We would be able to know quite a bit actually. If NASA and the science workers didn’t have so many articles of faith/baggage they keep carrying around.
On Mars there are river-beds still in good condition. So what does this tell us? It tells us that Mars had a thicker atmosphere not long ago. Because only with a thicker atmosphere can you hold liquid water. But it tells us something else as well.
Mars used to have an orbit that was closer to the sun. Or else it would not have had liquid water. So Mars was closer to the sun, which means closer to us, and with a reasonably thick atmosphere and liquid water. So already we know that Mars was closer to the sun, with an atmosphere and liquid water and now we know that Mars is further from the sun, without much of an atmosphere and with no liquid water.
Well what does this tell us? It would tell us quite a lot if the conclusions that come straight out of the above were not considered verbotten by NASA and the science worker/public servants.
Obviously something happened to Mars to:
1. Rob it of most of its atmosphere
2. Boot it out of its current orbit and send it further from the sun.
3. After it was robbed of its atmosphere the water that didn’t freeze under some ground cover evaporated off.
Consequently there will be enormous amounts of water on Mars. But NASA and the public servants don’t want to know. They send a probe to the highlands to look for water and another to the North Pole to look for life remnants. Are they the stupidest people in the world or are they relying on the rest of us to be stupid?
What can cause a planet to be kicked out of its orbit and its atmosphere sucked away? The answer to that is very clear. Only a comet with a nucleus bigger than Mars could have done this. And it had to have happened thousands, rather than millions of years ago or the river beds would not now be in pristine condition.
Every year there are at least two planet-wide windstorms on Mars. This happens because the solid CO2 at each Pole sublimates. Its a really big deal. Particularly the South Pole sublimation. So much friction is created that the temperature of the whole planet briefly warms. There could be dormant plant life that could briefly spring to life under those conditions.
Apart from the bi-yearly windstorms pretty much everything I’m saying goes against the NASA/public servant sacred cows. Real science is interesting and vital to know. Public service science is both boring and suicidal. What do the windstorms tell us?
The windstorms tell us that the most recent trauma that Mars went through is very recent or the river beds would not now be visible.
All the above is clear enough apriori. But to add to that the traumatic events were witnessed and reported to us BY THE ANCIENTS as told to us by Immanuel Velikovsky. Its pretty much an open and shut case.
But NASA and science worker opinion tells us that nothing happens in the solar system apart from asteroids crashing. NASA tells us that comets are snowballs, which is not true and cannot be true. So when we hear about the snowball earth it occurs to no-one that the earth may also have been kicked into a more distant orbit. When we hear about the heat maximum of 55 million years ago it doesn’t occur to anyone that we may have been closer to the sun at one time. The latter occurrence is not so drastic to evade other explanations. But nonetheless it ought to be clear that our orbit does not stay the same all the time. Nor does that of all the other planets except perhaps for Jupiter. Nor was there ever any reason to believe in the NASA/public servant view of the tame solar system.
Mars really does seem to have been through the wars though. Its not a planet that has had just the one recent traumatic event. I would speculate that its violent history has to do with it being close to Jupiter. Thats where all the action is because Jupiters gravitational force means that many of the larger comets coming into the solar system are going to interact with Jupiter. And Mars being a close neighbor is going to cop more than its fair share of trouble.
Other signs of earlier trouble are the fact that one of its sides is more heavily cratered than the other. Couple this fact with the existence of the asteroid belt and we see that Mars was probably the moon of a big planet that exploded a long time ago with its remnant forming the asteroid belt. No other explanation comes close to explaining the cratered side of Mars and the asteroid belt. But the idea of an exploding planet is another idea that NASA and the public servants don’t wish to believe. Or don’t wish the rest of us to believe.
Actually the reality of liquid water on Mars gives us only two options. Mars was closer in and/or mars was the moon of a planet like Saturn. That is to say a planet that gives off vastly more energy than it receives. Other explanations for Mars having liquid water are not available. Much as I would like there to be three or more paradigms to judge in parallel they are just not there to judge.
Van Flandern put the explosion of the planet that Mars used to be a moon of at 65 million years ago. I don’t know how he came up with that. But I suspect it was because of a couple of big asteroids that hit earth during this time period. And thats a pretty reasonable assumption to be making. But its the pristine nature of the river beds that tell us that the latest violence to Mars was very recent.
The record is clear then. All physical evidence on Mars and Venus tells us that Velikovsky was right. And that Carl Sagan, NASA, and those other unscientific pratts were wrong. The ancients reported that a big comet came on in with a companion, interacted with Mars, and also with Earth (on two occasions) and then went on to become the planet Venus.
And this tells us that our species has to get rid of its big governments, its fractional reserve practices, its wars, and its parasitical big-corporatism …………… and we have to start preparing for the next nasty comet that comes through. Or for other disasters. All this also tells us that we have to conquer space in a very big way if we don’t wish to go extinct.
Because while we don’t face quite the hazards that Mars likely faces, still one day we will be caught out. We need our buildings to be stronger on earth. We need to be in more of a survival mode as if we were geared up to face nuclear war by purely defensive means. And we need to have a great deal of our populations in space. Turns out this is easier than we thought. Because there is an immense amount of electrical energy in space which would allow human life to thrive out there.
Also now that we know that Mars had a closer orbit, had water, and had a substantial atmosphere not that long ago, there is really no longer the need to look the other way when we see such clear evidence of our former colonisation of Mars. (Or someone elses former colonisation of Mars.) It wasn’t that very far away. There is no need to pretend that what we see on Mars isn’t the remnants of industrial outposts. Thats what it looks like and we ought to accept the evidence as it stands.
But then thats another idea that NASA and the public servants have an irrational and dogmatic fatwah against.
“Fisky” has drawn attention to a documentary that blows the lid off the origins of Islam and the cause of the great Arab conquests.
What is going on here is proxy war against the Roman Empire. The invention of Islam being made after the fact to consolidate the gains and cover the tracks of the third party sponsors. And actually when he gets to the Jerusalem part of the story, with the contemporary testimony, we find what really happened. The Arab tribes were united under third party sponsorship and Jews were infiltrated into their leadership ranks. This is shown quite clearly and then deliberately dismissed by these guys pretending to be scientists, fearless but somewhat apologetic in the face of Muslim disapproval. But they are shown to be wimps who back down in the face of the Jew menace. History is about primary sources. And the only primary sources in this documentary that matter show Jew involvement in the uniting of the tribes and in proxy war against the Persians and Christians. And yet when they had their chance to be serious historians they back the fuck off and pronounce the eyewitnesses as “paranoid.”
To get a quick idea go in about 25 minutes and look at the rationalisations of the data for the next 10 minutes.
It was a faked event. No 15 year old Iranian was killed. The media is lying. And we can tell this by reading the stories in the daily mail last Thursday. But it may very well be the case that Curtis Cheng was murdered as part of this plot. Lets see the footage of the kid killing Curtis Cheng if it is the kid who is to blame.
I am making this determination on the basis of the sort of newspaper stories we got of incidents that were later proved to be fake events. Specifically the Boston Marathon bombing and the Sandy Hook shootings. These were both proven to be staged events where no-one died. Although with these things we expect targeted killings to stop participants from getting loose-tongued.
Daily telegraph October 8 2015. First page three cops impossible to identify due to their paramilitary clobber. And a big bloke with his face blocked out. Three headlines, but reading the actual articles shows absolutely no audit trail to any of this shit? Why is the teenager held to be an Iranian? So that his arab schoolmates cannot pin him down as a non-Muslim crisis actor.
First articles has mixed up “terror raids” where four adults were arrested. There is a claim that two teenage brothers were “go-betweens” and put a gun in the hands of the 15 year old in the play-acting. The other side of the transaction is held to be a notorious Middle Eastern crime family. Not notorious to me so who are they? Don’t know. Dog ate my homework.
Pages 2 and 3. Not a single photo where you can identify a single individual. Except for Omarjan Azari. Probably an agent. All the rest are obscured. In these faked events you never have heard of the journalists before. The writing never produces an audit trail. Most stories are written by two or three journalists supposedly.
“They wouldn’t give a f … what the gun was used for,” a senior police source told The Daily Telegraph.”
This alleged quote was in the newspaper version as well. I am using it as an example to show how all these stories are constructed. There is almost nothing to track down if you yourself wanted to investigate matters. In the newspaper version the photo of the kid looks like an artists rendition. Its a photo that looks like its been translated to a picture. It does not look like a real photo.
What about the family of the killer in this story? Well no news of the parents. This fellow does not seem to have parents. Even an immaculately conceived Jew has place-holders so where is Mum and Dad? But he does have a sister in the story. And the Turkish police are said to be looking for his sister. Its another nothing story. Nothing to check. The elder sister is said to have flown out to either Syria or Iraq? Why these two? The flight was for Istanbul in this story and the kid in this fantasy is Iranian. Well it may be to cast aspersions on Arabs and on Syria. But the kid had to be Iranian, since if he was even a real crisis actor, that they placed into a few classes in Parramatta for a year, he would be a sephardic Jew. Which means amongst Iranians he may have a hard time passing for an Iranian at his age. And amongst Lebanese students he could have been hard put trying to be an Arab. So he has to be someone other than the students in Sydney.
“He’s f … ed in the head, he’s crazy, he has a mental problem,” said one classmate……”
Other classmates described the 15-year-old as “really secretive”, “quiet”, “creepy” and somebody who got “too close” when he talked to others.”
I guess none of them wanted to be named either? Or need not be named because of their youth. So it goes all the way through. The Jews concocting this nonsense do so in such a way that nothing can be checked.
“The manager of the Parramatta kebab shop Jabar frequented with his family said he was a reserved and shy boy who offered little more than “hello” when greeted.” Just the confident swaggering psychopath you would expect to go on a shooting rampage? No. More like a planted crisis actor who does not wish to be profiled correctly so says as little as he can.
If he is a crisis actor then he is best just to show up in a few places and say as little as possible. So he has a family now? And yet in none of these stories do we have any detail about the mother and father. Only a sister thought to have flown to Istanbul. They just pile in the detail, yet none of the detail that you could ever fact-check or follow up.
Now look at this bullshit video:
For starters the cop is not professional at all. BECAUSE he steps into the line of fire. He has to step into the line of fire in order to give himself the excuse to kill the kid. Because the kid has to die in this pantomime. So they paste over this unprofessional behaviour (walking into the open) by relentless suggestion of his bogus bravery.
Secondly the kid is Iranian, but he’s shouting out in Arabic???? Its the old Mossad Allah Akbar standard last words. He’s wearing Middle Eastern clobber. Not normal clothes. Idiocy. Just their way of damaging relations between communities.
Worst of all we see detail after detail after detail of non-auditable detail ….. But nothing which proves that the kid killed Curtis. Well it must be true if Curtis is dead right? But this is not how false flags work. All the footage could be pre-shot, then they murder Curtis, then it takes them a lot longer to construct a good story to link the kid to the murder they themselves have committed. Or alternatively all the pictures for the papers could be sorted in advance ….. the news stories (not to do with the police roundup) could have been pre-drafted. The rodeo could have happened in realtime, in order to get witness reaction footage. In which case the shootout would have to be rigorously rehearsed.
If the shootout was pre-shot on the other hand; Note the jump cut between the officer shooting and the kid playing possum on the ground. I think they had the other officers bugger off-screen again, so the jump in the action would not be too challenging for the director. Being as he only has to deal with a fudged out kid lying on the ground, and one fat cop.
See the lame story about the Turkish police wanting to know about the sister? The Turkish police would not give a toss about any of this. You could hunt down Turkish police all day and all night and there won’t be one of these netted scoundrels that could honestly confess to having this make-believe sister in his IN-tray. The story is really about explaining what happened to the kids family.
Well the sister fucked off right? So thats partly dealt with. Where are the parents? A team of monkeys locked in a room full of typewriters are working around the clock to explain the strange lack of parental ANYTHING in this story.
They dealt with the sister last Thursday, and they will have conjured something about the parents some time or other. But it will take a lot of coffee since we know that Jews aren’t the least bit fucking creative.
Lets look at the video again. First 30 seconds note that its our old friends at seven news. The cocksuckers who besmirched themselves with the siege false flag not that long ago. What a disgrace that was, and it was a proven false flag. Next we have the kid firing indiscriminately. But its a cold day in the hearts of teenagers when such a person would not use his bullets to smash some of those mighty glass windows we see in front of the police station. Not plausible. Neither is the arabic bullshit to do with Allah Akbar. But this is standard Jewish fare.
By about 50 seconds we see that he’s been shooting in the vicinity of toddlers. But these are the most placid toddlers in the world. No-one is agitated that there is a gunman nearby. No confusion or activity or screaming.
At 65 seconds the second cop is out of shot and the first cop goes into freeze frame. At 67 seconds in comes the over-dub. Some agent with remote diagnosis abilities is using the power of suggestion to tell us what is going on. Now consider the distance. “Oh ………. he’s-dead” says the narrator we never knew we had. Not “he’s been shot …. Should I call the ambulance?” No the remote-doctor has to get on his own soundtrack of the video he’s shooting to use his psychic powers to pre-empt the experts at the hospital. He can tell that the 15 year old has died instantly through sheer Jew-Voodoo. “Oh ……….. he’s-dead” says the narrator with total certainty, total confidence, total finality. They do not just save the Jew-Voodoo for their physics.
Now in this regard we have none of the usual details about the ambulance men trying to save the kid and he is pronounced dead at 5.17 pm at such-and-such hospital or any of the usual legal procedure. No need for that when you have a forced-suggestion-overdub to tell you what is going on.
Now just a note at 58 seconds. “As two SPECIAL constables” What is so special about these constables? Why not two ordinary constables? Two mediocre constables? Why did it have to be two special constables? They had to be special constables because they are NO WAY ATTACHED TO THIS POLICE STATION. We cannot track these crisis actors.
“In the newspaper version the photo of the kid looks like an artists rendition.”
So what is this all about? Why this very strange airbrushed photo that looks almost like the work of an artist? Its pretty easy to understand if you see a photo of the kid. You see the problem is his Jewish nose. In the original photos he’s got this outrageous Hebe schnozzle that they have to somehow modify.
First the original newspaper shot:
Notice the superimposition of the sides of the nose on the corner of the eyes. They are trying to give this kid a normal symmetrical nose. A Jew hooter gives the game away.
And an example of subsequent and more realistic photographs.
This one is a little hard to see. But go to images and you will see what I mean. Comparing the newspaper photo with all the more realistic one and out comes the Sephardic Jew Nose. No doubt there is one young crisis actor with rhinoplasty in his near future.
Did these crisis actors follow competent Police procedure? Do the guys trying to control the rivers in Vietnam leave the boat? Does the soldier jump out of the tank? Is it brave to break cover and walk into the line of fire? No its stupid and irresponsible. Its runs against their training. Their job is to get the kid to drop the gun by shouting out demands to do just that. Then they shoot maybe. They are not to present themselves as a tempting target.
But consider if the crisis actor starts shouting out loudly for the kid to drop the gun? Well then we get to hear the crisis actors American or British accent. And that is just no good is it? We are not to hear the voice of the make-believe cop, Australian or otherwise. Because we are not meant to take an interest in these cops, since such interest would generate more tracks to cover. More enquiries to hose down.
The complicity of the fucking journalists is sickening. All that nonsense about police bravery they are trying to drum into the numb minds of their fluoride-drinking viewers. Suggestion suggestion suggestion. Bravery bravery bravery. If I stumble upon these journalists its a punch in the guts. I will note these “journalists” (ho ho) well. What a fucking disgrace channel 7 is. We should boycott them. I will never watch them again except on youtube to sample their lies.
This time go back and watch the video with the kids shooting style in mind. How do people shoot a .38 magnum Smith and Wesson? I had a look at a lot of videos on this matter and not one of them used the kids bent-armed single-handed technique. They all used two hands. Of course the recoil is less than the .357 or the .44. But you will search long and hard to find any grown men using one hand to shoot a .38 Smith and Wesson. Yet this skinny kid is not the least bit interested in the recoil of his weapon.
Still waiting for anything linking this kid to the murder of Curtis Cheng. If indeed such a murder happened at all. I think we are going to be waiting a long time. Jew typists getting writers block over this one. Order more coffee and pizza guys. Lets see what you come up with. Lets see how it compares to similar stories overseas. Since this is after all an international campaign.
Lets swing back to the kids in the kindergarten. So the 15 year old was within 10 metres of these defenceless kiddies? Is that so? What time is this pantomime alleged to have taken place? Its already 4.30 pm when Curtis was alleged to have been killed. Were the kids still there? Had their Mamas taken them home? Well the “journalist” SAID they were still there. What if we blew the picture up and found there to be no kids there? What would this mean for the motives of the people who wrote the “journalists” lines? Don’t these kids have homes to go to? Is that why the 15 year old had to die in this story? Because he shot his gun off aimlessly (literally) to close to the toddlers WHO WEREN’T THERE?
How about damage to the building? Are we to say that if the kid was just shooting bullets in the air, the idea is to go out and kill him without demanding that he put the gun down? Well he killed Curtis didn’t he? So far nothing has emerged to suggest he did, and yet the police acted as if he was not just goofing off. How did they know one way or another in this farcical story? So where is the property damage? What windows were smashed? Where are the bullet holes?
A lot of time has passed already and still no talk of the parents. Where is the photograph of the sister that high-tailed it to Constantinople in this fantasy? Lets find out more about the sister, if the Jew writers are not to lazy to make a few things up.
Its a weeks later and the Jews have the Wikipedia page on the incident up. It now seems that they are wrapping a false flag up with a somewhat pre-emptive harassment of a few kids. Proactive policing integrated with false flag terrorism and entrapment. You would have to say that this sort of thing could definitely WORK. It could easily draw out potential extremists before they do anything serious. This multi-faceted project would be compartmentalised of course. One compartment practicing pre-emptive policing. Another setting up the patsies. Incitement coming in from Jewish ISIS overseas. So now the cops have to try tenuously to establish links between these minor miscreants and this make-believe event. Which makes sense because it will seem credible if some chunk of this bullshit story is workshopped through minor hoodlums to give it all a manufactured reality.
“At 4:30 p.m., the assailant killed 58-year-old police civilian accountant Curtis Cheng as he was walking out of the building. The shooter remained at the scene and continued firing into the police headquarters. He was shot dead by one of three special constables who responded to the shooting.”
Bingo. Proof that this is all lies. Where was the dead body of Curtis WHEN THE PANTOMIME WAS CREATED??? Here we are not speculating whether Curtis is real or was killed or not. What we are saying is where was he, where was the ambulance, and where was the murder scene WHEN THE ALLEGED SHOOTOUT WAS FILMED!!!!!!! See they are full of shit. They had this one cut, edited and in the can prior to the Curtis killing and the raids on these other kids. Or at least one part of the story is pre-shot, the other done real-time but rehearsed to the nth degree.
Look more bullshit. Now supposing you are tracking down the sister? Where is his sister? She flew to constantinople? So where is her apartment? Where is her stuff?
So look what we have here:
“It has emerged that his sister Shadi may have been attempting to reach Iraq or Syria the day before the shooting as she flew out of Australia on a flight bound for Istanbul on Thursday.
She reportedly took all her belongings with her, according to the ABC.”
So she took all her stuff YOU FUCKING CUNTS? She took all her gear? What in a fucking suitcase? Or did she have two fucking suitcases? I hate these fucking lying cunts. I hate them so very very much. And look at how they pass the buck. “According to the ABC.” I bet if you went to the ABC they would be referencing some other liar.
Now how about the body? Where is the body? What about the autopsy and the coroners report? How about the funeral?
So supposing someone asks Where is the funeral? Do they say “Dog ate my homework”?
Here is how they handled it:
“Officials at the mosque where the radicalised 15-year-old Muslim shooter who killed a police accountant once frequented say they would ‘never’ hold his funeral at the place of worship.”
Someone else at the Mosque says his family should hold the funeral. What fucking family? This is a crisis actor there is no fucking family. Well so where is the family? There was a sister, but she left for Constantinople with all her belongings tied to the end of a stick like Dick Wittington. How she going to hold a funeral? But you see these guys just show up at the Mosque and get enough statements to craft all their excuses from.
So supposing you are wanting to investigate this matter and find out when his funeral is. Well you are shit out of luck. But the news stories are just an endless series of excuses for the facts not being available.
How about the autopsy. We have to believe that this autopsy is being done at Glebe and the report WILL BE handed to the coroner.
This is the answer to the question “Where is the fucking coroner report?” Even if they come up with one they are already admitting it will be as the result of something cooked up in Glebe and handed to the coroner.
Meanwhile this kid looks like he is going to spend a great deal of time in the morgue. Since they don’t have a body to conduct a funeral with so they are busy inventing reasons why we won’t have a funeral anytime soon. He will spend much time in the morgue, except in reality the Jew crisis actor will already be out of the country, feeling just fine and a lot richer. A nose job in his near future.
Jabbar’s sister Shadi has not returned (because she does not exist). The story is she lit out for Byzantium which explains her non-existence. Well how about her gear? Where is her stuff? The writers explain her absence of gear by claiming that she took all her stuff with her just one day before her brother decides to shoot a Chinaman. How is that for eventfulness in one family, just in 48 hours? “Well big sister is gone, lets kill a Chinese guy.”
I would say you cannot make this stuff up. But they did make it all up. So did she take all her gear in one suitcase or two? What does an extremist chick need anyhow? Two Burka’s, a Koran and a box of tampons and Shadi is good to go. The people who are REALLY responsible for violence always ascribe super-powers to those who are filled with religious belief. This is simply because they can use religious difference to cause trouble between two communities. Religious belief, in and of itself, is not a cause of violence. The history that claims it is, ignores third party incitement.
But all their jive about Shadi is the culprits admitting that there is no audit trail or evidence for family members of this crisis actor. We ought to start a new cult of Shadi. It appears that religions are often conjured around people who never existed. Her flight to Istanbul can become an iconic moment in the fabricated religion.
Jew physics is all lies. And its boring once you are out of your early teens. Unless it becomes an ego-crutch for those of us good at maths and nothing else. But Jew physics is oh so boring yet real physics is fantastically interesting. As we can prove by reference to Bruce Lee.
Now in enter the dragon Bruce was emaciated and down to the 120 pounds I believe. But in way of the dragon he was still a skinny and slight man. I would estimate that he was only in the 150’s. A very little guy. Nothing can defy the laws of physics. So its interesting when we see him do things that SEEM to defy REAL physics. Of course we leave Jew physics aside.
Now if you look at the kick at 2.13 in you see something that ought not physically be possible. And it requires some explaining and it leads to the young man understanding the upside potential of getting things right. Our young blokes are luckier than Bruce Lee should they attempt to replicate his awesome discoveries in the world of physics. For they have access to energetic medicine, nootropics, and better fringe theory, and so if they cannot reproduce what Bruce was able to do they ought to hang their head in shame and present themselves to their mother for a good ass-whipping.
After thinking about the physics at 2.13 you may also avail yourself of the even more awesome lecture at 3.32.
Now some of you of my vintage will be making farting noises out your mouth. You will be saying ….” Ho ho. So this little man made another little man fly across the room? Big deal. I used to watch Mike Jordan FUCKING FLY!!!!! Well for starters I have seen Bruce make Joe Lewis disappear in the same way. And Joe was a fairly substantially built individual, who went on to become one of the greatest fighters that ever lived. Secondly the whole sentiment is an attempt to fight magic with magic. Real physics is magical. Jew physics is boring. But I want to move like Mike. Mike Jordan defies normal understandings of human mechanics. So that is what the enquirer should focus on.
Now I am aware there are many racists amongst us. For my part I only disrespect elite Jew pigs and no-one else. I hope that even the most unrighteous racist amongst you understands, that you simply must respect any swarthy man who can fly.
No matter how old we get, we still have these aspirations. I want to move like Mike. Now I am NOT an homosexual. But I must say, for a cue-ball, he’s a damn fine-looking man:
When I was doing my Level 2 swimming coaching courses we had the fantastic Russian coach but we also had this biomechanics fellow. So we analysed why this Cricketeer had back problems, how the elephant swum, how the baseballers were someways ahead of the cricket guys and all things biomechanics. But then we touched on Mike Jordan, and we kind of come up blank.
“But Mamma. Thats where the fun is”
You see the magic of real physics, not Jew physics comes, when at first inspection you CANNOT same to be able to explain how Bruce and Mike were able to do the things they did. And if a good coach can investigate these things, and come up with some preliminary model as to how this seeming alchemy can be true, then he can have an edge over the others.
You see over and over and over again the biomechanist emphasised to us that our analysis must start from the premise that “nothing defies biomechanics” ….. But then we started looking at Mike Jordan and it was almost an embarrassment. He said off the cuff that Mike DEFIED physics and we quickly went on to other things. But I was blinded by the light.
The exquisite timing necessary for a skinny fellow to send a bigger bloke flying backward bears some thinking about. Its an whole body thing. With special emphasis on the torso, despite the fact that in this case the torso barely moves. Joe Lewis remarked that Bruce spent a lot of time on his “stabiliser muscles.” By this I think he means (to a large extent) the torso. I think here Joe gives away the secret of the bizarre physics of Bruce. The capacity of such a scrawny little guy to send people flying across the room like a magic trick.
In my time as a swimmer and a coach we vastly under-estimated the role of the torso. I finally understood its importance towards the end of my coaching career. But the boxers had developed a sort of pseudo-understanding of this by almost purely Darwinian methodology; those who did not use the medicine ball, and did not skip all the time got knocked out. Skipping and medicine ball are absolutely part of boxing but it strikes me that there probably wasn’t a clear explanation all those decades as to why this would be the case.
Skipping is absolutely necessary since foot placement (even during periods of compromised consciousness) is necessary to be able to instinctively get the feet in the right place, to convey force all the way from the back foot, through the torso, to the knuckle, and to the victim. There doesn’t seem to be an upper limit as to how much you can improve on your capacity to do this.
In boxing the most extremist example of what I am talking about would seem to have been demonstrated by Buzz-Cut Tua. Every punch that the younger Tua threw had that torso component. He was a bit of a jab and straight punch snob. He only liked to bother himself with punches that could, in theory, knock the other fellow clean out. I am a bit of an empathetic sissy, and I kind of feel the hurt. So I am very very glad that the referee practice got to be a lot tighter before Tua was launched against the Americans. Because any hesitation in calling off a lost fight, would have had Tua actually kill these motherfuckers in broad daylight.
Whereas Ali stopped and watched Foreman fall, Tua would deliver at least two extra superfluous (from the point of winning the match) potentially hospitalising punches (each one individually) before the poor bastard he was destroying, had the fucking chance to even fall peacefully to the ground.
There was many reasons was I was such a crap freestyler and really only had even the potential to compete at the high levels in 200m butterfly. Small hands and feet for starters. But one of them was simply because I had no idea of the implications of how the torso needed to be trained, so as to be conditioned well in advance for race-pace. But physics of water drag makes this subject very complicated so I cannot go into it here.
Little blokes today ought easily be able to replicate this capacity that Bruce had for the one-inch and six-inch punch. I am not joking. No-one is superhuman. Its just that Bruce must have innovated decades ahead of the others. Here we will show how he did this. There is footage of other martial artists who have replicated what Bruce developed.
Today you have all these amino acids and various other potions to help with training. But though his torso moves only millimetres, any young bloke trying to replicate this has to realise that just because the torso barely moves, doesn’t mean that much if not most of your training ought not focus around the mid-section. This is the physics that I speak of with Bruce. So there is the element of the magician going on here. You do not look at the secret. The secret is the torso. But you never know it because the torso barely moves.
But I still cannot quite make sense of Mike. Although I am sure a High-Jump coach could have a lot to say about that subject.
Joe Lewis developed an ideology to do with the three knuckle punch in boxing. He got it from direct boxing lineage from Dempsey. His teachers teachers teacher was Dempsey. I like watching the elder Joe Lewis boxing because to me its like a slowed down Roberto Duran. And there is not much footage of Duran in his prime. I see the Joe Lewis three-knuckle ideology as part of the short guy strategy, which emphasises the torso, and having a superior inside-game.
The short man is safer when he’s in real close or right out of range. Joe would lecture on the diagonal punch with three knuckle contact. My old friends and relatives are deriding me now because they know I could not box for shit (although I did get quite a bit better after the time period they will be deriding me over). But my own deficiencies are not the point. I am approaching this as a former swimming coach, who theorised a lot about biomechanics.
Now consider you are a shorter man with the strongest, and most explosive, torso in boxing. And you are right up against some big bastard. Real bad breath close. In a fight to the death it would be grappling that mattered. But I am talking here about boxing. If you apply Joes ideology of the diagonal punch, and you have the most explosive torso in boxing, this would seem to be an absolute killer advantage. Because as a short man you can do a lot more damage to these monsters, real up close, then they can do to you. The diagonal punch close up allows you to take advantage of superior torso explosiveness. The Joe Lewis diagonal inside punch gives you room to do all this damage inside, and then get the hell out of there before the monster knows what the hell happened.
In most sports its the torso that has been neglected.
Here is Dan Inosanto testifying that when Bruce boxed he was a slugger. Like a midget Joe Frazier. He would work the heavy bag and bash it.
Also Joe testifies that Bruce punched like a heavyweight. Well this is ridiculous on the face of it. All things being equal, a 138 pound man ought not be able to punch in a way that competes with people 1.5-2 times his weight. There is no superhuman and the laws of physics cannot be repealed on the basis of the cult of personality. So these are important insights I am talking about here.
The only explanation is really in the idea that FOR HIS TIME he had developed TOTALLY superior explosive conditioning in those muscles that can rotate the spine. I think Joe gave the whole game away when he reminisced about Bruce focusing on his quote “stabiliser muscles”. Its just that I don’t characterise these as stabiliser muscles. I think these are the engine. I think these are the motor. Its like when I saw Ian Thorpe when he was 15. Sure he had pretty good triceps and lats. But the real secret was in the torso.
So here I think I have helped unwrap part of the Bruce Lee mystery physics. His mental concentration is a thing of wonderment and amazement I suppose, but the young blokes ought to easily best him with their access to nootropics. But to unwrap the Mike Jordan mystery, we would have to go and dig deep into the high-jump and long-jump coaching literature. Maybe by revealing these mysteries I am taking away some of the magic. But I tell you that REAL physics is always magical. Its only Jew physics that becomes a tedious brain drain once you are out of your teens. This is how the bigshots want it. They don’t want us to master gravity and cheap energy.
Joe ought to have been resting here. Instead of conducting this seminar. People can die way too early if they don’t rest when they need to. I could show dozens of better Joe Lewis seminars taking from youtube. But this one shows some sort of essence of the extremist conceptual take of this thread. You may find out way more about boxing from his other lectures. But this lecture, where he should really have been lying down and having some chicken soup, most closely shows what I have been talking about:
I don’t think I should end this thread on such a somber note. The martial artist lacked the fear of ANYTHING, and so kept working when he should have been resting. So just to end on a better note lets have an example of Joe Lewis lecturing when he was very healthy. You never quite understand just how lethal this fellow is until the end of the clip when he is showing how to finish folks off with a hook coming so fast as to have no mode of avoidance.
Here is Danny Lewin. Murderer of innocent passengers during 9/11. Trained killer, he did not go into 9/11 green. So he has killed before, killed during 9/11 and is still at large, and has to be assumed to be killing still. So the Jews name streets after him.
Of course he will look different now. He will be 14 years older and he will have had some plastic surgery to hide his identity. But he’s still the same scumbag and he will need to be brought to justice. He’s easy to find also. Because all you do is follow his wife and children around. Easy to find but hard to take down. He is a living weapon. Which is why this Jew story of him being killed by midget Arabs with boxcutters is just ridiculous. We may as well say he was taken out by Smurfs using feathers. He was actually a specialist in foiling hijackings. If the situation had been real he could have colluded with the flight staff to sort things out. But the actual situation was for him to get the phone calls and then murder the innocent passengers.
From one evil bitch to the next:
This evil twat had a shady background in Hollywood. Enough time in that Jew citadel to be fully trained as an agent. She then went to a Jewish law school for two years. Both her parents were Jews. After school she was promoted to be a partner in a zionist law firm. No need to work for 20 years to become a partner if you are a Mossad agent. This law firm goes under three names but its really just one den of evil. It had a hand in stitching up Senator McCarthy on television back in the day. So its always been an instrument for Jew plotting. Anyway this bitch was a handler on one of the planes during 9/11. So she has to be considered one of the murderers of the passengers. Her public image was that of a conservative. One of the people who stuck up for Clarence Thomas when he was getting rained on. This is just Jew deep cover. They are cuckoo babies, and a lot of trouble is made to set them up as beloved in the eyes of the people who really matter.
The idea of the Jewish handlers was to arm-twist phone calls out of people then see to it that they went smoothly to their deaths. They make us conservatives fall in love with these people so that we want to go to war. Think of how many years this Jew was posing as a conservative. Its a bit like the Jew Hitler posing as a German nationalist when what he was really doing is setting up Germany for the takedown and founding the state of Israel. So these are tricks these people use again and again and again.
The answer that I gave is perhaps a little thin on the electrical effects that go into the formation of galaxies. The reason is that I do not understand much about how this side of things works. I need to go and read the old guys on the subject of electricity. People like J J Thomson and Steinmetz. People operating before the influence of team-Einstein and the Jew takeover ruined all our understanding of electricity and physics generally. Here is my answer:
The important thing to understand is that gravity has not had a scientifically valid update in more than 300 years. Its very evident now that it does not operate as advertised. In reality gravity is such that large objects like to orbit and not to crash. There are hundreds of millions of large objects all having some sort of gravitational attraction to each other. Yet no known crashes.
So orbits are very robust. Moons grow to planets grow to stars. Stars to bigger stars. Our sun may have been once a planet revolving around one of the big Orion stars. Looking at a single spiral arm I would assume that the very largest stars are in the centre of these bands. With generally smaller stars revolving around them. And these smaller stars, at any one time, being toward the outside of the spiral arm. So its kind of natural that over time that these bands would form. The spiral arms will never unwind. Because the velocity will be equalised between adjacent bands, because of these gravitational tendencies towards robust orbits and non-collision.
The solar wind amounts to an electrical current with a powerful positive charge. So there ought to be an electrical repulsive force between two stars that is not present between a star and a planet. This could well have a segregating effect on these bands.
Matter has a great deal of complexity. The construction of anything complex requires tasks in parallel and in series. It takes time. Therefore it must be ongoing. Old matter must assist in the construction of new matter or else new matter creation would be a separate miracle every moment. New matter creation therefore takes place inside of large objects. Therefore we see why the orbits of two large bodies must always grow larger and accelerate. Or matter would amalgamate, rather than orbit, meaning that no serious reality could ever have gotten started.
So yes galaxies grow larger. But if this process continued forever the universe would be crowded with mass. There is periodic culling. Every so often we expect Sagittarius A* to send out a shockwave culling moons, planets and stars.
Moons grow to planets grow to gas giants grow to stars and on to larger stars. But at any stage a shockwave from the centre can cause any of these to explode.
Why Newton’s laws of motion explain correctly the earth’s orbit but not mercury’s?
Where Mercury is concerned, Newtons formulation succeeded on one level and failed on another. Newtons formulation implied that there was a more oblate inner sun. A flatter inner sun means a faster spinning oceanic sun. Faster spinning and more dense. But Newtons formulation failed in terms of its projection of the relative mass of the sun. The formulae suggested that the sun was not particularly dense overall and so must have been made mostly of hydrogen.
The hydrogen sun thesis was a grave error. Since it lead to the fantasy of hydrogen self-compression. The problem is that we were probably still six decades or more away from being able to collect the necessary data to do a second draft on Newton’s good works at the turn of the century.
Its not so much that the situation was ripe for opportunistic abuse. Because what team Einstein got going went way beyond mere opportunism. It would be good if Einstein could simply be forgotten so we could get on with it. But we are not talking about yesterdays scandal.
So anyway Newtons setup did not do too badly. 50/50 with regards to Mercury. There is an inner water ocean. But the sun is not made of hydrogen.
In what way can the cosmic background radiation be construed as evidence for the big bang?
The CMBR cannot possibly be construed as some remnant of the Big Bang. This mantra is drummed into people with such ferocity because the CMBR is definitely proof of something. If NASA is reading things right and not accidentally reading something else, then the CMBR is proof of the aether.
Now this is not to say we need further proof of the aether. The existence of the aether is proven by the wave nature of light. But that the CMBR proves the aether and makes no possible logical inference for the Big Bang tells us why the oligarchy seeks to pummel everyone with the anti-logic mantra, to whit; CMBR implies Big Bang.
You see the pummelling has to go so far as to override the very logical faculties of the meme-disease spreader. There can be no letup. The denial of aether is the kingpin of science fraud. The mother of all science lies. The Big Bang is the most ambitious fairy tale ever told. So the oligarchy wants the Big Bang. The oligarchy does NOT want the aether.
So this meme-disease must be hammered in with extreme prejudice because its dual purpose. One mantra doing double duty nailing in two of the most important science lies the bigshots have.
The CMBR shines on all of us. It will hold you and your Andromeda girlfriend together when you are far apart. But I ask you: If the cosmic radiation is not the RESONANT FREQUENCY of the aether itself, then where the hell is this light shining from?
What is the cosmic background radiation
The CMBR is the luminiferous aether resonating.
True story. Accept no science lies.