But bird flaps. Seems to be thats about the only argument she has. If she had a proper argument I’d consider it, and not make like the stick figures are representative of her considered position.
Here’s the thing. If stealth-Jews lock in and vigorously enforce fantasy-finance and fantasy-physics, when you have a clear example of REAL PHYSICS making an hypothesis untenable, you are not going to see it. You are not going to see that force, mass and acceleration….. and the concept that forces always come in pairs, equal and opposite, make the Arab blood libel of 9/11 entirely untenable. If you think physics is all about this utter fantasy of “space-time” this make-believe of a light-speed limit, this embarrassment of the big bang theory, this maths-boy-101 bullshit of the singularity …. when an example of authentic physics comes along, you are not going to notice.
The saviour told us that we must forgive the children for the sins of the fathers. He also was zen cool when it came to tough situations, and one time he pulled out a coin and made a very clever distinction, under a scene of high intimidation.
Well you see that injunction, and that story of grace under pressure, got bundled up in the post-Aquinas world with the Aristotelian habit of taxonomy. Aristotle started off as a biologist and from that he gained the habit of making fine distinctions. The example of the saviour, the influence of Aristotle combined with the terrific Aquinian habit, of looking at a problem from at least three angles in any given paragraph……….. it was THIS cultural integration that produced the best scientific climate and the best scientific mindsets that recorded history has seen. In a way they were BETTER then Athenians, whose balance tipped too far towards the apriori reasoning. ((((Actually the contemporary Jewish philosopher Nozick, was particularly good at looking at matters from all angles in Aquinian fashion.))))
Anyhow; forgiving the sons for the sins of the fathers, translated into forgiving the fathers for working under the wrong paradigm. What it meant is that if you did an honest job, and followed logic and empirical evidence in science …. well you were cool, and there was no shame if you were eventually superseded.
Perhaps all this emphasis on redemption, forgiveness, letting prodigal sons off the hook and so forth, was bad for the late Roman era. Maybe Justinian was right in some ways, that the Christians were buggering things up, and undermining traditional Roman values. But what I’m talking about is the culture that was created post-Aquinas, and right up until the end of the nineteenth century. Mayhaps right up until after the first Christmas of World War I. Here we had an Aristotlean/Christian culture, that was conducive to the rise of science.
But are those Jews, those particular Jews, who did not have to fight their way up, and impress the Goyim …….. are this latest generation of Jews, really fit to be carrying on science?
I am sad to say that it no longer seems so, if we take prominent Jews under 60 as our example. I say this even though, up until quite recently, it was Jews who appeared to be, in many ways, the outstanding sub-culture within the intellectual world.
The God that Moses interpreted (or conjured) through his brother Aaron, said that he would punish the children to the 7th generation. This is in no way going to translate to the easy-going admission that ones ideas have been superseded. If brother-Nathaniel is right about the Talmud, then we may be seeing an insufficient humility, when it comes to ones ideas, being utterly trounced by some passing non-Jew. I’m seeing it all the time and all over the English-Speaking, formerly-Anglo world.
Now that the net is here we can see, all over the world. stealth-Jews, holding onto fantasy-physics and fantasy-finance, like it was a one-ounce silver coin between their butt-cheeks. Is the culture of those brought up as Jews? …. or must this culture be? …….A SHAME CULTURE?
Would reformed-Jews feel personal shame if they admitted to themselves that special relativity is a load of rubbish? A foolish and really quite a childish fantasy?
What if the protocols of the elder of zion was shown not to be forged? The protocols of the elders of zion has not been shown TO BE forged, and without evidence we must return an open verdict. (I believe they are forged, but I don’t KNOW THIS for a fact). But what if these protocols were shown to be valid? Would that cast shame on your average Jew? The brilliance of Christianity is that an individualistic Christian would not need to deny such a scandal, since it would be other individuals, and if the taint even reached him in the first place, you have a culture of making good and forgiveness AND NOT DOUBLING DOWN ON YOUR WRONGDOING.
We have a problem here. Because we suddenly have all these hyper-incompetent Jews in our face, RIGHT in our face, and particularly on the American scene. They are scuttling the ship at a great rate of knots. But the networking and mentality of these people seems to be to lock the error and dysfunction in, DOUBLE DOWN, and to never admit that one has been proven wrong.
This is a big problem, and no good can come of ignoring it.