Posted by: graemebird | April 5, 2009

Controlled Demolition Isn’t Administration Involvement.

Debunk Graeme McQueen. I don’t know what he believes, and I don’t know whether he is right or wrong in his beliefs of which I don’t know. But thats not the point and that never is the point. Debunk Graeme McQueen. Debunk his fundamental analysis. You can’t do it right?

You alleged skeptics have to wake up to yourselves.

Here is his video again.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. How about responding to your critics at Z’s excellent blog?

    I’LL DO SO AT A TIME OF MY CHOOSING OR WHENEVER THEY HAVE A VALID POINT, WHICH HAS NEVER HAPPENED YET.

    OR PERHAPS THE VALID POINT IS HIDING, EITHER AMONGST ALL THAT MINDLESS TRIBALISM, OR PERHAPS DOWN THE WELL OF THE 12TH IMAM.

    WHY DON’T YOU REINTERPRET WHAT YOU TAKE TO BE THEIR VALID POINT AND I”LL RESPOND RIGHT HERE.

  2. As I thought. No-one is capable of debunking Graeme McQueen. Jason implied that we must not follow the evidence lest we wind up finding evidence that Jews did it????

    Bizzare. I thought that the evidence showed Arabs were involved. Where is the evidence that Jews were also involved? If there is evidence that Jews, Botswanans, Chinese Iranians, Americans, or anyone else was involved we would want to see that evidence no matter what. The idea of Jasons contains two very strange implications. One is that you must not follow the evidence for fear of what you might find. The other is you must not follow the evidence lest Jews be found to be responsible. Well why would one suspect Jews in the first place without following the evidence?

    Always these faux-skeptics take the faith-based approach. The amount of failed analysts in this country is shocking.

  3. Playlist for Tom Coburn. One of the few decent people left in Washington. I like the Americans but Washington is fundamentally enemy-occupied-territory for the moment.

  4. Kodjo foolishly and wickedly justifying opposition to torture on the wrongheaded basis that it doesn’t work. The implication being that if it works thats OK.

    He may as well get out there as an advocate for torture. Since of course it does work and how. Because if you have something I need to know and you won’t tell me. And we use torture. Then I’m going to know what you didn’t want me to know.

    Kodjo if you are not up to the discussion don’t try it on. Because all you are doing is justifying what you are attempting to oppose.

    Its amazing how alike all these dummies are. Adrien filibustered on this self-same point and was making the exact same wrong arguments.

    On a macro level torture may indeed be next to useless. But make no mistake about it. On a micro level nothing could be more effective then torture.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: