Posted by: graemebird | August 22, 2007

Human Evolution Explained.

“The ice age extended the range of grasslands, which is what helped us evolve. All the foods we eat are based in grasslands. We didn’t evolve near Chicago.”

Grasslands helped people evolve. What is this? Grassland-magic?

It is not the first time that stick-weilding gangster bipedals ……. descended down from the trees, to dominate their (at first) larger competitors.

The first time was the early dinosaurs.

Now those early dinosaurs took the world by storm but the world was really just one big continent. If you look at their evolution from after they took over, these stick-weilding gangster bipedals… their evolution as to their outer-forms or outward appearance… their evolution appears to be very slow.

Stick-weilding bipedal gangsterism no doubt being a successful niche.

Anyhow the giant continent broke up, and the heretofore bipedals (now separated) took on many forms.

But why didn’t extended dinosaur family evolve large-brained bipedals from out of all that diversity?

Lack of grasslands? I don’t THINKso.

You see evolution is difficult. Its a tough process. And you need partial-but-not-total isolation within the species for it to happen.

If you have total isolation for too long you’ll have a split and two or more different species will arise through genetic drift.

A small animals scurries up a tree to get away from predators… Now we have the partial-isolation and subjection to a like-adaptive stress by all the partially-isolated of that species.

They have to get used to living in the trees for the first time. But living in the trees isolates them somewhat. Yet they are subjected to the same competitive stresses.

A four-legged animal flourishes everywhere until a new predator emerges and the species gets slaughtered mercillesly….

… Except for those who quite by accident run into a river to get away from the predator.

Now these innovators who ran into the rivers all over the place and into the surf. These guys are now partially but not totally isolated and they are subjected to a LIKE competitive stress in the new environment.
Now in our case, like the early dinosaurs before us, we were stick-weilding gangster bipedals.

We took over and dominated animals far larger.

Twenty-something glacial cycles in three million years. Each time the same pattern.


We spread out everywhere and our population becomes almost to hunter-gatherer saturation.

Just in time for the white wall of death to come and slash our population to pieces. Starve us off and isolate us, one clan from the other, for at least 60 000 years apiece.

We are so attrited that the fossil record scantly records the existence of the survivors cut off from eachother. But 60 000 years later the game will start opening up faster then we can reproduce such will be the sudden abundance.

And then the clans will amalgamate into one species again after suffering from a like adaptive stress from that endless winter. And just as they have re-amalgamated on comes the next long-night of the white-wall-of-death.

The case of a four-legged animal evolving to whales, hippos and dolphins I will call:

1. New Niche Morphing Evolution.

But the case of hominids evolving to Homo-Sapiens I will call:

2.Pulsing-Holocaust Evolution.

And its pulsing holocause evolution that is the norm and not the exception.

But lets put that all aside. Have some bloody sense man. Ice ages are not nice. A warmer world is a kinder, wetter, less harsh world. And only ocean-life gains from a glaciation.

You must be a really sheltered character or laying on some leftist play-dumb-and-win JIVE.

Try and think what it is you would eat if you had to live on a giant glacier?

The above is by no means the whole story when it comes to human evolution. The problem comes when the guardians of the theory of evolution are too stupid to recognise that there is an ongoing problem. An ongoing mystery.  Since science is really just detective work, if you cannot see a mystery, you have brought the process of science to a dead bang halt.



  1. Here’s the way to demonstrate the truth about evolution.

    If evolutionists want to end the arguments all they have to do is, get their brilliant heads together and assemble a ‘simple’ living cell. This should be possible, since they certainly have a very great amount of knowledge about what is inside the ‘simple’ cell.

    After all, shouldn’t all the combined Intelligence of all the worlds scientist be able the do what chance encounters with random chemicals, without a set of instructions, accomplished about 4 billion years ago,according to the evolutionists, having no intelligence at all available to help them along in their quest to become a living entity. Surely then the evolutionists scientists today should be able to make us a ‘simple’ cell.

    If it weren’t so pitiful it would be humorous, that intelligent people have swallowed the evolution mythology.

    Beyond doubt, the main reason people believe in evolution is that sources they admire, say it is so. It would pay for these people to do a thorough examination of all the evidence CONTRARY to evolution that is readily available: Try The evolutionists should honestly examine the SUPPOSED evidence ‘FOR’ evolution for THEMSELVES.

    Build us a cell, from scratch, with the required raw material, that is with NO cell material, just the ‘raw’ stuff, and the argument is over. But if the scientists are unsuccessful, perhaps they should try Mother Earth’s recipe, you know, the one they claim worked the first time about 4 billion years ago, so they say. All they need to do is to gather all the chemicals that we know are essential for life, pour them into a large clay pot and stir vigorously for a few billion years, and Walla, LIFE!

    Oh, you don’t believe the ‘original’ Mother Earth recipe will work? You are NOT alone, Neither do I, and MILLIONS of others!

    PS: Please don’t lie about the ‘first life’ problem, scientists are falling all over themselves to make a living cell. Many have admitted publicly that it is a monumental problem. And is many years away from happening, if ever. Logical people understand this problem and have rightly concluded that an Intelligent Designer was absolutely necessary. Think of it this way, if all the brilliant scientists on earth can’t do it how on earth can anyone believe that it happened by accident?????

  2. Yeah I don’t get that far back into it myself.

    I just assume some sort of evolution and merely haggle over what was the most likely sort.

  3. I’m really sorry Graeme but I’ve ignored you. I’ve neglected you horribly and I am deeply, deeply ashamed. Maybe you thought I had gone on holiday. That is because I did.

    But do not fret because in a few days there will be more amazing adventures coming along, featuring Sergeant Bob Robert and his noble quest to stop your evil and insane buns from taking over the world. This week, FINALLY, we are introduced to these wicked and diabolically clever slabs of hellish flesh.

    By the way notice that Jim accuses you of ‘lying’ about first life problems when in fact you were not lying. Isn’t it irritating that he does that? It’s almost as irritating as when you call me a liar about global warming. I may hold the incorrect view but I am not ‘lying’.

  4. Great. Keep it up Lambert. Your creativity, while being sunk into promoting my overmuscled glutes, is not being turned on getting black kids infected with malaria.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: