Posted by: graemebird | April 28, 2012

Upstart Lizzy. Worlds Biggest Drug Dealer?

Its been said that the Queen Of England is the kingpin of world drug-dealing.  Before we deride this idea, let us subject it to some sort of serious analysis

Sometimes analysis begins with asking a lot of questions. The questions are somewhat leading in this case, because I want to provide CONTEXT. Not enough is said about CONTEXT in science.  People talk a lot about content, evidence and proof, although if they are mainstreamers there is nothing they hate more then evidence, or the assumed need for evidence.  But context is very important.

Here are a few questions to set the context.

1. Did much of the British upper class engage in the opium trade in the 19th century?

2. Was the opium trade ever officially illegal during this time?

3. When did the opium trade end?

4. Is it not the case that the opium trade NEVER ended? Is it rather simply a case of substitution between opium smoking and heroin injecting?

5. Do large drug-dealing operations ever get closed down internally?

6. Can anyone ever think of even one sizable drug-dealing network that closed itself down?

7. Supposing you think that the opium trade was wound up? What date was that again?

8. Was it not the case that the royal family, during the 19th Century, gained financially from the opium trade?

9. If the royal family did not gain from the opium trade, why did they let other members of the aristocracy carry on this trade, and them not wetting their beak?

10. With a horribly illegal, immoral, and fantastically profitable opium trade going on, could any member of it, so much as propose a windup, without fearing for his life?

11. When was it a good time to wind up the opium trade without bringing massive opprobrium on the crown? For surely to try and wind up the opium trade is to admit that you have been trading in opium right?

12. The day  Great Britain wound up the opium trade …. What was that date again?

13. Can anyone suggest a plausible sequence or plan for Britain to have extracted itself from the opium trade?

14. Does anyone remember the date when this series of steps actually took place?

15.  Surely by the outbreak of World War II one would have wanted to get out of the opium trade. Now supposing that the war itself, and the abdication of the King, served as an excellent opportunity to extract oneself from this dirty business???  Was that the right time to be forgoing a source of funds, with the Empire having been militarily defeated at Dunkirk?

16. What about after the allied victory? Could we expect the impoverished Britains, to refrain from kicking that can down the road, when communism was threatening most of Europe?

17. What was that date again when the British shadow government rolled out of the opium trade?

You see the reality is that the Anglo-American shadow government never wound out of the opium trade. They are up to their eyeballs in drugs. And they have two drug money-making wings. The illegal and the legal drugs. The American cousins network has most of the cocaine, but the British still run half the opium racket. They cut a deal with the Chinese to carve the business in half. Which is why Britain has refrained from going to war on Americas side, whenever China was involved.

The ruling class, is the shadow government, and drugs is one of the businesses they monopolize on.  The proposition that Elizabeth isn’t the titular head of the opium trade is there to be disproved, and not the other way around.

 

Advertisements

Responses

  1. A Larouchite take on the idea of busty-Lizzy as “The Man” as it were. The main drug kingpin:

  2. Here is a full-blown lecture on this subject. Everything you and I thought we believed turned out to be bullshit:

  3. […] uncensored on “Upstart Lizzy. Worlds Biggest Drug Dealer?“ @ A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe […]

  4. When we use the phrase “The Crown” we are really talking about a large industry, probably involving covert operations, bankers, financial advisors, as well as people there for reasons of officially important hereditary. It is not to be implied, by what I’ve written above, that the Queens advisors ever remind her of any involvement this big outfit (ie the Crown) may have with this sordid drugs business. In fact, I’d be willing to believe, that a lot of their efforts have been to protect her from the knowledge of her outfits undertakings. I couldn’t possibly know about this one way or another. I didn’t pick any of this up from Larouche. But on the other hand he does seem to have a point. And we see why he has to be demonised all the time. And him an old man.

  5. Hey Bird.

    I bought back that silver and actually went long last night. Decent profit. Wish me luck, as we’re on the same side now.

    • Right. Good work. Inside information no doubt.

  6. Some of you weren’t ready for this five years ago. Maybe you are ready for this now:

    Graeme Bird :
    01 May 2012 8:07:00pm
    No seriously. Where is your evidence? Come on. Give it up. No use blustering about it. On an apriori basis I would have thought the extra CO2 might cool the temperature a tiny amount. You would appear to think that the extra CO2 might warm the planet (AS IF THAT WERE A BAD THING). So if you think that slightly warmer winter mornings for the Laplanders is a cosmic tragedy, then lets have your evidence that the extra CO2 may cause slightly warmer winter mornings for the Laplanders.

    What I cannot stand is the mean-spirited nature of the global warming fraud pushers. See the little calf shivering on a frosty spring morning. If she were adapted to deal with the cold without stress then she would surely perish in the heat of summer. The natural world can adapt to the heat or the cold but what they cannot adapt to is temperature differentials. Yet its the allegation that it is greenhouse gasses that would reduce temperature differentials. So the pushers are not merely wrong, anti-science, against evidence or the felt need for it. They hate nature too. They are nasty. They reckon the Siberians are too warm, at 3.00 am in January. These are not nice guys.

    Alert moderator

  7. Both of these guys were terrific actors. Both of them were promoted to the top of the acting world, but one was killed, the other had his acting career destroyed. The one who didn’t die violently, was nonetheless shot by the shadow government.

    Though the shadow government had tried and all but succeeded Ron Reagan went forward, and with the aid of Pope John Paul II, Reagan completed the job that he set out to do when white maggot scum ruined his marriage. Reagan finished the job. Give us the tools and we will finish the job. Reagan finished the job that Joe McCarthy had started. He finished it staggering forward with a bullet in his heart. McCarthy and Reagan were Anglo-Celts with the emphasis on Celts.

    None of this is anything that anyone ought to forget EVER.

    Life is at least as dramatic as Shakespeare if you know what it is you are looking for.

  8. Briebart Coroner shows up dead via suspected arsenic poisoning. The shadow government isn’t even particularly subtle. Here are two clear murders. And they don’t care that you know it. In fact we might think of this as terrorism rather than cover up. Its just a way of striking fear into Brietbarts crowd.

    • Where are you getting this from, you deluded git?

      From Wiki:

      An autopsy by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s Office showed that he had cardiomegaly and died of heart failure.[60] The toxicology report showed “No prescription or illicit drugs were detected. The blood alcohol was .04%. No significant trauma was present and foul play is not suspected.”[60] Personal friend of Brietbart, Bill Whittle, had said that Brietbart had a “serious heart attack” just months before his passing.[61]

      Seriously Bird, your crazy conspiracy theory obsession is getting worse. Now you’re a full blown moon landing denier too?

      • This is evidence for the hit. Since you will notice that he looked for prescription and illicit drugs. And alcohol. But not for any take-him-out drugs. So thats evidence for hit and coverup right there. Since precisely no-one thought that Brietbart was taken out with a valium prescription. Its just another method of looking the other way. Testing for things that have nothing to do with murder. What if he had found high levels of prescription drugs and cocaine? Would that have ALSO meant murder? Of course not. So you find out what it is you want to know. Try reason.

        The only evidence I”ve been able to find for the moon-shot is weak low-resolution pictures where NASA reckons they can see their own NASA gear left behind. Not very convincing so far. But they may be able to do better.

    • Ok, you’re now saying the coroner was murdered, with arsenic. Of course, this is only wild speculation with no evidence, typical stuff from crazy conspiracy tards.

      • Well its pretty clear what is going on. They murdered the first bloke, and then the second to cover it up. Like they murder Kennedy, and then they murder Oswald to cover that, and then they murder the murderer of Oswald to keep the cover going.

      • See once you realise this is just one single criminal maffia we are talking about then there is no credibility gap at all. Its just what they do.

  9. The Romney campaign is just media created hype. Rupert Murdoch really is a sellout. Ron Paul still gets bigger crowds then Romney, and in all likelihood gets more votes too, but vote-rigging is rife. Ron Pauls campaign hasn’t petered out its actually gaining momentum. Simple honest reporting would have had him in the number two position all the way, and by now he would have had a chance to overturn Romney who excites precisely no-one.

    The shadow government antics could still back-fire. Its a great advantage they have when it comes to selecting Presidents. But it could still backfire.

    • Just like you,fuckwit, to be completely sucked in by a comedy skit. What’ your view on alien abductions? No wonder your family kicked you out and you’re now living in a dumpzter.

      • It looks like a comedy skit to me also. But it just shows how easy something like this is to fake.

  10. Israelis sabotaging Japan’s nuclear facilities. Jim Stone contends that the actual earthquake was inland measuring 6.6. This is consistent with the lack of damage to coastal buildings prior to the tsunami:

  11. This is important because it suggests that

    1. The nuclear reactors were safe.

    2. You can never let an internet connection into the guts of your reactor

    3. Don’t let Israelis into your nuclear program.

  12. Sensational “Russia Today” Interview:

  13. Wayne Swan is such an asshole. Fake surplus. More welfare without a higher tax free threshold, so stiffing the disadvantaged worker who really is trying to make something of himself. And making ludicrous and hypocritical the reforms that someone like Peter Reith would like to make. And no-one fired. No public servant left behind. Not even one department closed down.

    I hate you Wayne Swan. I hate you so very very much you cunt.

  14. Time for you to come out of retirement

    http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/ormer_greens_candidate_professor_clive_hamilton_is_furious/

  15. I don’t know how Jerome is going to stay alive after this. He can demonstrate much of what I’ve been telling everyone for the last three and a half years. Jerome also confirms the thrust of this thread at least to the extent that the drug business is part of the intelligence business. Eric Holder is the CEO of Mexican drug-running.

  16. I’m expecting that the shadow government will have to start killing people in real numbers now. Brietbart was just a warning to these other guys, like Corso and the Sheriff. But now they may have to go out and kill a dozen people at a time. Because Brietbarts murder didn’t get any of these guys to back down.

    • Oooooohhhh, you better watch out Graeme, Humphrey B. Bear is gonna come after you with a sniper rifle if you don’t shutup about his bosses in the shadoh guvmint.

  17. Well they got Brietbart didn’t they. They certainly are going to kill who they feel they need to kill. They are not going to wake up one morning and decide that they wish to be life-long prisoners, or die by lethal injection.

  18. I just find it hard to understand why people are so addicted to unreality. They shot JFK. They shot Reagan. They killed Brietbart. They’ve made dozens of people die through the fast-acting cancer that Oswald was involved with. If you are fat and you get in their way you die by heart attack and the coroner doesn’t test for the assassins drug. And in times passed if you were a threat to them, your plane would fall out of the sky killing all the other passengers along with you.

    • Paranoid nutjob wrote: “And in times passed if you were a threat to them, your plane would fall out of the sky killing all the other passengers along with you.”

      Cough up the details Bird, which plane crashes were downed by the shadoh guvmint and who were the targets.

      • Think of that member of Clinton’s staff for example.

      • Ron Brown. Get your teeth into that one example. During the Clinton era it wasn’t really safe to fly. You never knew when you might wind up in a plane with an enemy of the shadow government. JFK Junior went down in a plane around about that time I think.

      • “During the Clinton era it wasn’t really safe to fly.”

        More unsubstantiated bullshit from the paranoid nutjob.

      • Well it wasn’t real safe for Ron Brown was it? Or for anyone who happened to be in the same plane as him right? Or for JFK-junior or for anyone in his plane either. So thats two planes right there.

      • You could say that for every fatal plane crash that has ever happened. You have no sensible arguments, only ridiculous unsubstantiated assertions.

      • Define “unsubstantiated”. You think JFK junior crashed his plane purely by freak accident? You think Ron Browns Air Force One equivalent went down the same way?

      • Turns out unsubstantiated is a completely meaningless phrase when it comes to you.

      • Unsubstantiated: open to question, unattested, unconfirmed, uncorroborated, unestablished, unproven, unsupported. indefinite, dubious, iffy, uncertain, doubtful, arguable, speculative, suspect, suspicious, unfounded, fishy, debatable, disputable, hard to believe, open to doubt, open to question, baseless.

        A claim, accusation, or story that is unsubstantiated has not been proved to be valid or true.

      • Well its clear that you are lying then. Of course these accusations are substantiated. And this remains utterly unaffected by your unwillingness to look at, and your visceral aversion for ….. EVIDENCE.

        Always we see, no matter what the subject is, your hatred for evidence, and your contempt for the felt need for evidence.

        Now have you looked into the Ron Brown story yet? No you haven’t. Just proving how full of shit you are. How about another non-plane Clinton-era murder? How about the assassination of Vince Foster. Are you going to pretend that this was a suicide? Even though the suicide lie is not merely unsubstantiated, but proven wrong utterly? No you are not going to admit it was a hit. Why? Because you hate evidence.

  19. Ron Pauls defense strategy is easily the best. You can do nothing without a strong economy behind you. If you shoot a bullet thats a bullet that you don’t have in storage. If you drop a bomb thats a bomb that you don’t have. If you have 700-800 bases overseas, this is detracting from the capacity to put together maybe 20 overseas bases that are fundamentally unassailable. If the soldiers were machines, and we didn’t care about them, still we would have to admit that we are depreciating them.
    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 second ago

  20. Great analysis by the commentators on the Israeli defence issue; By defunding all parties BOTH Israel, and those countries she tends to have trouble with will wind up acting more reasonable. But in the first instance Israel will be advantaged, on the grounds that she has a better economy. Naturally I’m entirely suspect of Mossad and the covert side of the Israeli state. But the survival of Israeli civilians is an important issue so its a good thing that Paulian policies favour this.
    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 second ago

  21. On March 3, 1994, Dr. Ronald Rogers, a dentist from Royal, AR, was killed when his twin-engine Cessna crashed near Lawton, OK, in clear weather. He was on his way to see Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, a reporter from the “London Sunday Telegraph”, to reveal some “dirt” on Clinton.

  22. C. Victor Raiser II, the co-chairman of Clinton’s presidential campaign finance committee, was killed in a plane crash on July 30, 1992 near Anchorage, AK, in good weather. With his inside knowledge of the Clinton operation, he had become disillusioned by what he had seen and thus became a potential liability.

  23. U.S. Commerce Secretary Ron Brown was killed when his plane crashed as it approached the Dubrovnik, Croatia airport. Brown had previously been under investigation by the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Commerce Department’s Inspector General, the Justice Department, the FDIC, and the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee was within two weeks of possibly being indicted for an bribe allegedly paid by Dynamic Energy Resources in Oklahoma.

  24. Brown’s plane was probably relying on Croatian ground beacons for navigation. In the minutes before Brown’s plane crashed, five other planes landed at Dubrovnik without difficulty, and none experienced problems with the beacons. But additional questions about the beacons and the crash will remain unanswered because, as the Air Force acknowledges, airport maintenance chief Niko Junic died by gunshot just three days after the crash and before he could be interviewed by investigators. Within a day of his death, officials determined the death was a suicide.

  25. Dying along with Ron Brown on April 3, 1996, was Charles Meissner, Assistant Secretay of Commerce. Meissner reportedly had provided special security clearance to John Huang.

    Air Force Tech. Sgt. Shelley Kelly, a stewardess, survived the crash for some four hours. Kelly and another stewardess had been seated in a jump seat at the very rear of the 737. That area was found basically intact after the crash. According to the Air Force, she received first aid from Croatian rescuers but died on the way to a nearby hospital. Her autopsy report states that Kelly died of a broken neck…”

    Ron Brown’s high level Muslim associate, Mohamed Ferrat was supposed to be on Ron Brown’s doomed death flight, but he changed plans at the last minute. He later died on TWA Flight 800. Coincidence?

  26. Staff Sgt. Brian Haney – Clinton bodyguard
    Marine Sgt. Tim Sabel – Clinton bodyguard
    Maj. William Barkley – Clinton bodyguard
    Capt. Scott Reynolds – Clinton bodyguard
    All four men died May 19, 1993 when their helicopter crashed in the woods near Quantico, Va. Reporters were barred from the site, and the head of the fire department responding to the crash described it by saying, “Security was tight,” with “lots of Marines with guns.” A videotape made by a firefighter was seized by the Marines. All four men had escorted Clinton on his flight to the carrier Roosevelt shortly before their deaths.

  27. Herschell Friday: A member of the presidential campaign finance committee. He died in an airplane explosion on March 1, 1994.

  28. Stanley Heard & Steven Dickson: They were members of the Clinton health care advisory committee. They died in a plane crash on September 10, 1993.

  29. I could continue. But you aren’t going to get a way with lying about “unsubstantiated” claims again. Clearly the shadow government prefers to select Presidents who are already gangsters, if they can help it at all. Or otherwise controllable.

  30. Here is Clinton 1. Admitting he’s a bullshitartist whose denying everything. 2. Admitting that the Bin Laden story he is setting up is pure snake oil (ie bin Laden is “the patsy” for the upcoming false flag.) 3. three minutes and twenty seconds in he admits that the murder of Vince Foster is a “silly hit.”

    • So you think that taking snippets of cherry picked reversed speech, that only vaguely resemble actual words is somehow what the speaker intended to say? Just how ridiculous can you get?

      I thought you were going to take Cambria’s advice and take a break from conspiracy theories. If anything you have gotten worse, delving into the craziest nonsense like there’s no tomorrow. What does your wife (or ex wife?) think of this?

      • See we are back to this total denial of astoundingly good evidence. The way reverse speech examples dovetail with CONTEXT means that coincidence can be ruled out entirely.

        So either the reverse speech doctrine is a good one OR the apparent brilliance of the reverse speech examples are an artefact of massive editing. That is to say its at least possible that hours and hours of taping are done, in order to get these apparent contextually brilliant examples. Now until we determine option B directly, then we are in no position, and in fact are dishonest little cunts, should we be in denial of option A.

        I’m fine with option B. I’m cool with it. I’ve never seen it demonstrated. Hence for the moment option A seems the reality.

  31. NO LYING ON THIS SITE. YOU LIE EVERY TIME YOU USE THE WORD “UNSUBSTANTIATED” BUT THAT WASN’T THE WORST THING. YOU LIED WHEN YOU SAID “ANOTHER” THAT WAS A CLEAR LIE. FUCK OFF IF YOU ARE GOING TO KEEP LYING YOU CUNT. I JUST GAVE YOU ENOUGH INFORMATION TO SHOW THAT THE FORMER CLAIM COULD READILY BE SUBSTANTIATED YOU LYING CUNT.

    WHY DO YOU HATE EVIDENCE SO FUCKING MUCH? I DON’T KNOW WHAT IS WRONG WITH CUNTS LIKE YOU. YOU JUST HATE EVIDENCE.

  32. Would you say that the claim that there exists reptilian humanoid alienson Earth and that George W Bush is one of these creatures is substantiated?

    How are your assertions any different to that?

    • I wouldn’t expect so. The assertions I’ve made are substantiated, and I gave you enough information that you should have been able to ascertain that. Because under normal conditions, you wouldn’t have had dealings with even two people in a lifetime, that had been killed by planes dropping out of the air, except that they went down in the same plane. Yet Clinton had dealings with many such people. So you were lying. As to the reptillian idea, I’ve not seen any information on that, and nor have I given you a clear indication that I could substantiate claims of this sort.

      So they are ENTIRELY different, and you are a lying cunt. Actually if Clinton himself had killed all the people associated with him who have been killed, he would be one of the biggest serial killers in the world. This is not really plausible, but its plausible for organised crime to clear a large swathe around his evil ass.

  33. So why are Clinton protagonists Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky and Kenneth Starr still walking around unscathed while the bit players you are focussing on got “murdered” by his henchmen?

    • Well there had to be SOME survivors. There is certainly a lot of people who aren’t walking around. Including one of his interns who was shot to death. The Shadow Government will only kill people they feel they need to kill and where they are not risking too much. That you even so much as know their names, would suggest that they were pretty risky to kill. You didn’t know Ron Brown, or Vince Foster before they were murdered. You didn’t know Brietbart before he was assassinated. But you knew these other guys names, and thats a good enough reason why they may have been thought too risky to kill at the time.

      These people aren’t butchers. They are overlords.

      • So it’s only bit players that the brave shadoh guvmint needs to kill? Anyone important with damaging claims is automatically left alone? What is the point of all this?

  34. Look you fuckwit. They don’t work by some morons wordgame. Grow up you dumb cunt. These are gangsters. They maintain power.

  35. What fucking idiocy will you come up with next? They shot Kennedy. Was HE a bit player? I don’t think-so. They shot Reagan. And they will most likely shoot Ron Paul if they feel they ought to.

  36. Did the shadoh guvmint feel the need to kill Michael Jackson? Or was he an agent?

    • Is that a scientific argument for something? For fucksakes you are an idiot mate. Thats why I always imagine you to be the dumb wop Cambria. How is it that you and he both think that baby talk is a scientific argument?

      You are a fucking moron mate.

  37. This appears to have something going for it ….. But it must be understood that there isn’t 1000 conspiracies. There is really only one conspiracy. Because its hard to keep secrets, and there is really only room for one network that is able to get away with this sort of thing.

    http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/FromOthers/Paul-McCartney-Italian.html

  38. So I’m a “fucking moron” for proposing that someone famous that actually died was maybe killed by your shadoh guvmint

    YES YOU ARE. FOR STARTERS ITS NOT MY SHADOW GOVERNMENT, ITS EXISTENCE IS PROVEN BY THE FALL OF THOSE THREE BUILDINGS SO YOU HAVE TO FUCKING LIVE WITH IT, AND BABY TALK ISN’T A FUCKING ARGUMENT!

    YOU GOT THAT DUMMY? YES OR NO? OR AM I GOING TOO FAST FOR YOU?

    SHIT YOU ARE A BLOCKHEAD.

  39. Here is Billy Shears in 1966

    http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/billy_shears_on_mal_evans_video.html

  40. This is actually quite brazen. Here we have Paul McCartney in 1966, with a side by side comparison of Paul McCartney in 1967.

    http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/interviews_comparison.html

  41. Look what exactly is the deal here. One blokes face is a bunch longer than the others. Its not quite as bad as the fat laden versus the bin Laden. But its not very convincing just the same:

    http://cheezburger.com/2619005184

  42. The face is longer. The nose is different. The ears protrude less.

    http://www.moviespad.com/pictures/61349/paul-mccartney-dead-documentary/

  43. Pretty excellent photographic analysis comparing Paul McCartney prior to November 1966, and then the other fellow from 1967 on:

    http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html

  44. I take it that Mark Chapman was a shadoh guvmint operative, or did they use mind control drugs on him in order to make him murder John Lennon? WELL I WOULD THINK SO. BUT I DON’T KNOW HOW I COULD KNOW THAT FOR SURE. HAVE YOU HEARD OF MK-ULTRA?

  45. Was Greg Ham another shadoh guvmint….. SEE YOU ACTUALLY THINK THAT BABY-TALK IS AN ARGUMENT. YOU CANNOT MAKE THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT GO AWAY WITH BABY-TALK. NO MORE THAN YOU CAN MAKE A MOUNTAIN GO AWAY BY WISHING ON A STAR.

  46. I cannot stand childish idiots who want to live in a world of make-believe. Here we have an ineligible candidate affecting to be President, and even going so far as going for a re-election, we have a series of wars, ostensibly kicked off because of a fellow called Bin Laden …. even though no evidence has emerged of him living beyond 2002, and no evidence links him to 9/11.

    What is the childish mentality of a stupid cunt who wants to play make-believe that the shadow government doesn’t exist?

  47. Here you had an opportunity to show an interest in SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, and you failed. You had photographic comparisons to do with the features that can be related to the skull. But faced with evidence you simply were not interested.

    And this is how you and Catallaxy is ALL THE WAY DOWN THE LINE. Doesn’t matter if its the Keynesian multiplier, the big bang, 9/11, the global warming racket. It just does not matter. In each and every case the obsession with you, and the others, is to run a million miles from evidence.

    What do you have to say about the photographic comparisons? The only other explanation I could think of would be human growth hormone. Thats a pretty damn feeble competing hypothesis.

    • Wouldn’t Paul McCartney’s Dad have noticed his son was a totally different person? What about Paul’s friends?

      • Of course they noticed. For fucksakes. Your boy won’t talk to you, is taller than he was before, has a longer face, sounds different, and isn’t your boy. You are going to notice.

        Now how about not running away from EVIDENCE. Can you look at the evidence? Can you do that for me?

      • So if all those people knew that Paul wasn’t really Paul, why didn’t any of them expose the imposter? Why didn’t friends of the imposter say anything? Please explain how the amazing shadoh guvmint has accomplished this and for what reason?

      • People did expose the impostor. Where did you get the idea that the impostor wasn’t exposed? It’s the same deal with the Barry Soetoro. He was fully exposed as ineligible to run. Yet there he is playing the role of President instead of being taken away in shackles. You aren’t making a scientific argument. The reality is that you and I or the beatles could not get away with this. But the shadow government can. Which implies there is more to the Beatles phenomenon than what meets the eye.

  48. You didn’t look at the evidence did you? See you go over to Catallaxy, or any other blog, and immediately you are dealing with people who are stridently opinionated and allergic to evidence in equal measure. What is the point of this all? Ought you not be doing something more useful?

  49. CAN YOU LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE? JUST TO PROVE THAT YOU CAN ACTUALLY LOOK AT EVIDENCE? MAYBE JUST ONE TIME, YOU COULD LOOK AT EVIDENCE. JUST TO SHOW TO YOURSELF THAT IT CAN BE DONE.

  50. Here’s a picture of the band “Billy Pepper And The Pepperpots” The third one along is Bill Shepherd. He appears to be the talent behind the band. And on the vinyl itself, down the bottom, you have written “The Bill Shepherd Orchestra.” Well that was him in the early sixties anyway. He later seems to have grown up to be Paul McCartney after the real one died. Over time he got himself plastic surgery (under this theory) to make him look a bit more superficially like Paul. So a quick look and you might not notice the difference. But with a photographic analysis the two cannot be the same person.

  51. Here’s a video where we are switching between 1966 Paul and the other fellow in 1967. It really could not be clearer that these are two different people:

    • For goodness sakes Birdflapz. In this one video you have total proof that they are two different people.

      Have you ever wondered why it was that an old man like Paul II would have a childs eyes? Eyes that look like they come from a Jap cartoon? Here endeth the mystery.

      Even after watching this one video you know I”m right.

  52. “Billy Shears” is actually a joke name. It may be that British MI6 still has the institutional memory to know that William Shakespeare was an imperial covert team effort. Much as the two Paul McCartney’s now seem to have been. William Shakespeare …… Billy Shakespeare …… Billy Shakespeares, Billy Shears. Then there is the blowing smoke in peoples face that comes from setting up a Paul McCartney lookalike contest, and actually running that contest, and then putting about the Billy Shears story. Saying he was an ex-cop from Ontario or some such other jive. Probably a great deal of phoney stories put about and vigorously promoted.

    More likely the reality was that William Shepherd was part of the Paul McCartney shadow songwriting team right from the start. And both the collected McCartney ideas-machine and the switcheroo were planned from the start. Which could mean the original Paul McCartney may still be alive …. or otherwise.

    See how The Monkees also had a songwriting team but explicitly so. The way I’d do it if I was the shadow government would be to have a shadow Paul McCartney team, that came up with a great many incomplete song ideas, to be completed via the Fab Four, giving it a more naturally creative sound. So you’ve got a very intelligent and creative John Lennon, whose there as the best ideas-man, but he’s out of the loop. If you didn’t do it this way the resultant sound ……. well what you’d wind up with …. the outcome would be too much like what the Monkees produced. Beautiful songs, very polished, each one a hit, but rather lame and shallow and very easy to spot that its a team effort and the kids are being handed their breaks. Totally different from the idea of the Beatles as this magnificent four-way magically creative machine. It wouldn’t wind up sounding like the creative efforts of four idiosyncratic yet superior artists, unless you used a shadow Paul McCartney team to produce a lot of ideas, then those ideas worked out to completion with the known four Beatles.

    Here we have also the reason for the sudden appearance of grunginess, facial hair, and the retreat from performing to purely studio work. We also have a reason why Paul McCartney (Mark II) became somewhat paralysed as an artist, and could only write bland and inoffensive material, once he’d cut loose on his own.

    The new seemingly creative-genius, to the three band members out of the loop, shows up and immediately takes charge. But clearly he is known to the other three. Known from the obscure band “Billy Pepper And The Pepperpots.” So the new band emerges calling itself “Sargent Peppers” band. The death of Paul (at least to the three remaining Beatles) becomes a creative driving force for the bands next three albums. In the course of writing the title track, the faux-bands name is expanded to “Sargent Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band.”

    • It actually is scientifically provable to some degree. Get a hair sample from Sir Paul McCartney and a sample from his still living brother and compare the DNA. If the results show they have the same mother, then this BS is in trouble although I’m sure the hardcore conspiracy deadbeats like you would come up with further ridiculous conspiracies to try and explain it.

      If the DNA tests show a non match, then there may be some basis for further investigation.

      Go to it Bird, you could do this testing and become famous, or are you scared the shadoh guvmint will come after you and give you a shot of quick acting cancer?

      • Thats unnecessary and you don’t need that and that is surplus to requirements. Since the science has ALREADY PROVEN that they are not the same person.

        You know back in ’66 to get human growth hormone, well it was more expensive per weight then gold, and the reality is that you would need maybe four years treatment to get results in someone who is already full grown.

        So the scientific proof is in and it is total.

        Getting genetic testing done could not be more surplus to requirements. It will just be more bullshit if anyone affects to do it. It will be along the lines of the faux-testing that was (not) done to Bin Laden before they (didn’t) deep-six his body into the deeper blue. It will just be more lies and it doesn’t matter.

        It doesn’t matter even a little bit but the reality is that William Shepherd aka Billy Pepper aka Paul II has already turned down each and every opportunity to get his DNA tested for this exact purpose.

        Now do you see that last paragraph? Do you see it? Do you see it Birdflapz? This is the paragraph I refer to:

        “It doesn’t matter even a little bit but the reality is that William Shepherd aka Billy Pepper aka Paul II has already turned down each and every opportunity to get his DNA tested for this exact purpose. ”

        From a scientific perspective that paragraph is meaningless. Because we have the proof. And if we were wrong the actual explanation would be so much more bizzarre then the freaky scenario that I have outlined.

        Now what if Billy Pepper with the childs eyes, this one time said okay lets put this to rest and lets get that DNA test?????

        So we get the DNA test and its announced that he is the true and original Paul?

        We would know that the fix was in and that everyone involved was lying. In this situation a positive DNA test could never over-ride what we already know. We would simply assume a Bin Laden like setup.

      • CAN YOU NOT SIMPLY ACCEPT PROVEN SCIENCE? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU? ITS OBVIOUS TO THE LAMEST DROOLING IMBECILE THAT 1966 PAUL AND 1967 PAUL ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON. AND EVERYONE WHO SEES THE EVIDENCE MUST KNOW THIS OR ADMIT TO INSANITY.

      • NO NO CAMBRIA. JUST CALM DOWN AND FOCUS ON THE SCIENCE BEFORE YOU. AFTER TWO PHOTOS ARE EQUALIZED FOR THE EYES, THEN OUGHT NOT THE TWO FACES FIT TOGETHER QUITE SNUGLY? SINCE WHEN DOES SOMEONE’S FACE GROW LARGER AND MUCH LONGER IN THEIR MID-20’S?

        YOU SEE CAMBRIA, THIS ANGRY CHANGING OF THE SUBJECT IS JUST A DUMB WOP RUNNING FROM THE EVIDENCE, AND FROM THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE.

        I KNOW, ITS ONLY SCIENCE,

        BUT I LIKE IT.

  53. […] Reply […]

  54. Look Cambria. I know you are mentally handicapped in science. But just tell me this one thing? What do you know about skull growth in adults that I clearly don’t know? What is your new theory about skull growth in adults?

    You have no new theory.

    So this is a MORAL AND MENTAL deficiency.

    Now just leave those childish things behind and embrace science, reason, and evidence.

    • STOP RUNNING AWAY YOU DEGENERATE WOP. STICK RUTHLESSLY TO THIS TOPIC OF SKULL-SHAPE-CHANGE IN ADULTS THAT YOU ARE NOW PURPORTING TO BE AN EXPERT ON.

  55. I know
    Its only logic-and-evidence
    …….
    BUT I LIKE-IT:

  56. I Just don’t get it? Why would a grown man FANTASISE that its the same Paul when we already have total scientific proof that we have TWO PAULS. I don’t understand the childishness and wish-fantasies involved here.

    • YOU WANTED TO TELL ME ABOUT YOUR NEW THEORY OF SKULL SHAPE-CHANGE …. IN ADULTS.

      FIRE AWAY. OR STOP BEING AN EMBARRASSING TODDLER.

      YOU CANNOT MAKE THERE BE BUT ONE PAUL NO MATTER HOW YOU PRAY TO ALLAH. IT SIMPLY CANNOT BE DONE. TWO PEOPLE WITH TWO DIFFERENTLY SHAPED SKULLS ARE TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

      • So how was London in 1966 Graeme? You obviously knew Paul McCartney well by all the amazing things you know about him.

        THATS JUST NOT A SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENT. ALL I NEEDED TO KNOW WAS THAT THE TAPES OF PAUL (I) IN 1966 WERE VALID TAPES, AND THAT THE TAPES OF PAUL (II) IN 1967 AND BEYOND WERE ALSO REAL TAPES. WITH THESE TWO FACTS I KNOW THAT THEY ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON, BASED ON AN UNDERSTANDING OF HOW SKULLS CHANGE NOT-AT-ALL (OR VERY LITTLE) IN ADULTHOOD. I DIDN’T NEED TO KNOW ANYTHING ELSE. THE SCIENCE IS TOTALLY SETTLED ON THIS MATTER. OR …… THE REAL PARADIGM IS A COMPLETE STUNNER COMING OUT OF LEFT FIELD.

        NOW JUST STICK WITH EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE SELDOM LETS YOU DOWN. THE SCIENCE DOESN’T ALWAYS TAKE YOU TO THE RIGHT PLACE IMMEDIATELY BUT ITS STILL THE SCIENCE.

  57. Well come on Cambria. If you think there is only one Paul you MUST have some theory about skull-shape-change in adulthood?

    Don’t hold out on us. If you have such a fantastic new theory, original to you, shout it to the mountaintops.

  58. IF YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE HAS AN ADULT SKULL-CHANGE THEORY LETS HEAR ABOUT IT.

    BUT LEAVE YOUR CHILDISH FANTASISE FOR ANOTHER BLOG.

  59. Look you can see that they are two different people on the video. There is no denying it. You must be a cretin mate. Now stick with the science. How in for view does one bloke become another? Taller, and with a larger and differently shapen skull?

    • SUPPOSE WE EQUALIZE AND GET OUR PROPORTIONS WITH REFERENCE TO THE EYES. AND WE WIND UP WITH THE SECOND PAULS SKULL (BY THIS METHOD) BEING HUGELY LARGER THAN THE FIRST PAULS SKULL?

      WHAT ARE YOU SUGGESTING? ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT PAUL HAS BEEN WEARING PHONEY EYES SINCE 1967? PHONEY EYES THAT MAKE HIS EYES APPEAR CLOSER TOGETHER THAN THEY WERE, HENCE BLOWING OUT HIS SKULL SIZE IN OUR TEST? IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE SUGGESTING. MAKE YOUR HYPOTHESIS CLEAR YOU DIM BULB. IN YOUR ONE-PAUL-FANTASY, HAS PAUL BEEN GOING AROUND BLIND, WITH FAKE NARROW EYES STUCK TO HIM, FOR THESE LAST 45+ YEARS, AND FOR NO REASON?

  60. RIGHT RIGHT. WHY NOT COME UP WITH ANOTHER PARADIGM THAT IS AT LEAST POSSIBLE???

    I MEAN 67 PAUL IS NOT 66 PAUL. BUT THEY COULD HAVE SIDELINED 66 PAUL FOR AWHILE AND BROUGHT HIM BACK AFTER ALTERING HIS FACE TO BE A SORT OF COMPROMISE BETWEEN THE TWO PAULS. AND THEN OF COURSE THEY COULD HAVE ALTERED THE SECOND PAULS FACE, OR THEY COULD HAVE USHERED HIM AWAY TO BRING THE REAL PAUL BACK.

    SCIENCE CAN BE PRETTY LIMITING. WE CAN BE SURE THAT 67 PAUL IS NOT 66 PAUL. BEYOND THAT THERE ARE SOME OTHER BIZARO PARADIGMS THAT MAY YET FIT THE DATA. HOWEVER CURRENT PAULS FACE FITS NICELY INTO ALL POST-66 PAUL DATA. IF THE HOAX IS DIFFERENT THEN HOW I PORTRAY IT ITS EVEN MORE STRANGE THEN I WOULD HAVE PEOPLE BELIEVE.

    • Why wont you try and prove your one planet fantasy? Is it because you know youcan’t refute this fact?

      The shadoh guvmint replaced the Earth last Thursday with a lookalike planet and hit everyone with a mind probe so they wouldn’t notice.

      Prove your one planet fantasy, Bird!

  61. Paul McCartney had a short and roundish head. A little pointy at the bottom because the inside of his mouth was so narrow. The shadow government is going to a lot of trouble trying to morph old material such that Billy Shepherd looks more like Paul in a lot of old footage. They just morph his face so it approximates the shorter rounder face of Paul 66. Maybe they are doing the reverse too. This is Psych Ops against the public and has nothing to do with any prank the Beatles had a mind to play on people for marketing reasons or as humour.

    This is an attack on your average Joes, and on societies ability and confidence to see reality and perceive it as such. Part of softening us up to bring three buildings down, with two planes and blame it on Arabs …. Or steal off us relentlessly through the banking network since 2008 (ie steal more frantically than is usual since then) … or select an ineligible candidate for the Presidency as a cover for the crime of 9/11 ……. and so forth.

    This is all astonishingly cruel. Worse then the SS in spirit.

    Here the truth-teller has had to source the original from a tape off the television. Whereas the shadow government has polluted the record, in a truly Stalinist way, with high-definition lies.

    • ATTEMPT NOT TO BE AN IDIOT.

  62. I’ve been trying to post a link to a comment at the catallaxy forum regarding your 2 Paul’s assertion but it wont go through. Have you got a filter that is blocking that?

    • Not me fella. But the 2 Pauls assertion is a simple scientific matter. If there aren’t two Pauls, then the psych-ops that there are two Pauls is more elaborate then the Psych Ops that there are not. Either way someone, and not just the Beatles, has gone to an enormous effort to make it look like Paul was replaced in 67, and then to make it hard to discern this by a barrage of morphed photos. Very fucking strange. And it tends to lend support to the John Coleman notion that the Beatles phenomenon was part of a wider attempt to manipulate society at large.

      • Ok, this was the comment:

        “geez who is this Bird nutcase? Please dont tell me he claims to be a libertarian.”

        papachango
        28 May 12 at 4:42 pm

  63. I saw that earlier. The fellow is just another person who doesn’t want to look at evidence. Of course faux-evidence can be manufactured as easily as any other sort of misinformation.

  64. Here is the real Paul. The fact is with all the photo-manipulation and bullshitartistry, most of us have quite forgotten about the real Paul.

  65. Have you ever watched the “Let it be” movie? I actually own a dvd of it. Do you really think the other 3 Beatles would let themselves be bossed around by a fake? Watch from around 6.45 on the youtube vid. Would George have really said those things to a guy he knew was a fake? He probably would have said something like “Rack off Billy”.

    YOU GOT IT BACKWARDS. GEORGE IS ACTING LIKE SARGENT PEPPER IS THE NEW BOSS. LIKE HE’S UNDER ORDERS TO TREAT SHEPHERD AS THE NEW BOSS. GEORGE ISN’T ACTING LIKE SARGENT PEPPER IS THE YOUNGER KID WHO GEORGE HAS BEEN WORKING WITH FOR THE LAST 13 ODD YEARS. AND DO WE HAVE PRE-67 PAUL PLAYING PIANO QUITE THAT WELL?

    SEE THEY ARE STILL FUMBLING THROUGH A NEW WORKING RELATIONSHIP IN THAT SCENE. BUT BILLY PEPPER AND THE PEPPERPOTS ALTERNATIVE NAME WAS “THE BILLY SHEPHERD ORCHESTRA” HENCE THE NEW BOSS IS USED TO ORCHESTRATING EVERYONE.

    • Dude I must thank you for this clip. Its truly awesome. Yet its not a clip of 4 blokes that started together and could barely play four chords getting together after having worked together for the last ten years. Its a clip of a fully trained musician, whose been part of the shadow-team, now taking charge.

  66. Yeah of course they would allow themselves to be bossed around. Sargent Pepper running things and the whole lot of them being told to listen to the new guy, and them being half and half whether their friend had been murdered or not.

    Probably Sargent Pepper was in the McCartney shadow-songwriting team from way back. Its very hard to assess this controversy, since we don’t have any information on an alternative paradigm, involving a lot of fakery from 67-69 to create the impression of a stand-in, along with the vigorous denial. It really isn’t science unless you’ve got three or more explanations for the same weird data. So far I’m only working with one, so it doesn’t feel quite right. The skeptical denialists aren’t helping since they don’t have an answer for the data. They don’t believe in evidence and they don’t feel they need to explain it with an hypothesis.

    Also there has been a lot of photo tampering. Its actually pretty rare to find a good pre-1967 photo that is truly pre-1967, and hasn’t been altered in some way.

  67. So there’s not only a shad ….. RIGHT I’M JUST GOING TO WIPE ANY BABY-TALK FOR YOUR SAKES. IF YOU CANNOT BUT PERSIST IN BEING DELUDED THAT BABY-TALK IS EVIDENCE, THEN I GUESS I’M GOING TO HAVE TO HELP YOU OUT. ITS FOR YOUR OWN SAKES.

  68. Yeah for sure. Else how can the spooks choose a band years in advance and know with certainty they are going to be a sensation? If you are going to use artists as psych-ops you have to create a sensation. Some modern scholars think that Shakespeare was an imperial project involving a number of writers. People make the mistake of thinking Bacon is the real Shakespeare, or Essex, or De Vere. This is a bad mistake. We are actually looking for a team and one which may have included several of the above. I would suggest that Marlowe never died and that he was one of the team. Another who we have very good evidence for is a dark-skinned Jewish lady from Italy.

    Also there is the same sort of theory for Mozart. But I haven’t looked into that one at all.

    The sensation with McCartney isn’t the quality so much as the range, diversity, and consistent output. More like a team of three or more even before John George and Ringo get a look-in.

  69. No baby talk. Yes the trail of dead bodies is very suspicious, Epstein or anyone else could have been killed by the shadow government, they are all dead now but Ringo. Hardly a co-incidence. The assassination of John could not be more of an MK-Ultra-Style hit if you had written it that way.

  70. Its hard to pick it, but in Hard Days night, George Paul and John look roughly the same height, with Ringo a little shorter. Yet in “Let It Be” Paul is easily the biggest all the way around. In the earlier years it looks like I’d give it to John as the tallest, but there couldn’t be more than a centimetre either way. Johns got the bigger head then Paul. But in “Let It Be” Sargent Pepper is a clean two inches taller. Or at least a clear inch being generous to John. He’s bigger too. And with a bigger head. Now how is this all to be explained?

  71. NO LETS NOT HAVE THAT FAMOUS BELLY-CRAWLING GULLIBILITY. TRY AGAIN. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN IT. WHY IS HE SUDDENLY TWO INCHES TALLER THAN THE OTHERS WHEN PRIOR HE WAS ROUGHLY THE SAME HEIGHT?

  72. In science you have to explain the data. So you have a fellow. 24 and not taller. Then you have him maybe 28 in your theory, and two clear inches taller.

    Try again.

  73. IT CAN BE VERY HARD TO TELL THEM APART, EVEN FOR ME, WITH THE ONGOING SURGERY, AND THE HORIZONTAL STRETCHING AND COMPRESSING OF OLD PHOTOGRAPHS. BUT ONE THING THEY WEREN’T ABLE TO DO, IS FULLY MAKE UP FOR THE REALITY, THAT THE REAL PAUL HAS EYES THAT ARE WIDE APART. WHEREAS THE OTHER FELLOW HAS EYES THAT ARE CLOSE TOGETHER. THATS THE ONLY WAY I CAN SOMETIMES TELL THEM APART THANKS TO THE SURGEONS AND THE PHOTO-MANIPULATORS.

  74. So why is he two inches taller in the clip you showed me?

  75. Here is the result of an audio analysis:

    The list of “Sgt.Pepper” Album is:

    Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band : performed by Faul
    Getting Better : the intro performed by Faul
    When I’m Sixty-Four : the first song performed by the “imitator”
    Fixing a Hole : performed by the “imitator”
    She’s Leaving Home :the last complete song performed by James Paul McCartney (that’s why George is pointing this song in the back cover of the Album)
    Lovely Rita : performed by the “imitator”
    A Day in the Life : the central insert is performed by James Paul McCartney
    Probably “A Little Help From My Friends” is performed by Faul imitating Ringo’s voice !!!

    The list of the “Magical Mystery Tour” is:

    Magical Mystery Tour : solo part performed by Faul The Fool On The Hill : performed by the “imitator”
    Your Mother Should Know : We can consider it the last song performed by James Paul McCartney but originally was only a “take” reassembled by George Martin repeating it X times
    Hello, Goodbye : the first song performed by Faul (imitating Paul’s voice)
    Penny Lane : this song was performed originally by James Paul McCartney but he left it incomplete.
    The “imitator” overdubbed Paul’s voice filling the left pieces
    We can listen the original voice of James Paul McCartney alone in the verses “very strange”

    The list of the “White Album” is:

    Back in the U.S.S.R. : still under check (it’s difficult because the voice is heavily filtered) but, if the compilation 1967-1970 contains only the songs performed by the “imitator” and those performed by Faul, it could be performed by the “imitator”
    Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da: performed by Faul
    Martha My Dear: performed by the “imitator”
    Blackbird : performed by the “imitator” (imitation masterpiece)
    Rocky Raccoon : performed by Faul
    I Will : performed by Faul
    Mother Nature’s Son: performed by the “imitator”

    From “Abbey Road”:

    All “Paul voice” songs performed by Faul except “Golden Slumbers”
    Her Majesty: performed by James Paul McCartney

  76. So how did he get suddenly taller?

  77. “Before we deride this idea…”

    Too late – ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

  78. No sorry. Science must prevail no matter how sacred the old cow is, and no matter what the subject is.

    Its only science but I like it. Don’t dwell on it too much slow-poke. Its not something you are every likely to understand.

  79. The thing that Birdflaps and Cambria have in common is that they are both Jews. They both reject Logos.

    • Huh? I’m not Jewish and I don’t have any Jewish relatives. I’m an atheist too, so once again you’re completely wrong, Bird. Not surprising.

      • That is about exactly what an anonymous online Jew would say.

      • Fuck off woppy.

  80. I proved totally in the threads above that Clintons people were murdering others by way of crashing planes. The alternative theory is statistically impossible. But the cunt rejects this reality because he is a Jew. He is taught to lie always.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: