Reviewing and dwelling on all the evidence on youtube makes it clear that Oswald didn’t act alone. And in fact had no part in these murders, beyond being the patsy. Although he was part of the secret service and knew a lot of the people who were involved. The murder, ironically enough, came out of a project that Bobby Kennedy had on the fly to kill Fidel Castro. This project worked out of Miami. Oswald was part of the team to take down Fidel. Bobby knew who he was. That is one reason Bobby knew it was an inside job.
Reviewing the evidence makes it clear that this was indeed an inside job.
The matter is entirely different if you are relying on print information. For example, when I was looking into Jack Ruby, at the state library, about 13 years ago, all the printed material I could find, was consistent with him being a bit of a vague hoodlum who was angered by the assassination and lost his temper. You go to youtube and we see very clearly that if he is blaming anyone, then Lyndon Johnson is clearly the key person that Ruby is blaming. And there is nothing disturbed, mentally deranged, or hoodlum-like about the youtube Jack Ruby. He’s a straight-up guy. All but spelling out what he knows.
Had the FBI agents, who were supposed to have been riding on the back of JFK’s limo, not been called away, this would have made the assassination very difficult. For starters it would have obscured the line of fire between the Daltex building and the President. The angle of the bullet that hit both Kennedy and the Governor is more consistent with a shot taken from the Daltex building then from the book warehouse (I’m fucking sick of that other word).
The last bullet may have been shot upwards from street level. This would create the impression that the bullet was fired from the grassy knoll, since if you heard the sound you would spin around in that direction, and not seeing anyone in the pothole, you would conclude that this came from that direction. Otherwise the bullet could have been shot from the so-called grassy knoll.
Here is an explanation based upon the idea that the bullet from the front came from street level:
The Zapruder film had a couple of frames taken out of them, where the car was stopped right in front of this pothole. Imagine the difficulty of nailing the shot from the storm drain if the car had been moving. We are left with the car slowing, but its ambiguous by the film alone if the car stops dead. But the car needed to stop in order for the shot to be made from there. If the care did not stop dead, or stopped at the wrong place, we would have to assume that the killer shot didn’t come from there.
People talk about so-called “Badgeman.” Badgeman was up there at the grassy knoll as the final guarantee that the job would be finished in all likelihood. Or he made the kill shot. But if he didn’t make that shot, had he been nabbed by some coincidence, and with a couple of witnesses, then testing of his firearm would have shown that it had not been used.
There was a platform on the back of the car for the two secret servicemen to stand up on. Other than the driver, who was part of the plot, those two would have been the only ones to be able to see that there was someone who shot from the pothole. Lucien Sarti is said to have been on the grassy knoll and he is said to be an assassin who relied on exploding bullets.
A shot taken from the grassy knoll could have been viewed by any number of people. Including two others who were up there standing next to badgeman. But Jackie could have seen him if that was where the shot was taken from. The whole thing would have been planned with such precision that she could not see the man taking the shot from the storm drain. It must be understood that the network, whose inner dynamic, created this wicked event, were not peopled by individuals given entirely over to evil. Its more the case of an unstable group dynamic that has run out of control. Had the idea been to murder Jackie, that group dynamic would have stopped dead.
To me whether the shot came from the storm drain or the “grassy knoll” is still ambiguous. The fact of a conspiracy is not the least bit ambiguous. And in fact there could have been as many as four gunman. So one assumption need not rule out the other.
There was simply no chance of the Kennedy hit, being sorted out, to such a degree of certainty, by any sizeable number of people, prior to the invention of youtube. Some tiny group of people might have gotten this right. But they would be neutralized by all this other low-hanging fruit around, by being relegated as cranks and so forth. But what youtube allows you to do is go over and over the evidence, judging each part of it as to relative validity, and finally tracking down the context, and building everything back up to a coherent picture.
The plot did not start with LBJ, nor with J Edgar Hoover. These two however are first and second as to the degree of responsibility. LBJ first. J Edgar Hoover second. The reason being that it had to be done in Texas, with LBJ then in a position to re-hire J Edgar Hoover, And the two of them able to work tirelessly to cover it up. The famous phrase LBJ made that it was better to have Hoover in the tent pissing out, then outside the tent pissing in, was gratuitously graphic, since the real reason is that he had no choice. So that phrase was concocted by him as a big fat excuse.
Next we will find out what the Bobby Kennedy assassination was all about. But here is an example of why you need to pull expertise from the private sector to get the job done: