Posted by: graemebird | May 21, 2010

That Fucking Moron FDB

The fellow was dismissing the correct matters that a scientist was saying about climate science, on the basis of his theory about the sun having an iron core.

So the fucking moron FDB has no valid argument about what the gentleman is saying about climate ….. when the scientist is simply reporting the results of what the evidence tells us.

And FDB has no argument to make against the thesis that the sun as an iron core, like the earth. Now I’ve read a bit of what this fellow has said about the sun having an iron core. And I don’t see anything that FDB would have to object to. So FDB is being a completely moronic cunt. Where is FDB’s refutation that the sun has an iron core. Queer bastard has not got one.

We know for an absolute fact that the current theory of the way the sun works is inadequate. I cannot tell you exactly how the sun works. I can tell you absolutely that the standard theory is wrong. So we know that the standard theory is wrong. And this fellow comes up with a different theory, one for which FDB has no objection.

So he was just giving me the shits. This continual shit-storm of idiocy from climate change advocates who know nothing about climate, science, or indeed any fucking thing gives me the shits.

However on reflection there is not enough there to make a thread out of it. So if you don’t want to lose your comments, be aware that I’ll be wiping this thread sooner or later. Just remember that FDB is a fucking dumb bastard. Why do these feeble minded deviants weigh in on matters when they don’t have a clue?

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Can we have more please.

    • I don’t know whether I’ll get around to it. The fellow was dismissing the correct matters that a scientist was saying about climate science, on the basis of his theory about the sun having an iron core.

      So the fucking moron FDB has no valid argument about what the gentleman is saying about climate ….. when the scientist is simply reporting the results of what the evidence tells us.

      And FDB has no argument to make against the thesis that the sun as an iron core, like the earth. Now I’ve read a bit of what this fellow has said about the sun having an iron core. And I don’t see anything that FDB would have to object to. So FDB is being a completely moronic cunt. Where is FDB’s refutation that the sun has an iron core. Queer bastard has not got one.

      We know for an absolute fact that the current theory of the way the sun works is inadequate. I cannot tell you exactly how the sun works. I can tell you absolutely that the standard theory is wrong. So we know that the standard theory is wrong. And this fellow comes up with a different theory, one for which FDB has no objection.

      So he was just giving me the shits. This continual shit-storm of idiocy from climate change advocates who know nothing about climate, science, or indeed any fucking thing gives me the shits.

      However on reflection there is not enough there to make a thread out of it. So if you don’t want to lose your comments, be aware that I’ll be wiping this thread sooner or later. Just remember that FDB is a fucking dumb bastard. Why do these feeble minded deviants weigh in on matters when they don’t have a clue?

  2. The above is not me.

    And who is FDB? Franklin Boosevelt? Or have you personified the evil of fractional reserve into a little homonculus of three cryptic letters?

  3. Fucking Jew Bastards.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/us/politics/22paul.html?hpw

  4. Kate Philips a Jew? The New York times aren’t all Jews are they?

    They are a bunch of jerks is what they are. What are they complaining about? Fair comment by Rand Paul. Clearly the spillage is a State matter and the usurping bastard ought to have butted out. Idiot cannot even so much as pretend to be President effectively.

    Apparently Obama is ex-CIA. Did you know that? It may be that in same way that Wall Street has made a sort of heist of Washington, spooktown is also trying to basically spread its power. After all they have a lot to cover up and so are motivated to act in desperate fashion.

    What a complete fuckup 9/11 was. What a bunch of incompetent Geese these people are.

  5. “The New York times aren’t all Jews are they?”

    Hahahahahaha you crack me up, Mr B. Very funny.

  6. DON’T GIVE ME THAT LEFTIST PROJECTION BONEHEAD. NEITHER YOU NOR SHERMAN PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH. I’VE TALKED ABOUT METHODOLOGY MORE OR LESS CONSTANTLY FOR THE LAST 4 YEARS BLOCKHEAD. SHERMANS DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER IS FAR LESS CLEAR THAN WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING. AND HE IS CONSTANTLY APPLYING OCCULT EPISTEMOLOGY BY PREJUDICING THE POLITICALLY CORRECT PARADIGM.

  7. Right but what is your point?

    Shermer is incapable of implying his own prescriptions. And his methodology involves prejudicing one paradigm, rather than building paradigms in parallel.

  8. Oh god, skeptics are such philosophically barren, spiritually dead and rule-ridden bores and this dude appears to be no exception.

  9. A C21 dull-minded skeptic would’ve sought to commit Percy Bysshe Shelley to an insane asylum (as they were known at the time) for writing:

    My soul is an enchanted boat,
    Which, like a sleeping swan, doth float
    Upon the silver waves of thy sweet singing;
    And thine doth like an angel sit
    Beside a helm conducting it,
    Whilst all the winds with melody are ringing.
    It seems to float ever, for ever,
    Upon that many-winding river,
    Between mountains, woods, abysses,
    A paradise of wildernesses!
    Till, like one in slumber bound,
    Borne to the ocean, I float down, around,
    Into a sea profound, of ever-spreading sound:

    Meanwhile thy spirit lifts its pinions
    In music’s most serene dominions;
    Catching the winds that fan that happy heaven.
    And we sail on, away, afar,
    Without a course, without a star,
    But, by the instinct of sweet music driven;
    Till through Elysian garden islets
    By thee, most beautiful of pilots,
    Where never mortal pinnace glided,
    The boat of my desire is guided:
    Realms where the air we breathe is love,
    Which in the winds and on the waves doth move,
    Harmonizing this earth with what we feel above.

    We have past Age’s icy caves,
    And Manhood’s dark and tossing waves,
    And Youth’s smooth ocean, smiling to betray:
    Beyond the glassy gulfs we flee
    Of shadow-peopled Infancy,
    Through Death and Birth, to a diviner day;
    A paradise of vaulted bowers,
    Lit by downward-gazing flowers,
    And watery paths that wind between
    Wildernesses calm and green,
    Peopled by shapes too bright to see,
    And rest, having beheld; somewhat like thee;
    Which walk upon the sea, and chant melodiously!

    from “Prometheus Unbound”

  10. Was Carl Sagan a “bonehead” too? He was the one who came up with the concept.

    YEAH HE WAS PRETTY FEEBLE.

    LOOK SHERMER DOES NOT PRACTICE WHAT HE PREACHES. WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU GIVING ME THESE RECOMMENDATIONS AND REFUSING TO CLEAN YOUR OWN ACT? THIS IS A NEW LEVEL OF DISHONESTY FOR YOU ADRIEN.

  11. 1) How reliable is the source of the claim?
    [argumentum ad hominem]

    2) Does the source make similar claims?
    [irrelevant]

    3) Have the claims been verified by somebody else?
    [irrelevant]

    4) Does this fit with the way the world works?
    [naive to the point of idiocy]

    5) Has anyone tried to disprove the claim?
    [non sequitur]

    6) Where does the preponderance of evidence point?
    [non sequitur]

    7)Is the claimant playing by the rules of science?
    [define them]

    8) Is the claimant providing positive evidence?
    [what is that?]

    9) Does the new theory account for as many phenomena as the old theory?
    [irrelevant}

    10) Are personal beliefs driving the claim?
    [irrelevant]

  12. more non sequiturs. What an empty vessel you are Ritchie.

  13. YOU ARE NOT COMING HERE TO TELL LIES. NOW YOUR LIES ARE MERELY BECOMING MORE DEEPLY IMBEDDED. YOU ARE CLAIMING THAT I DON’T SCRUPULOUSLY FOLLOW METHOD WHEN ITS YOU.

    YOU WANT TO COME GOOD WITH YOUR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FOR THE DATE OF THE PYRAMIDS BEING BUILT? LIKE YOU REFUSED TO DO LAST TIME? YOU WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE CARBON-DATING YOU PRODUCED FALSIFIED THE QUAKADEMICS CLAIMS? YOU REFUSE TO DO THIS. ITS YOU WHO REFUSE POINT BLANK TO FOLLOW METHOD. SHERMER AS WELL. IS SHERMER THE ONE WHO IS GOING TO GIVE US THE EVIDENCE FOR THE CO2-BEDWETTING CAMPAIGN? AFTER ALL THESE YEARS ITS SHERMER WHO HAS THE EVIDENCE?

  14. The Egyptian pyramids are generally accepted as being constructed between 2630 BCE to 1814 BCE. What’s the problem with that?

    LETS HAVE THE EVIDENCE FOR THIS OBVIOUS BULLSHIT.

    I’m not sure what you are referring to with regard to carbon dating, you’ll have to refresh me on that one.

    Shermer doesn’t have to give evidence about Global climate change, he is not making the claim, YES HE FUCKIING DID. but he accepts the veracity WHAT VERACITY YOU LYING CUNT of the claims because it passes on his baloney detection kit NOT IT DOESN’T. YOU ARE LYING. IT DOESN’T PASS. PLUS HIS METHODOLOGY IS FULL OF SHIT FOR REASONS I’VE ALREADY TOLD YOU ABOUT. HE PREJUDICES THE POLITICALLY CORRECT. THIS IS OCCULT-EPISTEMOLOGY. due to the preponderance of peer reviewed scientific evidence that supports it. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHICH SUPPORTS THIS RACKET. YOU ARE LYING. AND SHERMER IS PROVEN TO BE A FAILED ANALYST. WHEREAS YOU ARE PROVEN TO BE A LIAR.

    SO HE’S EITHER NOT FOLLOWING HIS METHODOLOGY OR HIS METHODOLOGY IS CRAP. SINCE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR THIS BULLSHIT MOVEMENT. THERE IS NO PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE SINCE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IN THE FIRST PLACE. SO STOP LYING THAT ITS ME AND NOT YOU FAILING TO FOLLOW THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.

  15. First step is you define your hypothesis. The CO2-Bedwetting movement is so useless it hasn’t even so much as defined an hypothesis, the positive confirmation of which, could possibly justify its goals and existence.

    Now if you define such an hypothesis, you will not find any evidence to support that hypothesis. None whatsoever.

    So you see its you and not me who fail to follow good methodology. For the love of God don’t take Shermers stuff as valid methodology. He himself does not apply it. He’s a dummy. A lightweight. There is not a mainstream bit of bullshitartistry that he hasn’t fallen for.

    Go ask him and I almost guarantee he fell for the Big Bang. For special relativity.

  16. Shermer has no good method and does not apply what he has. It could not be more evident that he is choosing his favored hypothesis, as if he had occult knowledge, and folding his arms at any alternative view….. Rather than ranking and re-ranking competing hypotheses in parallel, and not prejudicing anything as the correct answer up front.

  17. Suppose you were looking into the idea of when the Pyramids were built. You would want to go to the quakademics and see what they have to say. And try and hone in on the history of how their quakademic mainstream view got locked in over time. See if there is any primary contemporary data for or against.

    And at the same time you want to be having two or three other points of view. Its important to have the other points of view even if you think they are crazy. What you need is the logical advocates of the allegedly crazy points of view.

    Try this playlist, and then match the quakademic hypothesis with the sort of thing you hear here. But its not something you can get quick results on. You want to be taking your time with it. I think you will find the quackademic view is pretty arbitrary and baseless. In fact its virtually proved wrong. Although it may have altered as you indicated. It used to be that they put it down to a specific 20 years. Now you are claiming a much wider window of opportunity for these pyramids to be built. Showing how they didn’t really have a clue in the first place.

    Now bear in mind I don’t have any strong convictions about what Jason Martel is saying. I’ve not been able yet to assess the strength of the source material. I just acknowledge that he is logical fellow. And the things he is speculating about are worth speculating about whilst there are so many unresolved mysteries. So one ought to stay open-minded about it. Particularly in light of the solid evidence that Lloyd Pye has found.

    I used to think 9/11 having a false flag component to it as being a ridiculous idea. But I’d listen to the logical exponents of this idea without pretending I knew what happened. There were a lot of crazies of course. But Graeme McQueen was scrupulously scientific. After reviewing it all, and in some ways this took me 8 years …. thats how slow I am …… Its now obvious that this is the case. That there was an American overlay to the plot. This can no longer be denied if you review all the evidence.

  18. The great pyramid of Giza was built as a tomb for fourth dynasty Egyptian Pharaoh Khufu (Cheops in Greek) and thought to be constructed over a 20-year period concluding around 2560 BC.

    BULLSHIT. PROVE IT. EXPLAIN YOUR ARGUMENT IN YOUR OWN WORDS. THIS IS ALSO SOMETHING WE KNOW TO BE WRONG. ITS WRONG BECAUSE ITS IMPOSSIBLE. AND VERY SLIM EVIDENCE EXISTS FOR IT. I HAVEN’T BEEN ABLE TO FIND ANY OF THIS SLIM EVIDENCE. BUT SINCE I HAVEN’T LOOKED INTO IT ENOUGH I WON’T GO SO FAR AS TO SAY NO EVIDENCE.

  19. So Graeme, you don’t have a problem with believing the sun has an iron core?

    YOU JUST DON’T GET IT YOU BLOCKHEAD. ITS NOT ABOUT BELIEF. THE MAINSTREAM THEORY IS WRONG. I DON’T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THIS FELLOW IS SAYING. WHEREAS THE MAINSTREAM THEORY IS KNOWN THE BE WRONG. SEE YOU ARE A SILLY CUNT, BECAUSE YOU CANNOT GET IT THROUGH ITS NOT ABOUT BELIEF ITS ABOUT METHODOLOGY. THATS WHY I WAS WIPING YOUR POSTS. BECAUSE YOU WERE LYING. DOING THE LEFTIST PROJECTION. PRETENDING THAT IT WAS ME AND NOT YOU WHO WAS THE OCCULT-EPISTEMOLOGY BULLSHIT-ARTIST.

    HOW MANY TIMES DOES ONE HAVE TO TELL YOU ITS NOT ABOUT BELIEF. AND YET YOU SHOW UP HERE WITH YOUR LATEST SET OF LIES, CLAIMING ITS ME AND NOT YOU, WHO IS THE UNSKEPTICAL WOO NUTTER. THERE IS NOTHING YOU WON’T BELIEVE, NO MATTER HOW DISPROVEN, THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE PHONEY GLOSS OF “MAINSTREAM-CONSENSUS” TO IT.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: