Comparisons Between Kennedy And 9/11 Conspiracy Murders.

We really have to grow up, and realise that both the Kennedy hit (The Big Event) and 9/11 (code-name currently unknown) were American conspiracies. That both were American-based conspiracies is an historical fact. The reality could not be any other way. This proposition is unassailable. No-one has come close to any sort of debunking in either case. Go find an alleged “debunking” and I can tell you now; it will be utterly underwhelming.

For those of you who haven’t researched the issue, here is a bit of an overview of both these conspiracy-murders. Its pretty vital that everyone grows up about this. We cannot have the luxury of having all these sheeple around, giving cover to the conspirators, by way of simple stupidity. It is of “Fermi Paradox” level-of-importance, that you all snap out of sheeple mode. Thats how important it is. Fermi-Paradox-Important. The future of humane civilisation is at stake.

Modified from some emails to a discussion forum:

The buildings were hit by two planes yes. But they were devastated otherwise as well. This can be proved totally, by the simple method, of reviewing the video and scientific evidence available. So these propositions being mentioned on Lew Rockwells blog ought not be a “disappointment.” Since the proposition (that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition) is an unassailable fact. I don’t like the implication of it either. But we don’t work backwards from such implications, to skew the facts of the matter.

There is no chance of the two towers coming down (in the way that they did come down) without the extra explosions. But a theory that claimed that this was possible, would still have to explain the explosions. We know that the buildings needed the extra explosions to come down in the way that they did come down. We also know that there were extra explosions. So theorising that the buildings could come down without the extra explosions is somewhat besides the point.

Besides the point? Sometimes I use understatement for effect.

The theory that thermate wasn’t used is not a winning hypothesis, since it cannot explain the residue of the thermate found. The proposition that thermate would not have had to have been used, falls short of explaining the residue of the thermate left behind. No ‘mainstream’ theory explains the molten iron in all three basements. Therefore all such theories are irrational.

The Warren commission report, is that of a theory, that does not correspond, to what we already know about the Kennedy hit. The Codename for the Kennedy hit was “The Big Event.” The assassination came out of project Mongoose, based mainly in Miami. It was workshopped all the way up the chain of command so as to move the responsibility for the CIA murder, away from the CIA and onto Johnson (and a multitude of other parties). That the assassination could have been blamed on multiple other parties explains the structure of it. But it was a CIA hit, no question at all about it. Although it is possible to allege that Operation Mongoose could have been “turned” (as it were) from the outside.

(((((This observation is important. The possibility of Operation Mongoose being “turned” from the outside means, just by way of two examples; it is not possible to rule out the motivation of Jack wanting to set a precedent that fractional reservists would not be happy about. It is not possible to rule out the possibility of communist infiltration and influence.

It is not even possible to rule out the notion of the involvement of a ruling class. Or the notion of the involvement of a covert-ops/fractional reserve nexus.))))))

Both Johnson and J Edgar Hoover helped with the coverup. The mob was also involved. Just as they were tied into Operation Mongoose.

Oswald was CIA. He was an anti-communist involved in the project to kill Castro. We have to get that straight for starters. Oswald was an anti-communist and a CIA agent. Yes and I was taken by surprise at this as well. I had always emphasized that Kennedy was murdered by a communist.

Oswald was helping out on a number of CIA projects in New Orleans. One of them was running errands for experimentation going on, to make a particularly deadly strain of cancer that would kill quickly, and hopefully not be traced back to the Americans. The virus was based on Simian 40 virus. The Simian 40 virus was progressively made more virulent, by way of treatment with radiation. The radiation method was a surprise to researchers, who had originally attempted to use the radiation, to make an inoculation against the Simian 40 virus, which was causing cancer to those individuals who had gotten their polio shots at around that time.

The cancer experiment was a success, more is the pity. We have to live with a CIA that can give anyone fast-acting cancer that will kill in a number of days. The CIA can also give anyone a heart attack, by shooting frozen poison into their body. The sliver of frozen poison melts and sets up a heart attack. Any suspicious death by heart attack, ought to trigger an immediate search for this poison. Any convenient death by fast-acting cancer, ought to trigger a search for the virulent strain of virus, that is descended from the Simian 40 virus. There have been many too-convenient heart-attack deaths since 9/11. None of them investigated in the required way. There have been many other types of too-convenient deaths as well.

The shot that caused the bloodspirt came up frpm the storm drain, at ground level. So we know the driver was involved. He had to stop, or at least slow right down, directly in front of the drain. That he did so, was in flagrant violation, of standard training in these matters. The drivers training mandated that he accelerate his way out of the kill zone, as fast as possible. There is no chance the driver wasn’t part of the plot, and a serious investigation would have had him under truth serum and hooked up to lie detectors.

Handsome Johny Rosselini confessed to making that shot from the storm drain, but its possible this is mobster pride, because this was the kill shot, and not all shots were successful. Other testimony would imply that Handsome Johny fired from the Daltex building.

There were about six shots timed to sound like three. The angle of shots makes it, that none of the bullets that actually hit anyone, came out of the Book warehouse. However at least one shot that hit someone, came out of the Daltex building. More likely two.

It was thought that 3 Corsican Maffia shooters were brought into town to make the hit, and then were spirited up out through Vancouver. But that was probably backup, or to throw the blame off, if the real shooters looked like getting caught. Classic doubling up on all aspects of the hit. Its not clear who made what shot, despite confessions.

The shot from the grassy knoll probably hit, but it wasn’t the one that created the forward spurt, and its a little bit hard to demonstrate that the grassy knoll shot definitely hit on video, though some are sure they can make that case. Me not being one of them. James Files has confessed to shooting from the grassy knoll, and photographic evidence is at least consistent with his confession, and with the make of Remington Fireball that Files says he used. Files said Nicoletti was one of the other shooters and he confirms Rosellini being a third.

Like the Arabs-Alone twin-towers story-for-idiots, the notion that Oswald killed Kennedy, not only is something that did not happen. Oswald shooting Kennedy from the book warehouse is a proposition that COULD NOT have happened like that. It goes against all the evidence. All the bullet angles;

The shot that caused the spurt came from the front right drain as discussed. And quite naturally made Jacks head and body go up, back, and to-the-left. This shot came from no book warehouse. Watermelon-balancing party-tricks to the contrary nothwithstanding, the crazy book-warehouse idea, would defy basic physics.

A cleverly-misleading animation came out which makes the book-warehouse-shots-proposition, appear plausible. But the angles are no good if you get to that part of the more extended show, when they brought the real marksmen in. Nice try but no cigar. The proposition rests totally on a single bullet making multiple wounds, at specific points, through two people. The proposition fails, since the actual wounds are in the wrong place. By just a few centimetres, but thats the end of the theory-sorry about that.

And while you may find yourself convinced when immersed in this animation, the animation is in fact a croc, which does not take-in all the other evidence, not least the pristine nature of the bullet, that was held (by the animator) to have gone through two people, with multiple entry and exit points. This is no small matter. That the bullet was virtually pristine, is a total debunking of the animators bullshit case.

When investigating a matter, all evidence must be taken into account, and not just that which suits an animators tendentious purposes. I’m pretty pissed off about the animation, and the animator, because I was stooged by it for about two or three years. This dude actually fooled me. Made a fool out of me for years on end. I’m right to be angry at him. I must find out the name of that dishonest jerk. The rest of you ought to also be mentally healthy enough to be really very angry at being taken in. If you cannot muster some sort of healthy anger at this sort of thing, there is no prospect of you ever breaking out of your state of engineered-stupidity.