Tim Lambert is back to pushing that absolutely chilling eugenicists idea of the bed-net-alone. Ghoulish. He is not the only one and the goal of depopulating Africa of its children appears to be general within the environmentalist movement.
I’m sure I don’t need to spell out my reasoning to normal human beings since the general sick churning in their stomach ought to be more or less automatic as to what these holocaust-enablers have in mind. But I’ll spell it out for the leftists who visit this site.
A bed net alone strategy means that the environmentalist movement thinks its fine and dandy for a malaria-carrying mosquito to get within one metre of a defenseless toddler, or a little baby. The environmentalists think that this is just marvelous. Getting the mosquitoes and the children in close proximity is their goal with the bed-nets-alone strategy, no doubt about it at all.
The environmentalists are so serious about this wish-fantasy, they even go so far as to show pictures of dead mosquito having been caught in these nets that they find favour with. Just to prove they are serious about this plan to bring the mosquitoes and the children in close contact, you can find them showcasing pictures of dead mosquitoes caught in these nets. Really what they are after is a no-mosquito-left-behind policy. But they’ll tolerate a tiny level of mosquito-killing for the goal of SETTING UP POOR PEOPLE FOR MASS-MURDER. The bed-net-alone advocacy is truly the sickest use of bogus statistics ever attempted.
But the motivations and consequences of this plan are much much worse then how I have so far described things. Because the malarial agent isn’t just a horrifying disease for humans. Its a disease for the mosquito also, though apparently not one that is able to curb their numbers.
Do you see whats going on here? The environmentalist movement not only wants people to catch malaria. They want all the mosquitoes in Africa to catch malaria as a first step. And they want to do it without blowing out the number of human victims right away.
What this all means is that if you are unwilling to destroy the malarial agent when it crops up in mosquito populations THEN IT WILL BECOME GENERAL IN MOSQUITO POPULATIONS IN AFRICA. This is an absolutely clear plan of human eradication. To make as much of the mosquito population malarial as can possibly be achieved and to bring that mosquito population within 3 feet of your babies bloodstream (supposing you are poor and African).
No-one in heavy industry would ever tolerate a one-shield approach to hazards. We, who live in the real unsubsidised world, know that the long-reach of co-incidence will find its way through any TWO layers of safety to cause death or injury. In manufacturing we know that THREE layers of protection are required always. To keep our quality up in an environment of total safety and in a mistake-free-zone. To not understand this fundamental principle of reality is why people are frightened of nuclear power. To not understand this conceptual approach to hazards means that a husband gets himself killed by leaving arsenic in a coke bottle to kill his weeds, only to have his wife re-serve it to him by accident with ice.
These eugenicists never think they are going to get busted. The statistics will obviously be shown to be bullshit once they are subject to reasoned analysis. But the very idea that this plan could be put out and NOT be a confession that they are after depopulation is absurd. The plan goes against all conceptual principles of health and safety practice in any first-world workplace.
SETUP UP FOR MASS-MURDER.
Consider the setup for mass-murder that the bed-nets-alone conspiracy constitutes.
1. You leave people defenseless against malaria but for one metre of space.
2. You have mosquitoes become malarial more generally.
3. Then you just need to somehow take the final defense away all at once.
What are the pretenses here to this obvious misuse of statistics? What are the fantasy-elements of this misuse of statistics for blatantly eugenicist goals?
1. Kids never get out of bed during the night.
2. Human beings, like taxeaters, only work nine-to-five. No shift worker need ever apply for protection.
3. Mosquitoes only operate at night.
4. Mosquitoes only bite people who are sleeping.
4. Everything is certain in this world, and everything always goes to plan, even when presuming to set policy for a continent in its entirety.
The environmentalist might seem to be talking about handing out bednets for free in this case and so it might seem like a heart-warming charity delivered free of charge by voluntary dorks. The dork cover-story is horrifying and treacly bullshit. What the bed-nets-only environmentalists are really about is finding an excuse to further impede the use of multiple methodologies, DDT, other insecticides and LOCAL AUTONOMY when it comes to fighting malaria. What the dork cover-story hides is a blatant attempt to set up Africans for the kill, so that these neo-Malthusian Nazis can have a depopulated Africa.
Perhaps you share their goals?
Perhaps you don’t like black people either?
Maybe you think the rumours about black men are true?
Think hard about whats going on inside your id and make the ethical judgment. Because to actually publicly advocate allowing malaria to become general within mosquitoes and to bring these malarial mosquitoes three feet from almost every African is one of the most horrifying ideas I’ve heard in a long time. And it also brings up an epistemological problem with mistaking a tool of science for the very essence of science itself.
Statistics is only a tool of science. Like a drill, or a chainsaw. A hammer, or a vice. Visualise each of these tools being used productively. Now visualise them being used to horrifying purpose, one after the other.
Human reason (and most particularly induction) is the essence of science. We ought never over-emphasise any one tool, nor ought we throw any of our tools away.
I went to YouTube to find some pro-bed-net-only dork trying to be a new Gandhi, and showing proof that he wants to bring the mosquitos 3 feet from the kids. But instead I found some sane talk in this matter for once:
There is something pretty enticing about a black chick with a British accent. But she was lucky to get through without the environmentalists killing her. The kids here talk about a prejudice against a pesticide. But one wonders if they realise that what is really going on is that these leftist environmentalists want human depopulation. Mass eradication of humans in preference to mass eradication of mosquitoes. In fact over at Deltoid they admit openly that they would not make mosquitoes extinct even if they could do so without effort.
(Post-Script. This gorgeous girls name is Agnes. Nice old English name that we don’t hear very often anymore. I shouldn’t really be calling her a “black chick” with an English accent when she has already told us her name.)
Bear in mind that no country in Sub-Saharan Africa is a strategic threat to us in the West. So this is not like the Jihad desperately trying to breed more Muslims. There is not the instinct of self-preservation in these human eradication programs. The environmentalists just hate black people and they would wish for an Africa that was like a permanent safari-park.