Those few idiots who still believe that Arab kids brought the buildings down have no scientific evidence to back their theory. So its global warming all over again. The whole fraudulent point of view based on never coming up with any evidence and faux-Popper-falsification based on stray things the rational side of the debate say.
No-one purporting to take a scientific approach to the blame-the-Arabs story, who is also a professional scientist, will sign their name to anything they write. Because they have no extant theory as to how the buildings came down. Even the American Government does not support the “pancaking” theory anymore. Since the pancaking theory requires pancaking and there is no pancaking to be found in the footage of the towers falling.
Pancaking implies continual RADICAL DECELERATION from free-fall acceleration rates. And this the Clarke Cabal, could not possibly engineer without being caught.
The requirements of the Clarke Cabal are not hard to infer. So I’ll put them out there just so you can grasp clearly what is going on.
The buildings had to fall in the following way or the (stand down) false flag (denial, and deception) operation would fail.
1. The buildings had to fall as fast as possible. So as close to free-fall as they could contrive the fall to be. Since free-fall was the maximum possible speed, something close to free-fall was the best they could aim for.
2. The buildings had to fall symmetrically, sequentially, and straight downwards.
3. The Clarke Cabal was to try and get rid of as much as the evidence during the actual fall. Since the crime scene had to be cleared free of evidence under the nose, or with the connivance of Mayor Juliani, what evidence you could turn to dust in mid-air, you didn’t need to sneak out later.
4. Such explosives as had to be used, had to be as small as possible and as far from the outside windows as they could be contrived to be. Which is not to say there weren’t huge explosions. There were huge explosions, but obviously the use of very large explosions had to be kept to a minimum.
It was not possible to fulfill these stipulations to the required degree with any one method. Which is why explosions, thermate, and directed energy were all used.
With this in mind lets look at one of the disinformation sites supporting the blame-the-Arabs paradigm. Currency Lad, being just as idiotic as he wants to be, when matters are close to his heart, linked this disinformation site approvingly.
The first thing you notice is that the article is unsigned. Since “science” is the new in-vogue tool of misinformation no screed that purports to speak for an organization, or that is unsigned, ought to be taken seriously. Or rather all such productions ought to be viewed as highly suspect, since we have had almost the entirety of the scientific organisations roll over for the global warming fraud, and we now see how this sort of thing works. Stupid scientists who have no reasoning capacity outside their narrowly defined specialty may often speak for stupid and wrong ideas on their own behalf. But in 2011, official statements of scientific organisations are usually lies.
But lets put aside these very useful prejudices and lets have a look at what this morally bankrupt idiot-cunt has to say.
” Let’s forget for a moment that thermite doesn’t explode so the claims of hearing explosions become meaningless. The argument that there was thermite and explosives seems to be rationalization of this dilemma. Why would they use thermite which cuts steel without announcing it, then switch to explosives? To tip people off? ”
We’ll break this up a bit:
“Let’s forget for a moment that thermite doesn’t explode so the claims of hearing explosions become meaningless.”
In what sense does this cunt claim that the explosions were meaningless? Lets say this fellow tries to tell one of the girls who was hospitalized by one of the explosions … “Listen honey. The explosion that hospitalized you means nothing?”
It may mean nothing to this moral degenerate. But to the people killed, injured or hospitalized by the explosions themselves, or by the building materials falling on them, I’d say that the explosions had some meaning in their lives. We are talking about mass murder here. So every aspect of how the mass-murder was carried out is meaningful to the forensic analysis of the crime.
Can you imagine some crime investigations show, where a main character kept on breaking out into fits of nihilism every so often? “Yes Mrs Jones. That your daughter was raped before and after she was murdered, is a meaningless detail. ”
No detail is meaningless when you are sorting out what happened. Would this degenerate murder-loving freak prefer it if we said “Only thermate was used”? Would he find the case of the rational side of the argument stronger if they all agreed to say that only thermate was used? How would that make the case stronger? Would it make this cunt any happier?
Well the thing is the rational side of the argument isn’t going to say that explosions weren’t used to bring the building down. Because we already know for a fact, that explosions were used. We know that from the witness testimony, which includes people hospitalized by the explosions. We know it from the footage which shows the explosions. We know it from the sound of the explosions. Video, audio and witness testimony. The contrary point of view can produce no evidence that there weren’t explosions. So we already know there were explosions. That there were explosions, is a fact.
“Why would they use thermite which cuts steel without announcing it, then switch to explosives? ”
How stupid is this fellow? We already know that there was explosions. But just imagine if they had tried to bring that building down with JUST EXPLOSIVES. How is that going to work? If you don’t cut the girders first, diagonally and just short of being sliced entirely, then how powerful will the explosions have to be to make the building fall? Very fucking powerful. And not only that they have to go all the way out to the inside edge of the building. They need to be very big explosions, and some of them would need to be very close to the windows. Fucking hell this fellow is so stupid you would want to vomit on him.
Well how about just using the thermate? So that would mean every last girder has to be cut all the way through, and that you need to start cutting them at different times but finish cutting them all at the same time. Or else the building will fall when it feels like falling, it won’t fall symmetrically, and in any case there is no way to use thermate alone and fulfill the rather obvious requirement that the two buildings that were hit with planes, would fall clearly in a sequential way, from top to bottom.
How can you make the buildings fall in this sequential way with thermate alone? Obviously it cannot be done. Supposing we relax the sequential top-to-bottom requirement? Well we still could not get the building to fall symmetrically, merely by completing the diagonal cutting of all girders at the same time. Because each girder needs to slip. Clearly the Silverstein gang needed a range of techniques to get the job done, as is usual with any job. How did this dumb cunt conjure the idea that they had to use only one tool? When we know that all undertakings need more than one tool to be completed well? Can anyone name one undertaking that needs one tool alone to do well? Thats why we have a knife AND fork. Or some pistols, a rifle, a shotgun, a getaway car, balaclava’s and all sorts of other clobber. So apparently this dumb cunt has it that the bigger the crime is the less tools you need to commit that crime well? Obviously the contrary is the case. The bigger the crime WITH A COVERT ASPECT TO IT, the more extensive your tool-box has to be.
The alleged debunking site is an evidence-free-zone. That is to say the disinformation crew running this site do not bring evidence or argument to bear for their own hypothesis. Always this has to set alarm bells ringing. I’m not talking about requiring every fucker to reference some journal or other. No-one not getting paid is going to waste time on that. Anyone interested in what really happened, does not need to be directed to the authentication of well-known facts. If you were interested you could go to the journal of 9/11 studies to have the basic facts authenticated, showing you where the source material is referenced. And you could back that up with your own eyes viewing some of the video evidence on youtube.
Lets look at the four stipulations, that the Juliani boys had to work to, again.
But as an aside how culpable is Rudi Juliani? Well he may have been duped like so many of the rest of us. Clearly he had an exemplary record in the New York police. I don’t know how a shadow government could “turn” a heretofore righteous person like this, and get his co-operation. But the thing is we have to assume that these guys have extreme expertise in entrapping people into going along with their schemes. Some people cannot be threatened. Some people cannot be bribed. But almost no-one cannot be prevailed upon by a combination of threats, bribes, and flattery. Some single men may be able to hold out against that combination. I cannot imagine holding out in the face of such an onslaught, since there are girls in my new family. I try and hold my head up high and be socially brave now, knowing that I may have to pull my horns in at a later date so that I’m not shifting the requirement of physical bravery onto others who did not bring anything upon themselves.
To be fair I’m not saying the case against Juliani approaches the strength of the case against Richard Clarke or Silverstein. But the crime scene was destroyed under his watch. And therefore its a case he has to answer.
So what were the four stipulations the Silverstein Crew had to work to?
1. The building had to fall as fast as possible. So as close to free-fall as they could contrive the fall to be. Since free-fall was the maximum possible speed, something close to free-fall was the best they could aim for.
2. The buildings had to fall symmetrically, sequentially, and straight downwards.
3. The Clarke Cabal was to try and get rid of as much as the evidence during the actual fall. Since the crime scene had to be cleared free of evidence under the nose, or with the connivance of Mayor Juliani ……… THEREFORE ……….. what evidence you could turn to dust in mid-air, you didn’t need to sneak out later.
4. Such explosives as had to be used, had to be as small as possible and as far from the outside windows as they could be contrived to be.
Okay so why the need for speed? Well that’s just the illusionist sleight of hand. The hand is quicker than the eye. If the building came down slowly it would be easy to see what was going on. But then there is no capacity to bring down buildings slow-and-symmetrical. This they could not do.
Well how about this need to bring the buildings down sequentially? Clearly if the buildings didn”t fall from the top to the bottom there was no possibility of blaming the fall on the planes.
Well how about the stipulation that the buildings had to be brought down SYMMETRICALLY:
To be able to clear away all the evidence that could not be dustified during the fall the Clarke Cabal had to contrive events such that any remaining evidence HAD TO FALL ON THE PROPERTY OF SILVERSTEIN. Should the building tip as it fell, then the possibility was for evidence to fall on a string of other properties, sparking off parallel insurance and crime-scene investigations on all of those properties. So there was a total requirement for the evidence to fall straight down so it could be cleared away without sparking off national standards for crime scenes and for engineering failures.
If the Clarke Cabal had not managed to clear off all the evidence with such great dispatch then a lot of regulations may have been triggered. Regulations to do with insurance, engineering failure just for example. So the operation to clear the evidence had to be on a hair-trigger prior to the false flag operation being carried out.
“3. The Clarke Cabal was to try and get rid of as much as the evidence during the actual fall.”
You can see how vital the directed energy weapons were to this requirement. Whereas there ought to have been 13 or so stories worth of rubble on the ground, at the end of the fall, there were only three. They managed to dissolve 10 or so COMPACTED-stories worth of evidence during the fall. Also the directed energy weapons meant that the explosions could be placed further inside the building than otherwise. As well by cutting down the mass of evidence from 13 stories to 3, and by bringing the explosions further to the center, what this meant is that you didn’t have girders landing outside the Silverstein property, and therefore being photographed and taken into the possession of other people ……. people not under the influence of the shadow governments plans.
The last thing these white-bread criminals would want, is to have a string of different property owners and insurance companies, analyzing girders that had been substantially melted, or with clear diagonal cuts to them.
So the directed energy weapons had to be around the perimeter, helping to set the pace of the collapse of the outside walls, but also systematically dustifying what would otherwise be an accumulating mass of falling concrete and girders. The falling mass STARTED with a (non-compacted) block of about 14 floors. And under normal assumptions, this mass, would have gone on growing as it fell, supposing that it fell straight down.
This is how it happened. Directed energy, thermate, AND explosives.
But if you think it happened another way explain your thesis and I’ll be glad to take a look at it.