Posted by: graemebird | March 4, 2007

Kierkegaard Would Seem To Have Predicted The Behaviour Of The Warming Hoaxers.

Reworked from Catallaxy:

Kierkegaard offered a metaphor for his prediction of how future society will be:

….People will put up a poster soon saying

“TONIGHT JOHN ERIK WILL SKATE ON THE ICE AT THE VERY CENTER OF THE POND.
IT’LL BE VERY DANGEROUS. PLEASE COME…”

Everyone comes, and John Erik skates about three inches from the shore, and people say….

“LOOK, HE’S SKATING ON THIN ICE AT THE VERY CENTER OF THE POND!”

A lecturer says:

“ON FRIDAY NIGHT WE WILL HAVE A REVOLUTION.”

When Friday night comes, the hall is filled, and the radical talks passionately and flamboyantly for an hour and a half.

Then he declares that a revolution
took place here tonight.

The audience pours out into the street, saying:

“TONIIGHT WE HAD A REVOLITION!

TONIGHT WE HAD A REVOLUTION!”

((((Kierkegaard as quoted by Robert Bly in the book ‘The Sibling Society’))))

Now you see how this prediction has come true?

The alarmists never puts up anything that approaches evidence.

None of them are interested in the science.

The alarmists merely CALL the pro-science crowd “ANTI-SCIENCE”.

These guys say that there is evidence.

Then they show you PSEUDO-evidence.

And then they declare that there is no question about it.

And they say that “Climate Change is REAL” and other dishonest tautological crap and…… thats it.

NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE IS EVER TENDERED.

If you doubt it try out this google search…..

Just put “evidence for the likelihood of catastrophic” in the google and then go to the end to click where you can include all the similiar entries. At first you’ll get 3 pages and then you’ll get five pages and all but one or two of the entries will be requests for these wankers to pony up some actual evidence.

But nowhere can the evidence be found.

And I’m going all over the net with this.

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22evidence+for+the+likelihood+of+catastrophic%22&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en-us&filter=0

Advertisements

Responses

  1. I hate to point this out….but the reason you get hits coming back where

    “you’ll get 3 pages and then you’ll get five pages and all but one or two of the entries will be requests for these wankers to pony up some actual evidence.”

    is because you have spammed that phrase so prolifically across the internet that most of the hits are YOU asking the question to people who are largely over trying to explain their position to you and getting called liars or worse. So not an entirely unexpected outcome.

  2. The reason is because they have no evidence whatsoever.

    And when all is said and done its a stupid fucking fantasy.

  3. But they don’t have any evidence for such a contention.

    And when I ask even the scientists they cannot or will not give me an answer.

    And no one can find a scientist that can give me the evidence.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: