Posted by: graemebird | August 10, 2009

The Carbon-Booster: All Global Warming Alarmists Are Transmuted Rascists.

From elsewhere

We’ve got to get beyond skepticism. Everyone now knows that if there is any warming it would be a great and good thing and something extra to add onto the known and proven benefits of extra-CO2. Looking at the Paleo record it seems to me that the very long-term NATURAL CO2-future is all downhill. Maybe thats just my memory playing tricks with me. But its at least possible that without human life we could wind up with a planet so CO2-deprived that life itself would have been on its last legs. After all there is no doubt that the atmosphere is
CO2-deprived right now. No doubt about that whatsoever.

Perhaps we ought to call ourselves CARBON-BOOSTERS. And malign all our opponents as being transmuted racists. After all look at the advertisements that Penny Wong lies to the children with. Black balloons. They say CARBON when they mean CO2. Is it a black thing? I think its a black thing. I’m sure its a black thing. I think we’ve alway known that this is a black thing.

I think the warmers are all racists and barely reconstructed eugenicists. How many black intellectuals do you know of who are desperate to deprive us all of CO2? Anyone? No one? There are none!

Now way right? Its all the same lilly-white geeks, busy-body’s and bigshots that stop us from getting cheap DDT by the tank-load to sort any problems around the farm.

I am a Carbon-Booster. I’m not a skeptic since I know the other side is wrong. This is not a matter of doubt. I think we ought to call ourselves by another name. Carbon-enthusiasts.

That way we can smuggle in the marvels of this most magnificent of molecules. Imagine one day the giant superhard structures that may be made of carbon if we preserve civilisation. All the carbon-fibre vehicles and machinery. If we are carbon-enthusiasts, or carbon-boosters or carbon-spruikers, or carbon-advocates we can side with our black brothers against these whitey eugenicists, advocate the marvels of higher-CO2 levels, and bring in great inspirational teachings to the small children about the wondrous possibilities of carbon materials in the wider scheme of things.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    “The planet can survive higher temperatures, but can our level of civilization…..”

    YES AND ITS NOT GETTING WARMER. ITS GETTING COLDER. BUT YES WE WOULD THRIVE ON HIGHER CO2 AND MORE WARMING AND OBVIOUSLY SO. THIS IS A FACT.

    ” …..which I took to be Homer’s meaning. What will be the effect on millions living on low lying areas etc. Will benifits really offset this in the long term?……”

    THEY WILL BE LIKE 20 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING WORLD WHO WILL HAVE A CAPITAL VALUE LOSS ON THE HOUSES THEY BOUGHT. ((ITS COOLING))THIS IS LIFE. ITS NOT SOME COSMIC TRAGEDY. ((ITS COOLING)) IF THEY ARE FREE IT WILL BE AKIN TO VENICE AND HOLLAND.((ITS COOLING)) IF THEY ARE NOT FREE AND WE ARE FREE WE CAN ABSORB THEM (((ITS COOLING))). IF NEITHER ARE FREE THEN WE WILL ALL DIE AND NOT BECAUSE OF THE WARMING.(((ITS COOLING))). BUT RATHER BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF FREEDOM. (((ITS COOLING))).

    “Regardless, the justification for the ETS must be…..”

    MUST BE? WORKING BACKWARDS FROM A CONCLUSION??? THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR AN ETS AND NO-ONE ALIVE ON THE PLANET TODAY CAN COME UP WITH ONE OR EVER HAS…

    “…. that we’ll expect to be better off in the long term as a result. Otherwise why would we do it?……”

    FOR RELIGIOUS OR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE REASONS NOW DISTANCE YOURSELF FROM IT YOU SLOB.

    “I think the questions are:

    1) What is the risk of rapid climate change occuring.”

    NO RISK AT ALL. THE TOTAL CERTAINTY OF SEVERE COOLING.

    ” by rapid I mean the sort of stuff predicted by the IPCC. ”

    NONE WHATSOEVER RATHER THE TOTAL CERTAINTY OF RAPID COOLING.

    “I don’t think gradual change is likely to be a big problem.”

    IT WON’T BE BECAUSE WE AREN’T GETTING GRADUAL CHANGE. WE ARE GETTING STRONG COOLING.

    ” I think this risk is great enough to justify action.”

    WHY. IS IT ONLY BECAUSE YOU ARE AN IDIOT? WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO TO DEAL WITH THE KNOWN COOLING THAT IS HAPPENING AND IS GOING TO GET WORSE.

    WHAT ARE YOU PROPOSING FOR THE KNOWN COOLING?

    I propose freedom, hydrocarbons, and nuclear Edney. And when thats all onstream ubiquitous solar towers just for kicks. And road solarisation.

    What do you propose Edney? For the known cooling that is happening now and will get worse?

    2) Will we get any sort of global action of this. If not I think the ETS is pointless and should ultimately be abandonned.

    3) Is this scheme efficient at acheiving its objectives. Probably not.

    Steve Edney
    11 Aug 09 at 6:14 pm

    Chodorov
    11 Aug 09 at 6:28 pm

  2. Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    “Saying it bluntly: Doing something about global warming means less jobs”

    The title itself is not “saying it bluntly”. Its evasive and beating around the bush. Can anyone tell this story straight? I mean take it on as a challenge. To actually say it bluntly in as few words as that?

    If there was global warming doing something about it would be cheap and easy. And would not involve CO2 at all.

    But there isn’t global warming. And screwing around with CO2-ouput isn’t “doing something” to the climate.

    Can this situation be put bluntly and succinctly?

    Not by someone on the consultants or public payroll I suggest.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: