Posted by: graemebird | February 12, 2009

Country Women Of Means Vastly Improve Mother Nature/The Environmentalists Murdered Brian Naylor.

  1. Environmentalists are not defenders of the environment. They are the great destroyers of the environment. They turned these areas into a death trap for man and beast. Millions of animals have died in gasping asphyxiation or in searing blistering, pain, thanks to this evil twisted philosophy.

    So don’t be putting words in my mouth. I was talking about environmentalists. I was not talking about defenders of the environment. And the defenders of the environment are the property owners who typically try to make their own property a better environment, with whatever resources they have left, once the public service goons have finished rifling through their pockets.

    This fundamental fact of reality, (that is to say that MAN improves upon nature) may be slightly less evident today when Keynesianism, fiat-fractional reserve, height restrictions, zoning and regulations more generally….. have so inflated land prices, that having bought some property most of us then lack the resources to properly improve the environment of that property, though it is our natural tendency to do just that..

    MOTHER NATURE IS A NAZI BITCH-GODDESS AND  NEEDS TAMING AND IMPROVING.

    The man must break her like a horse. And the woman must turn her into a lady.

    That it is innate for humans to improve upon Mother Nature is particularly evident in the behaviour of our retired country women of some wealth and means. The tendency is for such people to understand far more about horticulture then any latte-drinking wanker from the city who wants to make a dignified country lady get approval for anything her creativity and industry might come up with.

    Face it. The public service posers who make up environmentalist ranks think of country Anglo-Saxons as scum. The new Jews as it were. Why worry if their flesh gets seared and all their dreams go up in smoke? That the environmentalists are themselves top heavy in Anglos does not make it any better.

    A country Victorian woman who produces a garden of glorious species diversity and great visual beauty…. she is a defender of the environment. She is the real defender of the environment. But now her garden has been sent to hell by this demonic movement. Years of careful dedication and hard to explain joy, trashed and made ashes.

    THE TENDENCY OF HUMANS (UNDER CAPITALISM) TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT SOMEWHAT TAINTED BY HISTORICAL LAND TITLEING PRACTICES.

    It is true that in colonial times and beyond we didn’t homestead the land properly. We wound up with properties sitting back to back with a shared fence, insufficient throughways, buffer zones,  rivers unrighteously claimed (since they were not plausibly improved upon), and not enough basically unowned land left aside, with understandings of how one might use this land as one were passing through.

    Its true that this sort of hyper-enclosure movement doesn’t lead to the best outcomes environmentally, or socially for that matter.

    But with that proviso aside, it is natural for free men to improve on nature in terms of diverisity and beauty. Mother Nature is a nasty little slut when it comes down to it, and she needs improving. She needs hosing down and dressing up.

    Yes the greens murdered Brian Naylor and you aint seen nothing yet. Because they are totally unrepentant and are using the crisis, purely of their own making, as further fuel to cause ever more vast human eradication.

    They are running an energy-deprivation campaign in a world where most people live in the balance between getting-by on one hand, and real-poverty on the other. And in running this energy-deprivation campaign, the environmentalists are setting up hundreds of millions of people for the kill. Just as they set up Brian and all the others. There is no hoping that they will stop of their own accord.

    ONLY A WITCH-HUNT LEADING SO MASSIVE SACKINGS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR WILL STOP THEM. Nothing else will stop them and there is no need to carry out this witch-hunt with rancour just so long as we know we can get many thousands of sackings.

    The environmentalist taxeaters are far too belligerent for anything but a witch-hunt, culminating in mass-sackings (public sector only) to stop them. Surely we owe the victims this much. To make sure that there is some sort of payback for what was done to them. And the assurance that we have at least reduced the level of idiocy in public policy.

    Over at one site yesterday I couldn’t get even one lefty to admit the clear and inescapable reality of the DDT-bureaucratisation-holocaust. So there is never any remorse for the evil that they do. Each new success in killing seems to make their shadows grow larger. They must find it all quite thrilling. There is some inner blast of excitement going on here with these guys. Or how else would you explain their behavour?

    Take some Westy twin away at birth and give him a rich person upbringing. Let him get a humanities degree and a job in the public service. While his twin brother is throwing rocks off some bridge with his mates. While the home twin is  dazzling pilots with a laser torch,. While the poor-boy twin is trying to wreck train-tracks and set them up for disaster,  While this is going on the rich-boy twin will be joining the environmentalist movement and saying stupid things like “climate change is real.” Every environmentalist is like Edmund in King Lear. Casually wicked. Trying to manipulate events in the direction of catastrophe. Not because of driving ambition. But just out of the ho-hum hell of it.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. FDB’s crowd have just murdered 300 people or so. FDB reckons that industrial-CO2 is to blame. We will see that by his own words he disproves this. But after his crowd murders all these people he goes into full holocaust-denial mode He reckons ABSOLUTELY NOTHING COULD HAVE BEEN DONE ABOUT IT. Its nothing to do with greenie efforts going back decades. It came out of a clear blue sky and no setup. And he reckons it was fate and they were all going to die anyhow and thems the breaks.

    “What hasn’t been much commented on is the heavy and widespread rains in Victoria last Oct/Nov. This created a large and unseasonal growth spurt in weeds and understorey, which promptly died back when things dried out again. Nothing could be done about this of course, as you absolutely cannot burn off in the middle of summer.”

    Nothing could be done. The socialist action of burning is the only solution to fuel problems. And they were all going to die. It was fate. No environmentalists to see at the crime scene.

    Now notice he comes up with a truth that completely pulverises the Karoly et al lies that this is to do with “climate change”.

    They say it will get so dry and there will be droughts and massive fire and thats the future. In reality of course the big fires come with a dry part of summer sure. But there has to be a wet winter and spring buildup to get eh fuel levels up.

    So forest fires are a product of wet springs and winters co-incidentally followed by a hot summer.

    Hardly consistent with the lies that this has anything to do with global warming or any of that jive.

  2. global warming = more heat. more heat = more evaporation. more evaporation = more rain in cooler seasons. geddit?

    NOT THATS ALL WRONG.

    1. WHEN YOU SAY “GLOBAL WARMING” YOU MEAN INDUSTRIAL-CO2-RELEASE. WHICH DOESN’T WARM ANYTHING THAT WE KNOW OF. IT MAY WARM A LITTLE OR COOL A LITTLE. wHAT-EVER EFFECT THAT IT HAS IS SMALL ENOUGH TO ESCAPE UNDER THE EVIDENCE BAR.

    2. ITS NOT WARMING ANY MORE ITS COOLING.

    3. WARMING IN ANY TIME PERIOD MUCH LONGER THAN A DECADE LEADS TO MORE AND NOT LESS RAIN. COOLING LEADS TO LESS RAIN AND MORE DROUGHT.

    4. THE FACTS OF BIG FIRES CONTRADICT OUTRIGHT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. SINCE THE BIG FIRES COME WHEN WE HAVE A WET WINTER AND SPRING, CAUSING A FUEL BUILDUP, COINCIDENTAL WITH A VERY HOT AND DRY BLOCK IN THE SUMMER. HENCE THESE FIRES ARE IN NO WAY CAUSED BY GENERAL LOSS OF RAINFALL.

  3. Birdy,

    Global warming does not involve a general loss of rainfall. (Read again what tractatus wrote.)

    And in any case, these tragic events which are due to a combination of circumstances, mainly the arsenists who lit the fires and the heavy winds which propagated them at high speed.

    Using these events to try to make cheap political points is a SIN.

    Nobody will take you seriously as long as you call the “greenies” murderers.

  4. Global warming, if it occurred which it won’t, would involve a general GAIN in rainfall. We can get that right for starters. They are not due to a combination of circumstances. The fires might be. But the deaths (or virtually all of them) are due to the environmentalists alone. You would be tripping to think that the conditions would not lead to some sort of fires. But fires are not deaths. We always have had fires. But never this many deaths. Its the environmentalists that caused the deaths.

    Fire need not have equated to deaths but that the environmentalist movement made it so.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: