If Phil Berg and Orly Taitz have been wrong about all other matters in their life prior it hardly matters because they are right in this case. Of that we can be sure. And David Horowitz has likely been right about more things than almost anyone else these last 20 years, but we can be absolutely confident that he is wrong in this case. And this isn’t a bad thing. Its a good thing. It shows us that we must not diefy anyone, and that we must always think for ourselves.
So you of deep pockets don’t stop contributing to frontpage. It has set the standard, in the power of its journalism and the strength of its intellectual rigour with only a few weak spots here and there. Its like Pat Buchanan. I love him. I think he’s marvellous. But he’s too harsh on Israel. Its not an absolutist thing but he’s just consistently too hard on them. Well nobodies perfect you know.
If Phil Berg and Orly Taitz were wrong in EVERY CONSTITUENT PART OF THEIR CASE, taken in its entirety their case would still be right. The case of Orly Taitz and Phillip Bergs is the case for reason, rationality, vigilance, lawfulness, and respect for the Republic and the greatest and most noble human experiment ever undertaken in the history of mankind.
Entirely independent of whose right and whose wrong on each and every constituent part of the argument, the case against Philip Berg and Orly Taitz is a case in favour of OCCULT-EPISTEMOLOGY, spitting on the constitution, giving special priviledges to marxists, the cold racism of condescension to black people, anti-vigilance, flippancy for the long-term, nihilism and everything unrighteous and rotten.
Now what do I mean by Occult Epistemology? Well we can only know the truth through: reason and convergent evidence. Phillip Berg and Orly Taitz are saying PROVE ME WRONG. Prove me wrong. They are only asking to be proved wrong. Now whats wrong with being proved wrong? What is wrong with THAT?
But the side opposed to them are claiming that they know things they cannot possibly know and they are claiming that no investigation is necessary. What sort of equal-opportunity idiocy is THIS?
BEIGE DON’T MAKE IT BETTER.
Its not alright to have a Marxist Usurper in the White House. Its not alright to pretend that you KNOW!!!!! that he is neither a marxist, nor a Usurper, when you cannot possibly know this.
People act like these things are alright but they are not. Like UN soldiers raping the black women they are supposed to be protecting, folks act like thats not a biggie. But these things are not alright. They are not OK. They aren’t. Get used to it they are not alright. And who people voted for is such a minor point on this score, that its virtually tantamount to an irrelevancy.
Its not OK to get people used to welfare and then suddenly pull the rug from under them and leave them to die. That the Americans have practiced defense welfarism all this time does not mean that you ought not give my country, and Taiwan, and perhaps Japan just a few years to become independent defense-wise if you want to take the Ron Paul angle and wash your hands of your dependents.
I say this to remind you that though you have the right to be totally independent and never let another of your soldiers die on the basis of defense welfarism, the fact is we could have developed nuclear weapons but decided not to on account of your assurances. Thats my country Australia, Thailand and Japan.
This may seem a tangential matter but I bring it in to say it doesn’t matter a tinkers cuss if each and every one of you Americans voted for a marxist usurper in the White House.
You have wider responsibilities and no such person must be allowed that much power. Right now particularly is a time for vigilance and for grown-up behaviour. And you must investigate this man, and if his presence breaks a million oaths to the constitution, then he must go… and preferably in chains.