Posted by: graemebird | November 21, 2008

Dick Cheney Must Be Sworn In As President.

I have been advised that this is constitutionally the right procedure to stop the swearing in of a USURPER. You see George Bush MUST STAND DOWN. But if there is no rightfully elected successor then the Presidency falls to Dick Cheney. And he could be there four years or until such time as the matter is fully resolved. If he stays on for four years lets hope he’s got a functioning veto arm, unlike the exacerbating Bush who mysteriously accepted any budget that the Congress sent his way.

Now Richard Cheney ought to be preparing straight away, since the left are already on the front foot. The leftists have fired off a series of court cases against Dick Cheney and his current attorney general. Just the two people who need to act RIGHT NOW.  The left are always ahead of their guileless and unsuspicious opponents. And they want Dick Cheney and the attorney-general wrong-footed and too busy to stop the outrageous trashing of the constitution, that is planned for January,  from going ahead.

In fact Dick Cheney is not safe if he DOESN’T assume command, as a just God would have him do. During the coming reign of terror it will be ubiquitous vexacious legal action all around, before the serious abuse really gets going.

As we found out in a previous post. The USURPER cannot be impeached. And would not be impeached in a month of Sundays if he could. He must be arrested. Now how is THAT going to work when he is surrounded by security, intelligence, and this criminal gang of hardcore scandal coverup artists? Its not going to work. 

Imagine if you tried to assemble the team to arrest the USURPER after he has already been sworn in??? The whole arresting party would be dealt with very quickly, given the intelligence infrastructure, that the USURPING regime will now have access to. But in any case you are there to arrest him and the USURPERS Praetorian guard, which will be like nothing heretofore seen in the history of the Republic, will be there to stop you. A firefight would break out with all the rightful officers of law killed. No-one would organise such a thing in the first place.

Anyway Cheney has got to start beefing up his own security now. He’s got to make sure no-one can poison him, or induce aN heart attack, or anything like that. Cheney’s own security has to be by far the toughest force anywhere near Washington. And he’s got to assume control. And he’s got to announce that all due diligence will be performed to test whether or not BARRY Adolph Hussein SOETORO is eligible to be President…… prior to Cheney and his administration handing the White House and the other organs of state, over to that fake-ass criminal team.

Richard Cheney. I’m talking to you. Its critical that you get started now. There is nothing in your life that you will ever do that is as important as this. The fate of the world is on your shoulders. Don’t underestimate these people. Make sure all the food you eat is untainted. Beef up your security so that there is no question of anyone taking the white house by force with media backing as to their legitimacy. Beef up your security to the point where all forensic investigations and outstanding legal issues are resolved before you so much as DAYDREAM about going home to the ranch.

But the thing is that these legal challenges WILL NOT BE RESOLVED IN BARRY Adolph Hussein SOETORO’S FAVOUR. You can say that the handover is to be delayed until he has proven eligibility.  But the fact is if all forensic and legal due diligence is performed, he will NOT be shown to be eligible. Hence you will be President until such time as a new election is completed, or even for the next four years.

Too Bad. Live with it. You have to do your duty.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. The corrupt Democrats know that its up to Dick Cheney to take control of matters and stop the usurpation. And so they haven’t wasted a minute in trying to neutralise him.

    Hence the Democrat-controlled Congress have passed a bill to IMPEACH CHENEY.

    Now they know that its no good impeaching President Bush. Because he has to step down anyway. So prior to Cheney having even considered the matter they are sprinting to get this fellow impeached. That way he cannot be sworn in until the ineligibility of Barry Soetoro is established, under the guise of saying he’ll hold office until such time as Barry’s eligibility is proven.

    If the above wasn’t the case they wouldn’t bother going after Cheney now. Believe it or not they wouldn’t waste their time if they thought he was sure to be out of Washington come January. They would just sit tight. But these leftists know what they are about. Even if normal Americans are too trusting to think through what has to happen now.

    YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME? You don’t think I’m serious that these assholes will try and impeach Cheney.

    Apparently the bill to do so has already passed the house. It will then have to pass the Senate. Wherein the President ought to veto it. Its a complete load of crap of course.

    But they are doing it anyway. And it has to be Cheney they are after. Since he’s the guy who it falls to to stop the usurper being sworn in.

    You’ll know I’m not having you on if you go to this here link:

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=xQDLyKGX268

  2. Good video report going over the facts of the matter:

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=XomFP0jaEqA

    This fellow reckons that as guardians of the Supreme Court, if Obama refuses to obey David Souter, and produce his birth certificate, then the Supreme Court will have to de-certify the election.

  3. http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=VJJGSMGNqJs

    This is the fox local news in Toledo. Phil Berg went to the University of Toledo apparently. So this is the first time I’ve seen the mainstream press handle the issue.

  4. Its not a complicated issue. This young man has figured it all out. America has many times in the past assisted people who have subsequently come to power. Saddam Hussein for example. The CIA helped him early on in the piece. They didn’t place him in power. But they gave him assistance and he subsequently came to power.

    NOW WHAT MAKES PEOPLE THINK THAT OTHER REGIMES CANNOT DO THAT TO YOU?

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ESbeGSBtxAQ

  5. I’m really proud of this kid I must say. Maybe the kids are alright after all.

  6. I think you are spending waaaay too much time on YouTube! LOL!!! I’ve got to go check out all of these now! Thanks GB!

  7. Right. But this is the best one isn’t it?

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=tJc6uczdhE0

    Long-legged skinflinting macdaddy.

  8. Radio station talks to a Kenyan official on the phone. The Kenyan official reveals that Obama Junior was born in Kenya. And that there is going to be some sort of monument to be built at his birthplace.

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=SQaYAAJgIvY

  9. Am I to believe that when President-elect Obama was running for state senate in Illinois, and then later for the U. S. Senate from Illinois, that not one of the residents of that good state took issue with his citizenship? If that is so, and it obviously is, it would have to be because there really is no legitimate question of his American citizenship, but merely a charade by the far right to try and retain the power they have held for the previous eight years. Strange how the issue never came up until he was a viable candidate for the Presidency. None of you had a problem with someone voting in the Senate who was believed to not be a citizen?

    Get real. All this talk about lawsuits and no one has produced so much as ONE copy of a filed suit in any court in this great country. I realize conspiracies are fun to talk about, but come on. If you want a real conspiracy to talk about, look into Cheney’s dealings with the oil companies. Have a nice day!

  10. Believe it. Not only did he run without any evidence of eligibility. He also CREATED A MASSIVE DISTRACTION TO THIS ISSUE by successfully working to disqualify all his democratic competitors for the race.

    This fellow must have amazing backing. People who weren’t taking any chances and were pretty determined to win.

    Its a pretty successful tactic. By attacking all his competitors over THEIR eligibility no-one even so much as thinks to check his. Amazingly audacious every step of the way.

  11. “All this talk about lawsuits and no one has produced so much as ONE copy of a filed suit in any court in this great country.”

    Well thats bullshit for starters.

  12. “If you want a real conspiracy to talk about, look into Cheney’s dealings with the oil companies. Have a nice day!”

    Well you’ve self-selected your act as that of an idiot. The alleged Cheney conspiracies are about the most mindless, baseless crap imagineable.

    I may have to wipe your post on grounds of sheer stupidity.

  13. So Graeme, what do you think of this take on Cheney? Do you think it’s true?

    Don’t worry we don’t think you do that kind of thing. If you did you’d be successful. 🙂

  14. Its just a link to you being a mindless lynch-loving idiot. This nonsense to do with Cheney has no legs at all. Its basically stupid people picking up on political warfare and running with it.

  15. hey Graeme
    JohnZ is stockpiling weapons for the coming Communist revolution when Obama invades Australia 🙂

    http://www.catallaxyfiles.com/blog/?p=3845

  16. Yes but he’ll be doing so as a willing traitor and Quisling.

  17. So Bird you don’t think that Dick cheney is an all time crony capitialist?

  18. Not by intention, no I don’t think so. In principle Jason or JC is far more supporters of cronyism then Cheney.

    Let me make an analogy. I don’t think that the Americans went to Iraq to steal all the oil as leftist conspirationists imagine in their ridiculous fevered minds. On the other hand they might not leave until they’ve sucked up every last drop that they can get out of the ground. Cronyism tends to follow naturally and not by intention. Since cronyism IS THE DEFAULT POSITION OF HUMAN RELATIONS. Some people imagine that capitalism is. But that is not the case. Capitalism is justice is a system that we must work very hard to come close to.

    Now this leftist deal where dummy-left conspiracies have it that Cheney and Bush started the war to boost their share prices. Well this is just idiocy.

    But then on the other hand once Bechtel or Halliburton or any other big outfit gets into a lobbying position and gets in the war zone the natural flow of forces winds up that these people are in a good place to profiteer. Hence people could have been stimulating small business and filling out their intelligence holes by distributing small amounts of cash to local small operators. And this would have been better to kick-start local employment, would have been better for relations and for neutralizing terrorist cells. It would be a good way of catalysing capitalism out of socialism.

    But no. They bring in truckers and big electricity corporations from the outside. Pay exorbitant prices while the Iraqis are sitting on their ass or joining radical groups indirectly paid out of Riyadh or Tehran. So this cronyism is not only expensive, counter-productive and idiotic. But its a major factor in allowing the surrounding nations to kick-start an almost unsquashable insurgency.

    But this is not Cheney and sacrificing young kids to swell his wallet. This is something in the nature of things.

  19. By the way after reviewing material on the internet I’ve had to rearrange my ranking of paradigms for the JFK hit, narrowly in favour of Oswald just doing it on his own. Thats the way you do it. Rank and re-rank competing paradigms in parallel according to material as it comes in.

  20. what about the probability of highways on mars? you reranked that yet?

  21. I agree, I think the argument they started the war for the benefit of Haliburton is ridiculous.

    But no. They bring in truckers and big electricity corporations from the outside. Pay exorbitant prices while the Iraqis are sitting on their ass or joining radical groups indirectly paid out of Riyadh or Tehran. So this cronyism is not only expensive, counter-productive and idiotic. But its a major factor in allowing the surrounding nations to kick-start an almost unsquashable insurgency.

    Well in this I also agree with you. Now do you think that Cheney’s very close ties with Haliburton influenced the decision to use them rather than try to use locals. eg. I read somewhere that locals were setting up their own mobile networks etc shortly after the US took over which, were then forcibly shut down and then contracted foreign companies to come in and set them up.

  22. I didn’t see any highways on Mars. As far as ancient remnants of a defunked moon-base we only had the idea that our ideas of geology are horribly primitive and that there is much to learn at that particular site. Or we had the idea that either NASA or people surrounding Van Flandern were running a bizzare conspiracy to screw with the photographic record.

    So we didn’t have much in the way of viable paradigms to rank and re-rank. We would need some more reasonable alternative paradigms to even so much as allow the methodology to be functional. Heretofore me and my detractors have been blind to such an alternative. We have lacked the creativity to conjure such an alternative, which when and if it arises, will have to come like a blinding flash of light from left field.

    So no. The ancient moonbase theory still must be ranked first through lack of viable competitors. As strange as that appears to be, reason tells us that so far, we are at a loss to explain the matter alternatively, other paradigms mentioned aside. And also so far there is absolutely no reason that has emerged to disbelieve such a notion. NOTHING AT ALL. Rather in fact the notion of this moon-base compels us to re-rank in favour of other paradigms that have been much neglected in the past. Such as the exploding planet thesis and the notion of panspermia. Both, in sober logic, already the leading paradigm in their respective spheres. And overdue for re-ranking in the mainstream.

    But don’t trouble yourself too much over this sort of thing Steve and Jason. Because you have both proved yourself incapable of any sort of rational analysis at all.

  23. No Cheney wouldn’t have had anything to do with all that. Except perhaps in a negative way. In terms of not being creative enough to see that the small business seeding in exchange for intelligence was the better way to go.

    But the time the war took off somehow the CIA and the State Department, both horribly leftist organisations, had seemed to gain ascendancy in war policy. And Rumsfeld, Cheney and the so-called neocons, appear to have lost control of policy.

    If you looked into Halliburtons record I think you will find that they have managed to get government work in pretty much any administration regardless which party the then President has come from.

  24. Stolen money organisations, no matter how patriotic and right-wing they start, have an inherent tendency towards leftism. As well as that once leftists get in an organisation they promote other people on that basis.

    This is why people like John Bolton copped so much trouble in these organisations.

    To win the cold war Reagan had to get a WWII hero who had worked flagrantly behind enemy lines as a young man, but who had in the interim been working in private business. Reagan got this fellow and set up an enemy intelligence organsation within the wider leftist CIA and thats how they managed to get things done surrounded by dumb leftists.

    The FBI seemed to have maintained its basic rightest outlook for a long time. But I think they are pretty much a joke at this point. In the early sixties I think they were still a pretty terrific outfit but that wasn’t long prior to that hateful skullduggery against Martin Luther King Junior. If you here the boss and Johnson on the phone. The way that they dealt with the civil rights issue, well they both sound very impressive. And all you can think of is that its a pity that LBJ was a socialist. Because he was a pretty effective character early on.

    Its just stupid to deny the upper managements leftist bias in the CIA. You see it all the time. You particularly saw it the way they conducted political warfare against the President.

    Useless. Stupid. Leftist. Incompetent. So foolish they had that rendition program to ENEMY REGIMES. They were so fucking thick they didn’t think of Syria as an enemy until after the Harire murder. We are talking some dumb fucking leftists here.

  25. Kirchner defends the Fed low interest rate policy

    http://www.institutional-economics.com/index.php/section/why_was_fed_policy_too_easy_between_2002_and_2005/

  26. I have to add even I think Kirchner has gone off the beam here

  27. Yeah its just silly. The quality of business and investment spending is something he just doesn’t get. It makes a difference if you are refurbishing the productive capacity of small business rather than flipping houses, pyramiding shares and creating all sorts of debt instruments.

    If things have gotten so out of hand that you cannot have a return to some level of quality without a recession well it would be better to take the recession.

    And the recession is a misleading thing anyway. If business-to-business spending holds up and savings are restored then thats a progressing economy yet the fall in consumer spending will register negative growth. Which is just misleading as to whether the economy is deteriorating or is it indeed regenerating itself? In this case the latter.

    In the case where business-to business spending totally collapses…. well yes then an argument could be made that you’ve got deterioration that cannot be made up.

  28. Answer the question!
    .
    Dick Cheney writes government policy expressly for the advantage of the big energy suppliers for which he works when the Dems are in. This is crony capitalism. And you support it.
    .
    For shame, for shame. What next? I know some Charles Ponzi bullshit right. Right?

  29. What are you talking about Adrien. Be more specific.

  30. Come on Adrien. You’ve made this claim? What are you talking about? Now of course I’d rather have Ron Paul take over than Dick Cheney. But we are talking about a constitutional crises and not about potential Presidential candidates.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    On another note here is a quote from another forum.

    “Even if he produced the original birth certificate, what is to stop you idiots from claming that it would be a forgery, as you have for what has already been produced?

    you see, there is no satisfying you. You’re idiots who refuse to see the truth.

    Actually I think Obama is playing coy with this so that you numbnuts spend your time on this rather than fighting him on real issues.”

    Welll he’s right of course. Unless this is all done in the most transparent and forensic way, at this point you’d have to be pretty dim not to expect the worst. Some sort of mock-up. And this is obvious when we answer the question “Why didn’t he show his birth certificate in the first place?”

    Hence when a person in public life acts in this irresponsible stone-walling way he is really spreading distrust and ill-will in the community.

    But the fact is he is stone-walling because he is ineligible.

  31. check it out cuz

    that nutball HUMPHRIES has outed himself as a left-wing lunatic

    http://strangetimes.lastsuperpower.net/?p=145#comment-1430

    I’m sometimes tempted to call myself a communist because I like their end-state.

  32. adrien

    fuck off goth boy
    don’t waste my cuz’s time

    he has a world to save

  33. “I’m sometimes tempted to call myself a communist because I like their end-state.”

    That makes two of us. I’ve been often tempted to call him a commie also. I have not always successfully suppressed that temptation.

    “I’m sometimes tempted to call myself a communist because I like their end-state.”

    Right ……………………………………….. Every cunt dead.

    “I’m sometimes tempted to call myself a communist because I like their end-state.”

    I suppose he’s talking about the withering away of the state once class conflict has been abolished through the expediency of the mass-extermination of all but one class.

    “I’m sometimes tempted to call myself a communist because I like their end-state.”

    He could be talking about the withering away of the state without any intermediary steps. If so its a pathetic attempt at free-enterprise street-cred, wrapped up in the spirit of compromise and appeasement-outreach.

  34. Specifics Graeme. Cheney and Haliburton yes? Halliburton and KBR yes? How much money did KBR make out of the Iraq war, no bid contracts? No competition. How much money did they get out of Gitmo?
    .
    Christ the list is a mile deep. I can’t believe this shit hasn’t landed these people in jail!

  35. Well lets have it then. Its a mile deep hey. Well go for it then. Lets have some of your batshit leftist conspiracy theory.

  36. Face it Adrien you have NOTHING. You say its a mile deep. You haven’t got a fucking thing. All this Cheney conspiracy stuff is the lamest leftist idiocy imaginable.

    But go for it anyway.

    Go.

  37. Come on Adrien. Lets have this batshit leftist conspiracy theory then hey? A mile deep hey? Well lets have some evidence then. Go!!!!

  38. Come on Adrien. You’ve got a batshit leftist conspiracy theory to do with Cheney.

    Well lets have it then. Go for it. If the stuff is a mile deep you can at least come up with SOMETHING. Fire away.

  39. In fact you don’t have anything do you? No you don’t. Its just complete moonbat idiocy with you. Conspiracy baby-talk. Not a stitch of evidence. Just like your CO2-bedwetting.

  40. See the problem with entertaining all these baseless conspiracy theories is when a real scoop comes along you are entirely blind to it.

    On the one level you cannot find anything at all about this Cheney stuff. And on the other hand you cannot come up with any sort of scenario where Barry Soetoro could possibly rightfully be sworn in as President.

    Your position is batshit crazy on both counts.

  41. Evidence?
    .
    Start with this. And I’ll get back to you.

  42. WHY DON’T YOU JUST ADMIT YOU ARE WRONG YOU FUCKING BATSHIT CRAZY CUNT?

    When you’ve been proved wrong the idea is to admit it. Not to create a diversion!!!!

    Come up with the evidence or admit you are wrong you stupid cunt. You fell for the most baseless idiotic crap conspiracy theory imaginable you complete moonbat.

    I’m forced to simply repost:

    “See the problem with entertaining all these baseless conspiracy theories is when a real scoop comes along you are entirely blind to it.

    On the one level you cannot find anything at all about this Cheney stuff. And on the other hand you cannot come up with any sort of scenario where Barry Soetoro could possibly rightfully be sworn in as President.

    Your position is batshit crazy on both counts.”

    You are such a dumb cunt mate.

  43. No filibusters dummy. You’ve made these batshit conspiracy-theory accusations. Now make good on the evidence.

    Or you could admit you are wrong.

  44. We see here that idiots like Soon, spiv, Adrien, Fyodor, Humphreys, JohnZ et al actually seem to think that the filibuster is a means of cognition. They actually seem to think that it proves something. That perhaps its valid falsification. Or they may even think that they can change the nature of reality via the filibuster.

    We are talking a whole generation of epistemological nitwits.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: