Posted by: graemebird | May 21, 2009

Alan Keyes Hagiography.

In my efforts to stick up for the primacy of methodology, for a year now I’ve been pushing demonised worthy paradigms in science and elsewhere, though from the first I knew that they would hinder my promotion of valuable ideas in economics and in wider societal matters. I couldn’t be more unrepentant about the decision I took.

And now we are in a world so very perverse that one would seem to be using up ones credibility-capital just saying a kind word for a man who IS A MAN. For a man who is what a statesman is meant to be.

The British grew their act to kick ass on every last corner of the globe, which is not necessarily a good thing, but it was no easy thing either. And surely one of the reasons they got to be so tough is that they recognised a difference between a good man and a good King.

Keyes is the Republic. He is America every bit as much as Ron Paul is. You ought to always vote for the best man and not try and second-guess the future all that much. Not second-guess the other guy. Our societies will become second-best in a world where second-best doesn’t get to contest-again, if we don’t recognise talent when we see it.

So I’ve decided to include out-takes from Louisiana ether-space where I decided to really push the case for Alan right over the top. Yes I would have liked to have seen Ron Paul win. But daily I would have worried about things, wanting the Congress to enforce Taiwans and Israels existence. Since when they made him move then he would have everyone behind him. Then he would win. The boys get home quickly.

But Keyes is more in keeping with my position on the isolationist spectrum. And so I wouldn’t worry on that account. Except for Americas enemies should they tarry with him. A Keyes Presidency would be an era of sudden peace. Since they would fear him. And then the internal problems of the Republic might stand a chance of being fixed up.

So here it is. My posts which show over-the-top praise and support for Keyes. And yes it is somewhat exaggerated for the kids. I make no apologies for that. Keyes is the man. He’s a real man. He’s a STATESman. And this is how a statesman is SUPPOSED to look.

Here’s Alan at what seems to be the Dinner speaking counterpart to the Fort Wayne Tea Party protest.

Post 1

Alan is 58 going on 59. You would run the danger of having his great talents go to waste, and this would be a great shame,even if you weren’t all under the most dire of circumstances. You’ve got to start sending quality people to Washington. You’ve got Tom Coburn, Ron Paul and maybe a handful of others that are alright. But how can you put up with clowns like Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd and other low-class dummies, when you have quality people you could send to do battle within blood-sucker-central?

Post 2

Oh man. What a wonderful video. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. What a brilliant man. What a MAN. See you kids think Alan is fucking weird or something because you have no idea what it is to be a MAN anymore. You’ve been taught that to actually be a man is an embarrassment.

This is Alan at his absolute best. Because when the pigs issue you with some notice or threat of compulsion, that is ultimately backed up by fucking NATO when it comes down to it, its always humiliating. And the crowd gathers round and taunts and you are made to feel like you are diminished in some way. But he just keeps his cool.

Notre Dame lies now convicted. They are saying he cannot visit anymore. Notre Dame, what was their motto? The place of the fighting Irish, and they were definitely Catholic. And they are spitting on their values on account of coterie of marxists no doubt infiltrating over a period of years and decades into the faculty.

Good Catholic Alumni who are millionaires and multimillionaires…. well still they have only so many dollars. They have only so many dollars to do what they think is right. And unless they can get a string of sackings over this outrage, both the granting of some honorary degree to a Nazi-Usurper, and the attempted humiliation of Alan Keyes…. well they ought to cease giving any money to Notre Dame, and they ought to start making common cause with outfits like Liberty University. Getting good Catholic Boys and Girls maybe to go along with a College that HASN’T been taken over by Fascist-Lovers and hasn’t gone hell-for-leather to betray its supporters and its professed values.

Post 3

Man it just keeps getting better.

LINK

Here is Keyes, in what would be a humiliating situation for most of us, and these guys have all the power, and look at him go.

I mean he’s pretty well disposed to these guys and he’s compelled to be nice to them in front of the camera.

JUST IMAGINE HIM SHAKING DOWN A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY SAUD BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.

These people, your so-called friends. Friends that talk friendly in English and talk spitting hatred for you in their own miserable language….

Imagine Alan dealing with these people. They’d be so fucking traumatised. They’d NEVER get over it.

Would Alan bow low to the Saudi King under current circumstances. Man he’d go so zen on that Mo’Fo’ that the Saud would feel his stomach had dropped out of his asshole and was now somewhere near China.

You people are mad. You just have no understanding of talent and statesmanship.

The English, a now extinct people in some senses, understood many centuries ago, that a good King and a good MAN were two different things. In fact the whole story of Henry the Fifth in those three Shakespeare plays where “Hal” is involved, revolves around this theme.

Now I’m not saying Alan is a BAD man but would be a great President. And I’m not saying that he’s not a likable guy because I like him. I like him a lot.

But YOU PEOPLE. You people don’t have to like him. You just have to be objective. You just have to make the adult decision to promote and vote for a person like Alan, to high office (President, Secretary Of State, Vice President, or Defense Secretary) people who are STATESMANLIKE and who can do the job.

You’ve got a fucking genius here and you are treating him like he’s a sideshow act.

It doesn’t matter if you are not a Christian. The fact is your REPUBLIC works on the theory of rights granted by God free and clear. He is the man who would stick up for that.

It doesn’t matter if you are on the left, you won’t have that luxury much longer.

You’ve just got to learn to recognise talent when its there. When it comes to rational policy rational policy runs in a very short spectrum between Alan and Ron Paul. And anything out of that spectrum is probably irrational, a ponzie-scheme, unsustainable, or just wrong from the start.

Post 4.

“It should be clear that most consrvative Cathoics are not in his camp”

Yeah but you’ll come around. You just haven’t got to know him yet. And then when YOU come around you’ll be able to help some of those other conservative Catholics come around as well.

After all they wouldn’t be conservative Catholics if they jumped at the latest fad or something. We want good people to take things into long-term consideration. We wouldn’t want it any other way.

Get to know this fellow a little bit. Duck under all the taunts and attempted humiliations and get to know this man. He’s a MAN. He’s a REAL man. And he’s a good man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Alan Keyes……. The Natural President Of The United States is so attuned to good theories of liberty that he even brings forth the Malcolm X “House Nigger” concept. But with admirable tact he uses the phrase “pampered slave”.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING MAN? SOME COTERIE OF MARXISTS INSINUATING THEMSELVES INTO THE UNIVERSITY OF “THE FIGHTING IRISH” REPRESENTS THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF CATHOLICS WRIT LARGE? BULLSHIT. EVERY GOOD CATHOLIC WOULD REALISE THAT UNIVERSITIES ARE MEANT TO BE OPEN INSTITUTIONS. AND THAT THESE MARXIST GOONS WERE MULTIPLYING THEIR USURPATION BY LAYING HANDS ON A PROPER CATHOLIC.

    THAT THESE MARXIST USURPERS WERE TRYING ON THE LEGITIMISATION OF A FELON AND PRO-ABORTIONIST JUST SHOWS ITS A CASE OF GLOBAL USURPER HAND-HOLDING.

  2. THATS BECAUSE YOU ARE A LOW-WATTAGE CHARACTER. THINGS COMING TO YOUR MIND ARE OF NO RELEVANCE IN THE REAL WORLD.

  3. Sinclair reduced to teenage sheila-talk.

    “whatever…”

  4. Alan makes a powerful argument that the betrayal of the unborn child is at the base of the betrayal of the constitution and the betrayal of future generations more generally.

    His argument is not airtight but its pretty powerful when witnessed at the end of a long speech.

    I myself would give our girls the briefest of opportunities. And perhaps a very tightly extended window for an unhealthy child.

    We are a barbarian race. And we cannot let go of our humanity or even our pretenses to it.

  5. Adrien cruising the central baths faggot sewer.

    “Productivity in Victorian Universities should improve today; the union are planning a strike
    .
    Meow.
    .
    I went thru Melb Uni earlier seemed to be business as usual. Then I went down Swanston St and there was the rallymarch. Not many showed up.”

  6. Mr B

    That youtube of Mr Keyes speaking was so evocative.

    Do you know what the music at the beginning was? Very moving.

    To see a Truly Righteous Negro speak the Truth brings tears!!

  7. Just imagine Andrew Jackson coming back to the Americas and finally realising that the man who would best represent what he hoped for with the Republic would be Alan????

    That would be a heart-warming thing would it not. It would bring tears to the eyes alright. Tears of Joy as he bitch-slapped Barney-Frank, branded the speaker as an unredeemable trollope, and took a sturdy piece of hickory to those too feeble to stand at 20 paces.

    Surely like the return of Arthur, he would hand his sword onto Alan. One of the few people truly fit to lead the Republic.

    And Alan is really a better person than Andrew was. Andrew has all the best qualities that we need right now. But he had flaws that Alan does not share.

  8. I DID NOT THINK IT WAS RELEVANT? DO YOU THINK ITS RELEVANT?

    APPARENTLY THIS DUMMY THINKS THAT ALAN HAVING A DAUGHTER WHO IS FOND OF OTHER WOMEN IS THE HEIGHT OF RELEVANCE.

  9. DID WE GET BETTER LEADERSHIP AS A RESULT?

    WE CANNOT BLAME THE CONTESTANT FOR THE VOTERS. IT WAS CLEARLY THE VOTERS THAT FAILED. ALAN NEVER LET THEM DOWN. THEY LET THEMSELVES DOWN.

  10. if you like Andrew Jackson you’ll like this

    http://www.badassoftheweek.com/jackson.html

  11. A very balanced biography. And its true that Jackson was more responsible than anyone for the trail of tears. So he’s an inspirational President. But it was a mixed Presidency.

  12. http://www.booktv.org/watch.aspx?ProgramId=LW-10484

    Very scary if true. And we ought not rule it out and we ought not sweep it aside. We need to know this if it is true. Surely it tells us something about pty ltd as currently formulated if what Edwin is saying is true.

    http://www.booktv.org/watch.aspx?ProgramId=LW-10484

  13. Posted over at thoughts on freedom. Where patchy libertarian Humphreys has me blocked. I’d better lodge it for the permanent record:

    The above scheme sounds reasonable. But we really ought to get out of the habit of this revenue neutrality. In this particular case you want to raise the tax free threshold for retirees to balance the damage to many of them. So that would meet the requirements of revenue-negativity that are needed to fulfill ethical considerations.

    People are too absolutist with land tax. They either are full blown about it, wanting to bring up-front land values down to zero. Or down to agricultural level…. Or they go the Sinclair way and deny any scintilla of truth to the other guys argument.

    I asked one of these old blokes why a town called Kaitaia had taken off in growth and Awanui hadn’t. And this is despite the fact that Awanui was nearer the fisheries and the forestry which were big industries up North in NewZealand. Old guys said that the “Dallies” (Dalmations/Croations) well when they got hold of land they would never sell it. And this tendency to hoard land tends to inhibit economic development. The land tax, if that is the way one is getting around certain economic problems, just needs to be enough to stop this tendency and to get people to treat low-rise houses as a consumer-durable and not an investment good. We want to tip the balance in favour of vertical development a little bit. But no need to go overboard. As well there are other ways of solving these problems.

  14. Yes. We’re all keeping copies of the permanent record for your next election foray. Let’s see if we can’t get that 186 votes even lower.

    WELL YOU DO THAT DUMMY. ADVERTISING THEORY WOULD TELL US THAT INITIALLY ANY RECOGNITION IS GOOD RECOGNITION. ONE IS BEST TO DESENSITIZE PEOPLE TO THIS SORT OF THING UP FRONT. ONE OF THE REASONS LEFTISTS ARE ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH ALL SORTS OF OUTRAGES IS THAT WE ARE ALL JADED AND WORN DOWN BY THESE GOONS.

  15. RECOGNITION IS ALL THAT COUNTS AT FIRST DOPEY. DUMB LEFTIST SHEILAS TALKING ABOUT YOU. THATS GOOD. DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER WHAT THEY SAY IS GOOD OR BAD. JUST SO LONG AS THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT YOU. THATS THE IMPORTANT THING IN THE FIRST INSTANCE. ONLY LATER DOES IT BECOME IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT IMAGE. SO GATHER ALL THE COMMENTS YOU WANT. AND THE MORE YOU USE THEM THE BETTER. I DON’T MIND READING MY STUFF OVER.

  16. One ought never fool oneself that Mark Bahnisch and that crowd aren’t anything but House Niggers…….

    ((((To be a bit less misleading, and more polite perhaps we should use Alan Keyes’ terminology for the Malcolm X concept. The Great Statesman and Americas natural President says “Pampered Slaves” when describing the self-same concept. Malcolm, authentic philosopher of liberty said “House Negro”. I say “House Niggers” but only when referring to people of lilly-white complexion. You can see here a subtle reason for my great affinity and admiration for Alan Keyes. He wasn’t too much of a snob to use a Malcolm X concept when the shoe really did fit. )))))

    …….. and people in favour of full-blown slavery. They are not for liberties.. civil or otherwise. Well insofar as they are for civil liberties its only to get their leftist traitor friends off the hook back out there plotting national disaster.

    See hopalong Kim. Perhaps you think she’s a cutey. A bit of a “good sort”. Twice as fun with half the legs you might presume? But when it comes to political ideology she and her kind are a menace. Fortunately she isn’t really persuasive in terms of her ideas. Even if she could likely be persuasive in leading men astray.

    I get the feeling that there are some who still look over their shoulders at the Prodeo crowd. Perhaps they are nominally libertarian, but they still act like they want to be IN with this supposedly IN crowd. This is so far from my sensibilities I cannot understand this syndrome. Some conservatives, not properly reconstructed ex-marxists, or ex-overly-earnest-undergraduates “not getting it” still locked in undergraduate mode, not wanting to be given the high hat by this expanded Bloomsbury group. But in sober reality the Prodeo crowd are a grubby, tawdry, stupid, dishonest, and rotten bunch.

    Here is hopalong Kim as quoted by Currency Lad:

    Lefty Kim at LP running interference for murderer and democracy-wrecker Hugo Chavez:

    The irony of course is that governments like Lula’s and Chavez’s are hardly communist or even Castroite, but really just social democratic. Although unlike the old social democratic parties of Europe and Australia and NZ, these movements are actually putting teeth into their ideology – expanding public provision of services and pursuing redistributionist policies. But the US had better get used to a more assertive South America. It’s called democracy.”

    These are the sort of people you’ve got networking all throughout the public service. You have them infiltrating conservative parties. Getting jobs in defense to make us weak. Getting jobs in treasury to make us poor. Getting jobs to do with the environment to wreck the environment through bushfires and property-violations.

    Even on the “good sort” side of things you have to be a little bit suspect about dear Kimmy. Because when you see a good-looking woman with two good legs you say to yourself…. Well her left leg is pretty alright…… And her right leg is quite fetching….. Two good legs… Well BETWEEN!!!! THEM!!!!!….. that could amount to something. But with Kimmy you are stuck because there is nothing between her legs. She only having one leg she cannot be said to have anything between her legs. You are left to contemplate the fungus between her toes. And by extension one has to be pretty suspect about whats down near the tropic of Capricorn, unsupported as it is by the full leg quota.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: