<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graemebird.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Dearest blog. Cheapest Thinktank.  Deepest Philosopher. Most Holistic Prophet..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='graemebird.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>There IS NO Temperature-Anomaly For The &#8220;Greenhouse Effect&#8221; To Explain.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/there-is-no-temperature-anomaly-for-the-greenhouse-effect-to-explain/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/there-is-no-temperature-anomaly-for-the-greenhouse-effect-to-explain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to David Karoly:
“Carbon dioxide is such a minor atmospheric constituent that it can’t affect global climate. This is untrue. While carbon dioxide makes up only 0.038% of the atmosphere, it is vital in the energy balance of the Earth’s surface and atmosphere. If the atmosphere contained no greenhouse gases, the surface temperature would be [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5040&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/there-is-no-temperature-anomaly-for-the-greenhouse-effect-to-explain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>People Lie All The Time About Those Utterly Useless, CO2-Biased, &#8220;Global Climate Models.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/people-lie-all-the-time-about-those-utterly-useless-co2-biased-global-climate-models/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/people-lie-all-the-time-about-those-utterly-useless-co2-biased-global-climate-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[” A GCM can only simulate the teperature trend of the last century if you include CO2.”
No thats completely and utterly wrong. If you hypothesise that CO2 is a warming gas you cannot fit the twentieth century data at all. Since the 30’s was warmer than the nineties, and the 40’s saw CO2 surge upwards [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5038&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/people-lie-all-the-time-about-those-utterly-useless-co2-biased-global-climate-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microscopic-Liquid-Water/ Designer Warming &#8220;Gas.&#8221;/ The Key To Settling This Science.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/microscopic-liquid-water-designer-warming-gas-the-key-to-settling-this-science/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/microscopic-liquid-water-designer-warming-gas-the-key-to-settling-this-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just because the H2O molecules are microscopic and airborne does not make them a gas. If you want to really understand what is going on track back to what I was saying about the characteristics of a designer warming gas. I said it would be heavy for one thing. Its not water vapour which fits [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5035&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/microscopic-liquid-water-designer-warming-gas-the-key-to-settling-this-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Are No Greenhouse Gases/ There Is No Greenhouse Effect.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/there-are-no-greenhouse-gases-there-is-no-greenhouse-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/there-are-no-greenhouse-gases-there-is-no-greenhouse-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of threads about the same thing. But people have to understand this matter. And many different re-tellings can be helpful.
“I just read one of the responses to that horrible article by Clive “your dad is scum” Hamilton, which stated that “vibrating” CO2 molecules reflect IR back to the surface thus warming the lower [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5033&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/there-are-no-greenhouse-gases-there-is-no-greenhouse-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>WARMING GASES: To Reinforce This Outlook.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/warming-gases-to-reinforce-this-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/warming-gases-to-reinforce-this-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The backradiation (ie &#8220;greenhouse effect&#8221;) explanation of the way a warming gas is supposed to warm our atmosphere is actually incoherent. Since whereas other gasses will absorb and re-radiate the entire spectrum, a gas with “greenhouse” characteristics will re-radiate the spectrum, minus the absorption region. In the first instance thats a cooling effect to the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5029&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/warming-gases-to-reinforce-this-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Better World Is Still The Greatest Innovator In The Field Of Climate Science / Greenhouse Gas Versus WARMING GAS: Towards A Truer Paradigm.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/greenhouse-gas-versus-warming-gas-towards-a-better-paradigm/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/greenhouse-gas-versus-warming-gas-towards-a-better-paradigm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Dr Marohasy&#8217;s Blog:
What you would need for a powerful warming-gas (note I don’t say “greenhouse gas” since this is a bollocks concept) is a gas that
1. absorbs a broad stretch of the VERY LOWER BAND of infra-red coming up from the ground.
2. Does not, unlike CO2, absorb those higher, infra-red regions that will disproportionately [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5023&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/greenhouse-gas-versus-warming-gas-towards-a-better-paradigm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The First Supernova After The Galactic Centre Explosion Is The Worst.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-first-supernova-after-the-galactic-centre-explosion-is-the-worst/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-first-supernova-after-the-galactic-centre-explosion-is-the-worst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some ideas taken from the big interview of Paul LaViolette.
Periodicity of Galactic Superwaves taken from the ice core records. Peaks of cosmic rays:
1. 28,000 years
2. 11,500 years
3. 5,700
4. Smaller events of maybe every 500 years.  
Paul thinks we are overdue for a pretty big event already. Overdue doesn&#8217;t sound real good. Like [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5015&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-first-supernova-after-the-galactic-centre-explosion-is-the-worst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Taya-Humphreys Scheme For Stooging The Left Into Small Government.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/the-new-taya-humphreys-scheme-for-stooging-the-left-into-small-government/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/the-new-taya-humphreys-scheme-for-stooging-the-left-into-small-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Taya while you are here. Why don’t you unveil your powerfully politically astute scam, to put over small government by stealth.
How does it go again? You will toady to Humphreys, and Humphreys from his position of economics-ignoramus will
1. broker this deal where the left will miraculously accept all these tax cuts in existing taxes [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5013&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/the-new-taya-humphreys-scheme-for-stooging-the-left-into-small-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Problem Is Fear, Unscience, And Rampant Lying/ The Solution Is Desalination Canals.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/the-problem-is-fear-unscience-and-rampant-lying-the-solution-is-desalination-canals/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/the-problem-is-fear-unscience-and-rampant-lying-the-solution-is-desalination-canals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I propose to hold off all action except for the building of desalination canals. With canals we have the ability, but not the necessity, of sequestering carbon by greening the deserts.
If this worry about CO2 blows over at least we then have our fresh water provided for, for decades to come. Its a no-lose proposition. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5010&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/the-problem-is-fear-unscience-and-rampant-lying-the-solution-is-desalination-canals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Tax (!@#$%^&amp;*) The Brazen Lie Of Revenue-Neutrality.</title>
		<link>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/carbon-tax-the-brazen-lie-of-revenue-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/carbon-tax-the-brazen-lie-of-revenue-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graemebird</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graemebird.wordpress.com/?p=5006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets have an answer for this most brazen lie of revenue-neutrality. Putting aside the unethical nature of putting forward stealing-neutrality in the first place. Just lets put that aside. It remains obvious that the carbon tax is a tax that destroys its own revenue base.
To suggest otherwise is to claim that the carbon tax will [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=graemebird.wordpress.com&blog=209915&post=5006&subd=graemebird&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/carbon-tax-the-brazen-lie-of-revenue-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/945b93532da476ca7ad6078f69f017d1?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">graemebird</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>