Posted by: graemebird | March 30, 2013

Jew Science Versus …… Science-type-Science/Real Science … You Know …. SCIENCE.

  • GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    Kaos I’ve got to circle back to the reality that you really need to have three or more paradigms in parallel. If people we could trust analysed that sequence, and all due diligence was done, it would be evidence for the fake-it-until you make it paradigm. Implying that they may have made it there by the time of Apollo 16. It wouldn’t in any way imply a clean rap-sheet for NASA. But I don’t think there is anything serious to see there. You know the JFK splatter turns out to be painted on.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 3 hours ago

    Science according to GMB 1) Peruse crackpot internet sites and choose a claim for evaluation. 2) Visit more sites and glean dodgy information that supports the claim. 3) Compare 3 or more lines of gleaned “evidence” (paradigms). 4) Rank these paradigms to determine which is most likely to be correct. 5) The spurious claim is declared proven true based on highest ranked paradigm.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    No no. Its a very clear and workable methodology that will help you find real answers reliably every time.

    But Jew science won’t. Hence the 100 years of Einsteins utter bullshit, foisted on us by his zionist synagogue buddies. He was a plagiarist and dishonest, and not capable of any real scientific discovery. I used to give him a break but I’ve been looking into the history of it. He’s just a rotten piece of chosen-one work.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 3 hours ago

    More crazy stuff: 9 The 911 attack was done by the jews. 10 The CIA killed JFK. They also developed fast acting darts that can kill people with cancer in just days. 11 Aliens gene spliced their DNA with a mexican woman to produce a hybrid alien / human child 900 years ago. 12 The holocaust never happened, that was jew propaganda. 13 Comets become moons, then turn into planets, which then turn into stars. Any stupid conspiracy theory is lapped up by the mental midget Graeme Bird.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 hours ago

    9. Its proven that Mossad had foreknowledge and were carried a lot of the weight. The shadow government is Jew-dominated. I cannot really justify your statement, although I’ve said similar things. We know that the driving force WAS NOT Arabs. We know this for a fact.

    10. CIA most definitely was part of the team killing JKF. The plot came out of operation mongoose, without pretensions to knowledge of who influenced the mongoose crowd from the outside.

    10. We know for a fact about

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 hours ago

    10. We know for a fact about the fast-acting cancer. This is just standard history. Their other weapon that we know about is frozen heart-attach inducement. You get shot with iced liquid, it melts inside you, and induces a heart attack. This came out way back in the 70’s.

    11. Its only genetic proof mate. As well as other convergent evidence. There could be a conspiracy of lies one supposes. But so far the evidence is all one way.

    12. The holocaust did not happen as originally claime

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 hours ago

    12. The holocaust did not happen as claimed. They have had to backdown on so many things. The Jews weren’t burned alive. They had to back down from the lies of gas chambers in camps in Western Europe. Then when we had access to the alleged gas chambers in Eastern Europe that turned out to be lies as well. Disease aside you were safer in the Jew work-camps then living in a major city. Of course you cannot put “the disease aside” so I”m not saying that the Jew Hitler didn’t hurt other Jews.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 hours ago

    You are the mental midget fella. Because you are wrong about all those things. And I am right in all my comments on the points you have listed.

    This is science gives you. It gives you the ability to judge in widely diverse controversial issues. Whereas Jew-science gives you nothing. You get everything wrong. It steals your ability to judge.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    The studio work for the first LEM take-off didn’t show any acceleration in the take-off at all. There was no sense of overcoming inertia. It wasn’t really flash special effects at all. Nor was there the violence in the propulsion you would expect from people who knew that they had to hit about 1.6 kilometres per second or die trying. The gravity to overcome may be one sixth. But the inertia to overcome is the same as on earth. Plus if they are going to have to tip on their side ………

     

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    …. if they are going to have to tip on their side on a piece of shit craft like that, in order to accelerate to 1.6 k per sec or so, then they were dead meat clearly. Nowhere do we see an equivalent daredevilish attempt with the flying bedstead. To tip too far to the horizontal would be instant crash-making potential in such an inherently unsound craft.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 3 hours ago

    Here’s a short list of some of GMB’s many delusional beliefs: 1 Einstein was wrong about special relativity. 2 Photons don’t exist. 3 No limit to speed of light. 4 Plate tectonics is a lie, the earth is expanding. 5 Global warming is a lie. 6 Paul McCartney was killed and replaced with a double in the Beatles. 7 The mars moon Phobos is an artificial satellite, hollowed out by aliens. 8 The sun has an iron core. These delusions are just the tip of the iceberg.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    Yes you are quite correct with one and two. Three is not quite right. Please re-word it. 5 is acceptable shorthand. I hope people know what he means. 6. Most aspects of 6 are proved to the nth degree implying a shadow government operation planned well in advance of the death. 7. The first part of 7 is proven totally by basic physics. I don’t pretend to know who was involved 8. Well thats the most likely story indeed.

    So what is your problem. I can back all of these. The scientific….

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    …. The scientific method is exciting. It gives you answers to mysteries, and leads you to intriguing questions about more mysteries and its always interesting. Jew science is boring. The kids just cannot get motivated about it. Never use logic. Listen to what the taxeaters are telling you. Believe them and never use your mind. Especially listen to Jews. Jews know everything, though they lack any method to find these things out. Jew science is boring and it tells you nothing.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    I missed 4. There is excellent evidence for Plate Tectonics. It just happens to be physically impossible. So yeah I guess it is a lie. Growing earth is proven, and beats Plate Tectonics in terms of the empirical evidence.

    The scientific method leads to good results. Jew science is faith-based and it doesn’t work.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    With Jew science you start with belief first, and you come up with excuses later to justify that belief. Since Jew science is sort of Rabbinical it consists of Talmudic like arguments about arguments about arguments and a big part of it is making citations from other Rabbis (or in this case taxeating science workers) and trying to avoid reasoned argument and evidence.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 5 hours ago

    @GMB I did tell you and anyone can see that he dust particles follow parabolic trajectories because there is no atmosphere. What would be the point of making studio recordings and how did Nasa keep this such a secret when 1000’s of people would have to have been involved? It’s a ridiculous claim.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 4 hours ago

    It’s just special effects fella. No need to get excited. Th buggie barely seems to make tracks in this footage. There is oddly not much in the way of rocks or shadows. The ground is uniformly well li implying a sun reasonably high in the sky. In this fantasy how did he survive in that oven. How was the 18mm film so miraculously unspoiled.

    It’s only Hollywood. It ain’t that exciting.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    What sort of a Jew argument is that? This is Stanley Kubrick and the Disney studios in 72. How can you claim that they cannot make this special effect in 72? You’ve got to be joking mate? Make a fucking sensible argument?

    Have you been verified that the video wasn’t touched up after 72? And have you been able to verify that the special effects weren’t possible in 72? No you haven’t? And have you explained, given the bright ground and the presumed high sun, how they survived in that oven?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 3 hours ago

    Can you even PRETEND to be Athenian in your outlook and make a serious reasoned argument?

    Fake it mate. Fake it until you make it. And by the way. The fake it until you make it theory of Apollo is still a reasonably respectable paradigm. At least attempt to be Athenian in your approach.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 8 hours ago

    @GMB So the rover being driven on the moon doesn’t cause dust clouds, only the dust rising and falling in parabolic trajectories. If they weren’t on the moon, how did Nasa produce video like that?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 5 hours ago

    You cannot tell me what the dust trajectories are. You cannot claim that Kubrick couldn’t do elementary special effects like this by 72. The scene has its own problems as to realism. And you may have trouble showing the original footage is being handled honestly.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 23 hours ago

    The moon buggy dust problem was a major part of this vid, so I assume you didn’t even watch the video. Anyway, have a look at this footage of the rover on the moon. v=5cKpzp358F4 The dust doesn’t form in clouds because there is no air. You can see the parabolic trajectories. So how did the evil Nasa fakers accomplish this?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 22 hours ago

    I’ll take a look tomorrow. You are saying there is something deeply strange about the dust behaviour?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 22 hours ago

    What is strange about that? I watched it. What do you imagine you are seeing? Actually what seemed strange to me about it is the excellence of the colour and the footage.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    Hey Graeme, I know I am disobeying my own advice about arguing with you, but can you please give us an explanation of how Nasa dealt with the problem of how dust clouds form when driving a buggy in moondust? Was the studio made in a giant vacuum chamber, such that dust trails formed parabolas, then they somehow manipulated the film to compensate for earth’s much higher gravity? How was this done?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    I’d like to see an example of what you are talking about. You cannot show me an example of these dust parabolas can you? See if you are a Jew you are talking about arguments based on arguments based on still other arguments and you get further and further away from the raw data. So you are imagining this parabola bullshit, because you are imagining that they were on the moon. Then you heard someone make that parabola excuse. So instead of going on the raw data you extrapolated like a Jew.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    @chtwrone1 I think it is mainly because his brain is damaged. The imbecile thinks that Hitler was a jew and that the holocaust never happened.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    @ PrognatusSeptum, when using the ipad, there is no reply button, so your silly assertion is wrong.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • PrognatusSeptem

    PrognatusSeptem 1 day ago

    Are you finished now? Can I move on to another video? Anyone who believes in NASA , believes in fairy tales. Anyone pushing the NASA lies is either a payed shill or simple minded. Either way, folks like you are bad news for the few people who can still think for themselves. I poked some fun at your shill ass but really, hope the best for you on your path. If you actually do believe the NASA non-sense then you deserved the poking too 🙂

    Peace out and good night,

    7

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • PrognatusSeptem

    PrognatusSeptem 1 day ago

    + What in the heck is wrong with this dude’s face? He looks like Raggidy Andy for the sake of nana !!! @6:56 They couldn’t fix his nose a little? Lay off the hootch doc! Just kidding, he probably doesn’t drink heavily to live with his lies.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    @ PrognatusSeptum So anyone who comments without actually making videos is being paid to do that? How does that work? Are you drinking the same concoction that GMB is?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    No one is sure that there are many amateur Jews and sundry degenerates.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • PrognatusSeptem

    PrognatusSeptem 1 day ago

    If you want to reply to me so that I know you have replied then you simply click the “reply” button. Typing the @ symbol and then my user name is a common shill / troll maneuver. You are very shilly lad 🙂 You didn’t even twist my words up very well. You new here or something? If I were your handler I’d smack you around a little for good measure..LOL, just kidding….but you do actually suck. Good luck with that 🙂

    Peace out..remember…IIIIIiiiiiimmm­mwatching Youuuuuuuuuuu ~

    7

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • IonianGarden

    IonianGarden 1 day ago

    =Fallen to the global warming fraud as well= Sorry for replying in another video, but your comment was removed by the user. Let me ask a simple question. Do you trust science? From many of your comments, I doubt it. Rejecting science is rejecting knowledge, reasoning & understanding. You will remain unaware that your ideals are obsolete & senseless unless you take the time to educate yourself. Science is not based on mindless assumptions, only conspiracy theorist do.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    I trust science. But Jews don’t practice science. They practice rabbinical style arguments which are based on arguments based on arguments and most of these arguments are thinly veiled argument-from-authority. The global warming fraud is argument from authority combined with lying about the data. There is no science behind it at all. In fact its very clear science fraud. Just like Piltdown man but with money and Jew media behind it.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to IonianGarden (Show the comment)
  • IonianGarden

    IonianGarden 11 hours ago

    Jews?!? There is no science behind global warming?!?…. Do you even bother to look? Watch some Potholer54 videos on climate change to see the science behind Global Warming.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 8 hours ago

    Potholder is the absolute worst. There isn’t one controversy that he is on the right side of. His arguments are pure unreason and this we can say prior to the complaint that he accepts rigged data. If you want to see just how bad he is check his animation where he attempts to show plate tectonics in action as opposed to growing earth. Growing earth is being pilloried simply to maintain Jew fairy-tale physics.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to IonianGarden (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 11 hours ago

    Yes I looked very closely. Starting around 2005 until about 2010 I was a big part of the Internet debate. I assure you it’s just all money and lies. As is special relativity and the Big Bang. If you think science is about citations, peer review and credentials …. Ie rabbinical Jew science, one supposes you might get sucked into it. But supposing you think science is about evidence, reason, intellectual honesty and so forth. Then it’s clear science fraud.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    This is an important point. If they are prepared to lie persistently about ANYTHING …. Now that we know they lie about comets, one must deduce that there is more to this criminal gang then meets the eye.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • PrognatusSeptem

    PrognatusSeptem 1 day ago

    Folly. NASA = Operation Paper Clip

    Plus goto chtwrone1 ‘s channel and see what a total 100% shill channel looks like.

    Ever hear of neuro-linguistics? Everyone who has and listens to this Irishman, should be able to pick up on what is going on with this communication.

    You folks are being lied to for a reason.

    Peace,

    7

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • PrognatusSeptem

    Comment removed

    Author withheld

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to PrognatusSeptem (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    It’s frustrating that one cannot prove the difference between the paid whores and the amateur degenerates.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to PrognatusSeptem (Show the comment)
  • PrognatusSeptem

    PrognatusSeptem 1 day ago

    This has been flagged as spam show • Not Spam

  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    Hey Graeme, weren’t you going to build a tesla tower in Queensland? Like everything else, your announcements mean nothing. How’s he silver investment going btw?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    It is a great idea but you’d face massive obstruction not excluding murder. Note that though Tesla was proven successful in such an unlikely area as New York, still his advanced lightning rod was ripped down and a second one has never been built on a non-covert basis. Proving that the Jew banker elite is the enemy of all mankind. Murderer of millions. A hateful disease.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    @chtwrone1, GMB is originally a kiwi before moving to Australia. His confusion in using simple terms may be related to that. More likely though is that he is just a fuckwit who doesn’t care if he gets things wrong.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    No now no ball no snowball. And yet you still believe the liars. Your faith-based approach isn’t science. It’s a Jew curse. People don’t realize the Jew origins of the destruction of science that followed the tragic mistake of emancipation

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 1 day ago

    What’s behind this anti- Jew sentiment that pervades nearly every post you make?

    Are there any other ethnic groups that you have strong and obsessive views about?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    To your second question the answer is no. All other groups have to gang up on the Jews to take them out of public influence. We’ve got to get all seven billion humans against the upper level Jews who control their co-religionists. These people are such poison and when I see someone like you who has a warped view of what constitutes evidence of course it only makes me angrier at Jewish elites who have caused all this.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    Judaism, in its literature is the only religion that takes special pride in genocide, malicious damage, and deception. So you would wonder what NASA lies to us all the time, but it becomes more understandable if you know that these outfits are largely controlled by this satantic cult of banker-elites. It can get confusing because a lot of the American wing of the troublemakers are these supposedly wasp-elite families like the Rockefellers, the Harriman’s in the old days and so forth.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 17 hours ago

    No fella thats not what I said at all. Don’t try it on you dope.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • eventcone

    eventcone 16 hours ago

    This has been flagged as spam show • Not Spam

  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    NASA’s fraud, theft, lies, coverups and murders are not merely of historical interest. They are a roadblock to science, they are getting in the way of a ready source of electricity, and the have completely distorted humanities understanding of what it takes to exploit space.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    Nowhere in Graeme’s potato head will anyone find evidence of a functioning brain. My advice to anyone trying to sensibly argue with GMB is don’t even try. Evidence is anathema to him. Reality is something he has little grasp of. He deserves only mocking for his debate style and pity for his mental condition.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    No I’m right about everything and you are a moron. This dunderhead takes all NASA’s lies so seriously he still thinks that comets are snowballs. No snow no ball no snowball but he just believes. Science will always elude this degenerate.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to DialecticKaos (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    Nowhere in this lecture will anyone find evidence that we went to the moon under Appollo.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 1 day ago

    Why do you frequently and incorrectly use the word ‘then’ when you should be using ‘than’? Is english your second language?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    I think my spelling capacity peaked at age 12. I’m aware I mix these up. I don’t quit no why.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 day ago

    I found out that the original bastardisation of science in the late 19th early 20th century was largely Jewish. It may seem a bit disingenuous since the Talmudic idiocy, unreason and poison has spread to Gentile culture so its hard to pull the influences apart. Also we have the tie-up between the Jew dominated money-creation/covert operations network. So everywhere we look Jewish influence is destroying everything, science not excluded.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    Hey Graeme, you avoided my question about your alkali water machines. Are you ever going to get around to publishing your cancer “cure”? Nah, it’s more important to be a retard on the internet, getting mad at people who actually believe that Paul McCartney is still alive and the fact that moonlandings have taken place. Get your priorities right.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • Ed Murray

    Ed Murray 1 day ago

    Oh so it’s a govt conspiracy and those thousands of folks who worked on the project never really worked on it etc. Oh and that included my Uncle who just happened to work on the computers for The Apollo Spacecraft?

    Perhaps you also believe that my Telescopes really do not show the Moon , Stars, Planets and Galaxies?

    And perhaps you are going to tell me that I did not discover something on the moon?

    Do your research and get over yourself!

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    You don’t impress anyone at all Graeme. What you do is alienate and disgust people with your hateful ignorant invective. How are your alkali water machines going? Didn’t you waste over $10k on 4 of those useless things?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • DialecticKaos

    DialecticKaos 1 day ago

    @chtwrone1 Why are you bothering with GMB? He’s an insane loon who became a disgusting raging anti semite a few months ago. You’d get a much more coherent argument from a house brick than from crazy Graeme. Google Graeme Bird and have a look at his blog of failure.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    The specs for the Lem were so contrived as to be an excuse for the thieves being unable to demonstrate its capacity to hover on earth. Better to save a few billion an just lie and not bother getting it right. More resources to steal that way. Supposing I conceded that Columbus could have made it to the Americas in a single long canoe rather then a 3-ship convoy? It’s physically possible yet they all would have drowned just the same.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    No not that craft. That craft will just go up a little way and topple. It had less thrust per weight then the hovering mechanism of a harrier. Since by their own admission it could not hover on earth.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 2 days ago

    Why would the craft go a little way and topple? Surely if it can get off the surface, it will keep going up, and up and up. Why would the thrust of the rocket engine suddenly have the inability to keep the craft going up? Are you saying that the rocket needs the surface to react against, and when it leaves the vicinity of the surface, then the thrust of the rocket becomes useless? Explain then how a rocket would ever get into earth’s orbit then if this is your reasoning.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • ThePurpleHarpoon

    ThePurpleHarpoon 1 week ago

    If they were going sideways on the landing then they would have displaced quite a bit of stuff when they hit the ground.If you drop a tennis ball on the beach it moves more sand than that big hunk of metal did on the surface of the moon.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 2 days ago

    The amount of sideways movement at the time of touchdown was virtually nil, so no huge amount of ‘stuff’ would have been displaced at all.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ThePurpleHarpoon (Show the comment)
  • ThePurpleHarpoon

    ThePurpleHarpoon 1 day ago

    I didn’t say a huge amount should be displaced, just more than evident in pictures.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 15 hours ago

    Why should any material be displaced at all? The LEM was descending vertically when it touched down, with NO appreciable horizontal component what so ever.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ThePurpleHarpoon (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 14 hours ago

    Don’t you and Dialecticaos want to have it both ways? He just go through showing me a vid where the rover is kicking up dust. Now you want to say that powerful rocket exhaust won’t kick up anything at all.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 14 hours ago

    Off course the LEM kicked up dust at touchdown – it’s obvious in all of the Apollo landing footage.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 8 hours ago

    You just contradicted yourself. Should it kick up dust yes or no? Now you are arguing like a Jew lawyer descended on all sides by Rabbis.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 7 hours ago

    Sorry if I have not articulated myself adequately re moon dust. My view is that yes, the lunar rover did kick up dust as per the numerous clips on youtube, and yes, the LEM did disturb dust upon touchdown.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 5 hours ago

    That is better. But how do you separate this from studio work with improvements each mission?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 5 hours ago

    But it looks like feeble studio action. Maybe the later productions are better. For example that buggy ride that dialectic showed me from Apollo 16. Well it’s got it’s own problems. But they are at least getting some decent special effects on the fly.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • expattaffy1

    expattaffy1 2 weeks ago

    Listen here guys, you have all got it wrong about the stars. The reason there are no stars is because none of the moon photos were taken on the moon at all, they are all composites done in a studio after the event and hence are all fakes.. While studying the moon photos I made an amazing discovery of every photo having. black dots in the bottom right corner and the top left corner. I put these findings to David Percy and after careful study he concluded that they are peg marks which were used y

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • jonas senhadji

    jonas senhadji 5 days ago

    get a life.. the man is explaining in a desent and calm way. with prove to back up his words. What do you got? he even dos it in a way, so even not so clever persons have chance.. incredible silly you are, just hanging on to your internet teoris “ohhh its a LIE, listen to me, i have nothing else to present to the world, so i have to make up something” aRGH!!! Get a Lif

    e

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to expattaffy1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    The man explaining hasn’t brought a single piece of evidence that they went to the moon.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to jonas senhadji (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 2 days ago

    Conversely, you could also argue that the hoax nutter brigade hasn’t brought a single piece of evidence that they didn’t go to the moon.

    In fact, not one reputable, independent and respected scientist has ever come forward with any information or evidence to suggest that the moon landings were a hoax – NOT ONE.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    Yes but he didn’t successfully fly the LEM. Not ever. You cannot organise a trip to the Americas in 1492, if you have never successfully gotten to know a ship with sails. The entire notion is ridiculous, and indicative of usurious Jew planners who are ten generations shy of having to work with their hands.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    You bet its an exaggeration.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 3 days ago

    David Percy? HA, don’t believe a word that hoax nutter says – complete bollocks. If you had watched this video, then you would know why there are no stars – short exposure settings, quite simple really.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to expattaffy1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    No no. We are talking a fellow consistently using reason and the scientific process. As opposed to your long list of feeble excuses for the usual thieves and haters of science.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • eventcone

    eventcone 1 month ago

    @unatics So, was your comment a bare faced lie, or simple stupidity?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • eventcone

    eventcone 1 month ago

    @unatics You see stars (and the aurora) in that video because it is film from the NIGHT SIDE of Earth. The Earth’s surface appears bright because the camera is set to capture very low levels of light. You MUST have noticed how bright the city lights appear? That also tells you it was at night.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • irishgeal1

    irishgeal1 2 months ago

    hendry is a right bampot

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • unatics

    unatics 2 months ago

    Type in youtube Zero project -Silence. You will see thousands of stars filmed from space along hugely exposed Aurora Borealis and earth with its albedo of 37%. Somehow bright surface in this video was unable to `eliminate` starfield. Poor scottish paycheck slave.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • jonas senhadji

    jonas senhadji 5 days ago

     

    ha you are so stupid..

     

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to unatics (Show the comment)
  • Reiflexx

    Comment removed

    Author withheld

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • losability

    losability 2 months ago

    Lies indeed, there’s no reason one couldnt photograph the stars. And the astronots even said they SAW no stars. Or didn’t recall ; )

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 3 days ago

    Did you not comprehend the part of this video that clearly and simply explains why there were no stars visible in the pictures taken on the moon’s surface?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to losability (Show the comment)
  • losability

    losability 2 days ago

    He’s wrong. As long as you don’t point the camera to the sun you will see the stars better than anywhere on earth. (camera too)

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 2 days ago

    Hi losability, he is not wrong at all. Due to the very bright conditions on the lunar surface and the very short camera exposure setting requirements, the stars would never been seen in pictures.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to losability (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    No good. It’s not velocity that counts it’s acceleration. Go straight to the cause rather then with the consequences.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • chtwrone1

    chtwrone1 2 days ago

    You realise that the a craft taking off from the moon’s surface will continue to accelerate at a constant rate until the trust been applied is reduced? In fact, for a given rocket throttle setting, the acceleration actually increases with time, as fuel (weight) is expended? As the craft gets further and further into it’s flight, it’s weight reduces appreciably, requiring it to throttle down a corresponding amount to ensure correct trajectory for orbital insertion and docking with the CSM.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • losability

    losability 1 day ago

    Bright conditions indeed but light from the surface only warms up the astronot, it doesn’t enter the camera. And with these very black pictures with only a tiny earth and the flag or only an “orbiting” module, you surely would have seen some stars; I have pictures with a moon and stars myself (yes stars are faint)

    Finally the astronots said they didn’t even SEE any stars, google ot youtube it yourself. Ridiculous.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    No thats wrong. An excellent excuse yes. But not really plausible when you think more deeply about it. If this was the ONLY problem then I for one would just let it fly.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to chtwrone1 (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 2 days ago

    This is a good point. One has to admit that the exposure argument is a masterful excuse. But if these buffoons, who in reality were dancing around the studio in an unmanly way, had wanted to under the paradigm that the fairy tale was REAL …… Well they could have had different exposures for different photos.

    Most of the guys who were first to expose this hoax, came out of the wing of photographic expertise rather then pure science.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to losability (Show the comment)
  • GUARDIANtrooper 

Responses

  1. […] uncensored on “Jew Science Versus …… Science-type-Science/Real Science … You Know …. SCIENCE.“ @ A Better World: Graeme Bird For High […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: