We know that there is a massive and perfectly preserved find, which will tell us all about life just prior to the bronze age catastrophe. This find is so well-preserved that it will put all comparable finds into the shade. It will rewrite recent “pre-history.” The greatest archeological find is waiting there and its easy to locate. Best of all its so great in its volume that the oligarchy, and their Jewish bully-boys, cannot possibly steal all the material and hide it from the rest of us.
This all goes back to the idea that the bronze age collapse occasioned a pole shift. I did not originate the idea, nor did I have the tools to do so. Rather I just think I have added a friendly amendment and update to the idea. I have a preliminary finding that looks like it fits the data much better. The data did not appear to be pointing all in the right direction. But with my friendly amendment it now seems to be.
The bronze age collapse was less than 3200 years ago. But the day the rotating ice ran finally ran aground may have been many decades, or even a century or two later. You see the ice distribution and longevity of our world, makes no sense under normal assumptions. No-one will find ice core data much older than 3000 years near the current North Pole. By the same token, no-one is about to find ice much older than 3000 years near the Eastern Antarctic Coast. Or in fact for many hundreds of miles inland. That ought to be a slam dunk for a pole shift right there. But the evidence keeps piling on from all directions.
So-called “Western Antarctica” holds a motherload of ice and easily the major part of all fresh water in the world. But the ice is not deepest at the poles …….
Have I gone far enough now? Supposing you are not a Jew or an idiot will you concede on the basis of what you have heard already that there must have been a recent pole shift?
Where is the ice to be found and why aren’t the ice cores at the current north and south poles? The biggest ice core record is at the Vostok station. This is not at the South Pole. But they have a station at the South Pole and they don’t have a substantial ice core there or they would have got their core from the South Pole and not from Vostok. Everything Jew science tells you is a lie. Christian-era science was a sort of projectile-vomit of truthfulness by comparison.
So at Vostok we get the 450 000 year (don’t quote me on precise figures. I developed this thesis over a year ago and am only going on memory now). What about in the northern hemisphere? Where is the ice core data derived in the northern hemisphere. It is derived FROM GREENLAND. Not from the north pole. And why is this? This is because Greenland ice is ice leftover from the former location of the North Pole. And so the pole shift is recent ON THAT BASIS and anyone who wants to gainsay me on that matter, in any sort of arrogant fashion is a Jew or just fucking full of shit.
So we get ice core data of maybe 200 000 years vintage from Greenland, and maybe 450 000 years from Vostok, which is NOT at the South Pole as you would expect if the South Pole had stayed put. But they are trying to get a longer record then the Vostok record had to offer. And if Jew science had not demanded that we don’t believe in a recent pole shift, and suppose the poles had been in their current positions for millions of years ……. then we would go roughly POLEWARD to get our more extensive ice core record! Right???? Wrong.
To get the longer ice core record the science community is pinning their hopes on DOME C. DOME C is near the coast. Almost due South of Perth last I looked. None of this is consistent with the lie of the poles having been in their current positions for tens of millions of years. And the reality is that the most major pole shift in a very long time was very recent. It came with the bronze age catastrophe. Elsewhere we will find evidence that it came with the conversion of Venus from a massive comet to a planet. But that is more accessible information (see Velikovsky) and lies outside the scope of this thread.