Hadcrut, Gistemp, And Who The Hell Cares/Getting Down To Business.

From elsewhere:

Notice that its not a case of blaming Goddard alone. The Goddard criminals are far more visible than the people who fake up the Hadcru figures and whoever that third group of frauds are (their name escapes me but who cares?). These other two groups keep a lower profile than Goddard members who are media queens. But they are all purveyors of lies just the same.

The job that all three outfits had was quite simple. Apply quality control to the data, prior to going to work with it with the statistical techniques. Then they ought to have been using the satelite/balloon data to test their output.

Neither of these three supposedly scientific outfits have reached so much as a Sesame Street level of ability in logical inference. If you look at all three of the ground data amalgamations, well they don’t agree with each-other perfectly. But they disagree far more with the satellite and the balloon data then they do with eachother.

So we have the balloon data. We have the satellite data. Both of which agree with each-other. Convergent evidence. Good data. If the two sets of data were not good data they would not confirm each-other.

Then we come to the ground data aggregations. And suddenly we find that “One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn’t belong. Can you tell me which thing is not like the others………..”

So we see that these people are not scientists of any sort but total failures. And an ideology has crept in that you just throw in all the data together, no quality control and then you go to work on it. Aggregate it all and don’t let anyone else check your work if you can help it.

Well how about if the Soviet Union collapses and we aren’t getting their Siberian data all of a sudden? If they just throw everything in how is that going to affect things? Its going to make the 90’s warming look a lot higher than it ought to have looked. Siberia being cold right? If I’m not going too fast for the fraud side of the argument.

What about if areas in Africa, or other hotter-than-average regions, are steadily coming on board over time? How is that going to rig the figures? Its going to produce a rising gradient of temperature on top of what ups and downs are already there. Thats what its going to do. And did revelations of the heat island effect and inappropriately placed measuring stations lead to a massive culling of historical data? I think we all know the answer to that don’t we?

So all of them, and just Goddard, are failures. They had the balloon and satellite data that would have allowed them to see if they were on the right track. Then when they had nutted out their methodology and exercised enough quality control over the data they had, they could have worked backwards to the pre-Satellite error.

Its no use getting any of this same crowd to try and reform their act. Each country ought to just sack them all. No need to replace them either. We know what needs to be done. Full steam ahead on governmental cost-cutting and clearing the road free of obstructions to synthetic diesel and nuclear power. Just release all the raw data onto the internet and let people argue it out. No conclusion anyone came up with could change the fact that we need to move quickly to make nuclear and synthetic diesel investor-friendly prospects. Billions of lives are counting on us doing just this.

We have to understand that something has happened in the English-Speaking world with our public servants. There was a time when, for the most part, they were reasonably content with merely getting a free ride on their hosts. Now the parasite has turned nasty. And it wants to actively damage its host for no reason. Just out of spite and nihilism or so it seems. We see this tendency rearing its head at every turn.

Civilisational Survival And The Loathing Of Lies

Diesel is inherently 40% more efficient than petrol. The idea is to get smaller cars onto diesel. The idea is not hybrids, fuel cells or electric cars. These are all pretty foolish ideas. And no-one is opposing them actively in any case. So they ought not form part of public policy thinking.

Diesel can be made out of coal that starts 400 metres deep in the ground without having to dig the coal up. At least this can happen if the threat of the carbon tax is removed. It can happen so much faster if the menace of taxing retained earnings is also defeated.

The coal that you can use for this process is almost a free good in some senses. In that if it is not gasified and brought to the surface there is not much hope of using it for any alternative purposes.

Once the syngas is brought to the surface it amounts to about the coolest and most versatile producer good around. So long as it is pretty-much used on the spot. If it is converted into diesel it can be transported cheaply to the ends of the earth.

From syngas you can make electricity, or plastics, or diesel, or ammonia amongst other things. Basically you can make pretty much anything that the petroleum-chemical industry is making now.

Now at that point where the syngas hits the surface the capital investment isn’t that high. To turn it into diesel is what requires the larger capital investments. Supposing we had no obsessive environmentalist liars, no carbon tax threatened and economists were doing what they ought to be doing and had managed to get rid of the company tax on retained earnings….. Well we could get it going very quickly.

START ACTING LIKE GROWN-UPS WHO WISH TO SURVIVE.

You cannot sit their like stunned mullets as people all around you are choosing economic destruction based on known scientific lies and appeasement.

Diesel and nuclear energy are the only real answers right now. Thats not a bad thing. Thats a good thing. Since there is nothing wrong with either of these fuels. We are getting a lot of new gas finds. Thats a good thing. But gas is a little bit harder to transport. Maybe it will be better a few years down the track when we might have a lot of ships especially designed to transport the gas.

But we don’t need to concern ourselves so much with gas for public policy purposes. Since the environmentalists don’t seem to be out to destroy gas at this point.

So we really have to boil it down to concerning ourselves with diesel and nuclear power. Once we have plenty of nuclear power stations then the production of diesel will be economic, not just from coal, but from pretty much any organic material. Algae, waste wood, municipal trash and so forth. Without the carbon tax and the company tax we would wind up being able to produce this diesel more cheaply every year.

If the nuclear power is in effect embedded in the diesel then the diesel becomes effectively like the most you-beaut battery there is. I cannot get with the stupidity about worrying about battery power. Whose opposing battery power? They are never going to get cheap batteries in a cheap car that is going to do the job like a diesel car with a full tank. Its not going to happen, if it did we’d still need coal and nuclear to power that car, so what is the point getting excited about it? It is argued that the economies of scale from electricity production can lead to savings in a battery powered car. But if you are going to go that route, why not do one better and advise using the compressed air car? Thats where the real cheap transport lies. At least for around town.

We have to take a few steps back here and decide that appeasing evil, and telling lies is not a good thing. So if Edney lies and claims there is a problem with CO2, well you ought to come down on him on the social level. If Humphreys promotes the carbon tax, he ought to be generally considered sellout filth and ignorant of economics or just plain pathological. If Cambria says that liquified-coal is no good well he ought to be harassed for some answers. Because in the real world its our best alternative.

I don’t think people are understanding the damage these lies are doing. Here we have a situation where we could continue growing and progressing our economy and all get better off every year. Perhaps if you are already rich this doesn’t matter to you. But this combination of scientific lies and economic lies are going to see us with the United States collapsing. And the rest of us being hobbled. No-one here can so much as invent a plausible scenario that has the United States pulling through if the new environmentalist bill is applied. And probably not even if it isn’t.

Some time, somehow, some way, we have to regain, or at least adopt, a real loathing for lies and unscience. This is necessary for our very survival. If the threat of the carbon tax is removed, along with the lies that brought this threat into being, and enough sackings are made to balance the budget and remove the company tax, then we can power ahead to a confident future. We cannot do so if we don’t get rid of the lies, continue with this carbon tax or cap-and-kill idiocy, and keep the company tax and the Keynesian economic illiteracy.

Developing a loathing for obsessive lying and unscience is what we need for civilisational survival right now.

Praise Be: The Mental Health Benefits Of Simple Gratitude.

I think we ought to follow the Christian examples, or some facsimile of it, when we are atheists. And part of the wisdom of the Christians is to have set up a series of practices that keep them more sane in general then the doubting Thomases and one of those practices is the habit of simple gratitude. The constant expression of gratitude is a mentally healthy thing for people to do and we atheists forget to do it and yet some Christians do this prior to even eating any food.

Now for my part I would think we could KEEP IT REAL and express gratitude, for the meal, to the maligned hydrocarbon industry, attacked on all sides by leftist filth, as they produce the ammonia, to fertilize the ground, the diesel, to get all the work done on the farms, the diesel and electricity, to help the miners of rock phosphates and the transporters of foodstuffs and the storage people with all their refrigerators running on the power that the hydro-carbon industry generates for us. Then there is the diesel to put in your diesel car and diesel on down to the shops.

But one crowd has helped me out a great deal more on a spiritual plain then these folks who have merely saved myself and others from starvation.

I speak of a bunch of people who have been good for my CHARACTER. Man does not live by bread alone. And surely we can be grateful to those who have done so much to improve the characters of persons at about my level of fortune and those less fortunate than I. For we may not have much. But what would we have without our CHARACTER?

Our electricity production industry contains massive barriers in the way of any individual who wants to set up a big power-generation operation. For one thing you cannot just go down to Picton or somewhere and make an offer on some farmland for a place to set up a nuclear station with a coal-liquification station besides it.

Therefore we have a sort of constrained competition. It is more important for competition that cap-ex spending flows be not inhibited into the area if the profit levels are high. Here we see great inhibition. Nonetheless. If the companies that provide our power have healthy balance sheets they ought naturally invest in the future and get themselves a bunch of surplus capacity.

With the constrained competition and flow of capital investment that we have we really have to rely on your average power station having surplus capacity in order to keep the prices of electricity down.

Supposing the price of electricity goes up. Look at the industrial companies income statement. They only have so many revenues. Should they spend more on electricity they must cut costs elsewhere. Capital investment and wages look good for the cost reductions and the summation of changes of this sort to everyones income statement as manifested by its spending decisions reduce real wages.

But not only that. We get hit by higher electricity prices along with reduced wages and a reduced growth in real wages.

When the threat of the carbon tax hangs over our electricity producers it causes a write-down in the value of their assets. It makes their debts harder to pay off. It causes damage to their ability to raise funds cheaply. It delays their investment in surplus capacity AND THIS MEANS AN INCREASE IN ELECTRICITY PRICES FOR US.

The price of electricity is now going up 20%. It is at this point that I want to thank the global warming appeasers particularly. Because you have done a great deal for my character. Having increased my electricity bill, reduced my real wages and reduced the future growth in same. Also on behalf of people less fortunate than myself and without economics degrees, can I thank you appeasers on their behalf. Though they do not know the great fucking things you’ve done for their character its a terrific thing to know that there will be so many more poor people around with such enhanced characters and isn’t it manifest that this will do wonders for the culture?

Praise be. Thank you. Thank you again. I am so fucking grateful. And notice you appeasers have visited these character gifts on people like me and people less fortunate EVEN BEFORE YOU HAVE MANAGED TO GET THE CARBON TAX APPLIED, RATHER THAN MERELY THREATENED.

Daily I will thank the appeasers for thine ongoing gifts. As the inflation-tax, the company tax on retained earnings, and the carbon tax, all working as force multipliers, will rain gifts of exceedingly beneficial character improvement, down on me and people who will die of good character thanks to you fucking appeasers.

(MAY YOU FUCKING GIRLY-MEN ROT IN HELL)

Chodorov
1 Jul 09 at 8:35 pm

Full-Blown Public Servants “Gramscian” Conspiracy Exposed At Jennifer Morahasy’s.

In the past I’ve tried to get it across that just because you, and to some extent I, don’t tend to think all that much in conspirational terms, that we must not take it that others are like that. The marxists were full-time intriguers. And conpirational thinking is a big part of Islam, or at least some parts of it. Conspiracy was a big feature in the Eastern Empire. Its been a big feature in many times and places. So you not believing in it doesn’t change the fact that others do have this caste of mind and they act on it. And an example we have here is a full-blown scandal involving a four year conspiracy carried out on the taxpayers resources. A totally unacceptable abuse by a government department with no motive involved that was not evil. And since it involved a desk all its own, and a number of staff then we would have to assume that the head of department, or at least the big cheese in that particular office, was part of the conspiracy if he wasn’t the instigator.

Of course Mott could be having us on at least in part. He could be embellishing what he knows. He might have his suspicions, but have no ability to confirm them.

Here is the claim that Ian Mott is making about this taxpayer-funded conspiracy.

Comment from: Ian Mott June 30th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

“The name “Luke” is the designation of a desk and PC in a Queensland Government Department. Various people are tasked to man this desk to provide regular, if hardly consistent, misinformation and distraction to the discussion on this blog and any other that might have the nerve to stray from the party line.

This desk has operated continually since 2005 and it must be said that the quality of the staff manning this desk has undergone a marked decline to the point where very little of substance is ever said. Some time ago the senior departmental management (comprising some of the most venal and loathsome low life ever conceived) decided that posting real research on this forum was “counter productive” due to the proven capacity of a great many contributors here to completely dismember the carefully constructed edifices of climate bull$hit.

Some might argue that it would be better to exclude “him” from discussion but to my mind he is a classic example of what is most loathsome in a green undergraduate ignoroid. And the more the public understands what kind of squalid intellects we are really dealing with, the better. Keep him here because he certainly serves to highlight our own reasonable and rational nature.

He is, as Sun Tsu might have said, Al Gores most feared enemy, a foolish ally.

Comment from: janama June 30th, 2009 at 5:19 pm”

I would say that Ian Mott could be having us on. I would take that into account. But all of us have had years experience with what a lot of us thought was one fellow. But now everyone is saying they can tell different Lukes within the one Gramscian conspiracy brand. And looking back that seems the same for me. Because he once told me he worked in a lab at the RMIT. And I later referred to this and he acted like I was being a nut. Two different conspirators.

This is the first time I’ve spoke to the conspiracy and the department that has perpetuated this conspiracy, now knowing the Luke identity to be a group of conspirators as well as their bosses, if not the head of department. Clearly if Mott isn’t kidding as his story turns out to be true, this is a very big scandal. Probably to be met with near suicidal indifference:

Comment from: Graeme Bird July 2nd, 2009 at 9:21 am

I can feel the waves of fear coming from up North. Six O’clock a senior bureaucrat in the same department as GRAMSCIAN TEAM LUKE is having a shave. Its early Winter. But already this time of the morning. Beeds of sweat are popping up on his forehead.

So whats this follow-through all about? Its a strategy based on fear and desperation. An attempt is made to put a single name on this conspiracy and yet the tag-team effort continues, giving more cause to believe ongoing malfeasanse. An attempt to fake up “honest advertising” with the Luke-desk Jive. A bit of chummyness and the loopy stuff. A continuing presence to do what? Establish that this conspiracy was all AOK and is in fact just a bit of a joke. And after all its up to the blog-owner right? Perhaps she is cool with it all? And could block GRAMSCIAN TEAM LUKE at any time. Is that what the department is now trying to establish?

It is a very stupid thing for GRAMSCIAN TEAM LUKE to be hanging around independent of what the blogowner might think. Naturally your bosses and all sorts of people ought to be publicly humiliated and deprived of your useless careers over this conspiracy. Hanging around trying on the old leftist desensitization cannot change that fact, since the people who would take offense to this and follow it up are not going to be desensitized like the “masses” as your crowd would have it.

You and your bosses ought to be relying on one thing and one thing only. That the taxpayers. The people who pay all your salaries and raise all your kids, are too busy, what with supporting their own family and yours as well. And if you disappear the outrage of this conspiracy, performed as it was on the taxpayers time, may fall off the TO DO list in their minds. Not everyone has put it together just how critical it is for our national health to make an example of people like GRAMSCIAN TEAM LUKE and their bosses, and the head of the department. They don’t know just how obsessive, destructive and determined this campaign of lies is. They don’t understand the economics of this. That an energy shortage looms. That the very threat of a carbon tax devastates the balance sheets, share prices and capital spending flows, of those companies who could save Australia from economic disaster during this coming energy crisis. So you may get away with it. Supposing you disappear.

Not everyone understands that green is the new red. But it aint the new black. GRAMSCIAN TEAM LUKE is not the latest fashion. Those who would follow this up cannot afford for you to be hanging around desensitizing people to the notion that it is alright for a group of bully-boys such as yourselves, in a government department…… that its alright for you conspirators to run a four year campaign of lies and defamation like this.

If we ever get to a point in this country where we find it normal and according to Hoyles that tag-team tax-eating Rococo Marxists can gang up on a civilian like this, with malicious intent….. if everyone gets used to thinking that this is OK then this country is finished. So don’t try to pull the leftist desensitization strategy because we cannot afford it and people will have to act.

I won’t be the only one getting about with everlasting outrage on this. Just try hanging around. I’ll bet you’ll have people emailing members of parliament in no time flat. Better to disappear and hope that everyone is too busy to get the story of this conspiracy out there in the wider public domain.

Taxes On Capital Accumulation: MULTIPLICATIVE EFFECTS.

Taxes On Capital Accumulation: MULTIPLICATIVE EFFECTS/The Mental Trap And Ethical Handicap Of “Revenue-Neutrality”./THE ULTIMATE HUMANITARIAN AND NATIONAL DISASTER OF THE CARBON TAX.

Yesterday I was talking to one of this countries most distinguished intellectuals. I suppose its true to say that I phoned him because I was in a frightful mood, and wanted to cheer myself up. Pretty selfish of me I guess. But I also wanted to congratulate him, on his calm and persistent fighting of the good fight. And this was a thing worth doing in its own right.

I brought up something that I wanted to express to him in order to emphasise just HOW BAD I reckon this carbon tax outrage will be. Even the rumour and shadow of the carbon tax is currently lnflicting upon us, largely unseen by most, untold destruction and hurt.

So I said, (not in any criticism of Gerry Jackson, who hates the carbon tax as much as I no doubt)………………………………………. But anyway I said that Gerry Jackson was understating his case. Well I wanted to talk about some other aspects of the problem. Other ways of picking up some notions of all the damage a carbon tax will cause….. and so I let go, as a supposed introduction, the idea that he understated his case because he was emphasising, for the most part, mostly-only Austrian capital theory, where in his usage “capital markets” referred to the structure of production. Not the markets for debt and equity but the networked production chain of the real economy.

Whereas I wanted to emphasise “capital markets” not just in terms of how the phrase is used to mean the structure of production in Austrian terms (Boehm-Bawerks pathbreaking insight into the “lengthening of the structure of production” and powerful Misean/Hayekian extrapolations on this insight) But you see the phrase can also be used for the other side of things. For the capital and equity funds markets, taken as a whole, and also encapsulating resource allocation decisions, within the individual firm, and also in the entirety of the economy.

I wasn’t implying that Gerry didn’t know all about this gear. He is Australias most knowledgeable economics commentator by a long shot. Good as the wonderful Frank Shostak is, and as magnificent as our unknown national treasure (bless her heart and rest in peace) Sudha Shenoy ( You were just up there in Newcastle and we barely knew you!!! The sadness. the sadness.) was….. still even with that tough competition Gerry is the best.

But anyway it was a lively discussion it was. My discussion with Prodos. And before I could rabbit on too much Prodos countered my suggestion that Gerry was understating the absolute disaster of the carbon tax. Prodos countered by explaining that economics is a science, Gerry in this regard is a serious scientist, and like any committed scientist he will exhibit often a tendency to understate matters. It was a very interesting angle. And of course I agree with all of what Prodos said.

You see if you read Gerry’s articles you will find that Gerry is very concerned and angry about the impending carbon tax, or cap and kill, and he is trying to explain just how bad it will be. But many will intuitively read the tone and the argument and imagine that the effect of the carbon tax might be a little less than Gerry’s tone would suggest. So you read the articles at Brookesnews, you absorb the tone and concern of Gerry, and maybe you have a sort of inner estimate about it. Maybe you intuit that Gerry knows his stuff. And he’s broadly right. But mayhaps you surmise that, after reading the argument, absorbing the tone, well you likely allow that Gerry is fundamentally right, that this will be a bad thing, this carbon tax, this cap and kill…….

But maybe your intuition tells you that Gerry is probably worrying a little bit TOO much. Maybe you think this nasty stupid leftist scheme will be bad, but not THAT bad. Maybe you will mentally post yourself between where Sinclair Davidson appears to be, in that you would see Sinclair as thinking it could be almost neutral so long as the carbon tax is “REVENUE-NEUTRAL” (The second stupidest phrase in the English language after “carbon sequestration”.)……

…. And after reading Gerry you place yourself between the perceived estimate of disaster that Sinclair appears to be intonating, and the perceived estimate of disaster that Gerry appears to be impressing upon you. Perhaps you wind up with a sort of WEIGHTED COMPROMISE BASED ON TONE. A position that lies roughly between the perceived position of Gerry and the neoclassical tribe.

I tell you straight. Prodos has it right. Gerry is holding back. This carbon tax ought to smell like carrion to you. This cap-and-kill or carbon tax (it does not matter which) is going to be a peacetime economic disaster totally unparalled in the history of the English-Speaking world. Until the day we get rid of it and a long time after that, and depending its duration, it will be far worse of a disaster then the Great Depression. At least if we cannot reverse these measures in time. The shadow of the carbon tax is doing immense damage even now. Its stopping our stock of coal-electricity generation plants from being renewed and enhanced JUST FOR ONE EXAMPLE. And its causing a string of other problems, some of which I’ve talked about elsewhere. I have to be brief on some matters since this post must be somewhat self-contained, and not spill out into a treatise on economic science more generally.

Gerry is holding back. If he isn’t holding back then we’d have to face the implausible idea that our best and most knowledegable economist is not taking a wide enough view of this subject. But Prodos has it right on this score. The reality will be much worse then the impression the economic scientist Gerry is giving. Much much worse.

Below I talk about how two taxes on capital update and accumulation, may interact with each-other, so the net effect is not just additive. Not merely loading one depredation upon the other. Not merely piling straw on the camels back. But in the case outlined below, (inspired by Reisman), I have discussed how these two particular taxes on capital are MULTIPLICATIVE in the hurt that they do us.

It could be postulated, that in the year 2100, under a lot of strange assumptions, that the carbon tax, added to these depredations, with other taxes cut, that this scenario might be an additive affair. An affair that might be compensated for by tax cuts in other areas. In an hypothetical Australia, awash and glutted in nuclear power generation, with an whole set of other hypothetical factors on the fly……….. This could (just) be postulated.

But this is not the case in the real world. The damage that the introduction of the carbon tax will have, to our capital accumulation and update, will DEFINITELY HAVE A POWERFUL MULTIPLICATIVE COMPONENT.

THERE IS NO REVENUE-NEUTRALITY COMPENSATORY MEASURES THAT CAN DO THE JOB.

Talk-thee-not of ‘revenue-neutrality’. Thats all crap, shysterism and kindy-economics. The carbon tax in no way can be compensated for. This tax cannot be compensated for and the introduction of the carbon tax will be revenue-negative as it destroys government takings from virtually all other sources. Each month the carbon tax will do damage that will continue to reduce government revenues from all other sources AND EVENTUALLY FROM ITSELF. Such will be the ongoing damage.

There is simply no way to compensate for this poxy, hateful, malicious, outrageous carbon tax (or cap and kill) that is being proposed. I don’t get into the reasons for that below, in an entry originally posted at Catallaxy. I don’t prove my case to the nth degree. The post was already getting overly long. And all the contributing reasons I have that would prove this case have been offered in dribs and drabs many times over elsewhere.

But what I do below is show you THE PRINCIPLE, of how devastating one depredation on capital accumulation can be …………. WHEN IT DOVETAILS WITH A SECOND DEPREDATION.

And I assure you that the carbon tax will be A THIRD MULTIPLICATIVE DEPREDATION though I do not prove this outright on this thread.

Mark my words. MARK MY WORDS. This carbon tax will be a disaster, mark my words, it will be a slow-motion catastrophe. Like having to watch the movie the titanic three times each day and then dreaming it in your sleep.

An absolute disaster.

A disaster of huge proportions both from an economic and from an humanitarian point of view.

Try and absorb just how it is that two separate depredations can have a far greater effect than the sum of their parts.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

FROM CATALLAXY:

At the moment we have two fatal taxes that fall most heavily on capital accumulation. The two taxes are the company tax on retained earnings, always unacceptable. Never OK. Not only thieving but stupid thieving.

The second is the inflation tax. Both the high rate of growth in money and its instability. Instability of monetary growth causes FURTHER INSTABILITY in spending due to the fact that this high and unstable monetary growth ALSO leads to wide swings in the demand for money for holding (and therefore the so-called “velocity of circulation”)

Our capital accumulation will always be tepid, no matter how much debt or foreign investment we attract or indulge in, so long as we have both these taxes together. They are not merely additive in the destruction they cause. They are multiplicative.

Now supposing we cut spending to allow ourselves to have either one or the other but not both. Here I am trying to demonstrate this multiplicative aspect of these two outrages.

Suppose we sacked enough taxeaters and closed down enough government departments to get rid of the company tax on retained earnings. But we are assuming that we still had left our errant money growth, and monetary policy?

Well capital accumulation could still go ahead powerfully strong. It would be in fits and starts. Doing business would be like now; never knowing whether the sudden down-turn or upswing in ones own business was any sort of reliable barometer. Costs would be imposed in terms of higher inventory levels then we had to have. Too much emphasis would be placed on asset appreciation and this would make a lot of investments less effectual. But there is no doubt that we could power ahead. Just getting rid of one of these two depredations.

Our trade balance would massively improve. Since having no company tax, we would no longer have any taxable income upon which we were able to deduct interest against. Supposing if our trade balance didn’t improve? What would this mean? It would probably be a sign of the force multiplier of foreign investment. Unlike in the current scenario this ought not be looked askance at (ie the continuing hypothetical trade deficits) since they would imply an investment boom, with real resources pushing up productivity very quickly. Although care would need to be exercised that the foreign money wasn’t merely blowing out land prices. We would have to be more vigilante about bubbles. Simply because we would be so much more dynamic.

How about the other combination? Keep the company tax but deep six the monetary inflation?????

Well there would be massive transition problems with this. We have to simply put these transition problems and assume that for a very long time we have been in a situation where we still have the current company tax arrangements, but that for a long time we have been used to a scenario of growth-deflation 100% backing.

Thats the scenario. Once all transition issues were in the past could we THEN powerfully accumulate capital goods? Even with the current company tax still in place?

Yes we could do very well. We can have very good capital accumulation with one or other of these depredations in place but of course we must get rid of both of them with extreme prejudice. Nonetheless it is manifest that with one or the other but not with both we can get up a head of steam of very rapid capital accumulation.

Now we’ve seen why this is possible in the first case. But how can it be possible in the latter case? When we STILL have this company tax?

The answer is that the combination of falling prices and depreciation schedules SANITIZES a good deal of the retained earnings to allow for continual improvement of ones capital stock. There is another indirect effect also. Growth deflation will understate nominal profits so reduce the size of government. Growth deflation will lead to more vountary retention of funds within the business for the purpose of spending now to reduce recurring costs. It will lead households to really try a lot harder to save money. All this would aid capital accumulation.

But the depreciation sanitation is the main deal here. You see suppose you have your major heavy metal equipment and you are depreciating it over ten years if thats in accordance with current schedules. That allows to keep retained earnings in the business and build up a fund to replace the equipment in ten years time. Hence supposing if the equipment cost you one million. That sanitizes 100,000 away from the taxman, and you can build it up and you may well be lending it to other businesses, but one way or another you can have this building fund and not be taxed on it. Not be taxed on it even if the retained earnings wind up being spent, rather then as an actual fund, to improve productivity in other ways and reduce recurring costs.

Now you get to the end of the 10 years. And one way or another in real terms you have this million of untaxed resources that you’ve built up from the depreciation. Well since prices were falling all that time then your capital expenditure budget has massively increased. Not only can you replace the equipment. But in my example you can replace the worn equipment with BETTER equipment, for only two-thirds the cost. Or you can massively increase your cap-ex budget and increase your productivity with more and not just better machinery and begin depreciating it year one.

Now consider the reverse situation where inflation leads to overstatement of profits, and inadequate funding for new cap-ex spending? This is a key reason why the depredation of taxes on retained earnings and the depredation of the inflation tax has a multiplicative effect.

Well the main point I haven’t hinted at here is that the carbon tax will also have a multiplicative effect toward the direction of capital destruction, when combined with the other two.

So you have a company tax under growth deflation. Its stupid. Its unacceptable. It not just thieving but idiotic thieving. Yet society can still progress. And peoples capital update budgets can keep getting better if they are one of the companies that does survive.

Now we could have the inflation tax and no company tax. It will lead to an unfair society. It favours the already rich. Investment funds will be less effectually spent. There will be booms and busts. But in a stop-start and erratic fashion, you could still get massively powerful capital update under this situation. You would have to watch out for bubbles a lot more carefully then today. A recent modern example thinking only a decade or two back was the Republic of Ireland. Irish Catholics, not heretofore known for dynamic business wealth creation taught us all that our bigotries were entirely unfair and unfounded. Because immediately after they dropped the company tax rate…. was it to 10%? Or did they entirely eliminate it? Well the place just exploded and with economic performance comparable to South East Asian tigers of the time. This is the secret you see. Capital accumulation. The focus on retained earnings.

But what else did we see? A classic Georgist situation right up front. Half of the higher living standards frittered away to higher rents and housing prices. Inequality promoted since the new wealth spilt over into land appreciation. This ought to have been anticipated in advance. And met with determined efforts to make sure vertical development was in permanent glut. Georgism makes many sound observations and no matter how much you hate the land value tax you must give the man his due.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NOW WE GET TO THE REAL POINT OF THE STORY.

What is all this in aid of? We found out that we could have powerful capital accumulation with one or the other but not with both depredations on capital development. We ought and must have neither but we can still progress as a society with one or the other.

The current situation is one where we have tepid capital update and accumulation but with relentless trade deficits and growing debt. Remember above. If you had trade deficits, and no serious bubbles, and no company tax this would actually be a sign of powerful capital accumulation. But our current situation, thanks to the multiplicative affect of the dual depredations on capital accumulation, is that we have relentless trade deficits, growing calls for protectionism, and only tepid capital accumulation to help deal with our spiralling debts.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF ALL THIS:

Wait for it………………….

THE CARBON TAX OR THE CAP AND KILL WILL BE THE GREATEST PEACE-TIME SELF-INFLICTED ECONOMIC DISASTER DUMPED ON THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING WORLD DURING ITS ENTIRE EXISTENCE. IT WILL BE A THIRD DEPRADATION PUSHING US TOWARDS CAPITAL DESTRUCTION. IT WILL NOT HAVE AN ADDITIVE EFFECT. THE EFFECT WILL HAVE A MULTIPLICATIVE COMPONENT. THIS WILL BE A DISASTER BEYOND ANYTHING AUSTRALIAN-BORN PEOPLE HAVE EXPERIENCED SINCE WORLD WAR II.

There really is not doubt about this.

How To Talk To A C02-Bedwetter.

“And you’ve been telling us that we’re in for global cooling. You bloody liars.”

WELL WE ARE!!!! We are in for global cooling if the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE is anything to go by. But lets talk about you Luke. Are you a homosexual? Or are you just a plain sissy? How does things work with you Luke?

So here we have Luke walking down the street, and his Mother starts to recede in the distance, and there he is, dangerously far from home. Like 200 metres from home. And this big girls blowse starts worrying about the air that is surrounding him right?

Is that how it works Luke? First you start worrying that Mums not close enough. Then you start worrying that you’ve gotten too far from home. And next you burst into tears because THE FUCKING AIR ISN’T QUITE RIGHT!!!!!

Thats about the size of it with you sissies isn’t it?

You see I can respect these homos if that is in fact the way they are meant to be. If that is how god has made them. If thats the best person that they can be. In my mind, given that, there is no cause for me to be disrespectful.

But I can never respect a pooftah like you. So much of a non-man that you are frightened of the clear-air around your ass.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The trace-gas-hysterics are unmanly. They are not masculine. They are not really MEN. THEY ARE NOT MEN. They’re not. You might think they are, but they are not.

This is the message we must get out there.

The Big Lecture On Conspiracy Theory/Don’t Let The Left Stop You Practicing It.

From elsewhere. In a blog slightly inappropriate for the subject:

Communism was a conspirational philosophy as is Islam or some wings there-of. Because of communisms endless intrigues, now fully documented history, the leftists made it the worst of all social faux pas(z) to ever mention a conspiracy not sanctioned by the left. So for example over the last few years the left were fine with Karl Rove or Vice-Presidential conspiracies.

What complicates this matter is that mental illness can indeed lead to an excessively conspirational outlook. So suspicions of this sort can carry a taint. Well its time to leave all this childish nonsense behind. Just because some fellow isn’t on your exact point on the conspirational spectrum this is no need to be disrespectful. Thats dancing to the leftists tune.

Many are overly conspirational because they fail to see that puny humans act strangely when massed together in the millions. What looks like a conspiracy can turn out to be mere networked biases. Or the advent of society accentuating certain tendencies.

Just for example; should anyone doubt that the congenitally stupid are now upwardly-mobile, they ought to repeat the following two phrases, three times each, out loud, with their eyes closed, click their heels three times, and open their eyes. Then perhaps they will be back in Kansas. Back in the real world.

The two phrases being:

“bottled water.” and “carbon sequestration.”

The upward-mobility of very stupid people can look like a conspiracy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The environmentalists:

Evil conspirators?

Or stupid pack-animals?

I think this sort of debate is healthy. I’d encourage normal humans to engage in such debates any extra-time they can find. But when the debating fades away it doesn’t really matter. Since whether it be conspiracy or stupidity or some appalling hell-marriage of both, in the final analysis IT DOESN’T MATTER.

Since we have to defeat them. go over, under and through them. Or get around them. To get done what needs to get done.

Now I really wanted to help people out by doing some heavy lifting with various net present value scenarios. But sadly I haven’t got around to it. With apologies to the blog owner and moderator I’ll try and do better from here on in.

Thoughts On The Precipitous Dive In Central Petroleums Share Price/Further Notes On Capital Markets Theory/ASX:CTP

In New Zealand companies are allowed to buy back their own shares. This is really a very good thing, as is insider-trading. Although insider trading would mean we might have to be very stern about a company misleading its current share-holders. And the public as a secondary thought.

But you see company buy-backs and insider-trading would lead to better share pricing. And the better the share pricing the more effective is societies capital allocation a priori. Before I go on let me say something about shorting shares. Shorting, even by insiders, would theoretically also help for better share pricing and therefore better capital allocation. I think most people agree with this THEORETICAL consideration. But even in theory it would have to be the case that it only helped pricing by a pretty meagre amount. Not nearly as well as insider-trading, greater societal and business honesty, and allowing company buy-back of shares…… not nearly as much as these other improvements would help pricing.

And you see its only a theoretical consideration. Since there is no indication whatsoever that in the real world shorting doesn’t bring with it share-pyramiding. That is to say the dreaded naked-short-selling. The wrecker of capital markets. Second only to fractional reserve, and taxes on retained earnings, as destroyers of resource-allocation.

Fractional reserve is bank-cash-pyramiding. Naked-short-selling is share-security-pyramiding. Both are forms of pyramiding unreal entities, on top of more tangible property-titles. In both cases the pyramided titles are ponzied up goodies for sale or loan (here I mean for sale as in currency-trading. Which goes some ways to explaining currency instability). Both these practices are wreckers of the price system in its most crucial manifestation (that is to say pricing in capital and investment markets as opposed to merely consumer markets). And since we cannot at this time guarantee that SHORTING doesn’t mean PYRAMIDING, then we ought to ban shorting outright, and give notice that it will be unbanned when the various bourses are able to electronically tag each individual share and pretty much trade on a real-time basis. Since shorting is a lucrative part of their business it would in practice amount to a ban of some months. Perhaps a year or two at most.

We must remember that these bourses are not perfect creations evolved under conditions of an idyllic version of anarcho-capitalism, and honed from alloys of righteousness, in some decades-long-process of benevolent nurturing, buttressed by some sort of legal context with unerring fidelity to natural law.

There is the possibility for corrupted and crony-socialist altered bourses, even if the share-market itself is the ultimate symbol of capitalism and sign of the potential for freedom within a country.

A CONFLICT OF MOTIVES WITHIN THE ONE INDIVIDUAL. THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PATRIOT/POLICY ANALYST AND THE SHARE-TRADER/DEBTOR.

Bear in mind that I am trying to trade my way out of debt. And not just in mockery of the usurper-Presidents “audacity of hope” line of bullshitartistry. Now while I say that me as a patriot would want tax-deductible buy-back legalisation in this country, putting on my new-share-trader hat thats not what I would want if share-trader/debtor amounted to the whole of my person.

This is the problem that Cambria is having I think. He’s been a trader so long he’s forgotten how to look at matters like a patriot. You see if the market is consistently pricing shares correctly, then there is less money for Cambria to take off the table. Less money for ME to take off the table for that matter.

I just couldn’t believe my luck when Central Petroleum dived to 9.4c cents. And then when it dived further to 7.7c I was besides myself with a sort of drooling greed. But these attacks on our share price are hampering the development of my second favourite company (as a patriot) and my first favourite company (as an investor), and when taken altogether this bad share pricing, brought about by a number of factors, is hampering our economy.

A word of caution. I learnt a lesson on holidays. Don’t trade shares on holiday unless you have mobile-internet or something. Like the new i-Phone or something. Because while I was ecstatic to be able to pounce on these cheap shares the fact is I could have picked them up even cheaper if I had been constantly monitoring the situation and had sussed out what was going on a little bit better. Obviously I’m not saying that I could have got them all at the absolute bottom. But still I could probably have gotten them at about halfway between where I bought some of them and the absolute bottom with a better ability to monitor things.

Anyway the price dropped right down and I pounced on them like some mad rapist, and they dropped some more and I made some consultations and pounced on them again.

But why did they drop so badly? Why more than the general share-market? And why particularly more then other shares that I’m interested in which were scarcely affected at all?

I think its because most investors don’t really do their homework. And they may have misunderstood an announcement recently made.

But using much extrapolation I’ll try and astral travel into their board meetings and tell you what I see. As far as I can suss these guys out they face a unique set of problems. Its a little bit like that fellow in “The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly” wherein Clint leaves him alive and with half the loot but no means of him getting himself and the gold out to civilisation.

You see Central Petroleum have found enough energy resources to put the Middle East to shame. And so all the investors are kind of on tenterhooks, hoping to see them find a way for some of this gear to produce a serious cash-flow. So thats the investor point of view but how do things look from the management side of things?

Well what I reckon is this: They are an exploration company. They have no expertise in producing synthetic diesel, setting up factories, building towns in the wilderness and laying down miles of train-tracks and so forth. They find stuff. Thats what the staff are trained in. And they are presumably brilliant at it. So to exploit all this great, marvelous gear, they would probably need a series of three-way relationships. Better still a white night that only wants to wet his beak. Or the Packer boy getting things right for a change.

They need three-way deals between the guys with the technology and the people with the finance. Or at least three-way-deals would be one way of overcoming their basic dilemma. Money is still a little tight and financiers are hard to find. Relying too much on share issues would be irresponsible since it would be swapping massively UNDER-valued shares for relatively less valuable cash. And when it comes to negotiating with the people who have the proven technology they face the fact that 1. There are only a few of these entities around (Carbon Energy Australia, Linc Energy, Cougar Energy, Maybe Sassol, A couple of outfits in America). 2. All of these guys are super-busy on their own projects. 3. This being the case they would tend to drive a very hard bargain.

(((I SUSPECT THE BOARD IS DOING PRECISELY THE RIGHT THING AND BEING PATIENT WITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH BOTH THE FINANCIERS AND THE PEOPLE WITH THE TECHNOLOGY))))

So in my view the idea for the board of directors is just to be patient with negotiations. Which is precisely what I suspect they are being. They have to be patient and negotiate good deals with both financiers and the joint venture partners with the requisite technology. If they aren’t patient and don’t negotiate hard with all potential partners, it will be the outsiders taking most of the inherent value, and not the Central Petroleum staff and shareholders.

((((((They’ve got so much gear to exploit they could even consider franchise arrangements. How cool would it be to have a syngas franchise in some sort of reclaimed nirvana in the middle of woop woop? Too good! The Sheilas in New Zealand say to you “Have an awesome day”. I thought it was just this one maori chick. It turned out to be all of them at the retail end. “Hev en AWWWsum day.” But every day could be AWWWsum when you own a really cool franchise.))))))

But it will take time to put together the best combination of financing and technology, in keeping with the companies long-term interests.

Now look at it from the investors point of view. And consider this in light of a recent announcement that these guys had raised 35 million, not to put a synthetic-diesel-factory in Central Australia, but rather to DO MORE EXPLORING???????!!!!!!!!!!!!

It makes perfect sense if you look at the companies point of view and consider where their expertise currently lies, and the likely protracted nature of the multi-faceted negotiations they will need to plough on with before they can stick holes in the ground for coal gassification rather than for exploration purposes.

Now they made 9 million in losses last year I think (I’ll check this later). And they don’t have a real steady cash flow. All investors wanted (I imagine) was a bit of light at the end of the tunnel. An announcement that contractors were putting together a plant construction schedule. An announcement about cash-flows from ammonia, synthetic-diesel and electricity-generation being less than 36 months away. And what they got was a promise to lose more money finding more stuff when they already own enough gear to keep Australia awash in hydrocarbon liquids for 1000 years.

Of course all this is in the wider context of the leftist filth trying to close down the most benevolent practice of all……. the gift to nature of filling the air with CO2. So naturally this scandal of un-science, motivated globalism, and purely fascistic evil, that the global warming racket represents, is also depressing the CTP share price. Probably by an order of magnitude. I’m not kidding. Which means of course if we could defeat these environmentalist bastards outright the shares would just oscillate upwards to stall at a much higher level on that basis alone.

On the one hand I could say “I don’t care. I don’t care a rats bum-de-bum-bum. I don’t give a fat rats lower intestine that our share pricing is totally up the crap. The more the tarnished market screws it up the more money is left for me. The cheaper I can buy these shares the sooner I will pay off my debts…….”

I can talk like this and there would be a scintilla of truth in it. But the problem is I DO CARE. And we have to make whatever changes we need to have a better share market pricing system. That means no shorting until each individual share is electronically tagged and cannot be pyramided. That means the war to phase out fractional reserve and fiat currency must continue with even greater vitriol. That means that until the fascist wing of environmentalism is destroyed we have to walk under, over, around, or through the environmentalists and subject them to seige warfare, like they were some moated and walled enemy citadel, to get done what needs to get done, always promising to SACK them just as soon as we can.

That means that we have to continue with the education, education, education when it comes to telling everyone about the wickedness and stupidity of taxing retained earnings. Its not just thieving. Its STUPID thieving. That means everyone has to know about the importance of effective share pricing and therefore the good that share buybacks and the right kind of insider-trading can achieve.

Onward.

And buy CTP shares if you can afford to hold them long enough to make an absolute killing.* And buy MST shares if you can afford even to lose a little bit of money to keep this lethal technology in-country and their staff ready to pin their ears back to help us in an emergency.

Access to Energy. Muscular Independence. Peace through superior firepower.

((((Full disclosure. Sadly I cannot hold shares for long myself. My debts and paltry resources mean I’ll be trading in and out of my favourite shares whether they are going up or down in the medium-term. Sometimes getting locked out until the price recovers. I’m not recommending this behaviour unless you can monitor things the whole time. Always bid lower then the going price if you have to walk away from the market. That can be hard but not if you have fallen for a basket of different shares. I say “fallen for” because you ought not buy shares that you are a stranger to unless you are some full-time trader with faster feet then anyone else. Whenever I sell these shares its like Homer Simpson hearing that his aunty has died and left him all this wealth. Its like he’s crying “Poor aunt such and such” and then in between sobs he’s also saying “Whoopee”. Its just terrible to have to sell out for $400 here, $95 there, $732 over there. Terrible but kind of neat as well.))))

Central Petroleum/Put In A Low-Ball Bid.

I’m almost tapped out myself. I wish I had more to invest on this no-lose situation. And yet the price keeps falling for now. So there is still a chance for any of my readers to get some advice from a qualified financial professional. Cobble together a few coins. Do all your due diligence on this company. And put in a low-ball bid on this one. The market seems so soft right now you’ve still got plenty of time. Its like what Julius Ceaser said “Make Haste Slowly”. Which of course means start right now but get everything done and don’t leap out there incautsiously until all your due diligence is done.

No need to rush really. Just get started with the process. The market looks so very soft if you get started now you are bound to still get these shares dirt cheap.

I don’t know when the incredible reality is going to sink in. It seemed to the other day and there was a burst of activity. But 160 trades on and getting towards midday the magic of the market had satiated all the lust and the share was then oversold and has been oversold since. I’m not asking you to bid it up aggressively. Matter of fact its in my interests for the price to stay low until I can get it together to get hold of more loot. But really one would kick oneself if one didn’t at least put in a low-ball bid and pick up a small parcel of these babies.

Its in my interests that the share stays cheap and gets cheaper. But its not in the companies interests and its not in the countries interests. Since if the share price can go high and stay high and relatively stable then these guys will find it easier to get financing at reasonable terms and it will help them with their various joint ventures.

Here is the news out today:

TO: Manager, Company Announcements ASX Limited 09.06.05
CONTACT: John Heugh +61 8 9474 1444

REPORT OUTLINES “ULTRA-CLEAN” FUEL POTENTIAL OF NT/SA BORDER COAL SEAMS
Vast potential resources of coal described as a viable Exploration Target in an area of the
Simpson Desert straddling the South Australian-Northern Territory border could yield a major
source of highly marketable “ultra-clean” middle distillate fuels through modern underground
coal gasification technologies, according to an independent report by Mulready Consulting
Services released today.

The independent report, prepared for Perth-based Central Petroleum Limited (ASX: “CTP”)
estimates that a “best” case recoverable prospective resource of 1.25 trillion barrels of liquid
petroleum products produced by “syngas” in a Gas to Liquids (GTL) process may be possible
from Central’s tenements, which cover a large portion of the Pedirka Basin.

Central said the findings added weight to its goal to develop a large-scale GTL processing plant
in Alice Springs, to produce “ultra-clean” diesel, jet fuel or naphtha for a global market driven by
the trend to more energy-efficient vehicles.

“The recent emergence of sophisticated Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) and GTL
technologies in Australia is paving the way for us to possibly unlock a huge unutilised potential
resource in Central Australia, and create a UCG/GTL operation of major national significance,”
Central Petroleum’s Managing Director, Mr John Heugh, said.

Today’s report follows Central’s announcement earlier this year of a one-trillion-tonne plus
black coal Exploration Target at between 200 and 1,000 metres depth within the Early Permian
Purni Formation of the Pedirka Basin, including significant coal thicknesses of well over 100
metres of cumulative coal seams.

“The Mulready report estimates that the “best” case (mid-case) syngas prospective resource
which may be available via UCG processes in our Pedirka Basin petroleum acreage could
produce about 1.25 trillion barrels of liquid gas in a GTL plant or plants, which would be
sufficient to fuel a 140,000 barrel-a-day gas-to-liquids plant for about 27,000 years,” Mr Heugh
said. “The UCG technology has not been proven at large commercial scale in the west however
and the Exploration Target remains just that until more wells are drilled.”
“In this era of growing energy efficiency and the desire for ever cleaner fuels, liquid
hydrocarbons are commanding a premium over gas and are much simpler to transport and
easy to sell not only for transport and electricity, but for the manufacture of chemicals,
solvents, fertilizers, and numerous other consumer products.

“We are looking at the findings of this report alongside our pre-feasibility study into the potential
for a large-scale GTL plant, which we believe could attract commercial interest from one of the
larger global petroleum corporations,” Mr Heugh said.

“With global markets of clean liquid petroleum products growing by the day, and the potential
for our domestic market to also grow rapidly if gas sales prices rise, we believe there is a huge
market for these products and certainly these factors may be enough to justify construction of
a GTL plant or plants if such resources are eventually defined by further drilling.”

“Our early drilling results also suggest that the coals in the Pedirka Basin have reasonably fit for
purpose qualities and adequate macro and micro permeability, which are fundamental
parameters for UCG production,” he said.

Why Is The Usurpation Of The American Presidency An Important Subject For Australians To Discuss And Resolve?

Because they are our most important ally. We are part of any global debate, and this fellow will systematically ruin and destroy this Republic, leaving it to split up, or if not become something of a rogue nation. What is more we may be able to offer our American friends the gift of objectivity and distance.

Rampant inflation affects the nature of a country. Makes it more viscious and callous. Even though Americans generally are known for their generosity of spirit and humane bearing, these are characteristics less well known to the Washington lifers and some of the big-shots in New York. The rampant inflation that is to follow, will make pigs more upwardly mobile and bring the pigishness within most people to the surface.

Its a funny question that you ask me Pete. Its like you are living in a dream world or something. Its like you’ve done the one thing you cannot do epistemologically. Which is assume a preferred conclusion and put the proof bar up high for any other alternative.

Imagine thinking that it didn’t matter having a Usurper and the rampant practice of fraud and illegality break out in a nation where the leader memorises nuclear code daily.

For one thing the USA was never meant to be a democracy. Its supposed to be a Republic under law. And it can only function well on that basis. Now that this has all been dispensed with the whole place is becoming a sort of gigantic airbrushed Pakistan. Its Barryland. Cook County and surrounding districts. Barry probably figures that if he doesn’t manage to destroy the USD (which he will manage) then at least he’ll have a patronage system on the fly and fundamentally a one party state.

Barry has made it clear he is going to pull the rug out from underneath his allies with his honeyed trashing of Israels right to exist. So he’s setting the world up for nuclear war. Plus for any of us to stand up to Chaina without being assasinated we have to have a functioning superpower who takes it seriously that Chaina is her one strategic threat. Chainese (incorrect spelling to slip through search engines) spies can be upgraded to control public opinion in this very manner ifsoever the USA isn’t focused on pinning her act to the mainland.

You see the post-war pretense that all countries ought to be more or less equal will fall away the moment its clear that America is not on the job. So suddenly we are back the medieval setup of vassal states. Pledging allegience to people you hate. Getting down in the dirt and begging for your life and in so doing degrading the status of the people you are representing.

Already Chaina has interfered in our elections. But in the case of the US we appear to have a foreign plant and a total subversion of democracy. With no chance of even McCains sudden resources and resurgence in the primaries being investigated. Like they set up someone for Barry to beat right under our noses.

Barry’s election had a warm-up drill. A trial run. This was in Kenya. The two elections have to be seen as a one-two operation. With the Kenyan usurpation a warm-up for the American one. The Kenyan election was also a test to see if Barry was still one of the “good guys.”