Posted by: graemebird | November 25, 2008

The Gravest Attack On Civilisation.

Here’s the Americans pledge of allegiance:

”I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands: one Nation under God, indivisible, With Liberty and Justice for all.”

Not the DEMOCRACY.

THE REPUBLIC.

In a functioning REPUBLIC (Not a DEMOCRACY)  based on justice, 99% of the population are unable to take away the rights of 1%. But in a DEMOCRACY you can vote in a communist/Islamist, DEDICATED to undermine the constitution, with 52% of the voters.  52% of the voters is all it takes. Actually it only takes 51% and possibly less that that.

In a democracy the banks can arbitrarily decide to steal 100’s of billions of dollars of the public in broad daylight and bribe politicians for a fraction of the payoff. There is a REASON why they could do this and it is because the firewalls of the constitution were rotted away and they finally broke down. Any situation has to be considered to be retrievable or else the good people will give up. But some Rubicons are kind of hard to uncross.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If FASCIST-BARRY is sworn in it will be the gravest attack on the principle of law, under civilised society, that has ever been perpetrated in all history without exception. Worse then the advent of the Third Reich since Germany was not founded on the principle of equality before the law and the freedom of the individual. Pre-Bismarkian Germans had indeed been free people by and large. But as a matter of circumstance rather than in principle. They had a multitude of tiny principalities which gave them the outcome of freedom via competitive government but it was never the case that they were pledged to freedom in principle.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

We Australians, and the Americans as well,  have raised up two or three generations of legal-nihilists from the law schools. And so the rot has been there all along. But never has there been such a blatant head-on attack on the principle of law itself as is the prospect of the BARRY-THE-USURPER taking the oath of office in the United States in January. It will be a decisive blow against civilised society, not only for the Americans, but also for us here in Australia AND FOR THE FUTURE HISTORY OF THE HUMAN SPECIES.

Even if the Usurper was sworn in and died of a crack overdose three months later, the damage he will do will be immense. But of course if this Islamist/Communist skunk is allowed to keep his position that will be far far worse.

Supposing “Obama” was a good prospect for the Presidency in all other aspects????? Supposing he was a new Alan Keyes or a Ron Paul??? Even in that extreme case he would be absolutely unworthy for the job by displaying the incredible irresponsibility and venom for the Republic that it would take for someone clearly not eligible to take the oath of office.

 

THAT THIS PRICK IS WILLING TO TAKE THE OATH DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM THE JOB ON ACCOUNT OF THE SHEER IRRESPONSIBILITY OF IT ALL.

In terms of strategy Jihadia is whipping your ass blind. Because if Barry is sworn in….  and supposing the ridiculous happens and he is “a good President.” Well it will still be a disaster. Since it will be a short-run gain at the price of a devastating blow to the viability and legitimacy of the Republic.

And of course if he is sworn in, and he becomes a bad President, as he most certainly will, then thats just a disaster on all levels. 

THAT THIS ALLEGED CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR, IS WILLING TO TAKE THE OATH DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM THE JOB ON ACCOUNT OF THE SHEER IRRESPONSIBILITY OF IT ALL.

But there would be no appealing to such a person on these grounds. Since his priorities are not the priorities of decent responsible humans everywhere.

Australians may even be a little bit more free than Americans right now. Perhaps in some ways. Perhaps over all. Perhaps not. Its a hard thing to estimate. But that we live in the shadow of whatever freedom the Americans enjoy ought to be obvious. And this was highlighted lately, at least for me, when Paulson came up with this bullshit stiumulus package idea that goes contrary to all thats known about economics.

AN ATTACK ON CIVILISATIONS FOUNDATIONS IN THE US, DELIVERS A DEVASTATING BLOW HERE IN AUSTRALIA.

Here is Paulson ignorantly going for these anti-economics programs of stimulus packages and bailouts, and suddenly here in Australia, the balance of forces is so tipped that we apparently don’t understand economics anymore. Apparently just the example, of this insane huckster Paulson, violating economic science causes our guys to forget everything that they knew about economics, and we are all on board for the rebellion upon economic science, and we are going to SPEND our way out of a recession.

You NEVER spend your way out of a recession. Not by asking people to spend more on consumer goods, nor by getting the government to spend more. If you actually understand economics this is irrational. Its straight illogic to be even so much as contemplating this. Sometimes there can be a role for monetary policy. But never can there be a role for stimulating demand via consumer spending exhortations or government spending more. No-ones shown how this could possibly work. Its the worst thing you can do. The best thing you can hope to achieve with this irrationality is to rig the figures such that we can DECLARE we are out of the recession.

And yet Paulson runs a stimulus package and a bailout and our guys forget all this. They forget it. Or more correctly, the guys who understand economics are marginalised, and the really dumb dum-dums become ascendant. Either way. The same result.

So if the Americans flout their law then our guys will flout OUR LAW. The conservatives might flout our law for a worthy cause at first and then the left will do it for high wickedness and it will be bi-partisan. Paulson effortlessly buggered our understanding of economics in this country just by going ahead with bad policy. And BARRY Adolph Hussein Barrack Osama-SOETORO will bugger the key foundation of L.A.W. LAW over here, merely by taking the oath.

Barry IS NOT competent to be President even though he does not NEED to be incompetent to an absolute scourge. He will do the damage to the US, and to us here in Australia, merely by walking around in front of the cameras, breathing the same air as us. He will do immense damage merely by being there in the White House,  AS IF he is not the usurper. AS IF he is not a criminal. AS IF he is not a traitor and a walking violation of the constitution, the rule of law, civilisation, the principle of equality before the law, and the principles of a Republic.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Republic and democracy are not incompatible dipshit.

    DID I SAY THEY WERE INCOMPATIBLE YOU STUPID CUNT???? NO I DIDN’T DID I? DEMOCRATIC PROCEDURES ARE A FEATURE OF A REPUBLIC THEY ARE NOT THE REPUBLIC ITSELF BUT A FEATURE OF IT. A THING IS WHAT IT IS. NOT SOME CONSTITUENT PART OF THAT THING.
    .
    The words come from very similar terms in Greek and Latin: Dēmos kratos (People rule) and Res publica (Public thing). Read a book.

    READ A BOOK ON LOGIC YOU STUPID COCKSUCKER. DON’T BE COMING HERE TO TELL ME TO READ A BOOK YOU MORONIC BRAIN DEAD CUNT.

    IS THERE SOME SORT OF POINT TO ALL THIS STUPIDITY DUMMY?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: