Bill Gaede explains his system of physics over at Youtube under the general topic of “Einsteins Idiots.” Now its a terrific system. Mostly I like his youtubes for his stringent methodology. He really brings home the power of defining things sharply. But of course I’m not in the position to verify every last part of his system as the revealed truth to the nth degree.
But the general thrust of his rope-theory of gravity and light pretty much MUST be true.
LOOKING ASKANCE AT PARTICLE PHYSICS.
Down the bottom I’ll link to Maurice Cotterels excellent short history of how the public service money-pit known as PARTICLE PHYSICS got so horribly corrupted. So economists. Don’t be afraid and don’t feel you are all alone. You have your public service money pits (for example the doctrine of the Keynesian multiplier) and the physicists have their public service money pits also. I’ll have to transcribe part of it and rely on the reader to follow the link and read the rest of the page. Since it appears to be an internet book. And so I cannot seem to copy it direct.
STOLEN MONEY MAKES SCIENTISTS REALLY STUPID;
“Scientists cannot understand why the positive protons in the centre of atoms do not simply spring apart-their positive charges repelling each other. In 1935 a researcher named Yukawa suggested that another substance or particle must exist to ‘glue’ the protons together in the nucleus, a kind of atomic ‘velcro’. But an objector to Yukawa pointed out that if indeed that were the case…..”
I started talking about this topic awhile back. You see the mainstream story of the structure of atoms is untenable. Because the protons would blast themselves apart. Or if that gig was somehow solved, the electrons would just fall into the nucleus and stick to all the protons. There really is no sense to what we’ve all been taught. So when asked to justify this, the insiders just lie. They deny all knowledge of this physical description of the atom. They will lie about it until their face falls off and beyond. When I entered into this topic on this blog there were enough physicists around to indeed confirm the idiotic and baseless road the study took. And the billions of wasted dollars involved.
This Maurice Cotterel link appears to be an internet book. I have no comment on the rest of it. But the remainder of that first page is really rather good. It shows the feebleness and baselessness of the direction that particle physics has gone. It shows this in very few words. And it gives you an insight as to how elites work. Perhaps you’d better read Maurice on that page over a bit before you continue. The important thing to understand is that we have gone down a certain road because of stolen money and science SOCIOLOGY. Not because of the powerful strength of reason and the abundance of evidence backing the priesthood compromise models up.
PARTICLE PHYSICS MAY ONLY APPEAR RIDICULOUS ONCE YOU HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE.
I just had got used to looking at things as if it were all three-dimensional Brownian motion. Atomic billiards as it were. So the full strangeness of what is being claimed didn’t really hit me even whilst I was disputing the received wisdom.
For example, when searching for a 3D billiards version of gravity that was not occult, naturally the only alternative that presented itself was “push gravity”. But I had problems with it. Since I ended up reasoning that what was required to make it work was the visible universe being surrounded by some bodies producing these superfast gravity-producing particles. Like really fast neutrinos. So the Universe appeared like it would have to be surrounded to make this push-gravity work well.
But thats not the real reason Push-Gravity is wrong. The real reason is that, its been calculated that gravity, if we assume everything is particles, moves as least 20 billion times as fast as light. The physicists would lie that it propagates at the speed of light. And they make all their excuses but thats all nonsense. Gravity, for all practical purposes, is instantaneous. Whereas light takes time. And when people work the numbers gravity (assuming its all about particles) is at least 20 billion times as fast. You see to get this far you have to already have deep-sixed the simple-minded idiocy of special relativity. But that goes without saying.
But to tell you the truth. The idea of “gravity particles” travelling that fast for no damn reason at all didn’t seem strange. It only seems strange now that I have the Gaede rope-theory alternative. You see the mainstream view of light is itself idiotic.
Think about it. And I’ve used the comparison before. Think about Forrest Gump running away, flat out, for no reason. “Where are you going Forrest” and why are you running so fast. The particle physics fantasy of the photon is like this. A photon is generated ex-nihilo, then it immediately buggers off from wherever it was generated, at the speed of light.
Why would it do such a thing” “Where are you going little photon? Come back. Don’t you like us? What is propelling you?, and why are you running so fast?”
Does the photon move in waves? Or a straight line? Is it a wave or a particle? “A wave is not what something is. A wave is what something does.” (Gaede). No pressure. The people who think light is a particle cannot tell us if the particles fly straight or in waves. Nor can they tell us WHY protons would fly in a wave-like trajectory, if they ever did. Fans of Michael Jackson? Couldn’t get enough of the Lambada or Dirty Dancing? Photons who just dig watching the swimming, and particularly like the butterfly stroke?
But if you are a bigshot stolen money Professor, and you and your crowd bitch about it enough and cry and cite your credentials and published papers, sooner or later someone is going to come up with some bad theology like the “dualistic nature of light” or the idea that a photon is a “wavicle”. All bullshit of course. But thats how this socialist science gig works.
There is no such thing as a photon. Nor would there be any reason for a photon to be created eh-nihilo, and immediately beat it (jus beat it) at the speed of light. The whole idea is silly. And yet for gravity to work under particle physics, we find that the particles that would have to drive push-gravity, would have to hot-foot-it at least 20 bllion times as fast as light again. No alleged photon ever had a reason to do a runner at the speed of light. And yet particle physics implies that gravity-producing particles would have to travel in all directions 20 billion times faster than light, bare minimum.
Gaeda therefore wins in this part of his model. He’s so far ahead, it turns out, that he basically wins by default. You see there is no other explanation in town. There is no particle alone. And every proton and electron in the known universe must be connected to every other. Some directly, all indirectly. Otherwise it simply could not be the case that gravity could propagate that fast. Thats really the end of the matter.
So what is causing such speed of light? Gaede gets us to imagine a clothesline. You have two ropes that make one rope since they are wound around eachother orthogonally. Gaede says something about Grandma’s test. You have a tight rope like this with pegs at either end of the clothes-line. If the rope is wound tight and orthogonally when you tap the pegs to rotate them at one end, the pegs at the other end respond SO FAST.
It is THAT which is the source of all this incredible haste. Not a whole lot of photons, newly-created, making like they want to be anywhere but where they were born. It is this part of the Gaede theory that is simply unassailable. And its a good thing too. Because it gives us a non-voodoo explanation of gravity and mass.
Here we already have the means to find out a great deal about these ropes. After all we already know how fast the signal moves along the ropes in various conditions. Thats enough for a computer modelling research project right there. Experiments on orthonological ropes. Finding what different ropes, different types of rope, different tightnesses of ropes, different diametres of the orthogonal ropes. How does changing various factors affect speed. We can generate different rules of thumb. And we can find out a lot about the nature of these ropes by extrapolating and theorising from these rules. We want to find out how varying factors affects the speed of signal along the ropes.