Posted by: graemebird | April 25, 2011

Dysfunctional Australian Economics/The Myth Of The Efficiency Dividend/ Getting Past The NASA Stupidity.

More Later

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Well it just goes to show that Sinclair Davidson is a stinking sellout cunt.

    But lets find out if someone can get a logical argument out of what the primitive wop Joseph Cambria has come up with

    I SEZ

    Folks. Its very clear now that I’m dealing with a real dummy here:

    “(Solon) Bird, get back to your trannie ….”

    Clearly you STILL don’t have a clue about monetary-economics. We’ve always been able to ban recessions. And obviously the ethical imperative is to do just that.

    Now you cannot make this reality disappear by ignoring it salami-eater. No matter how you wish upon a star. Recessions are caused by fractional reserve. And obviously so.

    STUPID WOP CUNT JOSEPH CAMBRIA (ITS YOUR MONEY HE’S MINDING) SAYS:

    Bird,

    Please show a period in modern history that wasn’t marked by business cycles other than the cave man period.

    THIS IS ONE DUMB WOP CUNT WHO NEVER SEEMS TO GET EMBARRASSED.

    Modern history involves fractional reserve banking. The dumb wop cunt is an embarrassment to the money management business. But he never seems to get embarrassed himself.

  2. Sinclair Davidson has actually claimed outright that the GFC was nothing to do with fractional reserve. Makes one wonder why they had to replace all the ponzi money with monetary base. Then after the fact the idiot discovers that “maybe its M1 that matters” or words to that effect. The fellow is scandalously ignorant. He ought never be employable.

  3. Woppy

    woppy

    Where’s the argument

    Woppy

    “Please show a period in modern history that wasn’t marked by business cycles other than the cave man period”

    Cambria you dummy? Whats the argument?

    Cambria doesn’t know.

    Hey dumb wop?

    Whats the argument?

  4. As a follow-up the dim-witted Cambria, who hates evidence with a vengeance, is now projecting his own stupidity onto the average American:

    “lol… That is too funny. So Trump is having some effect. ahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaha

    So he’s a muzzo who wasn’t born in the US.

    Here’s what I’m thinking… People are beginning to dislike him so much they will just tick the boxes that make them less pissed off about him.

    they tick muzzo and foreign born just to get their own back at him.”

    They do no such thing you dumb wop. They realise that there is no evidence for an American birth and a great deal of evidence against this proposition. Wake up to yourself. It was obvious that there was a problem when he was still a candidate. I was right. You were a fool. As usual.

  5. Obama is using a social security number issued in Conneticut to John Paul Ludwig. Ludwig died in Honolulu around 1980. Or at least was living there shortly before his death.

  6. “America 1979 – 2007: The Poor Are Getting Richer

    http://wolffiles.blogspot.com/2011/04/america-1979-2007-poor-are-getting.html

    (I make no claim regarding the accuracy, but he does reference Tom Sowell as his source).”

    Its just a matter of breaking down the numerators and denominators into their component parts so as to see where this happy-talk is coming off the beam.

  7. Bird,

    Do you have any opion on the theories of Gavin Menzies regarding the chinese discovery of the world? Including their igniting the renaissance by sailing to italy?

    http://www.gavinmenzies.net/

  8. Its a reasonable thesis. I’ve skim-read two of his books and there is certainly much evidence that conventional history just ignores. But when I read his stuff it was hard to say whether he was extrapolating on single lines of unexplained evidence …… which would be okay speculation …… or reserving extrapolation until he had three or more lines of convergent evidence at each major jumping off point ….. which would constitute authentic historical innovation.

    For the moment I place his work as excellent speculative history rather than proven history.

    I would simply recommend you read his books and not worry about the fancy editing of the putdown documentary, or the uppitty talk from the bitter credentialed historians. Thats all to be expected. I say read his books.

    I am now able to reveal that through convergent evidence we can now be sure that Venus is a young planet, aged between about 4000 and 13000 years. This sort of thing is old news to someone like Louis Hissink. But I personally didn’t have the evidence or understanding to make that call until the last couple of weeks or so.

    • NO THATS NOT WHAT WE ARE SAYING HERE. THE FACT IS THAT TAXEATERS ARE RESISTANT TO NEW INFORMATION.

      “I am now able to reveal that through convergent evidence we can now be sure that Venus is a young planet, aged between about 4000 and 13000 years.”

      WHAT IS YOUR ARGUMENT THAT VENUS IS OLDER? HOW CAN IT MAINTAIN ITS THICK ATMOSPHERE. START THERE AND SEE HOW YOU GO.

      • Flaps check Boltzmann and gases, and temperature. Then check escape velocity and you can get an idea of how much greater is Venuses’ atmosphere then it ought to be. It will be sloughing off massive amounts of its atmosphere every minute. Which means it cannot be all that old.

      • WHILE YOU ARE COMING UP WITH EVIDENCE FOR YOUR KNEW IRRATIONAL CREATION THEORY, I’LL TRY AND DO MY BEST TO LET THIS FELLOW GRAB YOU BY YOUR STUPID NOSE ON YOUR STUPID FUCKED FACE AND LEAD YOU THROUGH THE PROBLEMS WITH THIS LATEST FAKE CERTIFICATE OF “OBAMA’S”

  9. “I’ve been gradually unpacking over the last 2 weeks so it’s time to break the news. Clover is no longer my Mayor.”

    Must be a relief to get that piano off your back.

  10. Graeme, my apologies if you think this a completely frivolous question.

    But, are you going to watch the Royal Wedding?

    • What time is it Sydney time?

      • Not sure. I think early evening tomorrow. Just wondered if u had an opinion on it.

  11. this is uncanny Bird. Has Sailer been reading you?

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/04/whats-obama-hiding.html

    Another theory that I’m increasingly drawn to is that Obama got a little help along the way from CIA/NSA types, but that’s completely off everybody else’s radar because it doesn’t fit ideological categories.

    WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT COMMENT ALL ABOUT??????

    THE CIA ARE NOT PATRIOTS. THEY ARE NOT RIGHT-WINGERS IN THE SMALL GOVERNMENT SENSE. THEY ARE RIGHT-WINGERS IN THE CRONY SENSE. THERE IS NO IDEOLOGICAL CLASH.’

    His father was a protege of the CIA’s main man in Kenya, Tom Mboya, and was chief witness of his assassination. His mother worked in the U.S. embassy in Indonesia, a main front in the Cold War, soon after the 1965 coup, and then went on to a long career with U.S. government-affiliated organizations in the Third World. Barack Jr.’s one private industry job was as a copy editor at a firm, Business International, whose owner had previously admitted the firm served as a front for four CIA agents.

  12. Other than his confusion about ideological matters everything else he says checks out. Notice that Barack hasn’t produced a birth certificate. You cannot go to the bank and flip open your laptop and show a picture of a birth certificate and expect that to be taken as evidence. And if he could produce a physical copy obviously it cannot mean a damn thing after all this time.

    There will be a whole back-story behind every last detail of the computer image (a computer image is NOT a certificate), and if a spook organisation can’t conjure a computer image of a birth certificate after three years there is simply nothing they can do.

    But supposing someone could prove that he had the birth certificate and that it was the real thing? No-one can prove that but supposing they could? Well the iron law of conspiracies is that the only good way to hide them is with a smaller conspiracy that you deny vigorously and stonewall on.

    So what is the larger conspiracy that Barry Soetoro was tasked to hide? I say 9/11. I say that the 9/11 conspiracy was busted clean and smoking gun around 2006. So the only thing to do was get Barry to the Presidency surrounded in more conspiracies than Frank Miller could dream up in a year. That would be the only way to hide 9/11 once the shadow government was busted clean.

  13. Goodness me the woppy is a dope. If he thinks that the computer image is the real deal AND that the denial was not hiding any big conspiracy THEN WHY DID OBAMA COMMIT IDENTITY THEFT WITH SOMEONE ELSES SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?

    Cambria is hooked on the stupid junk, and thats one hard monkey to get off your back.

  14. Okay the moron birdflaps has a new creation theory. This time he reckons that all the planets are 4.5 billion years old.

    So whats the evidence for this blockhead? And what happened in this new solar system creation theory?

  15. Compare this to the idiots theory that the moon was shrinking!!!!! Imagine how big the moon was 4.5 billion years ago if its been shrinking all that time. This birdflaps simply has to be Cambria. You just cannot have two different people that stupid.

    • Don’t you get bored with fighting the same old fights over and over? I sure do. Most people do. No point in retreading old ground if you’ve got nothing new to say, or a new way of saying it and no one is listening.

      Reality checks are always in order.

    • You are just a dishonest twerp Bird. The shrinkage of the moon is very small, an insignificant amount over its history, I only brought it to your attention because it is good scientific evidence against this expanding earth nonsense.

      You say there is no lying on this site, you can barely make any comment without it being a lie.

  16. Its a live issue since the usurper is still in the white house and the dumb wop is still implying that he’s a valid President.

  17. NO LYING ON THIS SITE IDIOT. TEMPERATURES AREN’T RISING. USING RIGGED DATA IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE.

  18. Look you dope. Explain your new idiotic theory in your own words, and then you will see you don’t have a case. Why not try and break out of your trust-and-parrot idiocy? Why not? I know the public servants are demanding that everything that happens in our solar system happens all at once, and a long time ago. But they are morons, and they have no reason to believe this daft world-view.

    You say you believe that all the planets came into existence in some creation event about 4.5 billion years ago. But you are a moron and you have no reason to believe such a ridiculous creation-story.

    So explain what you think happened 4.5 billion years ago and explain why you think it happened that way, and then I will have something substantial to refute.

  19. “Then why release the LFBC now?”

    You’ve gone wobbly Gabrielle. A computer beta is not a long-form birth certificate. Yet at the slightest pressure you conceded what you have no right to concede. Its the conservative approach to global warming all over again and no good can come of it.

  20. “Then why release the LFBC now?”

    Also you are implying that you have conceded that this conman has released some sort of legitimate short-form birth certificate. Every certificate his crowd has released has been a fake-up. Not once has he released a legitimate certificate. People like Tillman or Fyodor know they’ve won when they get this sort of acquiescence.

    • “Also you are implying that you have conceded that this conman has released some sort of legitimate short-form birth certificate.”

      No. It’s most likely a fake however I really don’t care. The Protected One has been forced to show something, to do Trump’s bidding.

      The mere fact that he waited four years before producing the LFBC raises eyebrows and doubts as to its authenticity.

  21. The two of them were definitely scams. The important point is the language one. We have to be careful in not conceding some lies so that they become bipartisan.

    Take the lie that doubling CO2 levels would increase temperature by 1 degrees Celsius prior to positive feedbacks for water vapor. Thats a bipartisan lie simply because we were harangued into not asking questions about factoids that weren’t proven but appeared to be reasonable.

  22. “The mere fact that he waited four years before producing the LFBC raises eyebrows and doubts as to its authenticity.”

    There you go again GAB. Look you have to be so careful. I’ve seen this so many times since 2001. He has not provided a long-form or a short-form or anything. He provided a computer image beta. Thats a fact. He didn’t provide anything else but a layered computer image subject to constant update. Thats a beta. Its not a long form anything.

    • Graeme

      I leave the details of these matters to those who are eminently qualified to dispute the authenticity of the certificates. Such as yourself.

  23. any thoughts on Bin Laden’s death?

  24. Hey Bird:

    Aren’t you issuing any press release on this?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: