Posted by: graemebird | November 30, 2009

The Global Warming Fraud Will Probably Be The Death Of Billions/ Today Far More Important Than Most General Elections.

So much is riding today on the election of Tony Abbott to the leadership of the opposition. And his subsequent banishing of CO2-bedwetters, and especially Malcolm Turnbull, to the outer dark. Then making sure they are denied any pre-selection ever. But the main thing is this election. For if Tony Abbot is not elected today, then the cap-and-kill becomes bipartisan on this continent.

It was only last night that I found out that Turnbull was the local manifestation of the giant vampire-squid that is Goldman Sachs. That is to say that he made his money with the worst, most repulsive, rent-seeking lunatics the world has yet seen. His type must never again be let anywhere near the front bench. And because Joe Hockey was a banking-lawyer, and is feeble-minded with regards to those of the Turnbull mindset, then he must not be trusted either. Because you will just be thinking you’ve reached an understanding with this jolly fat Santa type ……… but as soon as you walk away fucking Turnbull, or a Turnbull type, will jump out from behind the bushes and get the fat man all confused like Hockey was some sort of dopey version of Hamlet. Then Hockey will, as predictably as night follows day, lose all the resolve that you thought you had instilled into him.

Everything is riding on Tony. I’m not a believer in prayer or psychic powers. But I suggest we drop our skepticism today and give him all the success vibes we possibly can. Real mental focus. Everything from your standard of living over the next ten years, to our survival as a sovereign nation, rides on Tony winning this one. This vote today is far more important than virtually every general election in our nations history. So when you think of Tony only think good thoughts. Use whatever imagined psychic powers you feel you have to push him over the line. He’s a good man. And he’s not a zombie-triangulater like Humprheys, the Catallaxians, and worst of all Malcolm Turnbull.

Here is why this global warming menace of obsessive lying may be the death of almost all of us. Its because the hysterics has masked real threats that are out there:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

FROM ELSEWHERE

“Birdy,
We ought to build a big gen 4 nuclear reactor on North Stradbroke Is and incorporate a desal plant.
Plenty of thorium on site.”

Yes of course. And a big liquified (and gasified) coal plant right next to it. Using off-peak electricity, hydrogen, steam, and heat all coming from the nuclear reactor to make our solid hydro-carbons go that much further.

Now listen up. This global warming constellation of lies is really going to be the death of us. And its not just the devastation of the cap and kill I’m talking about here. Its the masking of real looming threats to the planet and the species.

Everywhere we see crude and unscientific theories being held too rigidly in the mainstream. Crude and unscientific theories of gravity, how the stars produce their energy, matter creation, and pretty much everything else that is going to relate to the problem of a galactic centre blowup or a supernova or the first causing the second. They hold to these theories like a miser clutching a 100 dollar note between his butt-cheeks. But I feel if we can assemble the sort of brains we had here in 2008 we can get to the bottom of this matter.

And sometimes it is the same villains who played up the fraudulent CO2-emissions business, who are also playing down the potential for problems sheeted to us from elsewhere in the galaxy. I speak of the loathsome and beloved Goddard institute. The keeper of secrets and purveyor of lies.

“A stellar explosion on a scale previously unimaginable for anything other than a supernova recently erupted on a modest star (slightly less massive than the sun) in a two-star system called II Pegasi in the constellation Pegasus. According to a NASA-Goddard news release, “It was about a hundred million times more energetic than the sun’s typical solar flare, releasing energy equivalent to about 50 million trillion atomic bombs.” Were a comparable event to occur on the sun, it would result in a mass extinction due to the outpouring of lethal X-rays. The NASA report, however, adds a comforting observation: “Fortunately, our sun is now a stable star that doesn’t produce such powerful flares.”

Consider the stupidity of that statement when the flare from this star has taken them entirely by surprise. And since they are too stupid to recognise that the galaxy is an interconnected whole, they see everything as being internal to the star itself. So they didn’t bother to figure out what potential alignment caused this disaster. And we may be talking about the extermination of billions of intelligent beings here. Nothing to be flippant about. Where was the star in relation to the rest of the galaxy when this happened? No answer. What about in relation to its partner star and the planets that orbit them? Not interested. So we have to get onto this. Because leading up to supernova’s there seems to be typically all kinds of problems for us here on earth. And we are overdue for another one of these. We need to know what to do about it.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Excellent suggestion from Ken Neilsen, perhaps somewhat chastised by some home TRUTHZ he had thrust on him over at John Quiggin’s site.

    “I have a suggestion. It seems to me that quite of lot of blog airtime, here and in a few others I read, is taken up to shots at other blogs and bloggers. I have done my bit.
    I reckon blogs like this should mostly be talking about the outside world where stuff happens and some people are smart and some people are foolish and by their actions the world improves or goes backwards.
    Bloggers at their best are observers and thinkers and commentators about the outside world.
    Comments in blogs about blogs ends up with a kind of closed circuit. Maybe a short circuit.
    So, my suggestion is that we, voluntarily and without sanction for nonobservance, quit talking about and taking shots at other blogs in this place. Don’t even quote them.
    If we want to say something about a particularly wise or stupid statement elsewhere go there and do it.
    I am not asking for a rule or a vote. I suggest we try it for a while and see.
    Or you can ignore what I have said completely. Won’t be the first time.”

    Of course the downside of this is that they won’t be talking about my blog. So they will have to grit their teeth even harder not to talk about my blog. When all they really want to do is talk about my blog.

    So Ken has a point. But the real problem is the nihilism and anti-intellectualism at Catallaxy. The pride in being filthy triangulaters, and in never having a comprehensible or principled view on anything. Really Ken you ought just ban Cambria. Because its Cambria who is being a prick here. And then the rest fall in line with his act. On account of the size of his wallet.

  2. This Fleeced fellow seems to have always been a worthy young fellow.

    “Except that that’s not how the split seems to be happening. The side at least paying lip-service to smaller government and lower taxes (and no ETS) are also the social conservatives, and is the side closer the side of the Nats… and then we have the “left faction”. I’m not sure I would describe the latter as having quasi libertarian leanings.”

    Exactly. What on earth could these dummies have been thinking of??

  3. well you got your wish

    The Mad Monk has won

  4. Fantastic. Damn it was close. Why aren’t you happy that people like me are still going to be able to support people like you?

    You are such an ignorant fool. You don’t know what a close run thing for you that was. The money that goes to pay your ungrateful ass doesn’t fall from the sky. It comes from me and others using the big equipment. And all of it using stacks and stacks of energy.

  5. This is great news for Labor.

    ITS GREAT NEWS FOR ALL OF US DUMMY. TO DESTROY THE ECONOMY, AT A TIME OF IMPENDING AMERICAN DEFAULT WOULD LEAD TO TAXEATERS COPPING IT AS WELL. ALTHOUGH A VAMPIRE SQUID TENTACLE LIKE YOURSELF MIGHT STILL LIVE ANOTHER DAY. THE FACT IS THAT THERE WOULD COME A TIME WHEN THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE CULLING. AND THE OLD GUYS WOULD HAVE BEEN NEGLECTED IN SQUALOR AS WELL.

    THERE IS THIS FANTASY GOING AROUND THAT THE CAP AND KILL WOULD DO MINIMAL DAMAGE. BUT ITS NOT BY ANYONE WHO HAS SYSTEMATICALLY THOUGHT THINGS THROUGH. ONLY BY DUMMIES LIKE SOON AND SINCLAIR, WHO REFUSE TO APPLY THEIR TRAINING AND RATHER WISH TO MAKE THEIR ESTIMATES VIA LIVER QUIVER.

  6. Further proof that Ken Neilsen is an ignorant idiot. Whereas the following statement may usually be right, its just ridiculous under the circumstances to hand. Ken lives on the backs of people like me. And so he doesn’t know what it takes to keep his act afloat. Its takes heavy metal is what it takes. I’m not talking Rock and Roll.

    “What politicians say and do can be an interesting spectator sport but doesn’t really matter much to most of us. Certainly they are less important than they think they are.”

    What a dummy. This was the most important election in years.

  7. What is there to do but go get some hard hooch and ring in sick. Today might be the difference between successfully repelling China a decade from now, or alternatively becoming a captive nation.

    Notice that Cambria is such an incredible triangulater that his whole attitude changed as soon as the unexpected election result was announced. All of us have to make sure that weather-rooster knows which way the wind really blows.

  8. Mr Bird, an excellent comment of yours today at Prof Quiggin’s blog –

    “I don’t know to what extent I am to blame for creating this monstrosity that is Catallaxy 2009. But it has to be one of the most anti-intellectual sites around. Its not just anti-intellectual in terms of the participants. It appears to be stridently, smugly, proudly anti-intellectual in-principle.

    …. They don’t stand for small government. Or for anything at all. They stand for the mob mentality, cronyism, triangulation, nihilism, and the hatred for any novel or creative thought.

    The atmosphere got so bad, clubby and mob-like there that I was finding myself having to constantly stick up for a woman against ritualised pre-emptive abuse of the strongest sort. During better days I used to say to some of the leftist girls that they ought to “come over to the bright side of the road”. But there is no bright side of the road to take them to on the right that I know of. “

  9. I thought so. Thank you Sal. I hope that you won’t resent me for my preferred candidate winning. I’m going to have to talk to you about this global warming business some time or another. I understand your concerns about Mr Abbott. But if you understood things in the particular way that I do, you would know that I consider this matter an incredibly close call for our country. Without any hyperbole at all, a really close call and maybe the difference between national survival and bondage.

  10. YOU REALLY ARE AN IDIOT CAMBRIA.

  11. Mr Bird

    I think it is probably the best result.

    Joe Hockey is a nothing man. He believes in and stands for nothing, “not even the merest tincture of political conviction” according to the Australian’s David Burchell who went to uni with him.

    Abbott is a Cassius figure.

    Malcolm Turnbull is a Napoleonic figure.

    Both men even resemble their historical likenesses physically.

    Abbott will be far more entertaining and constructive in the long run for the future of Australia because he is passionate yes, but about the wrong things and from the wrong perspective.

    Interesting times.

  12. I haven’t changed my tune. I still prefer Mal

    NO BUT CAMBRIA HAS CHANGED HIS TUNE. AND YOU ALWAYS WITHOUT FAIL TRASH THE CONSERVATIVE AND PICK THE LEFTIST TRAITOR. AS THE AMERICAN ELECTION PROGRESSED YOU ALWAYS PICKED THE MOST LEFTIST OF THE TWO FRONT RUNNERS UNTIL YOU WERE PUSHING WITH GREAT FERVOUR FOR THE MARXIST TRAITOR WHO ACTUALLY WON. A MORE HONEST FELLOW WOULD HAVE BACKED THE MARXIST FROM THE START.

  13. They stand for the mob mentality, cronyism, triangulation, nihilism, and the hatred for any novel or creative thought.

    Like supernovas hitting the earth and causing a tsunami?

    WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE FOR THAT ONE. THE PROPOSITION IS SO SOUND THAT IT TOOK ME A SINGLE AFTERNOON TO MAKE THAT LINK.

  14. ALL SOUND THEORY. AND YOUR IDIOCY ON ALL THESE MATTERS PROOF OF MY CONTENTION ABOUT CATALLAXY.

  15. I would also include reverse speech and of course the Russians did 911.

    NOT ONLY THE RUSSIANS IDIOT. BOTH GOOD THEORY.

  16. Kennedy being assassinated by his driver? Thats a new one.

    NO ITS NOT ACTUALLY. BUT ITS A GOOD ONE. SINCE INSTEAD OF ACCELERATING TO EXIT THE KILL ZONE, THE DRIVER SLOWED TO WALKING PACE, TURNED AROUND AND POINTED HIS PISTOL STRAIGHT AT THE PRESIDENTS HEAD. THIS MUCH WE KNOW FOR A FACT. USUALLY IF ONE DOES THIS AND THE FELLOWS BRAINS COMES SPLATTERING OUT WE TEND TO ASSOCIATE THE TWO THINGS TOGETHER IN OUR MINDS. WHERE THE PISTOL IS POINTING WITH THE PERSON BEING SHOT.

  17. Over here:

    https://graemebird.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/specifications-for-a-generic-factory-built-survival-structure/

    Posting at 4.09 on Nov 28.

  18. Its a little bit too much of a stretch for you guys to associate a pistol pointing as someone, with that someone being shot.

    How foolish of me? My goodness. To think. That someone gets shot and someone else is pointing a pistol at his head. And its just a little bit too much to put the two things together. As non-independent events.

    This is the level of dumb at Catallaxy right now.

  19. The “pistol” is simply a reflection of the passenger’s hair NO THATS NOT RIGHT. REFLECTION OF WHOSE HAIR? YOU DON’T HAVE A LOT OF PASSENGERS TO CHOOSE FROM. ALSO ITS NOT NORMAL TO TURN AROUND AND PASS ONE HAND OVER YOUR OPPOSING SHOULDER. AND ITS COMPLETELY FOREIGN FOR A TRAINED DRIVER, OR ANY DRIVER TO SLOW DOWN IN THAT SITUATION. SUPPOSING HE WAS INNOCENT. TO SLOW DOWN IN THAT SITUATION WOULD BE SUICIDAL FOR THE DRIVER. EVEN A NON-TRAINED PERSON WOULD NOT HAVE DONE SO.

  20. Mr Bird, is Joseph Cambria a here the same as that dimwitted crank ‘jc’ on Catallaxy?

  21. Yes he is. Although he comes here under a number of guises. So I cannot always guarantee its him. But notice the crazy ad hoc nature of what he tries on. A gun becomes a reflection of someones hair. Whose hair and on what?

    This is like I played him the sounds of explosions during the 9/11 attacks. And he started claiming that it could be “cars backfiring in the basements”

    This fellow is a real dummy.

    But what must be noted is the way these secret service kills work. Without presumptions as to know WHICH secret service. They use multiple redundancy over each aspect of the plot. And to be successful its going to work better if they don’t initiate the plot themselves. But make the kill on top of a plot already in motion.

  22. Sometimes Sal. But he regularly confuses anyone who posts here as Cambria. And I am most certainly not he.

  23. Mr Bird

    I think Mr Soon’s problem is his Oriental background. You see, these Orientals tend to worship and have the highest deference towards big moneymakers. In his culture they are imbued with the greatest virtues.

    Mr Soon comes here, confuses the corrupt cronyist setup which you have brilliantly dissected to be a mere simulacrum of True Capitalism and assumes that Mr Turnbull must be an official of the highest merit due to his financial achievements. Hence he then entrusts as is the wont of the Oriental his decision making and thinking to Mr Turnbull.

    You need to disabuse him of these notions so that he may be of better use, Mr Bird.

  24. I think thats exactly right Winchester. And I could hardly imagine the point more clearly expressed in this or any other language.

  25. Mr Bird
    Given Mr Turnbull’s past position in Goldman Sachs I venture to say that he is most likely a closet Hebrew

  26. Culturally speaking he’s a vampire-squid tentacle and thats the main point. On another note here is William Greer shooting JFK 50 times in a row. Just so Cambria can see it this time around:

  27. Mr Bird

    It is exceedingly obvious to anyone with a flicker of intelligence that Mr Kennedy, that brave Irish Papist, was asssassinated by associates of Mr Castro.

  28. It’s such a pit, Mr Quartermaine that Mr Bird’s brilliant investigative skills were not available to the Warren Commission.

    To think that he unravelled the entire mystery in just a few minutes. And all without leaving the comfort of his own home!

    IT TOOK ME A VERY LONG TIME. AND THE WARREN COMMISSION DIDN’T HAVE YOUTUBE OR GOOGLE. YOU DON’T HAVE A POINT. YOU ARE JUST AN IDIOT. AND WE KNOW FOR A FACT THAT RIGHT FROM THE START JOHNSON WANTED TO HOSE DOWN ANY CONNECTION WITH CASTRO. AND THAT JOHNSON HIMSELF THOUGHT THAT CASTRO HAD DONE IT UNTIL THE DAY HE DIED. YOU ARE JUST BEING AN IDIOT MATE. DO YOU NOT SEE THE PISTOL?

    OBVIOUSLY ITS A GOOD THEORY. WHEN YOU SEE THE DRIVER SLOW THE CAR, PULL THE PISTOL, AND STRETCH OUT HIS ARM AND THEN YOU SEE THE PRESIDENT BRAINS EXPLODE.

    PEOPLE FROM CATALLAXY ARE MORONS.

    NOW THIS DOCTRINE OF TRADE-CRAFT, THAT YOU LET OTHER PEOPLE PUT THE PLOT IN MOTION, AND THAT YOU HAVE MULTIPLE REDUNDANCY ………. THIS MIGHT IMPLY THAT IF GREER DIDN’T FINISH THE JOB RIGHT THERE AND THEN, PRIOR TO HIM HITTING SOME PREDEFINED POINT, THAT THERE WOULD BE ANOTHER SHOOTER READY TO FINISH ALL OF THEM OFF.

  29. Right. Probably. What I’m thinking is that once a plot is in motion then you can have other people coming on board to see it through. But Bobby and the CIA had made 7 attempts on Castro’s life. And so Castro had to act. What I’m saying is that knowing Castro was involved doesn’t let everyone else off the hook. In the same way that knowing these Arabs and Saddam were involved in 9/11 doesn’t alibi anyone else.

    It would appear to be simple tradecraft to try and avoid initiating the kill oneself. And rather to help a plot along when it appears as it is bound to do sooner or later.

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    By the way I’ve just heard about some fellow claiming that crustaceans have been found in the stone blocks at the Giza plateau. I kind of like it when one of my theories starts to look like its panning out.

  30. Is anyone too stupid or blind to see William Greer point his pistol at the President and stretch out his arm? Yes or no?

  31. “By the way I’ve just heard about some fellow claiming that crustaceans have been found in the stone blocks at the Giza plateau. ”

    Not so unusual when you consider that limestone is A FUCKING SEDIMENTARY ROCK THAT FORMS IN SHALLOW SEAS.

    YOU COMPLETE MORON. THATS THE JUSTIFICATION THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY GOING TO COME UP WITH THE MINUTE THEY SEE THE CRUSTACEANS. WHAT A TWIT YOU ARE. BUT IT OBVIOUSLY STILL BACKS MY THEORY. AND PARTICULARLY SINCE THE FACT IS THAT IT MUST HAVE BEEN A VERY LONG TIME SINCE ANYTHING IN THAT AREA WAS UNDERSEA.

  32. You do know how fossils are formed, right?

    SURE. SO WHAT IS YOUR POINT? WHAT THIS MEANS IS IF THE CRUSTACEANS ARE NOT 100’S OF MILLIONS OF YEARS PRIOR THE ROCKS CAME FROM THE COAST. A VERY LONG WAY AWAY. WHICH IS EVIDENCE FOR MY THESIS, NO MATTER WHAT BULLSHIT EXCUSE YOU COME UP WITH.

  33. So how old are the crustaceans? Evidence please with referenced sources.

    HOW OLD ARE YOU CLAIMING THEM TO BE. YOU ARE CONTESTING THE MATTER. THE STORY IS THAT THE STONES THEMSELVES FORMED ONLY 700 000 YEARS OR SO AGO. WHICH MEANS THEY ARE FROM THE PRESENT OCEANS. FROM THE SEA. RETRIEVED FROM A COASTAL CIVILISATION AND NOT QUARRIED LOCALLY. THEY WOULD HARDLY TALK ABOUT STONES FORMED 700 000 YEARS AGO CHOCKERS WITH STUPID-CAMBRIAN CRUSTACEANS NOW WOULD THEY.

  34. “HOW OLD ARE YOU CLAIMING THEM TO BE.”

    The classic Birdian bait and switch.

    THERE IS NO BAIT AND SWITCH YOU ARE LYING. IF YOU ARE CONTESTING THE MATTER LETS HAVE YOUR EVIDENCE. THEY WERE SAYING THESE ARE ROCKS THAT FORMED UNDER THE OCEAN 700 000 YEARS AGO. THIS PUTS THEM OUT OF THE RANGE OF LOCAL GIZA PLATEAU ROCKS. AND PROVES THE OCEAN LINK UNLESS THE CRUSTACEANS ARE OF CAMBRIAN ORIGIN. AND IF THEY WERE HE WOULD HAVE SAID SO AND NOT TALKED ABOUT THE ROCKS BEING LESS THAN A MILLION YEARS OLD.

  35. From elsewhere:

    With some caveats peak oil is a reasonable model. And we may hit a daily peak in coal extraction some time this century. Never in this story are we wise to base policy on make-believe. People have sort of “referred pain” where they are bugged by other real matters that they cannot articulate properly. And it spills over into other things. We deal with the real problems then and we will have less blowback in the make-believe world. Nowhere do we find an excuse to base anything on fairy stories.

    I notice that no-one is the least bit interested in picking up this supernova/nuclear war story. But the real problems that aren’t addressed fuel the fake problems. And the fake problems mask the real ones. In either case we will get traction going after the real problems. People may dimly suspect that our resource allocation policies wind up with China buying all our gear on the cheap and us using up our hydro-carbon paternity too quickly. Personally I think this is pretty right and the referred pain may fuel the global warming racket. But there may be a lot of things spilling into the unreal concerns. People concerned about particulates. About overfishing. Not enough buffered land between private properties for the critters to move around.

    If there are real problems and we don’t address them we almost deserve to be plagued by all this make-believe. If people are poor and unable to get better jobs, or easily go into business, and we don’t improve the situation through more liberty and better policy then we almost deserve for the socialists to gain traction. Its the same story all the way down the line.

  36. “The observed random emplacement and strictly homogenous distribution of the fossil shells within the whole rock is in harmony with their initial in situ setting in a fluidal sea bottom environment,” write Professor Ioannis Liritzis and his colleagues from the University of the Aegean and the University of Athens.

    “…The analysis determined the primary building materials were pinky granites, black and white granites, sandstones and various types of limestones.

    “The latter contained numerous shell fossils of the genus Nummulites, simple marine organisms whose name means ‘little coins’.

    “[At Cheops alone they constituted] a proportion of up to 40% of the whole building stone rock,” the researchers write in the latest issue of the Journal of Cultural Heritage.

    “Nummulites that lived during the Eocene period around 55.8-33.9 million years ago are most commonly found in Egyptian limestone.”

    http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/04/28/2229383.htm

    No need to thank me.

    RIGHT. SO ALL FROM THE COAST AS SUSPECTED. OR ARE YOU CLAIMING THE GIZA PLATEAU WAS UNDERWATER THAT TIME PERIOD AGO?

    WHAT EXACTLY IS YOUR POINT? AND YOU CANNOT SURELY BE SAYING THEY SAMPLED THE ENTIRE PYRAMID? YOU ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT A SAMPLE FOR ONE BLOCK RIGHT?

  37. “Many of Egypt’s most famous monuments, such as the Sphinx and Cheops pyramid at Giza, contain hundreds of thousands of marine fossils, according to a new study.

    Most of the fossils are intact and preserved in the monument walls, giving clues to how the monuments were built.

    The authors suggest the stones that make up the Giza plateau, Fayum and Abydos monuments must have been carved out of natural stone as they reveal what chunks of the sea floor must have looked like over 4000 years ago, when the buildings were erected.

    “The observed random emplacement and strictly homogenous distribution of the fossil shells within the whole rock is in harmony with their initial in situ setting in a fluidal sea bottom environment,”

    There is a ringing endorsement right there,

    “…. they reveal what chunks of the sea floor must have looked like over 4000 years ago, when the buildings were erected….”

    Apart from them getting the timing wrong, its a total endorsement of my theory. They are saying outright that the builders got their stones straight from the sea floor.

    Total victory for me.

  38. Also dig this. For the Velanovins to be getting all these stones straight out of the ocean floor, as these scientists imply, we see my whole story of them manipulating their coasts to deal with the variable glacial-period sea level ….. well we see it in our minds eye. Pull the natural floor out and building these blocks. So you wind up having your goods received and your despatch going straight in and out to the water. The most energy-efficient heavy cargo transport there is.

  39. hey graeme
    what do you think of the fact that Nassim Taleb is a CO2 bedwetter like me?

    http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/cameronstatements.htm

    PEOPLE GET TAKEN IN IF THEY ARE TOO BUSY TO INVESTIGATE. YOU’VE GOT NO EXCUSE AT ALL. SINCE I WAS ON YOUR BLOG DOING THE INVESTIGATING. AND YOU KNOW FOR AN ABSOLUTE FACT THAT THE RACKET HAS NO EVIDENCE IN ITS FAVOUR. SO WHEREAS THIS REVEALS THAT NASSIM GOES WITH THE EVIDENCE BUT WAS MISLEAD. IT REVEALS YOU NOT GOING WITH THE EVIDENCE AT ALL. AND RELYING ON YOUR LIST OF GURUS, OR ON WHAT YOU PERCEIVE TO BE BIPARTISAN. BOTH USELESS AND ANTI-SOCIAL MODES OF THOUGHT.

  40. Bird:

    Why he fuck are you so angry today when you ought to be out their celebrating with orange juice… (you still staying of the booze?)?

    Abbott won. Your man won.

    I AM HAPPY. SUCK SHIT YOU TRIANGULATER SUPPORTERS AND SELLOUTS. NOT ONLY THAT. MY VELANOVIN THEORY HAS KICKED IN IN SPADES.

  41. If you want to do anything worthwhile you ought to link this brilliant interview with Professor Tim Ball. About the history of the global government aspect of the global warming fraud.

    We have to audit our CO2 measuring site people as well. Because they are almost definitely rigging the data as well. I’m serious. I knew that Hadcrut and the others were rigging the data long ago and can prove it. Well the same goes for our CO2 measuring stations. They are colluding with the Hawaian people to smooth out the data.

  42. NOT ONLY THAT. MY VELANOVIN THEORY HAS KICKED IN IN SPADES.

    You now have a theory on a female body part, bird?
    So what is this vulvian theory of yours Bird that has you all excited?

    DON’T GET ME TALKING ABOUT THAT END OF THE FEMALE PERSON, CAMBRIA.

    ONCE DIVERTED TO THAT SUBJECT, I’M LIKELY TO TURN INTO A PRISONER OF POESY FOR LIFE.

    WHEREAS WE ALL KNOW THAT THERE ARE IMPORTANT POLITICAL, STRATEGIC, TACTICAL, ECONOMIC, SCIENTIFIC, PHILOSOPHICAL, SPIRITUAL, AND MATTERS-OF-PROPHECY, FOR ME TO ATTEND-TO.

    ITS TRUE THAT I’D RATHER BE SOME SORT OF LATTER-DAY TOM BOMBADIL:

    GROWING ME HAIR LONG. GET A NEW BEARD. GROW THAT BEARD LONG TOO. JUMP ABOUT IN YELLOW GUMBOOTS ALONE IN THE WOODS. THAT SORT OF GEAR.

    THOUGH INSTEAD OF ONLY GATHERING FLOWERS FOR JUST ONE ELVIN LADY, OR ONLY MY TWO BEAUTIFUL GIRLS …….

    …INSTEAD OF DOING THIS ALONE, THE OTHER HALF OF THE TIME, I WOULD PREFER TO BE LOST IN SOME CRAZED LYRICAL REVERIE, FOR THE WRONG-END, OF HALF THE HUMAN SPECIES.

    SURE-SURE. SURE I’D RATHER BE LIVING THAT SORT OF LIFESTYLE, AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

    OR SUPPOSE EVEN IF I HAD TO STILL WORK IN THE CITY? AND BLOG?

    EVEN UNDER CURRENT PERSONAL REALITIES, I’D RATHER GIVE UP THE OTHER SUBJECTS, AND TALK ENDLESSLY, ABOUT THIS ONE SUBJECT. THIS ONE SUBJECT THAT YOU HAVE SEEN FIT, TO WRENCH MY WAYWARD MIND BACK TO.

    BY TRYING TO DISTRACT ME IN THAT DIRECTION, YOU WILL ONLY IMPRISON ME, IN A WORLD OF POETRY AND PROSE; AN ETHEREAL-OTHERWORLD. A TWILIGHT ZONE. A HOME FROM HOME,* THAT TAKES ME FAR ADRIFT, FROM THE CAUSES FOR WHICH I AM SORELY NEEDED.

    WORST OF ALL YOU WILL REVEAL ME AS BEING SOME SORT OF ALIEN-CHILD. SOME PURPOSE-BRED OUTER-STELLA HOMINID-BARELY-HOMINID. SOME E.T. SOME OUTLANDER ………. BROUGHT UP IN A HUXLEYAN “BRAVE NEW WORLD” GYNECOLOGIST BABY-POD.

    SOME HUEFARNO, WHO EVEN AS A TWO YEAR OLD, WOULD BE INCLINED TO LOOK AT THAT END OF A GROWN WOMEN, WITH ALL THE MYSTERY AND WONDERMENT, THAT A NORMAL CHILD OF THE SAME AGE, MIGHT HAVE MUSTERED TO SURVEY, A MATCH-BOX TOY-VEHICLE, WRAPPED UP IN HIS CHUBBY LITTLE FIST, WHILE ALONE IN SOME SANDPIT, A LONG LONG TIME AGO, AND FAR FAR AWAY.

    BUT THANKS FOR BRINGING THE MOST DISTRACTING OF ALL SUBJECTS UP ANYHOW.

    DESPITE THE TIME STARING INTO THE DISTANCE YOU’VE STOLEN FROM MY SCHEDULE. DESPITE THIS YOU’VE EARNED SOME BROWNY POINTS (DON’T WASTE THEM). YOU’VE DECISIVELY PUT ME IN A GOOD MOOD.

    NOW I MUST PAINFULLY WRENCH MY ATTENTION AWAY FROM THIS SUBJECT, BEFORE I BECOME LOST FOR ALL TIME.

    LOST. LOST. LOST.

    LOST LIKE-A LOTUS-EATER.

    THE THING IS THIS, AND PURELY FROM AN EXISTENTIAL POINT OF VIEW;

    ONE HAS TO SAVE THIS NATION ENTIRE. ONE MUST SAVE THE WHOLE NATION. ONE MUST SAVE AUSTRALIA. ONE MUST SAVE THIS COUNTRY, PRIOR TO DOING WHAT ONE REALLY WANTS TO DO.

    WHICH OF COURSE IS TO SPEND ONES TIME IN APPRECIATION OF A SUBSET OF ONES COUNTRY-WOMEN.

    BUT THE SALVATION OF

    1. AUSTRALIA

    2. THE NOTION AND REALITY OF LOCAL SOVEREIGNTY

    3. OF HUMAN FREEDOM

    AND

    4. OF HUMANE CIVILISATION…..

    WELL THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF. THIS IS HARD YAKKA. THIS IS BUSINESS.

    AND WHILST ONE WISHES ONE WAS DOING OTHER THINGS. THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THAT LIFE WASN’T MEANT TO BE EASY*. AND THE LESS-EASY-LIFE, IS NOT ALL BEER, ALL SKITTLES. OR EVEN ALL LOWER-END FEMALE-CHARMS.

  43. “CL,mate ,darl,luv, I hates the f**kers. Why do you like them”

    So sayeth my sweetheart tal. But she cannot mean what she is saying. And the philosopher CL defeats her utterly with a single link.

  44. “Why did the money pour in so quickly? Because the climate alarm kept ringing so loudly: The louder the alarm, the greater the sums. And who better to ring it than people like Mr. Jones, one of its likeliest beneficiaries?”

    Why did the money pour in so quickly?

    Conspirational thinkers cannot see behind doors. So conspirational thinkers see more conspiracies then are really there. Conspirational thinkers see more conspiracies then that COULD POSSIBLY be there.

    But there are conspiracies nonetheless.

    “Why did the money pour in so quickly?”

    It poured in at one, two, and three steps from various GLOBAL GOVERNANCE conspiracies. Surfing off the club-of-Rome assumptions. Assumptions that needed to be taken on board. But never surrendered to. Not now or ever.*

    Now there is another matter we have to attend to. The conspiracy to smooth the rate of CO2 increase by our own people. We have a station measuring CO2. Mark my words. An investigation will reveal skullduggery and the damaging of the data. But if the data is undamaged an investigation will reveal a conspiracy to smooth out the CO2 growth.

    An investigation will reveal our guys in collusion with the people running the station above the volcano in Hawaii. This must be jumped on immediately. They have been colluding and they have been faking it.

    Mark my words.

    And you have to go in with the potential of ubiquitous criminal punishments to get the kids to squeal.

  45. Why did you remove your post claiming that the limestone from which the pyramids were constructed was only 700,000 years old? A bit dishonest of you.

    I DIDN’T. IT MUST BE ON ANOTHER THREAD. I DIDN’T SAY THAT. I SAID SOMEBODY ELSE SAID THAT. AND THEY DID. BUT NOW WE HAVE THE SCIENTISTS THINKING THEY HAVE AN ANGLE OF WHAT THE OCEAN FLOOR USED TO LOOK LIKE 4000 YEARS AGO, BECAUSE THEY ARE PRETTY SURE THE GYPOS TOOK THE BLOCKS FROM THE OCEAN.

    WELL THATS MOSTLY RIGHT. BUT IT WASN’T 4000 YEARS. AND IT WASN’T THE GYPOS.

  46. My mistake:

    “THE STORY IS THAT THE STONES THEMSELVES FORMED ONLY 700 000 YEARS OR SO AGO. WHICH MEANS THEY ARE FROM THE PRESENT OCEANS. FROM THE SEA. RETRIEVED FROM A COASTAL CIVILISATION AND NOT QUARRIED LOCALLY. THEY WOULD HARDLY TALK ABOUT STONES FORMED 700 000 YEARS AGO CHOCKERS WITH STUPID-CAMBRIAN CRUSTACEANS NOW WOULD THEY.”

    Yet I have demonstrated that the crustaceans found within the limestone from the pyramid of Cheops are “of the genus Nummulites” and that “Nummulites that lived during the Eocene period around 55.8-33.9 million years ago are most commonly found in Egyptian limestone.”

    Ergo the limestone was quarried locally, and is considerabley older than the 700,000 years you cite – millions of years in fact.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    RIGHT. SO YOUR OWN CUT AND PASTE PROVES THAT I DIDN’T WIPE THAT INFORMATION AS YOU WRONGLY ACCUSED. AND YOUR OWN LINK HAS THE INVESTIGATORS ASSUMING THAT THE LIMESTONE WAS TAKEN, BY THE PYRAMID BUILDERS, FROM THE SEA.

    AND IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT GEOLOGY YOU WOULD SIMPLY ASSUME THAT THE GIZA PLATEAU HAS NOT BEEN UNDERWATER SINCE WELL BEFORE THE DINOSAURS ROAMED.

    SO WHILE SOME CLARIFICATION FROM THE WRITER OF YOUR LINK, AND THE SCIENTISTS THAT WRITER WAS RELYING ON……. WHILE SOME CLARIFICATION IS IN ORDER, IT REMAINS THE CASE THAT YOUR LINK SO FAR SOUNDLY BACKS MY THESIS UP, BY IMPLICATION AT LEAST.

    THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO FUCKING CASE FOR SALTWATER SHELLFISH BEING NEAR THE GIZA PLATEAU IN THE LAST 50 MILLION YEARS.

    NONE.

    SO THE ASSUMPTION HAS TO BE THAT THE BUILDERS GOT BLOCKS, ORIGINALLY TAKEN FROM THE SEA BED, A VERY LONG WAY AWAY.

  47. “SO THE ASSUMPTION HAS TO BE THAT THE BUILDERS GOT BLOCKS, ORIGINALLY TAKEN FROM THE SEA BED, A VERY LONG WAY AWAY.”

    And yet:

    the crustaceans found within the limestone from the pyramid of Cheops are “of the genus Nummulites”

    “Nummulites that lived during the Eocene period around 55.8-33.9 million years ago are most commonly found in EGYPTIAN limestone.”

    Ergo it was quarried locally, is considerably older than claimed by you, and the shells are present as a result of sedimentary rock formation, not as a result of the limestone being used as seawalls.

  48. Mr B

    Do I understand you to be saying that the Ancient Gypos possessed aquatic tendencies?

    I find that confusing since your average modern Gyp (or any camel jockey for that matter) is a notoriously appalling swimmer. Hence their many issues with crossing the Suez canal. You will also note that there have been no Arabs in any successful Aussie olympic pool team since the advent of the Modern Games (and thank god for that as don’t want the pool filters getting clogged up with Homos and Tabouleh and slowing down our superfast “Aussie Fish” in their Speedos as they blast past our Seppo Cousins for the Gold).

    Perhaps the regression of the modern Gypo is simply further evidence (as if any were needed) of the Perils of Cross Breeding. The Hebrews (ancient and modern) have never had any water skills and perhaps some Hebrew blood contaminated that of the Gyps and led to their Degradation.

    I’d appreciate the benefit of your thoughts on this Important Matter.

  49. Totally different people Ron.

    Same all the way down the line. You had your Roman MAN taken down by Goth barbarians.

    You see according to one correspondent some astute Roman survivors saw that (loose quotation)

    “The Goths were afraid of the water, couldn’t swim, and were pathetic low-lifes and weren’t about to learn.”

    So in this version of events thats why these civilized refugees set up the magnificent bejeweled city of Venice, when the Goth filth (Cambria’s homeys ) came in scuttling the treasury, and so forth (decency doesn’t permit me to tell you what else Cambria’s homey’s got up to).

    I choose the word VELANOVINS to differentiate them from the later house-nigger KEMI (Pharaonic Egyptian “citizens”) And the even later Goth-Like Gypos; Coptic and Arab.

    Three totally different peoples at least.

  50. Thanks, Mr B. It’s much clearer now.

  51. Link to Alan Jones and the person we are all relying on, so that the energy investment can go ahead.

    http://2gb.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6257&Itemid=134

    Tony sez: We are going to have to run a kind of “peoples revolt” campaign………..

  52. Look at how the science doesn’t matter for Jason Soon.

    “you seem to be still at the stage of betting on the truth of the theories not on the practical responses that could accomodate the different theories being right which is where I’m at.”

    What a fucking morron? What is he on about? The idea is to base policy on evidence. Apparently thats too much to ask for this dummy.

    It sometimes takes a while to realize what idiots people can be. For example I didn’t realise until today what a complete moron rog is.

    Like he still wants the cap and kill? For what reason? What problem does this idiot reckon is there that a cap and kill will fix?

  53. Whose betting SOON. No-ones betting? On what basis would we make such bets. When all evidence without exception points to CO2 being good for the biosphere. All evidence suggests we have a CO2-shortage.

  54. Tony Abbott is a mysoginistic sanctimonious prick who should just fuck off.

    NOT THATS NOT RIGHT CAMBRIA. HE’S A GOOD FELLOW. A HUMBLE BLOKE. AND WE NEED HIM RIGHT NOW TO PUT AN END TO THIS FRAUDULENT MOVEMENT. I FEEL PROUD OF AUSTRALIA THAT THIS PEOPLES REVOLT AGAINST FASCISM AND UNREASON IS GETTING AIRTIME OVERSEAS.

  55. “Just seen this. Yes, I agree; I thought I made that clear earlier when I more or less stated that CO2 is one of the horses in the field and that so far as I was concerned the house (the state) backs the field, not the favourite.”

    Oh my God. What a fucking moron. Where is this idiocy coming from?

    Dover have you decided that policy is not to be based on evidence? Have you decided that we tax positive externalities.

    Face it mate. You are just a fucking moron. What is this all about. Have you forgotten that we are cooling? Not warming. Cooling.

  56. Jeepers Creepers. A total sellout by Dover. What a godforsaken moron. Well my goodness. Dover volunteers his benefactors for a tax on the basis of no evidence at all.

    We are dealing with stupid child monkeys here.

  57. “A situation room? For Australia?”

    Oh Lord how long. The first really good idea that Rudd gets and these people are now against it.

    There they are full steam in favour for endless damaging idiocy. But then when Rudd, quite rightly, develops a situation room, they are going to hassle him for it.

    Everything back to front with these dummies.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: