Posted by: graemebird | December 15, 2008

Orly Taitz: American Media Acted Worse Than Russian Communist Media

YouTube – Inauguration Obama Tickets Not so Fast by Orly Taitz Birth Scandal Supreme Court decides

Orly  is one of the lawyers working to stop the Usurper from getting into the White House. She is stunned by the behaviour of the American media in this regard. Its so very hard to understand this sort of growing stupidity and dishonesty. I have no real explanation for it except as some sort of side effect of the new media. Or perhaps its some sort of delayed reaction to reduced religiosity.  Or it could be long-term Gramscian plotting in education finally getting to paydirt. Or it could be the long-term effect of government involvement in education.

I don’t know. But there is no use being in denial of a phenomenon for lack of explanation as to how it could be happening. 

With regards to the Americans specifically, it is noticeable that it is many people born outside of America that are stunned by this problem. Not one major media outlet pointed out that Obama was posting a fake document on his website, that was not a birth certificate, and even the fact that it wasn’t a birth certificate didn’t mean a thing since it was an obvious fake.  See Orly speaking before the National Press Club below. 

The electoral college must do its duty. We are all counting on them now to do the right thing.

YouTube – Inauguration Obama Tickets Not so Fast by Orly Taitz Birth Scandal Supreme Court decides

Advertisements

Responses

  1. “If peak oil isn’t about price, why is anyone remotely interested in it?” This is from dover beach. Now apparently dover beach is going for his PHD.

    Look we have to get away from this utter devotion to stupidity. Why are people willing to make pre-emptive judgements on matters that they do not understand on the conceptual level? Every one of the Catallaxians appears to be utterly in love with their ignorance and unreason. So all of them made judgements about the reverse speech business whilst refusing to watch the youtubes. Yet nearly all of them are CO2-bedwetters though 50 billions of money wasted on this speculation has turned up nothing.

    For three years I’ve gone over and over and over this peak oil concept and yet these people still do not grasp the concept YET THEY REJECT IT. Its a stupid concept to reject. Its really just about the EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION in mathematics. Its like rejecting one and one is two.

    But there you go. This problem of rampant and defiant stupidity. And its taken an incredible grip on Catallaxy. Perhaps the stupidest centrist website in the world.

  2. Dover you fuciking moron. If you were the least bit interested you would simply ASK. What a fucking dope you are.

    But its not your congenital stupidity that is the problem. It is your TOTAL DEVOTION TO YOUR OWN STUPIDITY. It is your love of your own ignorance. You ask the question. But are not the least bit interested in the answer.

    Well here is the maths component of the concept. But don’t bother because you would never understand it.

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY

  3. here we have the biggest corruption scandal in the US for a long time involving Obama’s chief of staff. he may or may not have been involved but this is the sort of thing you should be following.

    and what are you talking about instead?

    his fucking birth certificate.
    ITS NOT ABOUT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE. THE CORRUPT COOK COUNTY SCUZZBALL IS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HENCE WE WON’T HAVE TO PUT UP WITH ALL THE SCANDAL SUPPRESSERS HE’S BRINGING TO WASHINGTON IF HE GETS ROLLED AND SOMEONE ELSE IS PRESIDENT. OBVIOUSLY, GIVEN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, HIS LACK OF ELIGIBILITY HOLDS PRECEDENCE. I KNEW HE WAS CROOKED ALREADY. YOU KNOW HE’S CROOKED. EVERYONE KNOWS HE’S CROOKED. BUT ITS NO BIG DEAL SO LONG AS HE ISN’T SWORN IN.

  4. I am involved in following it. And OF COURSE!!!! his cheif of staff is involved. As is Obama. They are all dirty and you would not be able to rise up in the world of cook county politics without being dirty. I was the first one to mention the scandal on the David Horowitz blog. You see an allusion to it when I talk about the USA becoming cook county and surrounding districts. I cannot believe that you nincompoops actually supported Obama and Borked the honest Ron Paul. I mean you stand to live quite a long time if you don’t die of unnatural causes. Yet you support all these things that are going to hurt us. That are going to lead to us seeing our girls in grave distress. The future of our younger relatives compromised.

    If you had an historical framework you might have more chance of seeing the irresponsibility of supporting Obama.

  5. You also Borked Palin. An absolute sweetheart. Really intelligent. And clean. Not corrupt. Beholden to her constituents and a representative of free enterprise values that you ludicrously claim to support.

    http://au.youtube.com/results?search_query=Obama+Certificate&search_type=&aq=f

  6. The disgrace that the American media has created, I believe, is due to the wealth of the communist, America hating, George Soros. He owns the mainstream media and most of the Democrats in Congress. I think he is the evil catalast behind Obama’s success. I almost think of him as the Great Satan.

  7. Well he’s certainly a malign influence. He’s a weird guy. He’s got this Popperian-sounding notion of what an open society is all about. And yet he sponsors all these real leftist fruitcakes. A very strange man.

  8. Hey hoosiermom. I think you’ll like those Palin youtubes speaking at the governors conference. At last we get to see her without the media firestorm talking nonsense about her or trying to wrong-foot her via her obvious discomfort with some of the things she had to support with McCain.

    The Governors, or at least the fiscally responsible patriotic ones, ought to be expanding their co-operation as a sort of resistance to the nasty side of Washington.

  9. http://www.catallaxyfiles.com/blog/?p=3927#comments

    It will be interesting what GMB says about this, if anything. He consistently misunderstands a what ponzi scheme is, so the discovery of (what may prove to be – it has not been tested in court) a real one may just confuse him. The Obama story may mean that he ends up being right, but for the wrong reasons.
    C’est la vie.

  10. I would have thought its all rather old news. All par for the course. No I didn’t know about the Nasdaq ponzi-scheme its true. But ponzi-schemes are how these guys are making their money now. Not just bank-cash-pyramiding. But universal pyramiding of any homogenous tradeable item. So gold and silver pyramiding. Share pyramiding. You name it.

    For example when it came to Goldman-Sachs share commissions they were down to under 1% margins. You simply couldn’t make any money that way. Their money they were making under Paulson was called “Prime Brokerage”. This was a euphemism for a ponzi-scheme wherein they would hire out the same shares to many different people for them to short-sell.

    You can just imagine where the competitive advantage lies there. Its in your legal people and your bigshots working like demons to figure out who they can get away with merely stalling, who they can present an IOU to and who they have to authentically transfer the shares over to.

    Anyway this is a wealth destroying rather than a wealth-creating exercise. And these corrupt practices would have take over the system any time in the past but in the past WHAT THE AUDITORS FAILED TO PICK UP THE RECESSION WOULD DEAL WITH.

    WHAT THE AUDITORS FAILED TO PICK UP THE RECESSION WOULD DEAL WITH.

    Funnily enough it was Gailbraith who had a better quote explaining just this notion. One of your lefties might remember it.

    But now Paulson has decisively deep-sixed the enema that the recession would have brought. Not by preventing the recession. He has made that far worse. Rather by isolating the bankers from the consequences of their own fraud. By stopping the bankers from being cleaned out.

    Yes free banking can “work” if you are willing to be sufficiently ruthless about it. Hence the Humphreys position is wrong but not totally inconsistent or undoable. Neither Paulson would likely have a dime to their name under free-banking and they certainly wouldn’t be bigshots under 100% backing.

    Sometimes when a place is so corrupt and a person is so scandalous the sheer amount of their scandals can serve as protection to them as opponents divide themselves between scandals and therefore lack the follow-through to bring the crooks down over any one scandal. Hence the forces for good and righteousness in America were skillfully sidetracked into blowjobs and cum-stains whereas the real scandal was treason for the benefit of the Chinese, possibly murder, and the serial abuse of women (not the sex but running them down and intimidating them afterwards).

    In this way more scandals being exploded right about now could paradoxically save the usurper, although you would think it would go the other way and hopefully it might.

    • “But, and it’s a big but (nearly nanu’s wife’s size?), the theory is one thing and the actuality of reaching the point is another. The recent price climb was the basis for peak-oil-is-on-us hysteria and the reduction in the price is just as good evidence that it is not.”

      You are only halfway there pedro. Your analysis fell apart when you got to the above quote since peak oil is about supply. The higher prices didn’t lead to greater supply as they would have at any time prior to 2005. Which means of course that these lower prices will cause reduced supply in the works, not including anything that will be going on with synthetics.

      • “So let me get this right, Fisk. the upward non linear supply of oil since 1860 doesn’t refute peak oil and neither does falling real prices.”

        OF COURSE IT DOESN’T YOU STUPID CUNT CAMBRIA.

        “So in other words because demand has risen faster than supply in some years due to the global integration of (say) India and china we have suddenly hit peak oil.”

        NO THATS GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH IT YOU STUPID CUNT CAMBRIA.

        “This theory doesn’t allow for the fact that only about 3% of the world surface has been explored.”

        THE THEORY STILL HOLDS YOU STUPID CUNT CAMBRIA. BUT THIS FACT YOU MENTION IS MORE LIKELY TO LEAD TO A LONG PLATEAU RATHER THEN THE CLASSIC MODEL WHICH WOULD MEAN A FAST DROP-OFF IN PRODUCTION.

        “…one other thing the concept of peak oil has been proved wrong. the person who suggested peak oil said we would reach peak supplies sometime in the 90’s. That’s wrong so his theory was wrong. Sorry.”

        I’M SORRY THAT YOU ARE SO FUCKING STUPID YOU FUCKING STUPID CUNT. SINCE THIS IN NO WAY UNDERMINES PEAK OIL THEORY, BASED AS IT IS LARGELY ON THE EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION, AND THE TRADITIONAL GROWTH RATE WASN’T HELD TO DURING THAT TIME. THERE WERE SUPPLY DISRUPTIONS AND OBSTACLES TO EXPLOITATION.

        Seriously , is peak oil a cult thing?”

        NO ITS A PROVEN FACT OF FUCKING REALITY. ITS ALREADY HAPPENED. YOU ARE SUCH A DUMB CUNT THAT YOU CANNOT RECOGNIZE THE REALITY THATS ALREADY HAPPENED.

        See you are a fucking moron Cambria. You refuse to understand the theory. No its not being refuted its being relentlessly confirmed. If you weren’t such a DUMB CUNT you would realise that you had to UNDERSTAND the theory before you were in a position to judge it.

        Why do you keep on fucking claiming that peak oil has anything to do with prices. You are a dumb cunt. With emphasis on cunt and dumb.

      • There is a three-step program here. A three-step program needed for Cambria.

        1. UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT. Including where the exponential function fits into the concept.

        2. Swear off being a cunt.

        3. Swear off taking great personal pride in your own ignorance and stupidity.

        Now it might be that thats 25 steps. Since steps two and three might each constitute or necessitate a 12-step program. But the fact is that peak oil is a valid concept, and all the facts back up its validity and no facts go against it. None whatsoever.

  11. Peak Oil is a pretty straight-forward theory, regardless of what implications you choose to draw from it. I’m surprised that so many people have such an extreme allergy to acknowledging a potential limit to the production/supply of oil.

    • Right. Its symptomatic of a wider corruption. Of a wider embrace of stupidity as a way of life. Cambria has given himself over to the stupid demon for a while now.

  12. If you look at it as a wider commitment to stupidity we see it happening all the time. Yesterday with Porter doing debauch to any prior notion of what randomness consisted of. And earlier we saw dover/pedro/Edney taking a self-contradictory approach to world war II which amounted to choosing stupid ahead of modifying their views.

    • “No, not in the sense you mean. We could move away from oil as energy substitutes move in. We are already seeing subs such as oil sands. However the the price of oil sands based energy is uneconomic with cheap oil.”

      Cambrias stupidity is just oppressive. The Peak oil concept is entirely silent on substitutes.

      • The new solution. DON’T TALK ABOUT IT AND IT WILL GO AWAY. This one put over by that silly bugger pedro:

        “Very true, so why talk about something that is the bleeding obvious…. IF ITS BLEEDING OBVIOUS WHY ARE YOU NOT CRITICISING CAMBRIA, SINCLAIR, HILL AND SOON FOR NOT ADMITTING TO THE BLEEDING OBVIOUS at one level and which won’t be truly identified until many many years after the fact? STUPID QUESTION SINCE WE ARE ALREADY AT PEAK OIL. WHAT IS YOUR POINT?The market will solve the problem one way or the other YOU FUCKING STUPID CUNT. HAS THE ENVIRONMENTALIST MOVEMENT ESCAPED YOUR ATTENTION absent silly government meddling, which can’t be discounted obviously.CAN’T BE DISCOUNTED? THE CAP-AND-KILL, AND THE ANTI-NUCLEAR MOVEMENT ARE FACTS OF FUCKING REALITY.

        WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEDRO. WE HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THIS REALITY SO THAT THESE ASSHOLES CANNOT DESTROY US.

        pedro
        14 Dec 08 at 10:26 pm

      • “I suspect you and fisk are talking past each other a bit.”

        Get it right pedro. Fisk is doing OK. Its Cambria and Soon that are being appallingly stupid cunts. They should admit they are wrong.

      • “Pedr

        Until now nearly all the US coastline was unavailable for exploration inside the 90 mile limit. Inland areas of the US were also prohibited by laws set up by the Dems.

        there may be political peak oil but that is a different issue.”

        There is no substitute for actually understanding the theory you fucking moron. Where is it that you think you can make a sensible comment about the theory WITHOUT FUCKING UNDERSTANDING THE THEORY?

        You are just a fucking idiot mate.

  13. “The Peak oil concept is entirely silent on substitutes.”

    Precisely. There’s so much confusion and misinformation over Peak Oil. When people say that substitutes and/or low prices “refute” Peak Oil, it’s pretty clear that they have a weak handle on the theory.

  14. what’s the point of an economic theory that doesn’t look at substitutes?

    • WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT SOON?

      Peak oil is reality. Its a powerful predictive model that you keep lying and saying is bullshit. And it is silent on substitutes. What crap are you talking? Just stop being a stupid cunt. Now how about learning the concept? Three fucking years and still don’t understand it. The first time you and Cambria show up at the clock and you don’t understand the concept, prior to that you don’t understand the concept, two years on you don’t understand the concept, and you have influenced Mark Hill in your ignorance and yet you confidently AND WRONGLY YOU STUPID CUNT, say that the concept is bullshit.

      The idea is not to be a stupid cunt. Now if you understood the concept is would be very easy for us to show you its usefulness. But if you are a cunt, in love with your ignorance and error, you don’t even get that far.

      • “To me peak oil theory is about whether we will run out of oil at a time when we are all still heavily dependent on it and society and the economy will therefore collapse. This is the political and policy context in which peak oil is discussed, the rest is irrelevant. It’s the impact on prices and whether we can shift in time that matters. It’s evident the answer to that question is that so called peak oil is of no consequence, as the linked article suggests.”

        WHAT IS THE POINT OF LYING ABOUT THE THEORY YOU STUPID CUNT?

        LOOK JASON. WHAT IS THE POINT OF LYING ABOUT THE THEORY. YOU SAID THE THEORY WAS IN TATTERS. wHAT IS THE POINT OF MAKING UP THE THEORY, FAILING TO UNDERSTAND IT, THEN SAYING ITS WRONG WHEN ITS NOT WRONG?

        WHY DO YOU HAVE THIS POWERFUL COMMITMENT TO BEING A STUPID CUNT?

        WHY NOT JUST UNDERSTAND THE THEORY?

      • WHY NOT JUST UNDERSTAND THE THEORY YOU DUMB CUNT?

        FOR THREE YEARS YOU HAVE BEEN TELLING US THAT THE THEORY WAS WRONG. AND STILL YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND IT? WHY NOT JUST UNDERSTAND IT?

        WHAT IS THIS FUCKING CULT OF IDIOCY THAT YOU AND CAMBRIA ARE DETERMINED TO STICK WITH?

        WHY NOT JUST UNDERSTAND THE FUCKING THEORY.

        YOU STUPID GOOD CUNT IS THE IDEA FOR YOU TO MAKE UP AN ALTERNATIVE PEAK OIL THEORY AND JUST INSERT IT WHENEVER YOU FEEL LIKE IT?

      • “why not just write a 10,000 word description of oil and call it peak oil theory?”

        WHY NOT JUST STOP BEING A CUNT, STOP MAKING UP THE THEORY AND JUST FUCKING UNDERSTAND THE THEORY YOU FUCKING STUPID GOOK CUNT.

        YOU SAID IT WAS IN TATTERS. BUT ITS NOT. THE DAILY OUTPUT OF THE TRADITIONAL OIL WELLS HAVEN’T INCREASED. THE PRICE FALL IS FOR OTHER REASONS AND WHOLLY ON THE DEMAND SIDE. THATS AN IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION YOU STUPID CUNT.

        3 YEARS AND NO PROGRESS.

        YOU ARE A FUCKING DUMB CUNT MATE.

        ONCE AGAIN.

        WHY NOT JUST DETERMINE THAT YOU ARE GOING TO UNDERSTAND THE MODEL.

        WHAT A REVOLUTIONARY FUCKING IDEA YOU DUMB CUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  15. It was entirely obvious how fisk on one side and JC and Jason on the other were talking past each other.

    THEY WEREN’T TALKING PAST EACHOTHER YOU STUPID FUCKWIT.

    WHAT WAS HAPPENING IS THAT BOTH JASON AND CAMBRIA WERE BEING STUPID CUNTS LIKE THEY ALWAYS ARE ON THIS SUBJECT. FISK WAS BEING FINE. THATS NOT SOME SORT OF EQUALITY WHERE TWO PARTIES ARE TALKING PAST EACHOTHER. THIS IS WILLFUL STUPIDITY ON ONE SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT ONLY.

    WHETHER JASON AND CAMBRIA HAPPEN TO BE WRONG OR RIGHT THEY ARE USUSALLY TOTAL FUCKWITS WITH THE WAY THEY ARE ARGUMING.

    Just stop and take a breath for god’s sake.

    NO FUCK YOU PEDRO. THERE THEY WERE BEING CUNTS AND YOU DECIDED TO GO ALONG WITH THE STUPID SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT.

    Yes production will peak / has peaked. No you don’t know whether it has because you don’t know about future production.

    ITS PEAKED ALREADY YOU STUPID CUNT. THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE TRADITIONAL OILWELL OUTPUT TO SUBSTANTIALLY OUTDO ITS 2005 DAILY OUTPUT ANYTIME IN THE NEXT FEW DECADES AMOUNTS TO JUST ABOUT NIL. THATS BECAUSE IT IS A VERY POWERFUL MODEL

    No it is not going to be a problem because pretty much every pollie in the world will want to get reelected.

    NO THATS WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW. HOW IS IT THAT WE DON’T ALREADY HAVE NUCLEAR. YOU CANNOT RELY ON GOOD POLICY. OR HOW IS IT THAT WE DON’T HAVE GOOD POLICY ON THAT LOGIC.

    You can see that right now with Krudd gonig to water on this ETS.

    YOU STUPID CUNT. THEY ARE STILL PLANNING TO HAVE ONE. AND ITS ONLY THE MANIFEST COOLING AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS THAT IS SLOWING THEIR DESTRUCTIVENESS. THE UNCERTAINTY IS ENOUGH TO STOP INVESTMENT IN CARBON-PRODUCING ALTERNATIVES.

    CHOOSE LOGIC YOU STUPID CUNT WON’T YOU PEDRO? YOUR JOB WAS TO SLAM THE STUPID SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT.

  16. You don’t know if production has permanently peaked because you don’t know how much oil will be found in the future.

    YES WE DO KNOW THAT PRODUCTION HAS PERMANENTLY PEAKED ON A DECADAL LEVEL. SINCE THAT IS WHAT THE MODEL SHOWS. CAN YOU IMAGINE A SCENARIO WHERE WE COULD BEAT THAT PEAK CONSISTENTLY OVER ANY MORE THAN A NEGLIGIBLE TIME PERIOD? FAT CHANCE OF THAT. WE SEE THAT YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE MODEL.

    Why do you think we don’t have nuclear here? Is it because of stupid government decisions? Or is it because nuclear costs more than coal power?

    THE FORMER. WE KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. ITS BECAUSE OF STUPID GOVERNMENT POLICY SINCE NUCLEAR IS MUCH CHEAPER THAN COAL.

    Penny-dropped yet? Even now a nuclear shill like Ziggy wants a big carbon tax to make nuclear viable.

    THATS ZIGGY TALKING NONSENSE.

    Sure the 5% ETS is bad, but I predict we won’t even get that.

    EVEN THE THOUGHT OF HAVING IT IS DOING US HARM. MONEY IS A COWARD AND THE INVESTMENT WILL NOT GO AHEAD. IF THE IDIOTS KNEW HOW MUCH TROUBLE THEY WERE IN THEY WOULD GET RID OF THE COMPANY TAX, SORT OUT THE NUCLEAR OPTION, CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING RUTHLESSLY, AND SO FORTH.

    IT BETTER TO LEARN THE MODEL PEDRO. ITS ALWAYS BETTER NOT TO BE IGNORANT.

    YOU ARE IGNORANT AND EVERY POINT I MADE STILL STANDS.

  17. Just to summarise. In Pedro’s view there is no problem, even though according to energy economics and peak oil theory there is a massive problem. Why is there no problem in pedro’s view? Well he claims that there will not be a problem because the pollies will look to their voter base.

    This is rubbish since were this the case we would have good policy whereas policy is frightful. For example we don’t have nuclear even though its the cheapest form of electricity available and even though the failure to have nuclear goes against all valid notions of sustainability.

    So pedro is talking idiocy. He may be making the same fallacy that appears to be a Catallaxy staple. And that it the following obsessively made mistake in logic.

    1. A Free Market Would Handle the Situation Adequately Even From This Absolutely Dire Position.

    2. Ergo we will handle this situation adequately.

    Obviously the above argument makes no sense at all. But the crowd at Catallaxy always make it just the same.

  18. Graeme, I see you are a fan of models. I guess that explains your fervent belief in AGW theories. No wonder you want nuclear, we’ve got to get away from Carbon, before we all die!!!!

    I wish I new earlier that the future supply of any resource could be determined by looking at the right model. And there I was thinking you’d have to look in the ground or something. How silly. I’ll tell my geologist friend to look for new work.

    Sure policy tends to be frightful. The pollies always stuff these things up. I think that explains why we’re all ready scratching a living from subsistance farms.

    I see you are not in favour of the free market either. I suppose that is consistent with your desire to ban fractional reserve banking. You’re not channeling Homer Paxton are you?

    One day we won’t use oil for much, and that’s because other things will be cheaper. However, you can’t make economic sense saying the process needs to be rushed. That just gets you a congratulatory call from the head of Manildra. Those guys no a patsy when they see one.

  19. What are you talking about pedro you dope.

    The peak oil model isn’t about how much gear is still in the ground. Rather its about the daily output.

    It really does pay to understand the model dummy. This is not a computer model where the dumb leftists are hiding their assumptions. All the assumptions are clear and up front and you can audit them yourself.

    Now GO AND UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

    Its always best to understand what you are talking about. The peak oil model relates the exponential function to the peculiar nature of oil wells. And its a very powerful bit of reasoning.

  20. You cannot possibly outline a credible scenario where todays traditional oil production can be exceeded anytime in the next 20 years. Unless we are talking some radical global elimination of government spending and company tax that leads to a much faster level of capital development which leads to a massive tooling up for deep sea exploitation.

  21. Graeme. The market works

    • Yes a market economy does work. Congratulations for making the same logical mistake you always make over and over and over again you stupid gook cunt!!!!

      Look its offensive for you not to correct your mistakes you fucking dope. How do you manage to make the same logical mistake so many times over you fuckwit, even though its been pointed out to you.

      Show up again. And correct your logical mistake.

      Why are you so determined to be a fucking moron cunt for the rest of your life?

      So thats three years getting peak oil wrong. How long is this PARTICULAR logical fallacy going to be a relentless feature of your irrationality?

      • Notice that the stupid gook cunt Jason Soon made exactly the same logical mistake he always makes EVEN THOUGH I HAD JUST GONE OVER THAT LOGICAL MISTAKE SHORTLY BEFORE:

        “ust to summarise. In Pedro’s view there is no problem, even though according to energy economics and peak oil theory there is a massive problem. Why is there no problem in pedro’s view? Well he claims that there will not be a problem because the pollies will look to their voter base.

        This is rubbish since were this the case we would have good policy whereas policy is frightful. For example we don’t have nuclear even though its the cheapest form of electricity available and even though the failure to have nuclear goes against all valid notions of sustainability.

        So pedro is talking idiocy. He may be making the same fallacy that appears to be a Catallaxy staple. And that it the following obsessively made mistake in logic.

        1. A Free Market Would Handle the Situation Adequately Even From This Absolutely Dire Position.

        2. Ergo we will handle this situation adequately.

        Obviously the above argument makes no sense at all. But the crowd at Catallaxy always make it just the same.”

        So this gook cunt is just offensive.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: