In what way can the cosmic background radiation be construed as evidence for the big bang?
The CMBR cannot possibly be construed as some remnant of the Big Bang. This mantra is drummed into people with such ferocity because the CMBR is definitely proof of something. If NASA is reading things right and not accidentally reading something else, then the CMBR is proof of the aether.
Now this is not to say we need further proof of the aether. The existence of the aether is proven by the wave nature of light. But that the CMBR proves the aether and makes no possible logical inference for the Big Bang tells us why the oligarchy seeks to pummel everyone with the anti-logic mantra, to whit; CMBR implies Big Bang.
You see the pummelling has to go so far as to override the very logical faculties of the meme-disease spreader. There can be no letup. The denial of aether is the kingpin of science fraud. The mother of all science lies. The Big Bang is the most ambitious fairy tale ever told. So the oligarchy wants the Big Bang. The oligarchy does NOT want the aether.
So this meme-disease must be hammered in with extreme prejudice because its dual purpose. One mantra doing double duty nailing in two of the most important science lies the bigshots have.
The CMBR shines on all of us. It will hold you and your Andromeda girlfriend together when you are far apart. But I ask you: If the cosmic radiation is not the RESONANT FREQUENCY of the aether itself, then where the hell is this light shining from?
What is the cosmic background radiation
The CMBR is the luminiferous aether resonating.
True story. Accept no science lies.