Posted by: graemebird | November 20, 2008

Eight Constitutional Consequences Of Usurper-Barry Taking The Oath Of Office.

Brought to the front from November 2008 to remind you all that this issue ought never just go away. And as the days drag on under the Saul Alinsky wrecking-ball, this topic can only gain in relevance. Each month that this current lunatic crowd holds sway in Washington will do more damage then a year of hard work and privation can correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

THE PLAGUE OF THE WHITE TRASH LAWYERS.

This is basically a cut and paste of the second part of a very good article written before the last American election. But its also an ammunition cache. It is ammunition to allow one to be able to deal with THE ATTACK OF THE FUCKING STUPID LAWYERS. 

Since the issue of Barry’s ineligibility for office came out, we have had a shitrain of idiocy, often perpetrated by lawyers, or people pretending to be lawyers. Don’t let them lie to you. Don’t let them bamboozle you. These anti-educated legal skeptics have even been known to say the most idiotic thing imagineable….. “The American People Have Spoken.” Man. Aint that the-drizzling-shits-of-stupid? Surely the stupidest statement destined to be uttered widely this year.

These golden-calf worshipping lawyers have filibustered and lied, and lied-and-filibustered until they have managed to get other Obama Kool-aiders to block my posting ability on an American forum. The inability of such people to make a coherent argument troubles them not at all. Since they went to university to learn only to be law-nihilists.

The legal system has degenerated into an elaborate, and appallingly expensive… make-work scheme for these un-philosophical parasites. And its also a system,within and by which, they have conspired to become an untouchable higher caste of their own. They have conspired to be on a superior plane of their own ON THEIR TURF.  You walk into court and immediately they have soared to the highest of high house-niggers, while you have fallen in stature way below the most benighted field-slave.

Lawyers constitute a population of people we really need to be able to take down a few notches. I would say that we ought deny them the vote. I would say that anyone who has earned money practicing as a lawyer could be barred from holding elected office. In any case we have to undermine the standing of these people since the power they wield, within their monopolized sphere, has gone entirely to the heads of the fucking stupid bastards.

This is part of the reason why such compulsive liars and dead souls have taken to a fellow fraudster like Barry Too-White. And also why they still honour that white trash psychopath, William Jefferson Clinton.

Anyhow. It is with much gratitude, that I am able to cut and paste, from Dr Edwin Vieira Juniors fine essay. All the answers to help you deal with the current lawyer-plague are right here below.

FIRST (1ST) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.) 

 

First, if Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor Members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the Members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but anusurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because an usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation. 


SECOND (2ND) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.

 

 

Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.

 

THIRD (3RD) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.


Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242, which provides that:

 

[w]hoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States * * * shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, * * *, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Plainly enough, every supposedly “official” act performed by an usurper in the President’s chair will be an act “under color of law” that necessarily and unavoidably “subjects [some] person * * * to the deprivation of [some] rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution * * * of the United States”—in the most general case, of the constitutional “right[ ]” to an eligible and duly elected individual serving as President, and the corresponding constitutional “immunit[y]” from subjection to an usurper pretending to be “the President.”

 

FOURTH (4TH) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.


Fourth, if he turns out to be nothing but an usurper acting in the guise of “the President,” Obama will not constitutionally be the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States” (see Article II, Section 2, Clause 1). Therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces. Indeed, for officers or men to follow any of his purported “orders” will constitute a serious breach of military discipline—and in extreme circumstances perhaps even “war crimes.” In addition, no one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch of the General Government will be required to put into effect any of Obama’s purported “proclamations,” “executive orders,” or “directives.”

 

FIFTH (5TH) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.


Fifth, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority “to make Treaties”, or to “nominate, and * * * appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not * * * otherwise provided for [in the Constitution]” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any “Treaties” or “nominat[ions], and * * * appoint[ments]” he purports to “make” will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them. One need not be a lawyer to foresee what further, perhaps irremediable, chaos must ensue if an usurper, even with “the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, unconstitutionally “appoint[s] * * * Judges of the Supreme Court” whose votes thereafter make up the majorities that wrongly decide critical “Cases” of constitutional law.

 

SIXTH (6TH) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.


Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

 

SEVENTH (7TH) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.


Seventh, if Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Obviously, this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the General Government itself, or among the States and the people.

 

EIGHTH (8TH) CONSEQUENCE OF CALIPH BARRY THE FIRST (TOO-WHITE “THE USURPER”) TAKING THE OATH OF OFFICE.


Eighth, even did something approaching civil war not eventuate from Obama’s hypothetical usurpation, if the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be “the President,” and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. The potential for chaos, both domestically and internationally, arising out of this systemic uncertainty is breathtaking.

The underlying problem will not be obviated if Obama, his partisans in the Democratic Party, and his cheerleaders and cover-up artists in the big media simply stonewall the issue of his (non)citizenship and contrive for him to win the Presidential election. The cat is already out of the bag and running all over the Internet. If he continues to dodge the issue, Obama will be dogged with this question every day of his purported “Presidency.” And inevitably the truth will out. For the issue is too simple, the evidence (or lack of it) too accessible. Either Obama can prove that he is “a natural born Citizen” who has not renounced his citizenship; or he cannot. And he will not be allowed to slip through with some doctored “birth certificate” generated long after the alleged fact. On a matter this important, Americans will demand that, before its authenticity is accepted, any supposed documentary evidence of that sort be subjected to reproducible forensic analyses conducted by reputable, independent investigators and laboratories above any suspicion of being influenced by or colluding with any public official, bureaucracy, political party, or other special-interest organization whatsoever.


Berg v. Obama may very well end up in the Supreme Court. Yet that ought to be unnecessary. For Obama’s moral duty is to produce the evidence of his citizenship sua sponte et instanter. Otherwise, he will be personally responsible for all the consequences of his refusal to do so.


Of course, if Obama knows that he is not “a natural born Citizen” who never renounced his American citizenship, then he also knows that he and his henchmen have perpetrated numerous election-related frauds throughout the country—the latest, still-ongoing one a colossal swindle targeting the American people as a whole. If that is the case, his refusal “to be a witness against himself” is perfectly explicable and even defensible on the grounds of the Fifth Amendment. Howsoever justified as a matter of criminal law, though, Obama’s silence and inaction will not obviate the necessity for him to prove his eligibility for “the Office of President.” The Constitution may permit him to “take the Fifth;” but it will not suffer him to employ that evasion as a means to usurp the Presidency of the United States.

© 2008 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

So you see. Its very clear. For the sake of civilization, for the sake of the USA and for the sake of the constitution it is important to stop Barry from taking the oath. But its also important FOR BARRY’S OWN SAKE!!!!!!!

And for the sake of his family.


Advertisements

Responses

  1. http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=v07tPpQE6w0

    Barry Soetoro an illegal alien.

  2. In other news Obama supporters have suspended my ability to post at Tigerdroppings.

    Land of the free. Home of the brave. Well 47% in any case. Land of the lawyers. Home of the stupid for the rest of them.

  3. Good news. According to one poster:

    “According to the Constitution, if Congress fails to certify a Vice President before January 20th due to the Democratic ticket being held up by Obama’s birth certificate, the Vice-President before Janurary 20th becomes Acting-President.

    In other words, Dick Cheney becomes Acting President.

    After this point if Congress still can’t resolve the election, especially in the case of Democrats refusing to vote for McCain as President, Dick Cheney remains Acting President of the United States until 2012. ”

    This sounds logical to me.

  4. SOOTHSAYER STEVE EDNEY SEZ:

    Obama will be president and everyone except for a bunch of inbred retarded hill billies living in fantasy land will recognise it as such.

  5. THE APPEARANCE OF AN USURPER WAS ANTICIPATED BY THE FRAMERS OF AMERICAS AMAZING AND ALMOST SPOOKY CONSTITUTION.

    Edney. Do you see me making the prediction that he WON’T be sworn in as Americas first USURPER-PRESIDENT?????

    I’m not saying that at all. All I’m saying is that he will, if he is sworn in, definitely be a usurper. And at this stage we can say this pretty confidently no matter what documentation his allies can knock up. After all. Knocking up bodgy documentation is why Allah invented intelligence agencies.

    The succession of Popes from the 1st century down to the present is broken only by the intervention of ANTI-POPES. Now ANTI-POPES were often thought of as Popes by many dupes amongst the people who were taken in by them at the time. But in full examination of the facts they have been declared ANTI-POPES on the basis of their lack of legitimacy.

    Barry, if he perjures himself and is not stopped, may well be sworn in. But he will be a usurper and the constitution anticipated that a usurper might well seize power.

    Its just been the good fortune of the United States to not have had a Usurper in its first two centuries. That run of good luck really was not going to last and it broke down due to new media, an extended age of capitalism, and a war that took too long.

    This is not unanticipated and its not abnormal in the wider sweep of history.

    The printing press after all brought with it religious wars and all sorts of bad craziness. It takes a while to get used to these things on a civilisation-wide basis.

    All I’m saying is that we be merciful. That we think about the populace more generally. But that we also think about his three beautiful girls and stop him sooner rather than later. He will be humiliated for awhile and the his girls will cry. But he’ll pick himself up and make a good life delivering speeches for tens of thousands of dollars a hit so long as his allies don’t have him killed.

    Its crucial for civilisation and better for him as well if he is taken down NOW. Thats better than spending the rest of his life in prison or dying young with blood in his mouth.

  6. “I wear a smoking jacket before I’ve even received my PhD. Oh, and BTW, smoking jackets are reserved only for tory dandys. Of all people, he should know that.

    dover_beach
    20 Nov 08 at 3:56 am”

    Lets hope for the love of god that his PHD is not in the history of WWII.

    Rothbard used to say that they always specialize in the things that they are no good at.

  7. Something very different. The advantages of having more politicians.

    [audio src="http://www.lewrockwell.com/podcast/?p=episode&name=2008-11-16_069_the_case_for_bigger_government.mp3" /]

    We could cut their earnings in half and take their super and with that financing have three times as many politicians.

  8. Ward Connelly.

    http://www.davidhorowitztv.com/wednesday-morning-club/210-ward-connerly-qlessons-from-my-uncle-jamesq

  9. are you out of your mind birdy?
    stupid argument from Rockwell. We don’t want less intelligent people as politicians. we want to pay them well like Singapore, and attract more brains.

  10. No no no. Thats only going to work on a city-state level. And only one city in several. You cannot extrapolate that to a country like Australia.

    Having to pay a lot of money to government officials is admission of failure. Admission that you were TOO FUCKING STUPID TO CONSTRUCT A PROPER FUCKING MARKET FOR SO-CALLED PUBLIC GOODS.

    And you are too stupid. Everytime I’ve talked about it with you and the lunatic Mark Hill you’ve never been able to even get a foothold on a prequel to a start-point to a road-map to a first step on the problem.

    But since we first-worlders hadn’t solved the problem of public goods, and since Singapore was under seige from all sides, they came up with the formula of getting the best people into government and thats not something that is going to be repeated elsewhere, under democracy, and under the freedom of speech the former Anglo countries are used to,

    It would be better if we didn’t have to rely on the advent on someone like Lee Kwan Yew just to get the roads, ports and electricity working right without a foreign takeover.

    He may well be the Statesman of the last half century. But it is to be remembered he’s a pretty harsh bastard to… my admiration for him notwhithstanding.

    We want to get our public goods growing organically via small business success. And leave the best brains for sussing out how to increase Justice in the context of reducing the governmental footprint….. and when they are not doing that they are focused on how to defend the promised land as it is being built.

    Because we know what people do when they find the promised land right? They fucking invade and rape all our sheilas is what they do and our best brains have to be able to put that beyond the contention of even the most ambitious looney-toons.

  11. By the way. Actually listen to the tape. Thats not what Rockwell said. Thats my practical application extrapolating from the astounding findings of his esteemed guest.

    You’ve got to go to source Jason Soon.

    Always remember to go to source.

    And isn’t it about time you lifted your ban?

    I swear that Quiggin isn’t pissing me off even one tenth as much as some of your crowd of golden-calf worshippers. Quiggin isn’t being offensive at all. So the reason for the ban has expired.

  12. I feel a real sense of shame with Barry. Just imagine if Malcoms son has somehow got mixed up with the Miseans but spent a bit of time with some hawkish Codevilla-type characters as well?

    He ought to have been a Prince In Exile. He ought to have been a person of real substance. He ought to have been a man of depth and intellectual leadership. Now he’s just going to be the fucking President of the United Stats. And a failure. And a usurper.

    Its the worst crying-shame imaginable.

  13. “The less said about Bird the better.”

    BUSTED. Dover is doing his PHD in some aspect of history. And the fact is he is no fucking good at it. He was totally incapable of re-capturing the logic of the time OR IN FACT OF BEING LOGICAL.

    Clearly he was working backwards from the comfortable conclusions he was cleaving to. Rather than working forward to some tentatively closer proximity to truth.

    He can NEVER be a competent historian. Not if he lived for 100 year forward and 1000 years backward in time.

  14. They know no such thing you illogical, irrational, lying fuckface.

    Now you’ve just got to slow down and think differently. Things are not like they were. Things are not like they were in the 80’s when we were growing up.

    You lying about stuff is not going to change anything. Thats childish Steve. You’ve got to grow up. Countries can go bad. Cities can fall under corruption. We see that all the time.

    Now just one step at a time. You explain your position logically. No lying. Just explain yourself logically.

    GO!!!!!

    By the way. I’m wiping your post. Because you are not allowed to lie on my site. You have nothing to say that he’s legitimate.

  15. If you cannot think logically Steve…… how do you even make it to work on time?

    I don’t know how you people function at all. Really I don’t.

    Now lets have you make your case logically.

  16. Back right up there pigfucker and make your case.

    Now you are a grown up. You are supposed to be educated. So you ought to be able to make a coherent case.

    So go ahead. What is your theory.

    GO!!!!!

  17. So you reckon you have a case Edney. Why not try and MAKE IT!!! Do the best you can given your feeble talents. And if you do the best you can you won’t be lying and I won’t have to wipe your post.

    GO!!!!!!

    They called him Edney. The man with the face of a pig and who always left home without an actual argument.

  18. So you never DID have a case did you Steve you dishonest bastard.

    Mate. You are just surplus to requirements.

    To think that you are just congenitally incapable of making a case.

    So why do you reckon he won’t prove his eligibility. You must have a theory about it hey?

    Fuck you are an idiot mate. And its not like your looks are a consolation.

  19. No of course not. What is your point?

  20. Edney. You are supposed to be educated. So make your case!

    Now you say that foreigners sponsored the young man……. for what reason?

    You think he’s failed to show his eligibility……… to what advantage?

  21. Guys lets have your theories. You would see his behaviour as a rope-a-dope right? A high stakes attempt to make him immune from legal attack by wearing down any potential litigants.

    Is THAT your theory?

    You guys appear to lack any method of assessing the alternatives.

  22. What about the bet?

    Did I hear you saying suggesting we place your $400 vs my $900 that Hillary Clinton will be inaugurated before the end of 2009?

  23. Dice rolling is still popular.

  24. No Z you didn’t get those terms right. But in any case the bet ought to be related to what it is you think you are proving.

    Peak oil is a theory to do with daily output of oil from traditional oilwells.

    Peak oil says nothing direct about the price. The peak oil paradigm is also silent on synthetics and its really very quiet on the deep sea stuff. Or even the very deep earth stuff the likes of which we haven’t yet managed to extract.

    So if you want to make a bet, and you are motivated by some sort of skepticism of the peak oil paradigm it ought to be on the basis of daily output from traditional wells.

    This is probably wrong but from memory I think the world produces 85 million barrels a day. And I think about 12 million of those are from synthetics. Synthetics include coal to liquids. Gas to petroleum. Tar sands. And down the track there will be others. But I think that all amounts to about 12 million barrels equivalent a day.

    That figure can keep growing. It might grow at 20% per year. Although at the moment its a bit constricted by the availability of natural gas. But if those mini-nukes take off in the late twenty-teens (ie after 2012) then essentially the amount of production of synthetics can grown boundlessly for a long time.

    So we are only interested in the non-synthetic component. Not the total daily output and not the price. The peak oil paradigm rests on the non-synthetic daily output.

    Which is now about 73 million barrels per day but that will have to be confirmed.

    Now what you ought to do is construct a bet on the basis that this daily output figure will increase substantially. Traditionally daily output increased about 7% per year. But what I’m saying is that daily ouput will not increase by anything like that. It will oscillate up and down and it will start falling. And it will keep falling until the deep sea stuff kicks in.

    But of course its an open question as to what will happen with synthetics. As I said if there is all these mini-nukes getting out there in the late teens the potential ought to be there to increase the synthetic component by 10-30% per year even as the non-synthetic component begins to slowly fall.

    So thats how you want to construct the bet. Find out what the authentic non-synthetic daily oil output is now. And figure out when you reckon its going to hit the high-seventy-millions per day. Like if it hits 78 million per day average for 3 straight months then I will be wrong and you will be vindicated. But if it falls below 70 million for three straight months then I will be vindicated and you would have to pay out.

    Something like that.

  25. […] Is Obama an usurper? By lyrebirdy (Of course) Graeme thinks so. […]

  26. Over at one in the many sites named in my honour the Barry Soetoro homosexual admirers clique have been horribly beaten in the argument. Not one of them can find a single piece of evidence that Barry Soetoro is eligible to be President. Other than assertions of other people claiming he is.

    Likewise Humphreys was absolutely whipped in the carbon tax debate. But the contention that he wasn’t is only coming from people filibusting that he won without saying why.

  27. “We have his Hawaiian birth certificate.”

    Yeah? Where is it? Oh you mean you saw a scan of a copy of something that looks a bit like it at some website.

    Unbelievably gullible.

    DON-FATTY-H DIDN’T EVEN SEE THAT. WHAT HE SAW WAS A FORGERY OF A “CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH” NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE AT ALL. THAT BARRY EVEN HAD A COPY OF ONE OF THESE IMPLIES THAT HE WAS BORN ELSEWHERE. HAD HE BEEN BORN IN A HOSPITAL IN HAWAII HE WOULD HAVE BEEN ISSUED A PROPER BIRTH CERTIFICATE THAT WAS UNAMBIGUOUSLY FROM HAWAII. HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ISSUED A CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH AT ALL. THERE WOULD BE RECORDS IN ONE OF THE HAWAIIAN HOSPITALS BUT THERE IS NONE. AND THERE WOULDN’T BE A FREEZE ON INFORMATION ABOUT THIS IN KENYA AND INDONESIA.

  28. What a ridiculous compendium of stupid birther bullshit.

    Speaking of dud lawyers, Orly goes down in a screaming heap yet again:

    http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/cook-v-good-ruling/

  29. Pathetic reasoning by the court.

  30. The idiot Cook didn’t have a case since his orders were already revoked. He’s already being described as Blue Falcon on the miliblogs.

    This brings the number of cases Orly has won in the course of her illustrious legal career to precisely zero.

  31. And I think Orly had better get herself a lawyer who didn’t get their degree from a box of crackers. She may regret trying to fuck around with the US Army:

    “18 USC § 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally

    (a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:
    (1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or (2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States—

    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. “

  32. Well the army cannot legally go around killing people on the orders of a conman.

  33. NO LYING ON THIS SITE. BARRY WAS NEVER LAWFULLY ELECTED. HE DOES NOT QUALIFY. SINCE QUALIFICATION REQUIRES BOTH ABILITY AND WILLINGNESS TO PROVE ELIGIBILITY. THUS HAS IT BEEN. THUS MUST IT EVER BE.

    YOUR STORY COUNTS AS EVIDENCE. BUT ITS TOO LITTLE TOO LATE AND IT WOULD BE MORE CONVINCING IF SUCH AN ITEM HAD SURFACED TWO YEARS AGO.

  34. NO YOU IDIOT. THE CONSTITUTION IS THE HIGHEST LAW OF THAT LAND. THE US IS NOT A DEMOCRACY. ITS A REPUBLIC. IF HE IS NOT ELIGIBLE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION HE IS A USURPER. THATS THE END OF THAT STORY.

  35. YOU IDIOT. NOT ALL US CITIZENS ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. OR DID YOU FORGET THAT YOU STUPID CUNT?

  36. Very interesting extrapolations.
    There is only one major flaw. Namely that BHO was born in the US and therefore is a perfectly legitimate president.

  37. No he wasn’t born in the US. And he would not likely be eligible to be President even if he were to be found to be born in the US. That he is a conman is the reason he won’t allow his papers to be scrutinized. And its the reason he has spent so much money to stop from even so much as presenting his birth certificate. If he could prove eligibility he would not have taken this risk. He would have proved it. That he won’t prove it is proof that he cannot.

  38. NOW I KNOW YOU ARE CAMBRIA. SINCE ONLY CAMBRIA WOULD ACT THIS MUCH OF A DROOLING IMBECILE. THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT SAY THAT IF YOUR MOTHER IS AMERICAN YOU ARE IN. IT SAYS THAT YOU HAVE TO BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

    GET YOUR FUCKING FACTS STRAIGHT YOU MORON WOG CUNT CAMBRIA.

  39. TEMPLARS AND THE ILLUMINATI ARE ALL DEFUNCT OUTFITS CAMBRIA.

  40. Mr Bird
    That traitorous impostor Humphreys has been advocating a carbon tax in your motherland

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU0907/S00386.htm

  41. “The New Zealand government’s emissions trading system, due to come into force in 2010 for energy and 2013 for agriculture, is the wrong approach, says a new report being released on Thursday.”

    A new report it says. Its almost surreal when you know its really just the same old bullshit from the economics illiterate Humphreys. At least now he’s emphasised the company taxes and the taxes on diesel. He’s picked up that much from us so that evil triangulating prick will be ready the next time he gets a lecture on the importance of capital market theory. Bastard.

    Its of the utmost importance to get rid of the threat of any sort of carbon tax so that we can get moving with coal-to-liquids technology. And the whole idea was to get rid of the company tax on retained earnings as well. Not bloody well substitute one for the other like some imbecile.

    Its like when bloody Sinclair reckoned you could use this tax to raise the income tax threshold. But the whole strategic point was that you want to be raising the income tax threshold in conjunction with reducing welfare and in the context of trying to encourage wage restraint with moral suasion so that we could get rid of unemployment. And thats just one more lot of ammunition that gets pissed away compensating for this evil carbon tax.

  42. CAMBRIA. JUST PICK UP YOUR ACT AND I’LL STOP GIVING YOU SUCH A HARD TIME.

    LOOK AT KRUGMAN. AS A YOUNG BLOKE KRUGMAN WAS AN OUTSTANDING STATISTICAL RESEARCHER AND ACTUALLY NOT THAT BAD AN ECONOMICS COMMENTATOR.

    AS SOON AS HE BECOME A BIGSHOT HE JUST LET ALL HIS PREDJUDICES HANG OUT AND NOW HE’S A PRIZE IDIOT WITH A NOBELS IN TOW.

    IN YOUR CASE IT MIGHT BE ALTZHEIMERS. I DON’T KNOW. BUT ALL I EXPECT IS SOME EFFORT ON YOUR PART. PICK YOUR ACT UP. AT LEAST BE SEEN TO BE TRYING HARD.

    THATS NOT TOO MUCH TO ASK.

    I DON’T THINK THATS TOO MUCH TO ASK.

    PICK YOUR ACT UP YOU STUPID WOG CUNT AND THEN I WON’T SAY BAD THINGS ABOUT YOUR GENETIC AND MORAL HANDICAP.

  43. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT YOU ARE NOT CAMBRIA. DON’T BLAME ME MATE. I WAS ONLY GOING ON THE IDEA THAT NO TWO DIFFERENT CUNTS COULD BE SO IDIOTIC.

  44. TOO LITTLE TOO LATE.

    EVIDENCE BUT FEEBLE EVIDENCE AFTER ALL THIS TIME.

    GET ME SOME EVIDENCE THAT DOESN’T RUN THE RISK OF BEING A POST 1933 MOCK-UP ON THE NEW FUHRER’S BEHALF.

  45. INTERESTING. HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY WERE PLACED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH?

  46. Mr Bird
    Please ignore these ungrateful wogs and dagos.

    • Yes a little bit of respect is and gratitude is in order isn’t it Winchester. Though just a few short years before we were fighting these people, in the spirit of good Christian ethics, and in line with the saviours urgings that we ought (well at least try to) love our enemies, we welcomed them one boatload after another to this magnificent continent. And do they show any gratitude????? Well yes I suppose most of them do. And most of them are hardworking non-rent-seeking types who have added spice and culture to this place. But even one of these pricks not being a staunch Australian partisan tends to grate. Thats my view anyway.

  47. RIGHT. BUT I WAS INTERESTED IN YOUR CLAIM THAT THESE WERE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ANNOUNCEMENTS.

    BY THE WAY I’VE ONLY MANAGED TO SEE ONE OF THOSE ANNOUNCEMENTS. I’M SURE THERE IS A GOOD REASON FOR THIS BUT HAVE YOU YOURSELF SEEN BOTH?

  48. Mr Wombat
    Your invoking the name of a native animal as pseudonym does not in any way mitigate the stench of garlic emanating from your Mediterranean mouth.

  49. Exactly right Winchester. This fellow, by all accounts looks to be loyal only to the spirit of those Bonapartist rabble at the EU. Its a Bonapartism turned grey and decrepid. Loyalty to nothing in the end. In the end it becomes only loyalty to the principle of selling out.

    But here this Mr “Wombat.” If you can show that there were two lots of notices and not only one (I’m not saying otherwise but I only saw one) and if you could show that they were Health Department notices, then that could make feeble and lonesome evidence about ten times less feeble. Not decisive yet a lot stronger then it was. So if you can show this by all means go ahead. That doesn’t suggest he’s not a usurper if he winds up being born in Hawaii. He’s still a usurper. But it brings it a little bit closer to a line-ball matter.

  50. I’M DISSAPPOINTED. I REALLY WANT TO KNOW. ITS NOT A TRICK QUESTION. IF YOU HAVE IT THAT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT SIMULTANEOUSLY PUT TWO NOTICES IN TWO DIFFERENT PAPERS I’D BE HAPPY TO HEAR THAT INFORMATION.

    ALL WE WANT IS THE TRUTH. AND I DON’T THINK THE TRUTH IS TOO MUCH TO ASK.

    I DON’T THINK THATS TOO MUCH TO ASK.

  51. Mr Bird
    It appears that the brave maiden Marohasy is now looking for a job. Could the Leftists have got to her employers?

    http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/

  52. THESE ARE JUST TECHNICAL WAYS OF THE LEGAL INDUSTRY SHAFTING THE PUBLIC BY INTRODUCING ARBITRARY HURDLES. THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANCE IN IT OTHER THAN THAT.

  53. Here’s a post that I made over at marginal revolution. Last time I tried to school them up on the facts of reality over there they wiped my post.

    “”The primary reason that independent central banks are better at controlling inflation is that absent direct political control the default selection mechanism favors bankers, i.e. lenders, people whose interests make them more favorable towards lower inflation.”

    This is half right. In that its true that an independent central bank will favour the bankers. But it does not follow that the bankers want low inflation. High inflation enriches the bankers. When they make loans without creating new money they can only ever get a cut of the interest. Not the interest itself but only a cut. When they create make loans that create new money they get almost the entirety of the value of the principal and the interest.

    This is why there ought never be a central bank. Its part of a cartelisation of the financial sector run for the benefit of the bankers. What laughably passes for monetary policy usually consists of a bunch of subsidies for the banks.”

  54. THE SIGNIFICANCE LIES IN LEGAL PROFESSION SHENANIGANS CONTRARY TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND IN VIOLATION OF THE SPIRIT OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO NEED FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION TO THROW ARBITRARY HURDLES IN THE WAY OF JUSTICE.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: