thing as an ‘aether’ – either for electromagnetism or gravitation – and that light and gravity propagate at the speed of light. We would quite possibly see different results if this were not the case – but we don’t. 14 significant figures (it might be more? Not that it matters hugely, since it’s an absurdly high level of precision…) say Birdbrain is utterly wrong.”
This moron needs to get a brain transplant, a slut tumor removal, figure out if she is a man or a lady, and decide to do real physics for the first time in her life. Where has she shown me to be wrong? Nowhere. She’s just a fucking liar if she were to make that claim. My position remains uncontested by a logical argument to its disfavour. But do you accept her explanation?
Whereas in reality if gravity were not for practical purposes INSTANTANEOUS then all the orbits would unravel. So what is her explanation as to how gravity could propagate at only light speed? The argument for this stupid point of view is entirely absent. And since over these vast distances instantaneous effects imply constant contact, which implies a connective aether …….. Explain in your own words why this stupid transvestite slut is right? Take what she has said and explain it in your own words.
She is just not that bright. She cannot figure out if she is a man or a lady for one thing. Why oh why do such dim bulbs try it on?