Posted by: graemebird | April 9, 2012

Intermarriage As The Key To Putting Forward A List Of Culprits

When we go to bring wars to a quick close as I’ve said before, the idea is to do the following:

You try and analyse who is the regime leadership of the enemy force that is hampering your sovereignty and the safety of the citizens you are serving. In doing so you would want to make a list of the 10,000 most influential people in the nation, and another list of the 10, 000 most culpable, with regards to the issue you have with this enemy. Its in the intersecting set that you find the people you need to target. Those people whose death will lead the survivors within that group to put together a hasty reconciliation. But what if your enemy is the shadow government? How do you compile the lists?

One of the clues that will help you compile such a list is a history of inter-marriage within the bigshot families. Rent-seeking undertakings with standing in the time-range of multiple-decades, or even centuries, always involve near-incestuous match-making.  Certainly dynastic marriages are carefully made with a view to holding the power in as few hands as is possible. The more that the power is centred, the greater the impetus for bigshots to marry within the family business if not within the family itself.

Just look at the history of it. The Hapsburg family, a rent-seeking operation as I think everyone would agree, spent centuries carefully arranging their marriages.  Prince Phillip is a relative of the very Queen that he married. Most of the participants of the outbreak of World War I were direct descendants of Queen Victoria.  Prince Phillip talks about the communists wiping out a good deal of his family, and he isn’t mucking about. The Romanovs were all his close relatives.  Cleopatra Ptolemy married her little brother, then had him murdered. Egypt seemed to be where the rent-seeking power was concentrated the most and so the idea was to find attraction with ones sister.  The Roosevelts sought political power because of the tawdry way they made their money. These scoundrels and socialists were all rent-seeking opium dealers, and its only natural that organized criminals of this sort should then intrigue within Washington to shore up their position. But its also by no means unnatural that the worst of this scum should marry his own cousin.

International banking is also a rent-seeking operation, and so therefore we see a history of carefully planned marriages and marriages with an incestuous angle to them, literal and otherwise. So that once you were done with linking the money power with such groups as MI6, the CIA, the State Department, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, The Ford Carnegie Rockefeller foundations and so forth ….. the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the central banks of the world, and so forth, you might start looking for this never-fail sign of rent-seeking and power consolidation that these careful and incestuous marriages are.

Failure to do this means a failure to bring about a quick and humane peace.  So if you think of the case study of World War II. Here the allies bombed the cities, where civilians, who could not influence policy, were blown to bits, while the luxury houses and estates of the ruling class went untouched. This was a terrible failed policy and not unconnected to the huge carnage of that war. But supposing you have shut down the Wall Street and European bankers financing both sides of that war? Had you have known who to target in that department, and were willing to target them, a reasonable peace could have been sorted out fairly quickly supposing that you could also target those who you considered were domestic German regime leadership.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Graeme Bird :

    09 Apr 2012 11:00:24am

    We ought not talk about “The West wants …. ” this or that or the US seeks this or that. What we are really talking about is the shadow government. Its the shadow government of rich banking families, and their network of not-for-profit organisations that control things, and have done so since Woodrow Wilson’s time at the very least. Occasionally a wilful President like Kennedy or Reagan will act independently, but note that both these Presidents were shot.

    Think of the utter futility of the actions against Gaddaffi. In no way was this foolishness in the US national interest. But banking families can make profits on the weapons used, will now have access to create money and asset inflation within Libya, will be able to create new money against all the “sure thing” assets that Libya has, while any of the costs are sheeted off to the American taxpayer.

    Many people, like myself, who doubted this thesis, were brought around decisively by 2008, where the rampant thieving by the financial sector, made it more or less impossible to deny this way of thinking any longer. A review of the history of central banks will show that they are typically tied up with rich families and covert operations right at their inception.

    Reply Alert moderator

  2. Excellent link from Rafe

    http://www.longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm

    • That chart looks like it was compiled by cranks. Where are the units of the y-axis? Data also isn’t that smooth as they have depicted.

      Compare this to a graph made from real data.

      • The graph you criticise displays the appropriate level of exactitude for the data available. If you perceived that this isn’t very exact, your perception would be right. Its an honest graph, not an exact one. An exact graph, would be a dishonest graph.

        Your graph is lies. Its rigged data. Any graph you see where the 30’s are cooler than the 90’s is based on lies.

  3. […] uncensored on “Intermarriage As The Key To Putting Forward A List Of Culprits“ @ A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe […]

    • Very good, I’ve left my first comment on the birdclone site.

  4. So killing civilians is bad, but killing bankers and financiers is just fine and dandy? You need to stop these revenge fantasies before you do something really stupid.

  5. Not just any bankers. They have to be regime leadership.

  6. No thats not even true. They have to be judged both regime leadership AND culpable. Take Secretary of State George Schultz. A Rockefeller heir. A Bechtel executive (Bechtel set up by Rockefeller and provider of key posts in government), but to my knowledge did a good job, served his President ably, even going beyond the call of duty to pull Reagan out of the Contra mess with the Iranians that he had got himself into. Not to cover it up, but to pull him out of the mess the others had put Reagan in.

    So from my knowledge of the fellow so far, he was regime leadership, but not culpable. He could go in peace.

  7. What we ask of people who have had some good fortune with fractional reserve, not to give up their wealth, but simply learn to lead an honest life thereafter. But this cannot hold for the already corrupted who are determined to kill to keep their dynasties. In that case they have to be neutralized as a political force. Much like Putin did with that fellow who had been unjustly enriched in the privatisation of Russia’s state-owned assets. But as a practical matter Putin had to put this fellow in prison to neutralize him, lest he get together with his allies in international banking and cause trouble. It is a case study of how hard it is to get justice right. In this case Putin was somewhat unjust to this fellow, enabling him to be more just to the Russian people. Thats not what you want ideally. Ideally you want justice for all parties. But if you have to act, the better justice is not always going to be within your capacity to deliver. The fellow still lives, and when he gets out of prison he will probably live quite comfortably.

    Everyone ideally ought to get a chance at a new day. Everyone ought to have a chance to make an honest living, even with some fraction of the huge wealth that was gained under a dishonest system. Everyone ought to get a chance, no matter how poorly they have behaved in the past. But WHAT IF THEY DON’T TAKE THAT CHANCE? Rich people, no matter how dense, tend to think of themselves as morally and genetically superior. Case study Joseph Cambria. Who admittedly hasn’t said anything too appallingly stupid in some time as far as I can make out. We would want people to aspire to an honest living within a better system. Why is it so offensive to some people to accept that they can keep most of their loot, so long as they agree to aspire to an honest living from here on in? This is all we would ask. And I don’t think this is too much to ask:

  8. The motto of the best and most enlightened modern policing is “softly softly.” It must be understood that every encounter is a negotiation, and an opportunity to exercise the vast panorama of verbal skills open to those experienced-and-adept, in the art of persuasion.

    Here we see uncle-Graeme, using all his subtlety and communication skills, towards the end of turning, what might be to some, an unpleasant encounter ……….. into a triumph of diplomacy and “unexpected” consensus.

  9. Here is uncle-Graeme explaining why the banking oligarchy won’t be taken down without civil strife. The half-assed can be given another chance. But the hardened criminals will kill millions before they themselves get taken down. Because the hard-core are not “Half-Teds.”

    • No That’s bullshit, Bird, You need to stop the lying.

  10. Your hedging. What am I bullshitting about? 9/11 was no picnic. It was serious criminal behavior.

    • “Here is uncle-Graeme explaining why the banking oligarchy won’t be taken down without civil strife. The half-assed can be given another chance. But the hardened criminals will kill millions before they themselves get taken down. Because the hard-core are not “Half-Teds.””

      I’m not hedging. This is crap.

  11. Why? Its true. The oligarchical banking families that control the NATO countries aren’t going to just say “errr, you’re right, sorry we won’t advocate fractional reserve and central banking ever again. We will from now on use our ill-gotten gains to promote the concept of debt-free money. We too want a better capitalism…”

    That just isn’t going to happen. The money power, and covert operations power is integrated. They will manipulate and kill anyone who gets in their way. Because after all they are guilty of 9/11 and have been caught with a smoking gun. So they would face going from world dictators, (outside of Russia and China) to being criminals on death row, if things didn’t continue to go their way. They are born and bred under the culture of dynastic rule. They have run a bewildering number of scams, and frantically so just lately. The global warming scam for example. Going from being a Master Of The Universe to being on death row is something that these people are not going to abide.

  12. Don’t get me wrong. Under the normal scheme of things, 99% of what these people do is softly softly. Danny Estulin reckons some agents showed up and they said “Look you earned this” and handed him a blank cheque for him to shut up. He was theoretically in a position to simply write in how much money he wanted if he agreed thereafter to get off their case. He reckons he framed it and put it on his wall, and its a source of pride to him, because it reminds him of his loyalty to the better things as his Dad spent time in a concentration camp thanks to this filth.

    In passing; the Brietbart murder was murder but it was decoy murder as far as I can make out. Someone else would have been murdered at the same time, and Brietbart killed as decoy.

  13. Quote from a Doctor in 1936:

    “I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

  14. The fluoridation of water goes back to a bribe of $750,000 by the Rockefellers, to a government official, to inflict this poison on the people. Science-fraud, but after awhile you see a lot of this science fraud is coming from the same nexus.

  15. House of murder:

    http://www.mskcc.org/

  16. No lying on this site idiot. Fluoride is a known nerve poison and neutralizes thyroid hormone you lying cunt. It also attacks the thyroid gland you fucking vermin cunt. You deserve to die for this one lie.

    Everyone needs to get a fluoride filter. This is a fucking fact. Its a fact.

    • And alcohol is a known poison too, yet you have no problem with people ingesting it. Fluoride as an addition to local water supply has never killed

      NO LYING ON THIS SITE. FLUORIDE SHORTENS THE LIFE OF EVERYONE THAT IS MADE TO DRINK FLUORIDATED WATER. ITS A MASS-KILLER. WE ARE TALKING MASS-MURDER. WHICH WAS ITS ORIGINAL PURPOSE. THE 750,000 DOLLAR BRIBE TO OWEN EWING FROM ROCKEFELLER, WASN’T ANYTHING TO DO WITH PUBLIC HEALTH.

      • FIRST LETS HAVE THE COUNTER-EVIDENCE WHEREIN POISONING THE WATER DOESN’T SHORTEN EVERYONES LIFE WHO IS SUBJECTED TO THE POISON. OBVIOUSLY IT DOES, SO THE QUESTION REQUIRES COUNTER-EVIDENCE. SINCE THOSE PEOPLE SO POISONED, IF THEIR LIFE IS NOT SHORTENED, IT MUST BE A FAILURE TO SHORTEN THEIR LIVES, BY SHEER SERENDIPITY.

        FLUORIDE ATTACKS THE THYROID GLAND CUMULATIVELY, EVEN AS IT NEUTRALISES THE THYROID HORMONE ON AN IMMEDIATE BASIS. WE NEED EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST HOW THIS WOULD NOT SHORTEN ANYONE’S LIFE. OKAY OKAY OKAY, THERE COULD BE PEOPLE WITH UNDIAGNOSED HYPER-THYROIDISM, AND ITS JUST POSSIBLE THAT A SUBSET OF THESE PEOPLES LIVES WERE NOT SHORTENED BY THE POISONING. BUT WE WOULD WANT EVIDENCE FOR THIS.

      • FLUORIDE SHORTENS THE LIFE OF EVERYONE THAT IS MADE TO DRINK FLUORIDATED WATER.

        So tell us why the life expectancy in every western country that fluoridates its drinking water is increasing.

        YOU IDIOT!!!!!!! YOU’VE JUST BOUGHT ANOTHER COP-OUT MEME!!!!!! WAS IT NOT THE CASE THAT LIFE EXPECTANCY
        WAS INCREASING PRIOR TO FLUORIDATION????? YOU FUCKING TOOL. IS THERE NO LAME COPOUT MEME THAT YOU WON’T
        FALL FOR? LIFE EXPECTANCY IS ALSO INCREASING IN THOSE COUNTRIES THAT BANNED FLUORIDATION.

        ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE WESTERN COUNTRIES THAT BANNED FLUORIDATION ARE DOING WORSE THAN THE ONES THAT DIDN’T.

        YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON MATE. AND YOU FALL FOR EVERY FUCKING STUPID MEME THAT IS OUT THERE.

      • Flouridated or non flouridated water doesn’t affect life expectancy NO THATS A LIE. IT REDUCES THE LIFE EXPECTANCY OF EVERYONE THAT HAS TO PUT UP WITH IT. THATS VERY FUCKING CLEAR. SO STOP LYING ABOUT IT. IF YOU HAVE EVIDENCE FOR THIS FUCKING RIDICULOUS CLAIM, THEN IT ISN’T A LIE, AND I WON’T OBSTRUCT YOUR EVIDENCE.

  17. Since Fluoride cumulatively damages the thyroid gland, and neutralises thyroid hormone on an immediate basis, we would want evidence that even in one case, that it hasn’t shortened that one persons life. This evidence is not likely to be forthcoming.

    Fluoride at least doubles your chance of getting cancer. It leads to heart problems and people taking desiccated thyroid hormone don’t get heart attacks. The preventative cure for heart attacks is to have taken the fluoride out of your water, and your toothpaste and to take desiccated thyroid hormone. So in the first instance we assume that nearly all of those who died of heart attacks and strokes, or whose health was initially hurt by heart attacks and strokes …… and half of everyone who contracted cancer one time or another …. We assume that fluoride has shortened all their lives, but we have to assume that it will shorten everyones life, until we can find evidence that there is but one person whose life it hasn’t shortened.

  18. Could we even find one person, just one person, whose life the ongoing consumption of fluoride, hasn’t shortened. Can we even find evidence for ONE PERSON whose life hasn’t been shortened by this practice?

    I don’t think so. So I think we have to conclude its mass-murder. If you look to people who live 100 years or more, they don’t tend to come from households who are drinking fluoridated water every day, but this ought to be the case, if we were correlating health with fairly good material conditions.

    • At the time of the 2006 Census, there were 3154 centenarians in Australia, 797 men (25%) and 2357 women (75%). This number is expected to increase to 12 000 by 2020.

      Centenarians are the fastest growing age segment of the Australian population. Their numbers have increased by 8.5% per year over the past 25 years.

      https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2008/188/12/changing-face-australian-population-growth-centenarians

      Yes, it’s obvious how the fluoride menace is decimating the expected life of Australians.

      • Well give us some case studies? Since the damage is cumulative, lets have the case histories of these people. If they lived 80 years on the farm, and have only just recently showed up in a nursing home, where they maintain a fluoride filter, this is something we would want to know about.

      • So out of 3154 centenarians, not one of them grew up and lived their whole life in any city that has fluoridated water?

        SOME OF THEM MIGHT HAVE. BUT SHOULD THEY DO IT FOR ANY SUBSTANTIAL TIME THIS WOULD SHORTEN THEIR LIVES FOR SURE. YOU’VE GOT TO REALISE THAT THIS MENACE WAS ROLLED OUT OVER TIME. SO THAT QUEENSLAND DIDN’T MAKE IT COMPULSORY UNTIL 2008. WHEN A LOT OF THESE PEOPLE WERE BORN THEY WERE BORN INTO A MOSTLY RURAL COMMUNITY, AND FLUORIDATION ONLY CAME TO THE BIG CITIES NEARBY WHEN THEY WERE ALREADY IN OLD AGE.

      • Sydney has had fluoridated water since 1968. That is 44 years of consumption for a person of 100 years age. There would be 1000’s of people in their 80’s in Sydney that have been drinking it since their late 30’s, so how is this “mass murder” happening?

  19. Okay here is a life expectancy ranking. Note how the countries that don’t fluoridate their water have better life expectancy than those that do. The UK and the USA are ranked down the bottom in life expectancy. The non-fluoridating countries whip their ass. Japan wins out even though these people are chain-smokers. Sweden, Germany, and the Netherlands all banned fluoridation during the early 70’s. I don’t know about Denmark and Italy.

    Note also the fluoride drinking nations have incredible problems with obesity. These problems hit me starting gradually from the age of about 36, right up until I got a fluoride filter and started taking desiccated thyroid hormone. Actually I’ve run out and I have a terrible suspicion that I’m packing back on a few pounds. Also when I undertook these measures I had proven sleep apnoea. Overnight testing and everything. All thats gone now. The host of problems that fluoridation causes is truly a terrible terrible thing.

    http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=life+expectancy+U.S.%2C+Sweden%2C+Japan%2C+Germany%2C+Holland%2C+England%2C+France%2C+Denmark%2C+Italy

    • Israel fluoridates its water, its life expectancy is 82 (4th in the world) and is higher than many countries that don’t fluoridate. Australia is 6th overall, higher than most European countries that don’t fluoridate

      So tell us how many years of expected life is fluoridation cutting?

      • The main point is that its killing everyone. Not that we can say how much it shortens peoples life with any exactitude. When did Israel start fluoridating its water?

  20. “Israel
    Water supply in Israel is artificially fluoridated since the 1970s. Settlements with more than 5000 citizens and settlements sharing water infrastructure with large settlements receive fluoridated water. About 67% of Israel’s population receives fluoridated water.”

    Thats 67% less bottled and filtered. So a case in point. Virtually only half. Less than 1% for the Japanese. Pretty clear its killing all populations stupid enough to poison the water.

  21. We know that this behaviour causes hypo-thyroidism, leading to general ill-health, but that it also causes heart attacks, strokes and cancer.

    So if anyone dies of a heart attack, stroke or cancer, or has his health hurt by such events …. then when he dies what is your excuse? Ho ho. He would have died anyway.

    Like I said, the practice shortens everyones life who is subject to it. As the evidence suggests, and as logic suggests.

    I think you will find that the English-Speaking world has lost ground on comparative longevity studies since the fluoridation of water.

    • “Like I said, the practice shortens everyones life who is subject to it. As the evidence suggests, and as logic suggests.”

      The evidence (and logic) suggests no such thing.

      “I think you will find that the English-Speaking world has lost ground on comparative longevity studies since the fluoridation of water.”

      NO YOU ARE LYING. AT BEST ONE WOULD HAVE TO RETURN AN OPEN VERDICT ON THE STATISTICAL FRONT, SINCE YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR THE VIEW THAT YOU CAN TAKE FLUORIDE WATER FOR A LONG TIME AND IT NOT SHORTEN YOUR LIFE. SO THAT MEANS WE MUST DEFER TO THE REALITY OF PEOPLE DYING THROUGH CANCER AND HEART DISEASE, OR INDIRECTLY THROUGH ILL-HEALTH THAT THESE PROBLEMS BRING. HENCE MY STATEMENT STANDS AND YOUR THESIS IS WITHOUT MERIT.

      • Ha, the verdict is that there is no correlation. NO THE VERDICT IS FROM LOOKING AT THE WIKI FOR ABOUT TEN MINUTES, THE VERDICT ISN’T CLOSED YOU DUMB CUNT. ITS OPEN. WHICH MEANS MY PROPOSITION STANDS, SINCE YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE AGAINST IT, AND WE KNOW WE HAVE DIMINISHED THYROID HORMONE ACTION TO BLAME FOR MANY CANCERS AND NEARLY ALL HEART PROBLEMS. FUCK YOU ARE A MORON MATE.

  22. Take France and Italy as an example. On the Wiki list we are ranked ahead of them. Yet its well-known that these people aren’t having the heart and cancer problems as severely as we are. So when it comes down to the individual the assault on ones body, leading to heart and cancer problems, has to be taken into account on its own merits. No simple-minded country by country ranking can get Fluoridation off the hook when there isn’t much in it, and when our health and well-being were once to be envied everywhere.

    Now we are known as some of the fattest people around just for example. The Japanese can chain-smoke and we will typically get cancer before them.

  23. For fucksakes. You think that looking at ENTIRE NATIONS, from wiki for about ten minutes, on the basis of branding them as “fluoride” and “no fluoride” is a full-blown statistical investigation leading to a closed verdict? Fuck you are just such a moron mate. I suspect I’m talking to children here. To find evidence for your self-evidently bullshit case, you are going to have to have case studies, histories of when communities were fluoridated …. you are going to have to break the country up into small areas. In fact case studies are going to have to be the best evidence here. The quacks at the AMA dismiss all case studies as anecdotal. This is how fucking stupid they are.

  24. YOU’VE DONE NO RESEARCH AT ALL AND DON’T BULLSHIT THAT YOU KNOW THE HISTORY AND DRINKING HABITS OF ANY CASE STUDIES OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED 100 YEARS.

  25. Case studies. What we need is case studies.

  26. Early on I found out that the Obama Health Care plan, had all sorts of measures to pull the rug from out under the senior citizens. Note that John Humphreys bizarrely promoted the idea of cutting off social security right away, and at the same time famously is soft on deficit spending, and closing down departments by the bakers dozen. So the idea of destroying the prospects for people too old to be currently employable is a big idea amongst those on the inside track.

    But astonishingly, it turns out that Hillary Clinton’s original Health Care provisions had the same sort of thing. Totally leaving the 65 plus types out in the rain.

    Here is why health care, ludicrously described as “private” is far and away the most expensive in the US. Its because of this communist/Rockefeller monopoly they have their. And the Rockefeller nexus are extremists, with mass-murder on their mind. They skilfully manipulate the libertarian children and crypto-commie/globalist libertarians to aid their control and profits.

    They want everyone on expensive treatments, while they are working age, and they want them to drop dead, or be fully under their control, when they finally cannot work. It can be no coincidence that the hope to control or kill old people came out in two different health bills 20 years apart.

  27. Economics 101 sure took its toll on Joseph Cambria. He cannot ever be quits with the Keynesian Propaganda that he learned by rote that one year of education that he had in the subject.

    Look at this idiot:

    “Kelly

    Stop being a fucking idiot. Ryan’s plan is to balance the budget and Romney has essentially adopted Ryan’s plan.

    The idea is not to force down spending but to ease off the accelerator slowly allowing the private market to take up the slack.”

    Entirely wrong. There is no excuse in economic science not to run in surplus immediately. Every day that passes running deficits is causing economic damage and two times over. Economic damage now when resources that could be used for gross investment are being diverted. Economic damage in the future if the debt isn’t defaulted on, and is actually paid back.

  28. Note that the incurable Keynesian degenerate thinks that deficit spending is an accelerator? The fucking moron. How many times do you have to tell this stupid wop cunt WHERE IS THE MONEY COMING FROM. Deficit spending is NOT an accelerator. Its doesn’t increase spending. Wishing upon a star won’t make deficit spending increase spending.

  29. Kelly is absolutely right. There is no question but that Romney has no plan to get rid of the deficit. This is simply a fact. He has no plan. Nor will any plan he might be hiding be any use to him, if he gets in, without running a Paulian campaign.

  30. Can anyone tell me what the fuck James K’s point is?

    “The deficit is 40% of government spending every year Kelly.

    What da fuck is ur point?

    A surplus when?

    1 or 2 years?”

    Is his point that James K cannot read what Kelly has said? Is that his point?

  31. The War Of The Worlds radio broadcast seems to have been a shadow government psychological operations test.

    • Yes, but did you know that the early Mickey Mouse cartoons also were part of the operations? Walt Disney was part of the shadow government (YOUR FUCKWIT. YOU REALLY THINK BABY-TALK IS AN ARGUMENT DON’T YOU. YES YOU DO YOU DUMB CUNT) back then. I DON’T KNOW ABOUT THAT. BUT ITS AT LEAST POSSIBLE ONE SUPPOSES. NOT THE MICKEY MOUSE CARTOONS. BUT I KNOW NEXT TO NOTHING ABOUT WALT DISNEY. EXCEPT THAT HE ONCE HAD THE WORLD RECORD FOR THE MOST OSCARS. ITS A MAJOR RESEARCH PROJECT TO FIND OUT WHO IS INTERLOCKED WITH THE BIGSHOTS.

  32. I cleared up the Bird Flapz baby-talk. This is why I tend to think this moron is Joseph Cambria a lot of the time. Since Joseph Cambria is such a dumb wop he ALSO thinks that baby-talk is an argument.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: