If Robert Beck is still alive he will still have a bodyguard when he goes in public. Savings peoples lives without a license is a very dangerous gig. He’s been bashed up and his face is pretty mashed up, or so it seems. But not in this video.
Now notice that his cure comes from suppressed research findings. Also notice that its entirely in harmony with paradigms that I’ve discussed on this blog. It takes in the importance of the cell as an electrical appliance. It takes in the importance of adding electrons. And therefore it is likely that some of the results he’s getting are to do with raising pH. Whereas an alkaliser adds electrons via absorbing high pH water through ones intestines, Becks strategy is to add electrons to the blood in those parts of the body where the blood is closest to the skin. So its really the same principles at play. And his claims to these excellent results ought not be dismissed in the typical ignorant fashion.
SAVING LIVES IS A TERRIBLE CRIME. BUT CURING PEOPLE WITHOUT A LICENSE IS HERESY.
The other thing Becks system has in common with what I’ve discussed already, is the idea that ….. because our cells are 70% water … getting rid of infectious disease is fundamentally an exercise in water purification. You can purify water by oxidation (ozone, hydrogen peroxide, Jim Humbles MMS 1 activated. Jim Humbles MMS 1 non-activated. Jim Humbles MMS2), with Iodine, with electrical currents, or with silver colloids.
Now the thing is that the bugs have no answer to any of these assaults upon them. And not only that, they have no way to evolve and answer to any of these…..
But there is a problem with Hydrogen Peroxide and Ozone. These two bring with them collateral damage. They hurt some human cells as well as friendly bacteria.
We have to tread carefully with Iodine also. Whereas all of us probably need more, too much to soon can make us very sick. A court-case is afoot now because a lot of Aussies were hurt be a Japanese export. Probably made in good faith. But the Aussies aren’t used to absorbing as much Iodine as the Japanese.
So anyway this other CURE-ALL that I’ve just discovered ought to work. Not necessarily for the reasons Dr Beck says it ought to work. But apparently it does work. And because of this if he is alive he will always need to be in hiding or to have a bodyguard.
A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office 
I haven’t yet looked up the tiresome but inevitable hatchet job that the wikipedia will have performed on this martyr. I’ll just go and do that right now. Do it in real-time and we will see the same typical bullshit.
I wonder if they will go so far as to call him a child-molester. Or claim that he’s making all this cash deceiving people. We will see.
By: graemebird on October 23, 2010
at 9:22 pm
Right. It appears that he’s still under the Wiki radar.
By: graemebird on October 23, 2010
at 9:25 pm
Right. I’ve now found out he’s dead. But I have not found out how he died.
By: graemebird on October 23, 2010
at 9:36 pm
the fractional reserve/Covert ops nexus must have got him mr bird
that bloody devious quote “new world order” unquote.
By: Ron Pauline Hanson on October 28, 2010
at 5:41 am
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=4312930190281243507&hl=en&fs=true
By: graemebird on October 27, 2010
at 9:17 am
Look at this mean-spirited wrong, and irrational Gook:
“Sure, Bird could really be an unrecognised future Louis Pasteur beavering away in his basement watching YouTubes but if his ideas made any sense, he’d probably be teaching and employed at an institute somewhere by now…..”
What a fucking moron. What a fucking dummy? What a dildo. What a stupid cunt.
Under capitalism I could start up a clinic with $5000 seed money and start curing people right away. I’d be outsourcing a lot of stuff.
In the current situation I take a fucking dollar I”m in fucking jail you fucking wicked gook cunt. How am I going to outsource when the medical cartel would be unwilling? And this is despite the fact that you’d need a bodyguard which you could get only if you could afford it, and all sorts of insurance, WHICH I COULD NOT GET FOR ANY PRICE.
You are just a nasty little irrational tribal cunt mate. I don’t know why I had anything to do with you.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 5:41 am
LOOK YOU FUCKING MORON. WHAT IS YOUR SUPERIOR PARADIGM? I’VE EXPLAINED THREE PARADIGMS OF CANCER, TRANSPOSED ONE UPON ANOTHER, AND CRAFTED A STRATEGY OUT OF THAT. AND YOU COME ALONG YOU DUMB CUNT. YOU KNOW FUCKING NOTHING ABOUT IT. YOU DON’T SHOW HOW YOUR PARADIGM IS BETTER……
….. BUT ITS WORSE THAN THAT. YOU DON’T EVEN FUCKING LEAVE HOME WITH A COMPETING PARADIGM IN YOUR POCKET….
….. AND SUDDENLY YOU ARE A FUCKING EXPERT ON CANCER??????? WELL YOU ARE NOT. YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
I WATCH YOU GUYS AT CATALLAXY AND ITS JUST ONE MORON AFTER ANOTHER. NONE OF YOU HAS A CLUE ABOUT CANCER. YOU HAVEN’T COMPARED THE CONFLICTING TESTIMONY ON THE ISSUE. YOU HAVEN’T STUDIED. AND YET YOU THINK YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT IT THAN ME.
YOU GUYS ARE JUST SO FUCKING DELUSIONAL. AND TIME AFTER TIME, YOU KEEP PROJECTING YOUR PATHETIC DELUSIONS ONTO ME. THATS THE WORSE THING ABOUT IT. YOU THINK YOU KNOW THINGS YOU CANNOT POSSIBLY KNOW. THEN YOU PROJECT THIS DELUSION ONTO ME.
I’VE NEVER SAID THAT I CAN DO PURE RESEARCH FROM MY BEDROOM. I COMPARE THE RESEARCH OF OTHERS TO FIGURE OUT WHOSE WRONG AND WHO HAS THE BETTER CASE.
BUT YOU THINK YOU KNOW ALREADY.
YOU GUYS ARE DELUSIONAL. YOU ARE FUCKING MORONS. NO WONDER YOU HATE GROWTH-DEFLATION AND A FUNCTIONING SETUP SO MUCH. BECAUSE ONCE STUPIDITY CEASES TO BE UPWARDLY-MOBILE YOU DUMB CUNTS ARE ALL OUT OF A JOB.
By: Genghis Sun on October 28, 2010
at 8:30 am
Jason Soon likes to kick the vulnerable when they’re down? Who knew it? And JC likes to pick wings off butterflies for pleasure. Yessum, we know that too.
You’re right to be angry with them Graeme, but they’re hardly worth it. They’ve both got the emotional intelligence and the ethics of a gnat.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 6:17 am
Graeme, as a libertarian I’m sure you value in all circumstances the ideals of control and responsibility at an individual level. And when someone gets a serious illness then these things come to the fore for them, and those caring for them, in very important ways.
For example, one of the things, more so with certain illnesses, is the feelings of helplessness that occur and which contribute to the difficulty they experience in dealing with the illness, day by day.
And so the ways in which the individual asserts, and is allowed to assert, control and responsibility, including by making choices and decisions about treatments, information, and so on, are very important to them.
Now for others this can mean that our needs, for taking control and taking responsibility, can come second place to what the individual themselves decides about how they are going to handle their illness and their attitude towards it.
I hope that makes sense.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 6:31 am
On other matters, this report today piqued my interest and yours, Mr Bird?
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20102810-21507.html
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 6:37 am
Not really. Because if the trees take less CO2 then the plankton, the soil, and the crops will get it. So its a win win.
I had a big boost on the other issue just now. It seems that my initial treatment, feeble in comparison to what I’m after, got some results, being as she stuck it out. I cannot go into it further than that. I’d all but given up at getting any co-operation. But I can see we are going to win this thing after all.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 7:12 am
er, no, the point is that the trees are reliant on the soil and much else and if these are depleted, then so are the plants. It’s really just a confirmation of the ecological principle and the principle of interdependency and interconnectedness which the left is so firm on, the right, not so much.
Not that this report/research finding is definitive, or the end of the matter, as I do think we’ve still more to learn than we even can dream about just about everything.
Glad to hear about the other issue. I think the winning is on multiple levels, physical, psychological, emotional and existential. But then, only the wise ones can really delineate the means of achieving that and even then only in an approximating way. Literature, philosophy and the arts as usual provide – I think – the greatest inspiration and solace, e.g – randomly – Tolstoy’s “The Death of Ivan Ilyich” and Viktor Frankl’s “Man’s Search for Meaning”.
But don’t listen to me. I found solace in similar circumstances from “The Tibetan Book of the Dead”, tho’ not because I got or accepted all the esoteric stuff underpinning that, but rather for the very useful and practical ways it demonstrated of how to be the most help to others in this period of their lives.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 7:37 am
I’ll go back and read the report all the way through.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 8:10 am
Oh right. They are putting down the slowdown to lower nitrogen in the soil. But ultimately the ambient CO2 will increase fixed nitrogen in the soil. So while things may be a bit iffy, if you are on a knifes-edge worrying about CO2 levels, still the benefits from extra CO2, won’t be petering out in quite this same way, in the longer run.
It sounds like in this first round the trees growth surge has hogged all the nitrogen and then they’ve regressed back to more modest growth levels. But considering the bulk of the extra growth this ought not be so surprising. Since the way that higher CO2 levels leads to more nitrogen in the soil is by way of more micro-plant-life in the soil, and particularly decaying leaves and things, then via more micro-animal life, and the decay of that animal life. Its not that plants suddenly become legumes.
So its not so very surprising, that where the big trees were present that their initial growth outraced this process. So its bad news for the CO2-bedwetters, but its still good news for me, since it still says to me that higher CO2 means a better world. Though whether we continue with these high CO2 levels for much longer is not all cut and dried.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 8:17 am
Another case in point. The fucking moron Reynolds reckons he won a monetary economics argument with me. Reynolds has no economics credentials, HE DIDN’T KNOW HOW MONEY WAS CREATED.
He showed his ignorance on the matter in a blog post of his. The ignorant cunt Jason Soon linked to it favourably. Mark Hill agreed with Reynolds.
All of them didn’t even know how the money creation process worked. Both Mark and Jason got confused, thinking that the monetary base was the main determinant of spending as opposed to the money supply.
Just dummies.
And then Reynolds reckons he beat me in an argument in monetary economics.
You did not. You are a liar. None of you ever have. I was always right. Right from the start. I’ve never had to update on the technical side of this matter even once.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 9:04 am
reynolds must be circumcised
By: Ron Pauline Hanson on November 1, 2010
at 5:28 am
Graeme, focus please for one frivolous second on my current dilemma. I need your advice.
My chariot, a 150cc Taiwanese Golden Bee scooter came to a literal standstill today, but, can you believe it, it did so literally outside the abode as I arrived home from work. Truly, the gods were smiling on me yesterday.
Anyhows, the charming boys from the local motorcycle shop came over and bundled it up and took it away for tests without neglecting to gently advise me that despite the fact that is was probably in need of a new drive belt, or something, it was “time to move on” after three years of loving ownership of this dark beast and upgrade perhaps to a Yamaha Tmax 500 or at the very least a 200cc Italian job.
What should I do? I do love my old beast.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 9:20 am
I think you should upgrade but get body armour. The sort that professional riders have. Like for racing, even though hopefully you will ride conservatively. Plus there is a 500 dollar helmet that allows you to see directly behind you to stay out of trouble.
You need Lots of leather. And bleach your hair platinum blonde. Thats my opinion from several points of view.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 9:23 am
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 9:28 am
LOL. Funny you should say that. Everyone keeps telling me now I should go platinum blonde! WTF.
No I don’t like body armour, it’s too hot. Though I no longer like those nongs who ride around on hot pink or lime green Vespas, with waist-length streaming hair, donned in cheesecloth belted sheaths with bare feet.
I wear no-nonsense minimum protection pants, gloves, ankle-protecting boots and bob’s your uncle.
Look if I’m gonna go flying I might as well do it in comfort and style. Nothing else will save me.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 9:35 am
I don’t know. Some body armor arrangements can be pretty air-conditioned, so to speak, just so long as you don’t mind having your elbows smashed up. Like you could wear a chest and lower back protector and just a singlet, depending on what you wanted to protect.
I came to the conclusion I would need that Reevu helmet though. Just riding around the outskirts of Chiang Mai lead me to this understanding. Perhaps if you had that helmet you could stay out of trouble, what with the superior acceleration that a bike has. Perhaps your body protection kit could then be minimalist and innocuous.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 9:42 am
Graeme, I only watched one minute of that video. Are you applying for a job with the RTA?
Getting a motorcycle L plate let alone P plate these days is an exercise in sunny optimism, dexterity and concentration with a large dose of terror and self-doubt.
When I got my license three years ago I burst into tears. It was quite gruelling, an 8 hour test, in the classroom and then on the road, run by TAFE. All the other testees on the day were 20 something male trailbikers, plus one other woman. I passed, just. She didn’t, and neither did some of the trail bike riders.
I was so pleased I passed and it was a great physical effort to do so.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 9:51 am
Thats terrible news. All I had to do to ride in Chiang Mai is for my father-in-law to hand me the keys. Free at last. Free-at-last.
By: graemebird on October 28, 2010
at 10:04 am
Yeah, well, freedom can be just another word for nothing left to lose. The TAFE test these days is the pits and over 60% of people fail their P plate motorcycle test on first go. I didn’t. That was an achievement, of sorts. It boosted my self confidence no end.
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 10:11 am
By: Philomena on October 28, 2010
at 10:14 am