Posted by: graemebird | September 18, 2012

Theory Of Evolution And Inevitability Of Shadow Government

…. “Once you have given up the ghost, all else follows with total certainty, even in the midst of chaos…”

This, from memory, is the opening sentence of the Henry Miller’s “Tropic Of Capricorn” The Tropic Of Capricorn is a southern latitude, roughly approximating where the nether regions are on a human, in comparison with the earth …. if thats not too convoluted an explanation for the title.  I’ll correct the sentence and my memory later. But the sentence is very much like how I’d explain the extra-ordinary emergence of a shadow government which now seems to control almost everything, to the extent of being to write itself out of the history books and its place in contemporary journalism …. and yet be able to control almost everything in the medium term.  Not through total hands-on-control, but rather by one million points of small influence.  That overall influence amounting to CONTROL (for practical purposes.). How did this come about? Is this “theory” (actually its manifest reality) plausible in face of the commonplace idea that when three people know a secret its a secret no longer?

In retrospect we can say that given enough time, if fractional reserve banking is so much as tolerated, it will lead to global shadow government. Everything will progress with total certainty, even in the midst of chaos.

Fractional reserve leads to a non-market advantage to size, which will lead to a single network becoming dominant. That network will de-monetarize silver when it gets a chance to, will set up and dominate central banks, and once these two objectives are obtained, if not before, will then exert its control over covert operations, soon capturing politics proper thereafter. Its not only not implausible that such a shadow government would develop. Its actually an inevitability. The last chance we had to avoid it was probably during Andrew Jackson’s time. But now that we know better our blood oath must be akin to the oath of Hannibal. We must all set our hearts against it and consider anyone who is weak on this point a traitor to the species.

MORE LATER

Advertisements

Responses

  1. My new hero: Randall Carlson

    A totally committed scientist. A background in geology …. A BUILDER BY TRADE. I don’t even know whether to agree with him on any of his conclusions. But his methodology so far seems impeccable. And it is THIS that me must demand from a scientist, and only THIS that we ought to expect.

    We don’t even want scientists to get it right. We want them to be sound as far as method and process is concerned. We don’t really want anything else from them. This is what separates a true scientist from a public servant, a field worker, or an “expert” hired by the man to tell the man what he wants to know.

  2. Sometimes I come across a quote of mine that I’d entirely forgotten about, and I get a bit of a buzz from it, insofar as it comes across as a good piece of prose that I would have liked to have read from someone else. Here’s one now:

    “….Default with relish. Default with blood-lust. Default with whatever gets you going. But default default default. Waiting another fortnight ensures more damage from the wealth destroying machine that is bank-cash pyramiding … and government departments … Government departments running amok, like cancer cells jacking off in a hall of mirrors, and splitting-2,4,8,16….”

  3. “I’m sure they were working and building anti-gravity machines. They’re called aircraft.

    LOL

    Bernoulli was an alien!”

    Here a Catallaxian is talking about the theory of aerodynamic lift. But the Bernoulli theory as presented to me I’m pretty dubious about. Perhaps I have it wrong. No matter aero-dynamic lift is a real thing whether the Bernoulli explanation is correct or otherwise. But here Infidel Tiger is presuming that there is no knowledge of anti-gravity.

    Actually there is knowledge of anti-gravity. At the moment IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, there is enough information for me to start a research program that could get almost guaranteed results for space travel …… from near-earth-orbit to the rest of the solar system …. But NOT for the purpose of getting on or off planets and moons.

    Thats as much as is directly available in the public domain. If flying saucers are covert ops blowing smoke at us, and covering for their monopolised technology, then this would mean that the anti-gravity technology actually allowed us to get off and on-planet as well. But thats covert or not at all.

    But I can assure Infidel that with the right dictator, we have enough information in the public domain RIGHT NOW to force a study program on our own CSIRO ….. RIGHT NOW …. to use electro-gravitics, to power our ass around the solar system, but not off and on planets and moons.

    I’m not saying that electro-gravitics CAN NEVER be used to get off and on planets. I’m saying that what is known in the public domain already tells us that the technology will with massive near 100% confidence, be useful for space travel, from near-earth-orbit onwards.

    I’ve actually got step by step instructions for the research project RIGHT NOW.

  4. From Catallaxy here is a list of Jews getting the Nobel prize. I myself would not wish the insult of a modern Nobel prize on ANYONE except for someone really really evil or really really stupid. But nonetheless, its not necessarily the case that the Nobel prize was as objectively a character bad-reference as it is now. Here is the list but can anyone tell me which one of these characters is DESERVING? Many Askhenazi Reformed-Jews, though they have no ancestry in the Old Testament, fancy themselves a superior race. They act like white supremacists, in that they tend to only let high-IQ whitey blokes to marry their sheilas. They are a sort of airbrushed version of bigoted white supremacists.

    But lets looks at this rogues gallery of Nobel Prize-Winners, and suppose we are REALLY to pronounce them a master race and superior and all that, well can someone tell me which Nobels are actually deserved by this crowd?

    1910 – Paul Heyse
    1927 – Henri Bergson
    1958 – Boris Pasternak
    1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon
    1966 – Nelly Sachs
    1976 – Saul Bellow
    1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer
    1981 – Elias Canetti
    1987 – Joseph Brodsky
    1991 – Nadine Gordimer World
    Peace:
    1911 – Alfred Fried
    1911 – Tobias Mi chae l Carel Asser
    1968 – Rene Cassin
    1973 – Henry Kissinger
    1978 – Menachem Begin
    1986 – Elie Wiesel
    1994 – Shimon Peres
    1994 – Yitzhak Rabin
    Physics:
    1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
    1906 – Henri Moissan
    1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
    1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
    1910 – Otto Wallach
    1915 – Richard Willstaetter
    1918 – Fritz Haber
    1921 – Albert Einstein
    1922 – Niels Bohr
    1925 – James Franck
    1925 – Gustav Hertz
    1943 – Gustav Stern
    1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
    1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
    1952 – Felix Bloch
    1954 – Max Born
    1958 – Igor Tamm
    1959 – Emilio Segre
    1960 – Donald A. Glaser
    1961 – Robert Hofstadter
    1961 – Melvin Calvin
    1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
    1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
    1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
    1965 – Julian Schwinger
    1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
    1971 – Dennis Gabor
    1972 – William Howard Stein
    1973 – Brian David Josephson
    1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
    1976 – Burton Richter
    1977 – Ilya Prigogine
    1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
    1978 – Peter L Kapitza
    1979 – Stephen Weinberg
    1979 – Sheldon Glashow
    1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
    1980 – Paul Berg
    1980 – Walter Gilbert
    1981 – Roald Hoffmann
    1982 – Aaron Klug
    1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
    1985 – Jerome Karle
    1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
    1988 – Robert Huber
    1988 – Leon Lederman
    1988 – Melvin Schwartz
    1988 – Jack Steinberger
    1989 – Sidney Altman
    1990 – Jerome Friedman
    1992 – Rudolph Marcus
    1995 – Martin Perl
    2000 – Alan J. Heeger
    Economics:
    1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
    1971 – Simon Kuznets
    1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
    1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
    1976 – Milton Friedman
    1978 – Herbert A. Simon
    1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
    1985 – Franco Modigliani
    1987 – Robert M. Solow
    1990 – Harry Markowitz
    1990 – Merton Miller
    1992 – Gary Becker
    1993 – Robert Fogel
    Medicine:
    1908 – Elie Metchnikoff
    1908 – Paul Erlich
    1914 – Robert Barany
    1922 – Otto Meyerhof
    1930 – Karl Landsteiner
    1931 – Otto Warburg
    1936 – Otto Loewi
    1944 – Joseph Erlanger
    1944 – Herbert Spencer Gasser
    1945 – Ernst Boris Chain
    1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller
    1950 – Tadeus Reichstein
    1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman
    1953 – Hans Krebs
    1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann
    1958 – Joshua Lederberg
    1959 – Arthur Kornberg
    1964 – Konrad Bloch
    1965 – Francois Jacob
    1965 – Andre Lwoff
    1967 – George Wald
    1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg
    1969 – Salvador Luria
    1970 – Julius Axelrod
    1970 – Sir Bernard Katz
    1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman
    1975 – Howard Martin Temin
    1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg
    1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow
    1978 – Daniel Nathans
    1980 – Baruj Benacerraf
    1984 – Cesar Milstein
    1985 – Mi chae l Stuart Brown
    1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein
    1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
    1988 – Gertrude Elion
    1989 – Harold Varmus
    1991 – Erwin Neher
    1991 – Bert Sakmann
    1993 – Richard J. Roberts
    1993 – Phillip Sharp
    1994 – Alfred Gilman
    1995 – Edward B. Lewis
    1996- Lu RoseIacovino

  5. Joseph Cambria (Scientist)

    Its always good for a laugh when that fucking woppy moron Joseph Cambria turns his boot-nigger intuition to the judgement of science…. Here he is again. The stupid fucking boot-nigger who claimed that the Triceratops did not lay eggs. I expect that the dumb fuck thought she looked too damn butch to lay eggs.

    “I laughed myself silly when Margot came up with some crap that Boeing was working on an anti-gravity machine for the US military at the height of the leftwing’s paranoia over the Iraq war.”

    What the fuck would this dumb fucking organ-grinder know about the state of science?

  6. […] uncensored on “Theory Of Evolution And Inevitability Of Shadow Government“ @ A Better World: Graeme Bird For High Office. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe […]

  7. “White House Must Stop Sony from Releasing ‘Killing bin Laden’ Film

    Now that the White House and State Department have made clear that they believe movies compel terrorists to terrorize, it’s time for them to get ahead of this problem. And one thing the White House can do immediately is to pressure Sony to stop the release of director Kathryn Bigelow’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” which celebrates the killing of Osama bin Laden.

    I’m only saying this because, you know, the White House and the media told me movies inflame and cause terrorism.”

    Don’t people think that they will avoid more violence if they start telling the truth? If they admit that the bin Laden hit was a ludicrous lie?

  8. “1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
    1971 – Simon Kuznets
    1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
    1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
    1976 – Milton Friedman
    1978 – Herbert A. Simon
    1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
    1985 – Franco Modigliani
    1987 – Robert M. Solow
    1990 – Harry Markowitz
    1990 – Merton Miller
    1992 – Gary Becker
    1993 – Robert Fogel”

    All but one of them full of shit. Becker barely acceptable. Milton Friedman a fine economist sure, but his modern admirers and invokers tend to be utterly useless and mean-spirited, so he tends to be discredited by association, even if he was both a sound economist, and a great warrior for liberty. Actually the greatest economists of the century are all Jews but they were persecuted and ignored by the mainstream. I’m talking about Mises, Rothbard and (perfection-at-last) George Reisman. I say Reisman is perfection at last in terms of showing how economics could work if we got things right. But I’ve now turned away from his and Ayn Rands sympathy for big business. Though Reisman himself sticks up for big corporations his technical economics is fully consistent with aspirations for the sole trader economy. So his sympathies for artificial persons ought not rule him out as the canonical economist for the new century.

    I’d have to say that Robert Solow was at least an intellectually honest economic scientist. Unfortunately somewhat one-eye-blind. What have the rest of them done for us? Maybe they are testimony for mainstreamer Jews to promote eachother as vigorously as they rubbish authentic righteousness like that coming from Mises, Rothbard and Reisman.

  9. Here’s physics:

    1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
    1906 – Henri Moissan
    1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
    1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
    1910 – Otto Wallach
    1915 – Richard Willstaetter
    1918 – Fritz Haber
    1921 – Albert Einstein
    1922 – Niels Bohr
    1925 – James Franck
    1925 – Gustav Hertz
    1943 – Gustav Stern
    1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
    1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
    1952 – Felix Bloch
    1954 – Max Born
    1958 – Igor Tamm
    1959 – Emilio Segre
    1960 – Donald A. Glaser
    1961 – Robert Hofstadter
    1961 – Melvin Calvin
    1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
    1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
    1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
    1965 – Julian Schwinger
    1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
    1971 – Dennis Gabor
    1972 – William Howard Stein
    1973 – Brian David Josephson
    1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
    1976 – Burton Richter
    1977 – Ilya Prigogine
    1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
    1978 – Peter L Kapitza
    1979 – Stephen Weinberg
    1979 – Sheldon Glashow
    1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
    1980 – Paul Berg
    1980 – Walter Gilbert
    1981 – Roald Hoffmann
    1982 – Aaron Klug
    1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
    1985 – Jerome Karle
    1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
    1988 – Robert Huber
    1988 – Leon Lederman
    1988 – Melvin Schwartz
    1988 – Jack Steinberger
    1989 – Sidney Altman
    1990 – Jerome Friedman
    1992 – Rudolph Marcus
    1995 – Martin Perl
    2000 – Alan J. Heeger

    Look I only have a good idea of the direct contributions of two of these guys. Einstein and Bohr. But since modern physics is so comprehensively full of shit, ought we not judge them all full of shit? I mean how can it really be otherwise? At least Bohr had a model which worked for some things but these guys must be really barely reconstructed Talmudic mystics, because they are constantly falling for their own voodoo models. They have really gotten in the way, and made the shadow governments quest to monopolize on technology that much easier.

  10. Some of the above are Chemists and they look to be very much on the level.

  11. “While at Manchester University, Bohr had adapted Rutherford’s nuclear structure to Max Planck’s quantum theory and so obtained a model of atomic structure which, with later improvements – mainly as a result of Heisenberg’s concepts – remains valid to this day. Bohr published his model of atomic structure in 1913.[13] Here he introduced the theory of electrons traveling in orbits around the atom’s nucleus, the chemical properties of each element being largely determined by the number of electrons in the outer orbits of its atoms.[14] Bohr also introduced the idea that an electron could drop from a higher-energy orbit to a lower one, in the process emitting a photon (light quantum) of discrete energy. This became a basis for quantum theory.[15]”

    Half-baked rubbish. And we are stuck with it. Its not really his fault I guess. I suppose its other forces that lock half-baked ideas in, and build on them.

  12. All good stuff from Martin Ferguson but oh so one-sided:

    “Resources Minister Martin Ferguson blasted the complacency about the boom as he took aim at managers and unions for failing to keep costs down, declaring that wage claims would have to be cut in line with lower prices. ‘Industry itself has got to front up to better managing some of these projects. In terms of construction projects, management has become sloppy,’ he said.”

    All true. But on wage restraint, ought not the government get rid of a string of government departments, raise the tax free threshold, and so thereby argue for before tax wage restraint in the context of a lot of poorer workers IMPROVING their after tax income?

    Ought not he also call for dividend restraint and salary restraint as well?

    Why is it that only the industrial worker has to pay the price for higher employment? Of course if we are to have more employment the industrial worker ought to have before tax wages grow more slowly. But what about everyone else? Almost everyone else is receiving massive protection. Every CEO every corporate lawyer, every pharmacist and Doctor. Almost everyone earning 100,000 plus except for a few exceptionally good small businessmen are part of a protected or subsidised racket.

    So why when this valid stuff about improving employment comes up, is it only the industrial worker that has to bear the cold wind of the free market?

    We’re not saying you are wrong. But a little more balance please.

  13. “I would think his sympathies would be with it but as a potential future PM, he’d be wise to avoid the record.”

    People shouldn’t talk like this. Its an absolute disaster that Andrew Leigh, an incompetent economist and a fucking economic vandal, got anywhere near Canberra. God he’s useless. The damage he’s done and the shit he talks.

  14. Finally The Reverend Joseph David Manning finds out about the theory that Malcolm is Obama’s father. Edward Klein, David Maraniss and Joel Gilbert all think this as do I. But I don’t think the Reverend Manning is won over. Just remember that I sussed out who Obama’s daddy was before those three.

  15. A full breakthrough. The ABC approved it in its entirety. Even the goose-stepping moderators may be getting sick of what we have had to face since 2008.

    Graeme Bird :

    19 Sep 2012 5:46:34pm

    We don’t need to choose between the US and China. Because the Australian people, the people of the United States, the Chinese government, and the Chinese people, all have a common enemy. That enemy is the money-creation/covert operations nexus of the West. You might say the “shadow government.”

    Our interests lie in describing our mutual enemy to our friends in Beijing. We would emphasise that in a hot war, no matter who was in charge we would, like it or not, always side with the Americans. But failing that we can work together, with Beijing, to belittle and diminish the shadow government, that bedevils us both, and the human race.

    Reply Alert moderator

  16. Here is my next one on the ABC:

    I’m so sick of this. Why is it any concern of the RBA what foreigners do? We should control interest rates on foreign bank to domestic bank loans such that we always run a trade surplus. But our banking business ought to be our own business and its not the business of foreigners. Nor is foreign bankers actions, all of them idiotic, any strong concern of ours.

    This latest fellow we have, Stevens, he’s far less bad then we have gotten used to. But I could do his job as a part-time gig. That he gets a million a year as base salary, and gets to fly ABOVE FIRST CLASS in his own damned room in the air, is just the bankster network payoff. They are paying him off to be a supporter of their international scam.

    Yes we were quite lucky with this fellow but he’s part of a scam no matter what. The indignity of this fellow and an underling, flying to Basel to get on one knee and negotiate concessions from these bankers, overpaid manifest failures…… its just disgusting and we ought not stand for it.

    We’ve got to get rid of money-as-debt. Its time we Australians struck out for liberation from this unbelievable racket.

  17. Sometimes you can get in the mood wherein the medicine from Dr James David Manning is just not strong enough. Sometimes you need to go to Dr Phil Valentine. Plus Phil Valentine is a fantastic investigator who was ahead of everyone on many of the facts.

  18. The Bari Shabazz death certificate. Read all about it:

    http://www.barimshabazz.com/

  19. wtf? are you some kind of performance artist? I’ve only recently become aware that you exist, Mr Bird, and have come to the conclusion that you must be some kind of Stephen Colbert on meth style parody or dangerously unbalanced. If you are not in fact a performance artist, seek help. Your philosophy is not ‘deep’, it’s constant mental masturbation, your opinions are not fact, they are the product of a diseased mind, one that seems to think that it’s inane ramblings are more valid than the collective achievements of the history of Human scientific research. I guess I feel sorry for you too, from what I’ve seen you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time trolling websites frequented by people with brains that work and posting comments to your own blog. Hell, I’m the first person to comment on this post and its been up for nearly 2 weeks, Just thought I’d see how long it’d take you to edit it into all caps vitriol. And before you tell me I am lying and ask me for evidence that you are, in fact, insane, I’ll tell you to go back and read your own blog, that would be all the evidence a sane person would need to know the author was insane…

  20. oh, and nice work on the coupla hundred votes in that election, must be nice to know that there are at least a few hundred people in your vicinity as crazy as you are. If we didn’t have a compulsory democracy I’m unconvinced that they would have had the intelligence to make it to the ballot box…

    • You Dirty Jew Bastard

      • lol…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: