Energy at last. The first time an easy solution to an impending glacial crisis has come to light. And we now even have a way of bringing terra-litres of fresh water to the deserts of the world in a cost-effective way. Energy to burn. And a reason to get hundreds of thousands of people up and working in space. We ought to get moving.
So how are we going to do all this? Well we aren’t doing any of this unless we can defeat the fractional reserve banking network. Libertarianism and all other Isms can wait. The Northern Hemisphere banking system needs to be busted up by any means necessary and subsequently fractional reserve banned. And anyone who tries to do this has to realise that they are coming up against covert ops resources and the people who have had more medium-term influence on government then anyone else.
There is no point making the point that none of this would be necessary under capitalism, since this is a true point but a pointless point just the same. Once banking becomes the senior partner of the banking-government racket, then no good policy can so much as be hoped for until we break up their act any way we can.
MORE LATER.
I will be very interested to hear how you can achieve this without violating any of the major laws of thermodynamics.
By: evcricket on June 15, 2011
at 3:46 am
Magnificent. The Big Lebowski. The Dude Abides. There he is, taking it easy for the rest of us sinners.
By: graemebird on June 15, 2011
at 7:48 am
You are reducing the energy differential by discharging the solar capacitor. There is a buildup of charge in the sun, and any object moving through the solar system finds itself akin to an insect moving through one of those zappers.
You leave the outdoor zapper on all night and it doesn’t use up too much energy. Every time an insect flies into the zap-region, it is helping along the movement towards entropy by discharging the capacitor-situation within the zap region. A comet, upon entering the solar system, does the same. But then any reasonably long body, particularly in a non-circular orbit, will do this.
Now as proof to this view of the solar system, as opposed to the contrary propaganda put out by NASA you have the strange story of COMET HOLMES.
Comet Holmes was of course lit up some when it was first spotted or else no-one would have seen it. Its supposed to have a small nucleus, about 30 miles across. But at one stage it was the largest object in the solar system, its long tail of dragging objects, more volumnous then the sun. So anyhow its already lit up right? Then it comes close to Jupiter. The interpretation is that a SUN-JUPITER-HOLMES electrical connection is made. The fact is that it lit up 500, 000 times more. There is no way to explain this but through the electrical model of the solar system.
We know we can harness this electrical energy. We don’t know how accurate we can get the laser. The most powerful electrical energy will be found 1000 kilometres ABOVE the path of earths orbit to avoid the blocking action of the earths magnetic field.
But that is extra for experts. Because though there is less electrical capacitance in near earth orbit there is still far more than what we can look a gift-horse in the mouth about. In fact there are likely excellent ways to draw this energy down, at least in some equatorial regions, without recourse to even satellites.
By: graemebird on June 15, 2011
at 7:44 am
IT DID LIGHT UP.
ALL COMETS LIGHT UP SINCE ALL COMETS DISCHARGE THE SOLAR CAPACITOR. ITS WHETHER THEY COME TOGETHER WITH OTHER OBJECTS TO MORE SUCCESSFULLY DISCHARGE THE SOLAR CAPACITOR WHICH WILL DETERMINE HOW THE SPARKS FLY.
By: Ƀîᴙď ₣Įаρ§ on June 16, 2011
at 8:01 am
When did Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 light up similarly to comet Holmes, as opposed to the normal behavior of comets?
I don’t recall it increasing in brightness or size too much in the lead up to it breaking apart and crashing into Jupiter.
EACH PART OF SHOEMAKER LEVY CAUSED AN EXPLOSION GREATER THAN ALL THE NUCLEAR BOMBS IN THE WORLD WHEN THEY HIT JUPITER. HARDLY THE WORK OF SNOWBALLS. HOW BRIGHT WAS SHOEMAKER-LEVY MEANT TO BE?
By: Ƀîᴙď ₣Įаρ§ on June 16, 2011
at 9:39 am