Posted by: graemebird | April 5, 2013

The Need For Loyal Opposition To Buttress Jew Fairytales

I was saying that as likeable as Steve Kates is, he seems to be (perhaps unwittingly) playing the role of loyal opposition to the Keynesian multiplier.  The Keynesian multiplier is a Jew fairy tale.  Of course it was too close to home when it came to banker enrichment, to give the credit to a Jew.  So the credit went all to Keynes.

We saw how Sinclair, when the 2008 crisis hit, weakly opposed the proposed spending spree, while at the same time backing up the reasoning BEHIND that proposed spending spree.  But the Keynesian multiplier is such a ridiculous and baseless idea itself that it may require a further level of opposition.

(DRUM ROLL) Here enters Steve Kates.  Steve correctly explains half of the argument as to why fiscal policy ought not be used in a recession.  But leaves the other half blank, and makes excuses for fractional reserve, by denying that plummeting aggregate demand, can ever be a problem?????!@#$%^&*!!!!!

Its true that if total demand is growing enough, then consumer and government demand deficiency need never be a problem.  But Kates somehow forgets to state this part of the story, and the rest of the story,  clearly enough.

What will happen then is someone will have heard Steve talk, gotten half the story …. And me not knowing this I’ll try to explain to him why fiscal policy is useless.  Well having heard and rejected Steves thinking, I’ll get onto Say’s Law, and the fellow’s eyes are going to glaze over.  This is the intent of loyal opposition.   I say this even though I cannot in good faith accuse Steve of doing this on purpose.

I tried to convict Professor Kates but I cannot do it.  And yet this is the nub of the Jew problem. Because we cannot usually accuse the individual;  sooner or later we are going to have to evict the entire tribe. Western society has faced this problem and dealt with it morally 109 times.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Anyway this is not exactly what I wanted to talk about today.  But before I get to the main topics, let me tell you just how far loyal opposition (or controlled opposition) can go.  The Rockefeller crime gang essentially knew that they had been busted.  They were found out.  So they started a group in order to get people to accuse them of what everyone already knew they were doing.  They got Robert Welch to tell the truth about them. They financed Robert Welch in starting up the John Birch society.  And Robert Welch himself told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.  But his organisation was discredited and so the truthzzzzz he told were cleverly discredited by dint of discrediting the Rockefeller financed organisation in its entirety.  Even though this Rocefeller financed organisation had the dope, and was spilling the beans, on the Rockefeller crime gang.

Eustace Mullins describes how  the organisation would screw things up on key strategic points while Robert Welch still lived …. But subsequent to Welch another later President of the John Birch society was Larry Mc Donald.  And Larry also told the truth, but may not have been bought by the people who bought Welch in order to discredit themselves and discredit their discrediters in masterful loyal opposition fashion.

So Larry McDonald, telling the truth and this time NOT BOUGHT (one may assume) seems to have become a menace to the ruling elite.  Which is no doubt why all the crew and passengers of KAL-OO7 had to die.  An assassination of a single individual disguised as the shoot-down of a passenger flight.  Loyal opposition can work beautifully. But it can go wrong. No matter. Just murder a bunch of people and everything works out alright for the ruling elite in the final analysis.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

What I really intend to show you is how one Jew fairy tale, locked in by character assassination, the cult of personality, and relentless propaganda, must lead to another Jew fairy tale, and another, and must eventually lead to the full spectrum breakdown of science, the humanities, and any possibility of  free enquiry.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It ought to be just taken as given that the philosopher holds precedence over the physicist. Why would a mere field worker and mathematician hold sway over philosophy?   Why would a philosopher skew all his deliberations to better suit the mood of a young Jew who makes pronouncements on the physical world?       But this travesty of unreason has already happened???? It came about after 1913 when the Christian era of science was ended and the era of the moneyed interest reigned supreme.

We have the golden age of science which is the Christian age of science….. Let me grab some of the magic of the righteousness of new testament Christianity:

In the beginning there was the Logos.  And the Logos was God. But the Logos to the Romans meant so much more then just THE WORD.  It means something akin to the following:

……….In the beginning their was the ordered universe, the natural law, and the moral law.  And this was the Logos, and the Logos was God………….

If we take this broad understanding of the Greek concept of Logos, and then when we consider people like Nick De Cusa and Saint Thomas Aquinas, and a boy called William …. A boy who was said to have come from a town called Occam.  If we look at the Logos concept and we consider these personalities, is it any wonder that Christianity wound up being the greatest gift that science ever had?

Somewhat arbitrarily I’m calling before 1913 the Christian era of science.  And after 1913 I’m calling it the ERA OF THE MONEYED INTEREST.  And I’m assuming that the moneyed interest was Jew dominated.  So that I’m assuming that this horseshit we have now, passing itself off as science, is really JEW-SCIENCE.

Now I know a lot of this is technically wrong but part of my agenda is an agenda of desensitisation.  The Jews have made us jumpy and akin to a pack of Pavlovs dogs.  They spend a lot of their time on blogs abusing the Christian paternity and running down our Muslim brothers and sisters, and yet they expect us to treat them like delicate plants, or fine glassware.  Or let me be more honest and say “like delicate plants or fine glassware” because I’m quoting someone and that quote comes from about 1879.

So these are not new tricks these people play on us.  The other thing is that the fact that the holocaust is yet another Jew fairy tale, is a little hard for people to take until they realise the plethora of Jew fairy tales that are out there.  And once people know just how much of the bullshit they believe can 79% be classified as Jew fairy tales, then they may be a little bit more comfortable with facing  the fact that the holocaust is just another one of these disgraceful contrivances.

The holocaust is a Jew fairy tale amongst many.  And just like the science-Jew -Fairy-tales  ………………     that get in the way of scientific advancement …………..   the holocaust Jew Fairy tale ……..  this most horrid of Jew fairy tales hides this multitude of crimes-against-humanity that must be atoned for.

The victims of the crimes that the jew fairy tale of the holocaust is hiding have to be given a proper Christian burial. But the victims of THOSE CRIMES that the Jew fairy tale of the holocaust is hiding will NEVER HAVE THAT CHRISTIAN BURIAL …. They will never have a Christian burial.  They won’t have it while the Jew fairy tale of the holocaust is tolerated.

I said TOLERATED.

The Jew fairy tale of the holocaust is NOT acceptable.  Certainly its NOT acceptable to SPEAK-this-lie.  But I say that its not acceptable to even believe the Jew fairy tale of the holocaust in your heart.  Zero tolerance when it comes to this particular Jew fairy tale. This fairy tale is a moral outrage.  Its an infinite insult to the Logos.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

“”””””””The title “The Weight of Smoke” refers to a challenge that Sir Walter Raleigh had with Queen Elizabeth.  He told her that he knew the weight of smoke.  He proved this by weighing out tobacco on a balance, lighting it in his pipe and weighing the remaining ashes.  He said that the weight of the tobacco minus the weight of the ashes was the weight of smoke.    “If thought be smoke evaporating in the wind, what ash is left is our estate…To weigh our failures is to weigh the smoke.”””””””

So they say that matter can neither be created nor destroyed? But if they believe in the big bang theory they are liars or have not thought the matter through.

In one sense Sir Walter believed in the conservation of mass.  Otherwise he wasn’t laying out this foreplay with the pipe, the tobacco and the weighing machine.  BUT HE WASN’T A FUCKING LUNATIC.  He was an Englishman.  He accepted the LOGOS.  But this was before Darwin.  And before Darwin it was just cursory assumption that you don’t have a clock without a clockmaker.

When Sir Walter was showing good Queen Lizzie the principles of the conservation of mass, prior to showing her what it means to be a woman, do you imagine that he even daydreamed that all the weight of matter in the world could BE HERE, without somehow BEING CREATED?????

He was a pirate. An adventurer.  But he wasn’t a fucking lunatic.  That he weighed the Tobacco before the burning, and the ash after the burning, and calculated the weight of the smoke (not correct by the way because the tobacco bonds with the air so the smoke actually weighed a great deal more …….. not correct but certainly good enough to keep a hot single girl talking)…..

That Sir Walter had a crude version of the conservation of matter in no way means that he could ever delude himself into thinking that no agency, God or otherwise, could ever create matter.

The matter is fucking here. If something is constructed it must be capable of construction. If something is HERE it must have GOTTEN HERE somehow.

Now this is what philosophy has to offer physics.  And philosophy would have guided physics, rather then the other way around, if it had been still the Christian era of science …. and had not the moneyed interest (Jew fairy tales) taken over progressively after 1913.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So let us get this straight. If you take God out of it, or you if you leave him in, or if you never knew of the concept NEW MATTER IS CAPABLE OF BEING CREATED.

How can anyone doubt this? Is foreplay between our lovely Queen and Sir Walter enough evidence to deny this? Its here. Heeeyah.  The matter is here. You cannot deny that.  If its here it must have gotten here.  If it got here, it must have been able to get here. If it was able to get here after it wasn’t here before, it must have been capable of being created, constructed or converted.

There is no getting around this.

But we can say that the concept of the matter being created continuously over time is one trillion times more credible then the JEW FAIRY TALE of all this construction happening ON THE INSTANT.

So in the end when we see matter we must explain for its presence.  We have only the one choice in the matter.  Matter is here so it must be continuously being created.  But the Jew propagandists insist that there is two ways to deal with this story……

1. The matter is created continuously over time:

2. A Jew fairy tale has everything created on the instant?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Anyway lets have a look at the implications of this Jew usurpation:

  • bencubed 1 day ago

    I still don’t see how there is no 4 billion year old oceanic crust, somewhere.

    It has all subducted under the continents ?

    180 mya seems very young for the entire ocean floor on a 4.6 bya earth.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 10 hours ago

    The answer is that potholder is wrong and obviously so. He should have seen this when he went to make his animation. The forces produced by volcanic emissions would be localized. They could not produce a reaction thousands of kilometers away. In the fantasy of plate tectonics the rift zones are visible but the trenches are almost all hiding down the well with the twelfth Imam. Or hiding under continents. The forcing apart of continents could only ever happen by way of stretch marks.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to bencubed (Show the comment)
  • acekillercod

    Comment removed

    Author withheld

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to bencubed (Show the comment)
  • MegaMDAT

    MegaMDAT 10 hours ago

    This has been flagged as spam show • Not Spam

  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    You do understand that you are toying with an Argument from Incredulity there. The fact that at the average oceanic crust formation rate we see, you would expect oceanic crust older than 200 million years to get subducted. It also helps that as the oceanic crust ages, it gets colder and thicker, and thus denser and more easily subducted relative to younger crust.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to bencubed (Show the comment)
  • bencubed

    bencubed 4 hours ago

    This has been flagged as spam show • Not Spam

  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    The pacific basin has a very dynamic history. This image will give you some idea: farm9. staticflickr. com/8335/8093299232_110e60fb48­_b. jpg (top left is how it looke 140 million years ago, bottom right today)

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to bencubed (Show the comment)
  • bencubed

    bencubed 4 hours ago

    The central plate appears to have grown over the past 140 my.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 2 hours ago

    The central plate is what is today the Pacific Plate, and it started at the triple junction where the spreading ridges between three older plate met. It is the only realistic way to explain the pattern of crustal ages on the Pacific Plate as we see it today.

    EE insists that expansion started there, but that necessitates that the spreading ridges stayed close to the diverging continental margins, which is dynamically highly unlikely (the name MID-ocean ridges says it all)

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to bencubed (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 hour ago

    No you are running away from the point. Forces simply do not and cannot travel that far, when the force is being generated by volcanic reactions at the bottom of the ocean. Find where the source action is? If its where you claim it is then the reaction cannot be where you say it’s happening or otherwise the action and reaction are unrelated. You are not going to be able to draw realistic force vectors to make your point.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 45 minutes ago

    Not they are not equal you are lying. Expansion overmatches subduction and massively so. Subduction is an oddity. A rarity. Whereas we have many thousands of kilometers of rift zones that we can find direct evidence for. Your hypothetical subduction zones are hiding down the well with the twelfth Imam os Shia. Not only can you not prove this hidden subduction is happening …….. You cannot even show that its possible. It is a fantasy of yours there only to keep Jew fairy tales alive.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • bencubed

    bencubed 58 minutes ago

    I still don’t understand how 4bya rock is found on continents, but not on the ocean floor, considering how vast the Pangea theory suggests it has always been.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 33 minutes ago

    Continental rock does not subduct due to its lower density relative to oceanic crust, thus continents remain for billions of years and even grow. There is a lot of erosion, but most of the time this sediment is deposited in continental basins, or if it goes into the deeper ocean it often gets shoved against the continent again by some later continental collision.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to bencubed (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 hour ago

    But the behavior of the banking elite is a absolutely central to this story. Judaism attitude is anti-Athenian. Stupid ideas like energy mass equivalence, the Big Bang, plate tectonics, and special relativity cannot exist except that they are mandated in by an elite. They are simply pummeled into us by this new Banditti. The old Banditti would steal things from us. These jerks hammer untenable ideas into us.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 55 minutes ago

    You, sir, are a complete and utter idiot.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 15 minutes ago

    So. You see what you are doing. It is because you are denying the rational approach to the fact that matter exists (OUTSIDE YOUR FIELD) … well this leads you to tendentiously deny the growing earth paradigm (WITHIN YOUR SPECIALITY).

    If you cannot see this it remains the case that everyone else can. This is why one Jew fairly tale, ruthlessly locked in, must always lead to another.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 31 minutes ago

    The argument from incredulity is simply an accusation the jew makes when his evidence is not there and his logic doesn’t hold up.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 29 minutes ago

    When someone straight faced is trying to sell one an illogical and evidence-free bill of goods incredulity is amongst the more polite of the better responses.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 10 hours ago

    How can it do so under plate tectonics? If the force originates at the ring of fire how can it manifest thousands of miles away? It cannot.

    Supposing I have a hill of marshmallow ten meters high and ten miles wide. If I push on one side of it with a bulldozer the results are localized. Think of what it would take for the results NOT to be localized. Potholer’s denial of growing earth is based on pure superstition.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    Ridge push is not the only force involved, there’s also slab pull, as well as mantle convection.

    And the insistence that the crust is too weak to maintain structural cohesion under force would also undermine most of the EE explanation of mountain building, such as crumpling due to reduction in curvature.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 10 hours ago

    The compression travels thousands of miles around a curved planet before manifesting itself? It’s amazing what grown adults can be compelled to believe to keep Jew fairy tales (the Big Bang, energy/mass equivalence) alive.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    keep your anti-semitic crap out of this.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 10 hours ago

    Imagine is that sort of compression really was there and you drilled down into the sea floor. There would have to be a violent snap and that compression, coming from thousands of miles away, would be stopped in its tracks. But the compression isn’t there. This is no line-ball call. Compression of this sort cannot hope to travel horizontally even one mile.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • michael delaney

    michael delaney 9 hours ago

    ridiculous babble

    Subduction is a reaction to excessive growth

    Subduction is not an equivalent to growth, that is secular BS

    compressive subduction is a facet of growth

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    WTF? ‘excessive growth’ would just mean that the earth grows faster. Why would there be any need for subduction on a globe that is experiencing only expansive stresses?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to michael delaney (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 hour ago

    There is no need for it but it can happen. Whereas there is no way to force two continents apart under PT. The fact that subduction is so comparatively rare is a winning sign for EE. Denialists would have to explain where all the matter comes from alternatively.

    I know what. Instead of matter being created a little bit at a time perhaps it all got here at once, in a gigantic Genesis Jew explosion. That ideas gotta work right? With 100 years of propaganda that idea could work a treat.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 35 minutes ago

    Everything else is sub ducted. How convenient. In other words your evidence always hides. The dog ate your homework and the checks in the mail. If the oceans were older then they appear we would have the evidence for it.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 10 hours ago

    What a lot of bullshit you talk. Your claim is that subduction equals expansion? Back it up liar.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    Where did I say “subduction equals expansion”?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • michael delaney

    michael delaney 3 hours ago

    Plate tectonics foundation is a subduction zone that eats away at all the growth at the rifts in equal amounts, what dont you get?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 2 hours ago

    That’s fine, though I would say that subduction was a prediction of PT, which has been amply verified by observations.

    But that’s not what GMBCATASTROPHE is saying, his quote “Your claim is that subduction equals expansion?” doesn’t make sense from anything I’ve written.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to michael delaney (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 hour ago

    But it doesn’t matter since PT is impossible. So it doesn’t matter what it predicts. Further to that PT predicts subduction equal to rifting. If it were not bad enough that your theory is impossible it falls far short of showing equality when it comes to this prediction.

    I guess you have to do what you got to do to keep Jew fairy tales alive?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 56 minutes ago

    The total rate of crust production at MORs is indeed balanced by the total rate of subduction plus contraction at continental collision zones, but considering the amount of times this has been pointed out, yet this rubber duckie keeps popping up, I’m guessing it won’t sink in this time either.

    However, this simple fact of crust creation being balanced by crust destruction kills the whole EE idea at it’s very start. No need to look for bizarre matter creation causes.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 22 minutes ago

    Look around you dummy? What do you see hey slow-poke? You see MATTER. Everywhere you look you see matter. Even if you close your eyes you see matter. Can you deny this?

    So how did it get here? A little bit at a time like everything that must be manufactured? Or all at once like in the Jew fairy tales of Genesis and the Big Bang?

    It had to get there one way or the other. And making things takes time. A gentile manufacturer would know this. A Jew banker claps his hands and it all comes his way.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 41 minutes ago

    You don’t have the evidence mate. You don’t have the evidence and you know it. Are you going to lie to the kids and say that you can prove that this hidden subduction exists?

    You are an embarrassment. That is what it is.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 57 minutes ago

    You dropkick. Your claim is in fact that subduction equals expansion. Since you are denying new matter creation. Logic may not be your strong suit. Jew science is essentially the denial of the logos. Denial of a comprehensible universe that we are to perceive through reason, logic and the scientific method.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • Buzz Werd

    Buzz Werd 2 days ago

    The majority of people never really get science. In school the majority practice rote and regurgitate to get by then forget all but the pieces that stuck. Most never got the math or logic to understand basic science. It’s a sideshow part of their world view.

    Don’t be surprised by the idiots. Be surprised that there aren’t far more of them.

    If you expect smarter people on average, you are probably living in a selective environment and have an inflated idea of what IQ 100 means, you lucky dog.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • MatkoBA

    MatkoBA 2 days ago

    A person that loves science should understand the potential of EVERY theory (including the bible), because every one of them is interesting to think about. On the other hand, a person that just needs to believe (in religion or in “science”) comes to an outcome TRUE and FALSE. Because to sustain a rigid image of the world (also called dogma), you can only accept or neglect. That is why haters hate instead of thinking.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • tdjdk

    tdjdk 2 days ago

    The bible is not a scientific theory, no matter how much you desire it to be so. It doesn’t even qualify as a hypothesis. Science doesn’t care about what YOU see as true or false. Science doesn’t care if the answer is god or something else. Science is a method, and you are a moron for denying it.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to MatkoBA (Show the comment)
  • MatkoBA

    MatkoBA 1 day ago

    People like you make me sad. The trouble is if someone isn´t aware of his stupidity, he will never need to get rid of it. So tell me what harm you suffer when you for example read a different story on what you claim to know? What Idea is that dangerous, it has to be scientifically prohibited? Say hello for me next time you meet Dr. Science and keep the moron thing to yourselve, please

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to tdjdk (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 1 day ago

    Do you even understand the scientific method?!?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to MatkoBA (Show the comment)
  • MatkoBA

    MatkoBA 23 hours ago

    Tell me

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    I’d like to hear your understanding of it first.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to MatkoBA (Show the comment)
  • dwkjo

    dwkjo 2 days ago

    What does the Bible have to contribute to science?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to MatkoBA (Show the comment)
  • MatkoBA

    MatkoBA 1 day ago

    Whatever you want (if you want)! It was just an example… What I meant was that dividing theories in false or truth is quite a destructive method.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to dwkjo (Show the comment)
  • dwkjo

    dwkjo 1 day ago

    No, it’s a scientific method. Of what value are irreparably falsified hypotheses? Some old theories can still be useful. Newtonian physics is perfectly valid in non-relativistic scenarios, but is inaccurate otherwise. However, completely falsified theories like geocentrism and Biblical flood geology have no value at all.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to MatkoBA (Show the comment)
  • MatkoBA

    MatkoBA 23 hours ago

    I disagree with the idea of absolute falsification of a theory. Nothing can ever prove a theory is 100% correct neither absolutely false. Observed phenomenons only support a theory or not but never “show” the truthfulness of a theory. The more Phenomenons it explains the better theory it is, however being harsh on sentencing a “FALSE” theory to death. For example “the earth is flat”. We believe to know that it is round but WHAT IF we´re just about to find out it is flat? Who will burn this time?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to dwkjo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 11 hours ago

    No good. That the heart is analogous to a pump is proven absolutely. It may be other things but it is most definitely a pump. Plate tectonics may seem to have a lot going for it but it is falsified by the fact that it is physically impossible. If growing earth isn’t fully proven now its only because it amounts to a heresy. The traditional enemies of truth don’t want to know. So if its not proven its readily provable. In case this comes up we know that Einstein’s energy and mass equation is wrong

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to MatkoBA (Show the comment)
  • michael delaney

    michael delaney 8 hours ago

    The bible and science have one thing in common they both have an agenda so they both put a finite time frame on existence

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to dwkjo (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 8 hours ago

    Now you are onto it. But they are both Jew fairy tales right? You have the Big Bang Jew fairy tale and the Genesis Jew fairy tale. Other then the growing earth crowd and a few others almost everyone has fallen for these chosen one stories.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to michael delaney (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 4 hours ago

    If it turned out that Sam Carey was a Jew, would you suddenly dismiss expanding earth as well?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • michael delaney

    michael delaney 2 hours ago

    why is everything non secular spam?

    Lets face it the Jews have an agenda and you are its obedient sentinel

    you are happily shackled to promoting ignorance

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 2 hours ago

    I guess it makes sense, if you believe there’s a conspiracy within science, then it’s not too far to believe there’s a jewish conspiracy as well.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to michael delaney (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 53 minutes ago

    You are denying new matter creation. This is in fact your claim. So will you now admit that expansion overmatched subduction?

    Check mate motherfucker.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • ginckgo

    ginckgo 28 minutes ago

    Of course I deny matter creation like this. Why would new matter on this scale be created in violation of the known laws of physics? And why would said matter creation be restricted to inside the earth and not be happening all around space?

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to GMBCATASTROPHE (Show the comment)
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 1 hour ago

    No of course not. But just when Jews were ready to start adding to the sum total of human knowledge it seems they found it easier to cut corners and pummel their wrong ideas into the rest of us.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to ginckgo (Show the comment)
  • BurchTimothy

    BurchTimothy 2 days ago

    All the theories you are using to debunk are just theories. We have zero proof of any of the theories that you have accepted as fact. You guys have more blind faith than any living religious person. How about this my guess is as good as yours and vise versa.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • Thicite

    Thicite 2 days ago

    well, that’s mostly because “proof” isn’t what’s seeked, “evidence” is seeked, and there’s a great deal more evidence against the theory than there is for it, which in science is what they refer to, as “fucking stupid”

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to BurchTimothy (Show the comment)
  • tdjdk

    tdjdk 2 days ago

    *sigh* Science 101 yet again. Scientific theories can NEVER be proven true. Scientific theories HAVE proven themselves valid. They started off as a hypothesis, claiming to explain a vast ammount of facts (observed reality). They had to produce precise predictions about future observations, and only when tested and confirmed by pier researchers wold they ever have a chance in hell to become theories. And the 2 MOST supported theories are those of evolution and quantum mechanics. Quantum winning

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to BurchTimothy (Show the comment)
  • 13Heathens

    13Heathens 3 days ago

    The first time I watched an expanding earth video I was intrigued. So I looked into it. It took less than 30 minutes to get the information I needed to falsify it. The production quality of the presentation was great, which just goes to show that you can indeed polish a turd, but a turd it remains.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
  • dwkjo

    dwkjo 3 days ago

    I did a search and polished coprolite is actually a thing. O_o

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down in reply to 13Heathens (Show the comment)
  • phunkracy

    phunkracy 4 days ago

    retards… conspiracy retards everywhere, even right at the comments section of a video that utterly ridicules them…

    Reply · 2 Vote UpVote Down
  • GMBCATASTROPHE

    GMBCATASTROPHE 4 days ago

    Potholer must surely know he is incompetent in this task he has set himself. He gets everything wrong. He’s got an animation that is supposed to show why continents are forced apart that is obviously physically impossible. When it comes to science this fellow is a retard. He might be fine in standard journalism but he hasn’t a scientific bone in his body.

    Reply · Vote UpVote Down
Advertisements

Responses

  1. […] uncensored on “The Need For Loyal Opposition To Buttress Jew Fairytales“ @ A Better World: Graeme Bird For High […]

  2. Great post, Mr B. But it’s almost more Rationality than I can handle in one sitting.

  3. Thanks Ron.

    I know its hard to take. How can something come from nothing?

    I’m not saying I’m comfortable with this business either right?

    But we have something. We don’t have nothing. So something MUST BE ABLE TO COME FROM NOTHING even if that is just too much for either of us in a single sitting.

    The problem comes with the Jew. The problem comes with the Jew if he wants all the STUFF to come into existence in a Jew-nano-second and claim that he, being a chosen-one, has decreed from here on in that no matter can be created nor destroyed.

    Well the stuff is HERE right? So it must gave been able to GET HERE right? So it must be capable of being created right? So creation of matter must be possible right? And if creation of matter is possible it must be a situation of ONGOING CREATION right? ……… since the idea that IT CAME ALL AT ONCE is idiotic right?

    There is no getting around this.

    AND I’M NOT HAPPY ABOUT IT EITHER. BUT I FOLLOW THE LOGOS WHICH THE JEW HAS REJECTED. How can I do otherwise?

    Ongoing creation of matter may be ridiculous and I think it IS ridiculous …. but the matter is here.

    No matter how ridiculous ongoing creation of matter is, the alternative of …….. instantaneous CREATION OF ALL MATTER IN A JEW FAIRY TALE ………

    No matter how ridiculous ongoing creation of matter is, the Jew fairy tale is at least a trillion times MORE RIDICULOUS …..

    And so we are compelled to believe in the ongoing creation of new matter. There is no way out.

    This is really all there is to this matter and I am right here and incapable of being bested on this matter.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: