Posted by: graemebird | March 17, 2007

James Annan….SCIENCE-WORKER!!!!!!: Lies And Makes An Idiot Of Himself.

James Annan bullshitted about the Durkim program on his blog.

http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2007/03/swindled.html#links

He said it was basically all rubbish. He didn’t bring to bare any evidence for this but instead palmed it all off onto a couple of other blogs who also didn’t have any evidence. Then he rubbished authentic scientists as past their use-by date.

I made a comment but it won’t last long:

Anonymous said…

Evidence James. You haven’t got the evidence against it. Don’t pretend that you have.The documentary was flawless.

https://graemebird.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/martin-durkins-masterpiece-the-great-global-warming-swindle-the-climactic-climate-moment/

17/3/07 7:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

James Annan can no longer be considered a scientist. And this thread stays until he is willing to show up and put up some authentic evidence against the television program or show up with some evidence for the likelihood of catastrophic warming.

Alternatively he might get rid of that thread and add one that is complementary to this brilliant documentary.

Imagine rubbishing his betters without explanation…….. and then palming the need for evidence all off onto lunatics like realclimate.org (fuckthedata.com).

We know a hoax when we see it Annan.

Evidence James.

And shape up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Postscript. Now that brilliant documentary didn’t have all that much in the way of graphs. When it showed them we saw brief visual displays. These were meant to show visually to the laity just how closely various things track.

In any case it appears they got some poopy-pants criticism of this axis not being properly labelled or something… all for this brief visual display….. totally irrelevant to what the documentary was trying to communicate about this hoax.

So they fixed up the graph a little for the rebroadcast.

APPARENTLY ITS A SCIENCE-CRIME TO FIX UP THE GRAPH FOR THE REBROADCAST.

Thats bad science in the hoaxers camp you see. Because if you are a leftist alarmist hoaxer the only crime is to ever admit when you are wrong. The fixups didn’t change the rightness of the conclusions at all.

If you’ve seen the show you’ll know that these were brief visual displays.

So in any case the science worker Annan responded to my complaints with:

ANNAN SEZ:

James Annan said…
Oh don’t be silly. They(‘ve already changed one of the temperature graphs and they also used a completely discredited “analysis” of solar data. Take your silly denialism elsewhere please.

18/3/07 7:19 AM

SO I SEZ:

Annan you claimed it was all rubbish.

You are lying.

They BARELY changed that graph. So the conclusion doesn’t change.

Including the 1980-2000 stuff in a brief visual display would just have opened a can of worms. Because this is the one time when the two lines diverge.

IT WAS A BRIEF VISUAL DISPLAY.

If its me and not you that is the denialist why is your blog an evidence-free-zone?

Where is your evidence for the likelihood of catastrophic warming?

Or for the idea that a little bit of human-induced warming is a bad thing in a brutal and pulverising ice age?

You are the liar.

You are the denialsit.

Shape up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I’m not prepared to treat these compromisers and/or lunatics with kids gloves anymore. Annan links with those lunatics at realclimate.org (fuckthedata.com). He links to the Quiggin. He links to Deltoid I think,

Nowhere in any of these blogs is there any positive evidence for the likelihood of catastrophic warming. You won’t see any of these hoaxers dwelling on the idea that we are in a brutal and pulversing ice age.

How about that hey?

No actual positive evidence of their own. Only putdowns of better scientists. Annan went right over the line by suggesting the better more honest (MORE SCIENTIFIC) scientists then him were past their best-before-date.

Everyone should be knives out against these lunatics. Don’t give them any room to move. They have hurt you already by denying you cheaper energy and economic growth that comes from that cheaper energy.

They are hurting us by putting money in the pockets of hateful oil-producing dictatorships when the rest of us could be exporting motherloads of cheap energy.

People are dying but thats not the worst thing they have done.

Worst of all all the hoaxers have betrayed their proffessions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

POSTSCRIPT II

MORE ATTEMPTS TO GET ANNAN TO WITHDRAW HIS CRITICISMS OF THE DOCUMENTARY AND THE SCIENTISTS IN IT.

Anonymous said…
You’ve got to change sides Annan.

Otherwise you have clearly betrayed your profesion.

18/3/07 10:36 AM

Anonymous said…
Look Annan.

You still haven’t shown any mistakes.

Someone didn’t have the labels on the axis that Stoat was after. Other irrelevant stuff. So what.

Lets see those mistakes.

In fact you were lying.

18/3/07 10:46 AM

Anonymous said…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/18/ngreen218.xml

Lets have this thread altered Annan.

And then you can wipe my contributions.

And I’ll think about wiping my thread calling you a liar on my own blog.

18/3/07 12:28 PM

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Good job graeme!!!! You’ll enjoy this
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/18/ngreen218.xml

    ‘The global-warmers were bound to attack, but why are they so feeble?’

    The remarkable thing is not that I was attacked. But that the attacks have been so feeble. The ice-core data was the jewel in the global-warming crown, cited again and again as evidence that carbon dioxide ‘drives’ the earth’s climate. In fact, as its advocates have been forced to admit, the ice-core data says the opposite. Temperature change always precedes changes in CO2 by several hundred years. Temperature drives CO2, not the other way round. The global-warmers do not deny this. They cannot.

    During the post-war economic boom, while industrial emissions of CO2 went up, the temperature went down (hence the great global-cooling scare in the 1970s). Why? They say maybe the cooling was caused by SO2 (sulphur dioxide) produced by industry. But they say it mumbling under their breath, because they know it makes no sense. Thanks to China and the rest, SO2 levels are far, far higher now than they were back then. Why isn’t it perishing cold?

    Too many journalists and scientists have built their careers on the global-warming alarm. Certain newspapers have staked their reputation on it. The death of this theory will be painful and ugly. But it will die. Because it is wrong, wrong, wrong.

  2. Thanks for the link.

    I immediately used it against Annan.

    But the thing is that if he withdraws his comments I might feel obliged to destroy this thread.

    So people ought to link it far and wide and copy it for the permanent record just in case I have to wipe it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: