A few days ago I posed the questions below. I’m bringing this to the front to give you the answers. Its doubtful that the answers I’m giving you below will ever need to be updated. There seems no other possible explanations.
Someone has posted a picture over at Catallaxy and just left the topic hanging. I have my own suggestions on what the picture means but of course I can only get through to Catallaxy maybe once a month. Here is the picture:
I’d be happy to collect your suggestions as to what this means for science. I mean REAL science and not JEW science. If you make some good suggestions on the thread at catallaxy you will be blocked by the Jew Sinclair. You can believe that. Now this tells us much more then the surface of Mars even. And as you saw from a previous post, the surface of Mars told us a great deal about the history of Mars.
A people who are not curious are not capable of science. A blog full of people that lack curiosity lack the capacity to discuss science, religion, economics, or current affairs, in a productive way.
More Later. But I’d like to get some input. Because I’m pretty disappointed in the lot of you guys at Catallaxy really. You pretend to be so smart and so well-educated. But when it comes down to it you really aren’t that bright. At least Fisk showed a modicum of curiosity yesterday. The rest of you are pretty damned dead between the ears.
The picture above is a BIG HINT. Note that Jupiter as well is an oblate spheroid, and the earth is as well but only to the tiniest extent. Now a smart 12 year old ought to be able to take all my hints and run with them. But this can never be the case if you take JEW SCIENCE seriously.
Okay you’ve had three days to think about it. Here is the answer from elsewhere:
“We can make short work of this. The gamma gets out because its the highest energy light. Note. The conception of the black hole in mainstream Jew science is refuted totally by this empirical evidence. That gamma ray gets out in this way implies that there is immense energy stored inside the dark rift, which further implies that we ought to expect pulsating explosions from the dark rift. The Gamma from the north and south poles are akin to a steam release valve.
The only reason that the steam comes from the North and South poles is that the gravity must be less there. In such a large body this implies that the mass is spinning at an incredible rate and so it must take on an oblate spheroid shape. As much a disc as a sphere. Or between a disc and a sphere.
No settling of dust could lead to that sort of angular momentum. Jew/Nasa fantasy creation stories need not apply for consideration here.
Except in the case of new matter creation angular momentum is conserved. Hence the angular momentum of the dark rift must be a feature that grows with its development. There is no traction in space and so no way for anyone to reach in and send the thing spinning. So the growth of the mass of the object and the growth of its angular momentum conclusively has to be part of its evolutionary story. Just as is the case with Jupiter.
Here we see that the only model that fits this story is the model where moons grow to rocky planets, then to gas giants and then onto stars, then stars continue to grow until they become akin to the dark rift in the middle of our galaxy.
So why is the universe not full of only dark rifts?
Because the evidential record tells us that when the dark rift erupts, moons, planets and stars explode, as the shock-wave moves out through the galaxy.
So moons grow to planets, grow to gas giants grow to stars grow to dark rifts. But only those that survive.
The growth in spin is easily explained but not in the one post.”
Isn’t that diagonal line amazing and intriguing? What could be causing this? NASA fakery? Or a real line. The only thing that comes to mind is some sort of electrical difference between North and South Poles but why such a straight line in a dramatically rotating body? If I could verify the veracity of this side of the photo I would next wish to know what the plasma physicists had to say about it. In another photo I did not see this so I don’t quite know what to think. Is that line rotating too? And at what light frequencies are we seeing it if it is not part of the photography process?