Posted by: graemebird | April 2, 2009

Berg/Taitz Are Right Even If They Are Wrong

If Phil Berg and Orly Taitz have been wrong about all other matters in their life prior it hardly matters because they are right in this case. Of that we can be sure. And David Horowitz has likely been right about more things than almost anyone else these last 20 years, but we can be absolutely confident that he is wrong in this case. And this isn’t a bad thing. Its a good thing. It shows us that we must not diefy anyone, and that we must always think for ourselves.

So you of deep pockets don’t stop contributing to frontpage. It has set the standard, in the power of its journalism and the strength of its intellectual rigour with only a few weak spots here and there. Its like Pat Buchanan. I love him. I think he’s marvellous. But he’s too harsh on Israel. Its not an absolutist thing but he’s just consistently too hard on them. Well nobodies perfect you know.

If Phil Berg and Orly Taitz were wrong in EVERY CONSTITUENT PART OF THEIR CASE, taken in its entirety their case would still be right. The case of Orly Taitz and Phillip Bergs is the case for reason, rationality, vigilance, lawfulness, and respect for the Republic and the greatest and most noble human experiment ever undertaken in the history of mankind.

Entirely independent of whose right and whose wrong on each and every constituent part of the argument, the case against Philip Berg and Orly Taitz is a case in favour of OCCULT-EPISTEMOLOGY, spitting on the constitution, giving special priviledges to marxists, the cold racism of condescension to black people, anti-vigilance, flippancy for the long-term, nihilism and everything unrighteous and rotten.

Now what do I mean by Occult Epistemology? Well we can only know the truth through: reason and convergent evidence. Phillip Berg and Orly Taitz are saying PROVE ME WRONG. Prove me wrong. They are only asking to be proved wrong. Now whats wrong with being proved wrong? What is wrong with THAT?

But the side opposed to them are claiming that they know things they cannot possibly know and they are claiming that no investigation is necessary. What sort of equal-opportunity idiocy is THIS?

BEIGE DON’T MAKE IT BETTER.

Its not alright to have a Marxist Usurper in the White House. Its not alright to pretend that you KNOW!!!!! that he is neither a marxist, nor a Usurper, when you cannot possibly know this.

People act like these things are alright but they are not. Like UN soldiers raping the black women they are supposed to be protecting, folks act like thats not a biggie. But these things are not alright. They are not OK. They aren’t. Get used to it they are not alright. And who people voted for is such a minor point on this score, that its virtually tantamount to an irrelevancy.

DIGRESSION.

Its not OK to get people used to welfare and then suddenly pull the rug from under them and leave them to die. That the Americans have practiced defense welfarism all this time does not mean that you ought not give my country, and Taiwan, and perhaps Japan just a few years to become independent defense-wise if you want to take the Ron Paul angle and wash your hands of your dependents.

I say this to remind you that though you have the right to be totally independent and never let another of your soldiers die on the basis of defense welfarism, the fact is we could have developed nuclear weapons but decided not to on account of your assurances. Thats my country Australia, Thailand and Japan.

This may seem a tangential matter but I bring it in to say it doesn’t matter a tinkers cuss if each and every one of you Americans voted for a marxist usurper in the White House.

You have wider responsibilities and no such person must be allowed that much power. Right now particularly is a time for vigilance and for grown-up behaviour. And you must investigate this man, and if his presence breaks a million oaths to the constitution, then he must go… and preferably in chains.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Listen to this idiot Cambria:

    “Yep, they flew back and the Ads went in the paper so as to provide cover for when the kid was old enough to run for prez.”

    If you are the parent of a teenage girl, and she’s just had a baby, WHY WOULD YOU NOT MAKE THE NORMAL NOTIFICATIONS.

    The stupidity of Cambria beggars belief. There is nothing abnormal about the notification of Obama’s birth in the Hawaiian newspapers, even a little bit.

  2. Of course idiot. Thats what leftists do. Of course the Marxists will be persecuting her. If they weren’t persecuting her they wouldn’t be leftists. What is your point DH?

    NOTE: THE IDIOT DH HAD JUST POINTED OUT THAT ORLY TAITZ IS BEING PERSECUTED BY ALL SORTS OF DEFAMATORY LEGAL ACTION. AS IF THAT HAD SOME SORT OF STOCK IN IT FOR THE IRRATIONAL SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT.

  3. New Documents Faux-Expert Finally Doing A Runner.
    Comment: You will find it is the case that leftists all feel they have the gift of second sight. And they love nothing more than to taunt one of the people they are threatening out of anonymity. For example, in the case of the ordained minister that interviewed Sarah Obama. They accuse him of lying, they get together like pack-animals and all implicitly claim that since the ordained minister used an assumed name he lied or he doesn’t exist, and that he isn’t a minister. What these people are after is to put the minister in danger, even though they know that the Raila/Obama campaign had murdered thousands of people in Kenya just months prior to that interview.

    One piece of vermin on the Economist magazine staff actually revealed this fellows name. Then went out of his way to misrepresent the confusing recording that the fellow had made via a mobile-phone call to the US.

    Currently it appears that Orly Taitz is now having to put up with this leftist pack-animal vermin thrusting medical malpractice suits at her. This is the people you are siding with when you are going against the case for vigilance-and-reason in this matter.

    Notice how this crank (who has now thankfully done a runner) claimed to have expertise in forensic matters to do with documents. Bizzare. And yet the Polarik proof is all laid out very clearly, and more than easy to understand. Yet they are only a summary of some of the main points as to what is wrong with the Daily Kos cut and paste affair.

  4. I’LL PUT UP WITH A LOT FROM YOU OBAMA-VOTER. BUT I’M NOT PUTTING UP WITH FUCKING BARRY-PIMPED YANKS COMING OVER HERE AND MAKING OUT THAT THIS IS SOME SORT OF FUCKING STANDUP ROUTINE.

  5. HUH!!!! I CAN SEE WE HAVE AN AMERICAN TAXEATER HERE.

  6. THE FBI CAN GO FUCK THEMSELVES. OUR GUYS HAVE BENT OVER BOTH WAYS TO LET CHINESE INTELLIGENCE OPERATE HERE. BUT NO WAY WOULD THEY SIT STILL FOR FBI TYPES SNIFFING AROUND IN AUSTRALIA. IN ANY CASE, THOUGH THEY HAVE A PROUD HISTORY OF BEING AN INSTITUTION THAT WENT FOR MANY DECADES WITHOUT GOING TOTALLY DYSFUNCTIONAL THATS ALL OVER NOW. THEY ARE USELESS LIKE ANY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT. NOT AS PERFECTLY DYSFUNCTIONAL AND INEFFECTUAL AS THOSE LEFTIST POOFTAHS IN THE CIA. BUT NO GREAT SHAKES LIKE THE GOOD OLD DAYS.

  7. Explain your inference. You say that Berg is suing Orly so Obama must be legitimate? Is that what you are claiming? Idiot.

  8. Stop making shit that makes no sense. Anyone would have known that a usurper would have been sworn in at least once. This usurper was sworn in twice as you say. And the constitution anticipated that this might happen. And it establishes him as a usurper, the swearing in as perjury, and Barry as a felon committing one criminal act after another.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: