Posted by: graemebird | May 8, 2009

Pushing Forward With The Investigation.

The discussion of these grave matters goes on with students in Louisiana. Some of whom are still righteous and American. And not Barrylanders of the heart. Not willing participants in Cook County And Surrounding Districts. This was proven by Sterling efforts to get me back on the board. And by the fact that the youngsters who did ban me couldn’t see their way straight to keeping me banned. Elsewhere they’d have banned me up front and kept it that way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
YouTube is a very good thing and the best medium imaginable for the presentation of evidence. If but for youtube and the preponderance of hand-held video, even nearly 8 years on, almost none of us would know that the terrorist attack was not just a hijacked plane attack. But that the buildings must have been rigged up overnight with explosives.

It had to have been rigged up overnight or someone would have found all the many explosives used. Thats why its only right that the attack was timed for 8.30 in the morning.

That explosives were used to bring down the buildings is now not open to question. Its a proven fact. There is no alternate government explanation and they have admitted as much. You can hear the explosions yourself. You can see them. You can listen to the eyewitness accounts of them. This is what is known as a FACT.

But we must move on from there. Who could have rigged up three buildings overnight like this? Certainly not your government. They could not swear everyone to secrecy. No chance at all. So we can put that one to rest right now. American traitors? A tiny number maybe. But your government, at that time could not have pulled that off. So it had to be a foreign government project. With more than one government involved in all likelihood. Don’t be falling for the trap of singling one out.

And the 9/11 attacks had to involve governments who could find out about the various training exercises of your fighters. We are talking the involvement, either for hire or as an active participant, some pretty high tech crowd and probably with good satelite information. Or people like the Cubans who have worked for years to get spies into your networks. One visualises Iranians walking around Russia with bags of cash pulling favours from various intelligence insiders. This sort of thing. With Saddam being the bunny and doing the hard yards recruiting, and some of the training, for the Arab suicide bombers.

If your President wants to betray you in the future he will do so more readily through his friends overseas. Through foreign intelligence organs. This is not what we are talking about with 9/11.

No one scenario has much chance of being true since the possibilities are many. An operation like this, to be able to rig up buildings overnight, would be years in the making. Not so much for this specific project. But just getting people into town. Sussing out alternative identities and stories for various visiters. Getting agents green cards and Candadian papers and all that. Bringing people into Canada and Mexico. Being able to move small amounts of stuff across the Canadian border when they want to.

In other words by having embassies and the UN in your country you have opened the door to a lot of vipers who use the resources you have allowed them to take hold of, to influence you and to plot against you for malign purpose. The idea is to throw as many of these people out as you can and derecognise any country that you are not sure about. Only maintain ties with people who you can trust and no more sovereign US territory to be granted to these horrid governments that you ought not be trusting.

But the investigation ought to move on. And yet you simply have no provision for such an investigation. All that money wasted in investments in taxeater-ego and you cannot even get it together to investigate a foreign attack with any real commitment.

It had to be this way. It had to be that the surface conspiracy had to be a protective outer shell for the larger plot. Because no-one can get away with anything that doesn’t have these concentric circles of intrigue.

And the plot you must assume is on the fly is the one where nuclear bombs are planted, or going to be planted, in many of your cities.

Just Say No To Kenyan Communist Coups. We need a BETTER-FAKE birth certificate. We’ve GOTSTA-have a BETTER-FAKE!!!

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Even with a puffy face and diminished athletic ability I’ve still got it.

    http://www.grods.com/post/5547/

    Here the post orginator laments that a post about the kama sutra has progressed into them all talking about me. Toward the end the girls are speculating in almost frenzied fashion about their nether regions. So the post has really rolled along in logical fashion.

    You see if you’ve “GOT IT” you can be carrying an extra 40 pounds, much of it seemingly stuffed into your face, and it really makes no difference.

  2. On another topic check this out:

    Now thats a disproven model. Why do people listen to Hanson and Schmidt. And all those dummies at realclimate? Nothing they claim is right.

  3. This is a pretty good review of Plimer’s book:

    “ONE of the peculiar things about being an astronomer is that you receive, from time to time, monographs on topics such as “a new theory of the electric universe”, or “Einstein was wrong”, or “the moon landings were a hoax”.

    The writings are always earnest, often involve conspiracy theories and are scientifically worthless.

    One such document that arrived last week was Ian Plimer’s Heaven and Earth. What makes this case unusual is that Plimer is a professor — of mining geology — at the University of Adelaide. If the subject were anything less serious than the future habitability of the planet Earth, I wouldn’t go to the trouble of writing this review.

    Plimer sets out to refute the scientific consensus that human emissions of CO2 have changed the climate. He states in his acknowledgments that the book evolved from a dinner in London with three young lawyers who believed the consensus. As Plimer writes: “Although these three had more than adequate intellectual material to destroy the popular paradigm, they had neither the scientific knowledge nor the scientific training to pull it apart stitch by stitch. This was done at dinner.”

    This is a remarkable claim. If Plimer is right and he is able to show that the work of literally thousands of oceanographers, solar physicists, biologists, atmospheric scientists, geologists, and snow and ice researchers during the past 100 years is fundamentally flawed, then it would rank as one of the greatest discoveries of the century and would almost certainly earn him a Nobel prize. This is the scale of Plimer’s claim.

    Before reading any further, I examined Plimer’s publication list on the University of Adelaide website to see what he has published in refereed journals. There are a scant 17 such papers since 1994, two as first author with the titles “Manganoan garnet rocks associated with the Broken Hill Pb-Zn-Ag orebody” and “Kasolite from the British Empire Mine”. Absolutely nothing on climate science.

    Now, before I am accused of attacking the man and not the argument, let me point out that scientists regard peer-reviewed journal publications as fundamental for advancing science. They allow ideas to be exchanged, tested, improved on and, quite frequently, discarded. If Plimer can do what he claims, and can prove that human emissions of CO2 have no effect on the climate, then he owes it to the scientific community and, in fact, humanity, to publish his arguments in a refereed journal.

    Perhaps we will find a stitch-by-stitch demolition of climate science in his book, as promised? No such luck. The arguments that Plimer advances in the 503 pages and 2311 footnotes in Heaven and Earth are nonsense. The book is largely a collection of contrarian ideas and conspiracy theories that are rife in the blogosphere. The writing is rambling and repetitive; the arguments flawed and illogical.

    He recycles a graph, without attribution, from Martin Durkin’s Great Global Warming Swindle documentary, neglecting even to make the changes that Durkin made following an outcry over the fact that the past two decades of temperature measurements had been mysteriously deleted.

    Plimer claims that scientists such as himself, who do not agree with the consensus, are labelled deniers, “yet their scientific doubts are not addressed”. Nothing could be further from the truth. All of Plimer’s arguments have been addressed ad nauseam by patient climate scientists on websites or in the literature.

    To appreciate the errors in Plimer’s book you don’t have to be a climate scientist. For example, take the measurement of the global average CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. This is obviously important, so scientists measure it with great care at many locations across the world.

    Precision measurements have been made daily since 1958 at Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, a mountain-top site with a clear airflow unaffected by local pollution. The data is in excellent agreement with ice cores from several sites in Antarctica and Greenland. Thousands of scientific papers have been written on the topic, hundreds of scientists are involved from many independent research groups.

    Plimer, however, writes that a simple home experiment indoors can show that in a week, CO2 can vary by 75 parts per million by volume, equal to about 40 years’ worth of change at the present rate. He thinks this “rings alarm bells” on the veracity of the Mauna Loa data, which shows a smoothly rising concentration.

    While it is undoubtedly true that if you measure CO2 in your home it could vary by large amounts from day to day — depending, for example, on whether you have the windows open or closed, or how many people are in the house at the time — this is not the right way to measure a global average. That’s why scientists go to mountain-tops or Antarctica or to the isolated Cape Grimm on the Tasmanian coast rather than measuring CO2 in their living rooms.

    Incredible as it may seem, this quality of argument is typical of the book. While the text is annotated profusely with footnotes and refers to papers in the top journals, thus giving it the veneer of scholarship, it is often the case that the cited articles do not support the text. Plimer repeatedly veers off to the climate sceptic’s journal of choice, the bottom-tier Energy and Environment, to advance all manner of absurd theories: for example, that CO2 concentrations actually have fallen since 1942.

    Plimer believes “global warming” occurring on Mars, Triton, Jupiter and Pluto proves human emissions of CO2 don’t affect Earth’s climate. He believes that once CO2 levels reached 200ppmv (about half of today’s value) the CO2 had absorbed almost all the infrared energy it could, and further increases will not have much effect. He believes global warming does not lead to biological stress. He believes volcanoes emit significant quantities of chlorofluorocarbons. He believes the sun formed on the collapsed core of a supernova. All these ideas are so wrong as to be laughable: they do not offer an “alternative scientific perspective”.

    Plimer probably didn’t expect an astronomer to review his book. I couldn’t help noticing on page120 an almost word-for-word reproduction of the abstract from a well-known loony paper entitled “The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass”. This paper argues that the sun isn’t composed of 98 per cent hydrogen and helium, as astronomers have confirmed through a century of observation and theory, but is instead similar in composition to a meteorite.

    It is hard to understate the depth of scientific ignorance that the inclusion of this information demonstrates. It is comparable to a biologist claiming that plants obtain energy from magnetism rather than photosynthesis.

    Plimer has done an enormous disservice to science, and the dedicated scientists who are trying to understand climate and the influence of humans, by publishing this book. It is not “merely” atmospheric scientists that would have to be wrong for Plimer to be right. It would require a rewriting of biology, geology, physics, oceanography, astronomy and statistics. Plimer’s book deserves to languish on the shelves along with similar pseudo-science such as the writings of Immanuel Velikovsky and Erich von Daniken.”

    Michael Ashley is professor of astrophysics at the University of NSW.

  4. And about those ‘explosions’ in the WTC. Not controlled detonations but exploding equipment and falling elevators:

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002-09-04-elevator-usat_x.htm

    Case closed.

  5. Don’t be stupid. Many of the explosions weren’t even near where the planes were. Just make-believe. You are a dummy fella.

  6. Sounds like that real dummy from “Bad Astronomy”. Lucky Phil. A real fuckwit that fellow. I cannot remember his last name. Phil Plait I think. He’s looking after Randi’s outfit. Man what a complete fuckwit he is.

  7. I love the first two paragraphs of the Plimer piece. They sound just like you.

  8. Of course it does. He’s a scientist. Shut up you ignorant cunt and listen to Kodjo:

    “One thing that has vexed quite a few people is the prospect of future inflation. Yet if one looks at the spread between US 10 year Treasury Inflation-protected security (TIPS), and 10 year bond, rates, inflationary expectations, as forecast by the market, appear modest.”

    Look at what a stupid cunt Kodjo is. He thinks interest rates are caused by inflationary expectations, and he thinks that inflationary expectations cause inflation.

    The whole fucking idea Kodjo, is to come to grips with the material.


  9. This is a remarkable claim. If Plimer is right and he is able to show that the work of literally thousands of oceanographers, solar physicists, biologists, atmospheric scientists, geologists, and snow and ice researchers during the past 100 years is fundamentally flawed, then it would rank as one of the greatest discoveries of the century and would almost certainly earn him a Nobel prize. This is the scale of Plimer’s claim.”

    Look at that. What a fuckwit. Whoever wrote this doesn’t understand a fucking thing. The work of scientists DISPROVES the global warming racket. Thats the whole point. The science goes against this leftist science fraud.

    How do these completely useless unscientific cunts like that ever managed to get listened to?

    They just lie and claim scientific consensus and all the dumb leftist cunts just climb on board.

  10. “Plimer has done an enormous disservice to science, and the dedicated scientists who are trying to understand climate and the influence of humans, by publishing this book. It is not “merely” atmospheric scientists that would have to be wrong for Plimer to be right. It would require a rewriting of biology, geology, physics, oceanography, astronomy and statistics. ”

    Totally wrong. A ridiculous lie by an ignorant cunt. Who here confesses to not understanding a thing about science.

    Don’t keep me guessing. Who is this idiot?

  11. Who the fuck is Michael Ashley and why are you quoting some random idiot who knows nothing?

  12. Details here:

    http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/ACADEMIC/ashley.html

  13. Yeah he looks like an idiot as well. And he’s not a scientist. He’s basically just a mathematician.

  14. Notice that he himself has no evidence whatsoever for this idiocy.

  15. Its just disgraceful the humber of appallingly ignorant rancid mosquitoes like Michael Ashley, feeding off the public dime.

  16. Here is the study that this idiot Michael Ashley is talking about

    “The Sun is a plasma diffuser that selectively moves light elements like H and He and the lighter isotopes of each element to its surface. The Sun formed on the collapsed core of a supernova (SN) and is composed mostly of elements made near the SN core (Fe, O, Ni, Si, and S), like the rocky planets and ordinary meteorites. Neutron emission from the central neutron star triggers a series of reactions that generate solar luminosity, solar neutrinos, solar mass fractionation, and an outpouring of hydrogen in the solar wind. Mass fractionation seems to have operated in the parent star and likely occurs in other stars as well.”

    Perfectly fine speculation except that supernova business. It wouldn’t make sense that all these stars were resultant from collapsed Supernovas. But the real idiot in this story is Ashley. Who does not have any evidence for this global warming racket but believes it anyway. Who is so ignorant he thinks all these other sciences mysteriously support the racket, and who imagines that just because we can see Hydrogen at the Suns surface that means the sun is for some bizzare reason going to be hydrogren all the way down.

    Its a worthless article that Australian article. Its based on the cognitive technique of monkey-see monkey do. This is a moron who is actually incapable of science and who does not practice science in his own work. Jumping on the bandwagon is no logical argument but its more of a sub-human technique for stupid people to fake it and to get by.

  17. http://www.springerlink.com/content/906760626772561u/

  18. Mr B

    Be careful in your discussions of solar energy. APparently this is a VERY sensitive topic in certain corridors of power. I know from experience that this Blog hits enough “keywords” for it to be REDFLAGGED and subject to monitor and review.

    Please be careful Mr B.

  19. Look what happens to a patriot:

    http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/05/alan-keyes-among-21-arrested-at-notre-dame-in-obama-protest.html

    What about his diplomatic immunity as an Ambassador?
    What can the Little Man such as you or I hope for?

    I have to drop off the grid for a while Mr B but I shall resurface from a new proxy soon.

  20. Yes disgraceful isn’t it. But did you see his performance in the face of these vermin. It was as though he was doing his best to save their feeble souls. Even a Catholic-Irish university taken over by leftist baby-killers. Keyes is there acting like some cross between Jean Valjean and Churchill. Marvelous. Incredible because this filth betrayed their contributers and conferred on a pro-abortion extremist felon like Barry an honorary degree. It makes you sick with lengths these leftist cunts will go to. This leftist vermin have no honour.

  21. CAN YOU PROVE THAT?

  22. Sure. He was arrested for trespass:

    “SOUTH BEND, Ind., May 8 (UPI) — Alan Keyes, who lost to Barack Obama in a U.S. Senate race, was arrested Friday protesting President Obama’s invitation to speak at Notre Dame in Indiana.

    Keyes and 20 others were charged with trespassing, Dennis Brown, a spokesman for the Catholic university, said. Brown said the university has a long-standing policy that only student-led demonstrations are allowed on campus with approval from the office of student affairs.”

    http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/08/Alan-Keyes-arrested-in-Notre-Dame-protest/UPI-73971241836028/

    A clear case of publicity deprivation syndrome, as he said before the event he planned to be arrested.

  23. He was arrested for protesting the Usurper. Don’t be a pendantic literalist motherfucker.

  24. So here we have the University. The CITADEL of protest. The places that tolerate unpeaceful protest. But the place that at least tolerates peaceful protests of all sorts.

    And right away Alan Keyes protesting, well thats TRESPASS.

    On whose sayso?

    The sayso of some traitors who managed to commandeer the security subcontractors for the moment I would have thought.

    This is a disgrace. Patrick Whelan must resign. And be excommunicated from the Church.

  25. You’re an atheist, so you have no say in what Patrick Whelan or the Pope should or should not do.

  26. You are wrong about that. I have enourmous snap in these matters. I bear witness AND with atheistic objectivity.

  27. site diety sez: No you are talking rubbish. I will not butt out. And the vermin who disrupted this righteous protest are not catholics either so there. They are barely human. They may as well be lizards. Patrick must step down and commit hari-kari.

  28. Mr Bird, I await your budget response.

  29. Didn’t you hear? Bird said in January the economy had bottomed-out. We should be well on our way to recovery by now.

  30. Lets have that reference you lying cunt

  31. What am I supposed to be lying about?

  32. Bird on Jan 6:

    “Anyway I’m getting into some pretty bigtime share-trading from here on in. I think we’ve bottomed out.”

    https://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/no-such-thing-as-time/#comment-20040

  33. I knew you were lying you low-down filth. I say clearly there that the sharemarket has bottomed out. Not the economy.

    Which of these low-down lying scum are you? Fuckhead.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: