I’ve kept people waiting a long time for this new angle on energy. And I’ve only really scratched the surface. Sometimes its better to try and work things out for yourself though. Here is some rough notes that I’ll be using to turn this into a proper explanation later. You see the electrons and protons in an atom don’t have an accountant working to add up the charges and take a net charge.
An electron which is compressed utterly, and surrounded by protons, cannot express its charge further than those protons. I’m assuming that electrons are porous in some ways and protons are not. Hence when new matter is being created, and simpler lighter elements are being compressed into heavier elements, we are always running out of electrons. Compressed electrons are always getting surrounded and effectively lost in the process. So large bodies where this is happening are drawing electrons and electricity into them, via plasmas in the vast reaches of space.
The sun draws into it Birekeland currents. This implies new matter creation in the core of the sun, compressing and hiding electrons, and leaving an electron shortage. The shortage, draws in the Birkeland currents from outer space, the sun gets more massive. The electricity heats the Hydrogen in the Corona and the “surface”.
Wherever electricity is being drawn in, and we cannot account for where the electrons have disappeared to, we must assume new matter creation and the building of the higher elements.
THE “HOMESICKNESS” OF ELECTRICITY IMPLIES NEW MATTER CREATION.
This is why electricity is always homesick, as Hunter Thompson puts it. This is why electricity always seeks out earth. Nothing else can explain it. If the earth is neutral then why the ubiquitous current of electrons into it and where do they go to? If the Sun is neutral why the Birkeland currents and why doesn’t the implied net positive charge of the sun “right” itself?
The solution is that the electrons hidden and compressed inside the inner nucleus of an atom are neutralised as to the expression of their chargea. How could it be otherwise? Except in some sort of occult view of physics?
Electrons are naturally bigger than protons but more subject to compression. They are like a party of fattagram ghosts gone back in time to hunt for the poor Rudi Valentino. If he is running he may pass through him on account of their porousness. But if he loses his nerve they will have him surrounded and they will all squash up against them, compressing themselves where they meet eachother via their surface repulsion, but compressing themselves also against Rudi. This will mould their fat all out of shape.
But supposing there are many Rudis and as the Rudis all back away from the outside fattograms they are pushing against compressed fattograms behind them. No-one can hear the compressed fattograms screaming after some time. Their characteristics cannot be manifested on the outside world. Here is the interlocking and countervailing forces that don’t reach that I was talking about in the earlier thread. The fact of many more electrons being locked away in the nucleus. The outer electrons don’t take these electrons into account as they push against the protons. They cannot notice their charge. Forces simply don’t tend to reach in the first instance.
Obviously this is no completed essay. But those of you who are interested have something here to ponder. And the take home story is that if we can save science from the cult of stolen money financing, then the human race need never be short of energy. Since where there are “neutrons” there is compression to be tapped. Since “neutrons” imply the existence of many more compressed electrons than anyone has ever suspected. And where there is compression there is useful energy to be recruited.
((((Simplified working model of the atom. We will assume that electrons are porous at speed, fat and capable of compression. Many more electrons then there is thought to be. Protons form the outer shell, else why would they determine the basic nature of the element? Electrons porous to many things. Will be penetrated at high speed. Neutrons are not on the outer level of nucleus. Else explain why they don’t effect which element the atom belongs to? Essentially there is no such thing as a neutron. Where neutrons exist there is protons and compressed electrons locked in as compressed and countervailing forces. The nature of matter is essentially vastly more static then we have been lead to believe. Where there are neutrons there will be useful energy.
Electrons porous to certain effects but not protons. Protons surrounding compressed electrons WILL NOT LET THEIR CHARGE manifest on the outside. Electrons pass continuously into the ground for the purpose of new matter creation. New matter creation involves the continual compressing of electrons within the nucleus. Surrounding them with protons wherein their charge cannot be manifested outside the nucleus. This is the setting up of opposing forces I was referring to. This explains the constant seeking of electricity for earth, the voltage difference between your head and feet, and the magnetic field.
The entire planet comprises an electric current going down to the centre of the earth. And electric current, not via a single wire, but going down at every square metre on the surface of the earth. This is where all the electrons are dissapearing. Also in the case of the sun. The Birkeland currents travelling across space and going into the sun, implies new matter creation in the sun since the compression of electrons in the nucleus of atoms leaves the situation many electrons short, hence the attraction of new electrons always into both the sun and into the earth.
Other topic: Gravity as negative energy- A partial critique. The voodoo of exnihilo creation by saying that gravity is negative energy, hence if the two are created together thats alright in this mystic view. If only making things in the factory were that simple!!!!! Its Maths-mysticism.
Nonetheless energy can be dissapated. That energy is immortal is bullshit. And certainly gravity will help dissapate energy. But at the same time large gravitational bodies set up the context for new matter and energy within them.
To show that gravity will definitely dissipate energy set up 3D billiards example)))))))
Will be cleaned up into a proper thread at some later date.