When we go to bring wars to a quick close as I’ve said before, the idea is to do the following:
You try and analyse who is the regime leadership of the enemy force that is hampering your sovereignty and the safety of the citizens you are serving. In doing so you would want to make a list of the 10,000 most influential people in the nation, and another list of the 10, 000 most culpable, with regards to the issue you have with this enemy. Its in the intersecting set that you find the people you need to target. Those people whose death will lead the survivors within that group to put together a hasty reconciliation. But what if your enemy is the shadow government? How do you compile the lists?
One of the clues that will help you compile such a list is a history of inter-marriage within the bigshot families. Rent-seeking undertakings with standing in the time-range of multiple-decades, or even centuries, always involve near-incestuous match-making. Certainly dynastic marriages are carefully made with a view to holding the power in as few hands as is possible. The more that the power is centred, the greater the impetus for bigshots to marry within the family business if not within the family itself.
Just look at the history of it. The Hapsburg family, a rent-seeking operation as I think everyone would agree, spent centuries carefully arranging their marriages. Prince Phillip is a relative of the very Queen that he married. Most of the participants of the outbreak of World War I were direct descendants of Queen Victoria. Prince Phillip talks about the communists wiping out a good deal of his family, and he isn’t mucking about. The Romanovs were all his close relatives. Cleopatra Ptolemy married her little brother, then had him murdered. Egypt seemed to be where the rent-seeking power was concentrated the most and so the idea was to find attraction with ones sister. The Roosevelts sought political power because of the tawdry way they made their money. These scoundrels and socialists were all rent-seeking opium dealers, and its only natural that organized criminals of this sort should then intrigue within Washington to shore up their position. But its also by no means unnatural that the worst of this scum should marry his own cousin.
International banking is also a rent-seeking operation, and so therefore we see a history of carefully planned marriages and marriages with an incestuous angle to them, literal and otherwise. So that once you were done with linking the money power with such groups as MI6, the CIA, the State Department, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, The Ford Carnegie Rockefeller foundations and so forth ….. the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the central banks of the world, and so forth, you might start looking for this never-fail sign of rent-seeking and power consolidation that these careful and incestuous marriages are.
Failure to do this means a failure to bring about a quick and humane peace. So if you think of the case study of World War II. Here the allies bombed the cities, where civilians, who could not influence policy, were blown to bits, while the luxury houses and estates of the ruling class went untouched. This was a terrible failed policy and not unconnected to the huge carnage of that war. But supposing you have shut down the Wall Street and European bankers financing both sides of that war? Had you have known who to target in that department, and were willing to target them, a reasonable peace could have been sorted out fairly quickly supposing that you could also target those who you considered were domestic German regime leadership.