Posted by: graemebird | October 10, 2015

There Was No Muslim Terrorist Attack In Sydney Last Week.

It was a faked event.  No 15 year old Iranian was killed. The media is lying.  And we can tell this by reading the stories in the daily mail last Thursday. But it may very well be the case that Curtis Cheng was murdered as part of this plot.  Lets see the footage of the kid killing Curtis Cheng if it is the kid who is to blame.

I am making this determination on the basis of the sort of newspaper stories we got of incidents that were later proved to be fake events.  Specifically the Boston Marathon bombing and the Sandy Hook shootings.  These were both proven to be staged events where no-one died.  Although with these things we expect targeted killings to stop participants from getting loose-tongued.

Daily telegraph October 8 2015.  First page three cops impossible to identify due to their paramilitary clobber.  And a big bloke with his face blocked out.   Three headlines, but reading the actual articles shows absolutely no audit trail to any of this shit?  Why is the teenager held to be an Iranian? So that his arab schoolmates cannot pin him down as a non-Muslim crisis actor.

First articles has mixed up  “terror raids” where four adults were arrested.  There is a claim that two teenage brothers were “go-betweens” and put a gun in the hands of the 15 year old in the play-acting.  The other side of the transaction is held to be a notorious Middle Eastern crime family.  Not notorious to me so who are they? Don’t know.  Dog ate my homework.

Pages 2 and 3.  Not a single photo where you can identify a single individual.  Except for Omarjan Azari.  Probably an agent.  All the rest are obscured.  In these faked events you never have heard of the journalists before.  The writing never produces an audit trail.  Most stories are written by two or three journalists supposedly.

“They wouldn’t give a f … what the gun was used for,” a senior police source told The Daily Telegraph.”

This alleged quote was in the newspaper version as well.  I am using it as an example to show how all these stories are constructed.  There is almost nothing to track down if you yourself wanted to investigate matters.  In the newspaper version the photo of the kid looks like an artists rendition.  Its a photo that looks like its been translated to a picture.  It does not look like a real photo.

What about the family of the killer in this story? Well no news of the parents.  This fellow does not seem to have parents. Even an immaculately conceived Jew has place-holders so where is Mum and Dad?  But he does have a sister in the story. And the Turkish police are said to be looking for his sister. Its another nothing story.  Nothing to check.  The elder sister is said to have flown out to either Syria or Iraq? Why these two? The flight was for Istanbul in this story and the kid in this fantasy is Iranian.  Well it may be to cast aspersions on Arabs and on Syria.  But the kid had to be Iranian, since if he was even a real crisis actor, that they placed into a few classes in Parramatta for a year, he would be a sephardic Jew.  Which means amongst Iranians he may have a hard time passing for an Iranian at his age.  And amongst Lebanese students he could have been hard put trying to be an Arab.  So he has to be someone other than the students in Sydney.

“He’s f … ed in the head, he’s crazy, he has a mental problem,” said one classmate……”

Other classmates described the 15-year-old as “really secretive”, “quiet”, “creepy” and somebody who got “too close” when he talked to others.”

I guess none of them wanted to be named either? Or need not be named because of their youth.  So it goes all the way through.  The Jews concocting this nonsense do so in such a way that nothing can be checked.

“The manager of the Parramatta kebab shop Jabar frequented with his family said he was a reserved and shy boy who offered little more than “hello” when greeted.” Just the confident swaggering psychopath you would expect to go on a shooting rampage? No.  More like a planted crisis actor who does not wish to be profiled correctly so says as little as he can.

If he is a crisis actor then he is best just to show up in a few places and say as little as possible.  So he has a family now? And yet in none of these stories do we have any detail about the mother and father.  Only a sister thought to have flown to Istanbul.   They just pile in the detail, yet none of the detail that you could ever fact-check or follow up.

Now look at this bullshit video:

For starters the cop is not professional at all.  BECAUSE he steps into the line of fire. He has to step into the line of fire in order to give himself the excuse to kill the kid.  Because the kid has to die in this pantomime.  So they paste over this unprofessional behaviour (walking into the open) by relentless suggestion of his bogus bravery.

Secondly the kid is Iranian, but he’s shouting out in Arabic???? Its the old Mossad Allah Akbar standard last words.   He’s wearing Middle Eastern clobber.  Not normal clothes.  Idiocy. Just their way of damaging relations between communities.

Worst of all we see detail after detail after detail of non-auditable detail ….. But nothing which proves that the kid killed Curtis.  Well it must be true if Curtis is dead right? But this is not how false flags work.  All the footage could be pre-shot, then they murder Curtis, then it takes them a lot longer to construct a good story to link the kid to the murder they themselves have committed. Or alternatively all the pictures for the papers could be sorted in advance ….. the news stories (not to do with the police roundup) could have been pre-drafted.  The rodeo could have happened in realtime, in order to get witness reaction footage.  In which case the shootout would have to be rigorously rehearsed.

If the shootout was pre-shot on the other hand; Note the jump cut between the officer shooting and the kid playing possum on the ground. I think they had the other officers bugger off-screen again, so the jump in the action would not be too challenging for the director. Being as he only has to deal with a fudged out kid lying on the ground, and one fat cop.

See the lame story about the Turkish police wanting to know about the sister? The Turkish police would not give a toss about any of this. You could hunt down Turkish police all day and all night and there won’t be one of these netted scoundrels that could honestly confess to having this make-believe sister in his IN-tray. The story is really about explaining what happened to the kids family.

Well the sister fucked off right? So thats partly dealt with. Where are the parents? A team of monkeys locked in a room full of typewriters are working around the clock to explain the strange lack of parental ANYTHING in this story.

They dealt with the sister last Thursday, and they will have conjured something about the parents some time or other. But it will take a lot of coffee since we know that Jews aren’t the least bit fucking creative.

Lets look at the video again.  First 30 seconds note that its our old friends at seven news.  The cocksuckers who besmirched themselves with the siege false flag not that long ago.  What a disgrace that was, and it was a proven false flag.  Next we have the kid firing indiscriminately.  But its a cold day in the hearts of teenagers when such a person would not use his bullets to smash some of those mighty glass windows we see in front of the police station. Not plausible.  Neither is the arabic bullshit to do with Allah Akbar.  But this is standard Jewish fare.

By about 50 seconds we see that he’s been shooting in the vicinity of toddlers.   But these are the most placid toddlers in the world. No-one is agitated that there is a gunman nearby. No confusion or activity or screaming.

At 65 seconds the second cop is out of shot and the first cop goes into freeze frame.  At 67 seconds in comes the over-dub.  Some agent with remote diagnosis abilities is using the power of suggestion to tell us what is going on.  Now consider the distance.  “Oh ………. he’s-dead” says the narrator we never knew we had.  Not “he’s been shot ….  Should I call the ambulance?” No the remote-doctor has to get on his own soundtrack of the video he’s shooting to use his psychic powers to pre-empt the experts at the hospital.  He can tell that the 15 year old has died instantly through sheer Jew-Voodoo. “Oh ……….. he’s-dead” says the narrator with total certainty, total confidence, total finality.  They do not just save the Jew-Voodoo for their physics.

Now in this regard we have none of the usual details about the ambulance men trying to save the kid and he is pronounced dead at 5.17 pm at such-and-such hospital or any of the usual legal procedure.  No need for that when you have a forced-suggestion-overdub to tell you what is going on.

Now just a note at 58 seconds.  “As two SPECIAL constables” What is so special about these constables? Why not two ordinary constables? Two mediocre constables? Why did it have to be two special constables?  They had to be special constables because they are NO WAY ATTACHED TO THIS POLICE STATION.   We cannot track these crisis actors.

“In the newspaper version the photo of the kid looks like an artists rendition.”

So what is this all about? Why this very strange airbrushed photo that looks almost like the work of an artist?  Its pretty easy to understand if you see a photo of the kid.  You see the problem is his Jewish nose.  In the original photos he’s got this outrageous Hebe schnozzle that they have to somehow modify.

First the original newspaper shot:

Notice the superimposition of the sides of the nose on the corner of the eyes.  They are trying to give this kid a normal symmetrical nose.  A Jew hooter gives the game away.

And an example of subsequent and more realistic photographs.

This one is a little hard to see.  But go to images and you will see what I mean.  Comparing the newspaper photo with all the more realistic one and out comes the Sephardic Jew Nose. No doubt there is one young crisis actor with rhinoplasty in his near future.

Did these crisis actors follow competent Police procedure? Do the guys trying to control the rivers in Vietnam leave the boat? Does the soldier jump out of the tank? Is it brave to break cover and walk into the line of fire? No its stupid and irresponsible.  Its runs against their training.  Their job is to get the kid to drop the gun by shouting out demands to do just that.  Then they shoot maybe.  They are not to present themselves as a tempting target.

But consider if the crisis actor starts shouting out loudly for the kid to drop the gun? Well then we get to hear the crisis actors American or British accent.  And that is just no good is it? We are not to hear the voice of the make-believe cop, Australian or otherwise.  Because we are not meant to take an interest in these cops, since such interest would generate more tracks to cover.  More enquiries to hose down.

The complicity of the fucking journalists is sickening.  All that nonsense about police bravery they are trying to drum into the numb minds of their fluoride-drinking viewers.  Suggestion suggestion suggestion.  Bravery bravery bravery.  If I stumble upon these journalists its a punch in the guts.  I will note these “journalists” (ho ho) well.  What a fucking disgrace channel 7 is.  We should boycott them.  I will never watch them again except on youtube to sample their lies.

This time go back and watch the video with the kids shooting style in mind.  How do people shoot a .38 magnum Smith and Wesson? I had a look at a lot of videos on this matter and not one of them used the kids bent-armed single-handed technique.  They all used two hands.  Of course the recoil is less than the .357 or the .44.  But you will search long and hard to find any grown men using one hand to shoot a .38 Smith and Wesson.  Yet this skinny kid is not the least bit interested in the recoil of his weapon.

Still waiting for anything linking this kid to the murder of Curtis Cheng.  If indeed such a murder happened at all.   I think we are going to be waiting a long time. Jew typists getting writers block over this one.  Order more coffee and pizza guys.  Lets see what you come up with.  Lets see how it compares to similar stories overseas.  Since this is after all an international campaign.

Lets swing back to the kids in the kindergarten.  So the 15 year old was within 10 metres of these defenceless kiddies? Is that so? What time is this pantomime alleged to have taken place? Its already 4.30 pm when Curtis was alleged to have been killed. Were the kids still there? Had their Mamas taken them home? Well the “journalist” SAID they were still there.  What if we blew the picture up and found there to be no kids there? What would this mean for the motives of the people who wrote the “journalists” lines? Don’t these kids have homes to go to? Is that why the 15 year old had to die in this story? Because he shot his gun off aimlessly (literally) to close to the toddlers WHO WEREN’T THERE?

How about damage to the building? Are we to say that if the kid was just shooting bullets in the air, the idea is to go out and kill him without demanding that he put the gun down?  Well he killed Curtis didn’t he? So far nothing has emerged to suggest he did, and yet the police acted as if he was not just goofing off.  How did they know one way or another in this farcical story? So where is the property damage? What windows were smashed? Where are the bullet holes?

A lot of time has passed already and still no talk of the parents. Where is the photograph of the sister that high-tailed it to Constantinople in this fantasy? Lets find out more about the sister, if the Jew writers are not to lazy to make a few things up.

Its a weeks later and the Jews have the Wikipedia page on the incident up.  It now seems that they are wrapping a false flag up with a somewhat pre-emptive harassment of a few kids.  Proactive policing integrated with false flag terrorism and entrapment.  You would have to say that this sort of thing could definitely WORK.  It could easily draw out potential extremists before they do anything serious.  This multi-faceted project would be compartmentalised of course.  One compartment practicing pre-emptive policing.  Another setting up the patsies. Incitement coming in from Jewish ISIS overseas.  So now the cops have to try tenuously to establish links between these minor miscreants and this make-believe event. Which makes sense because it will seem credible if some chunk of this bullshit story is workshopped through minor hoodlums to give it all a manufactured reality.

“At 4:30 p.m., the assailant killed 58-year-old police civilian accountant Curtis Cheng as he was walking out of the building. The shooter remained at the scene and continued firing into the police headquarters. He was shot dead by one of three special constables who responded to the shooting.[5][6][7]”

Bingo.  Proof that this is all lies.  Where was the dead body of Curtis WHEN THE PANTOMIME WAS CREATED??? Here we are not speculating whether Curtis is real or was killed or not.  What we are saying is where was he, where was the ambulance, and where was the murder scene WHEN THE ALLEGED SHOOTOUT WAS FILMED!!!!!!!  See they are full of shit.  They had this one cut, edited and in the can prior to the Curtis killing and the raids on these other kids. Or at least one part of the story is pre-shot, the other done real-time but rehearsed to the nth degree.

Look more bullshit. Now supposing you are tracking down the sister? Where is his sister? She flew to constantinople? So where is her apartment? Where is her stuff?

So look what we have here:

“It has emerged that his sister Shadi may have been attempting to reach Iraq or Syria the day before the shooting as she flew out of Australia on a flight bound for Istanbul on Thursday.
She reportedly took all her belongings with her, according to the ABC.”

So she took all her stuff YOU FUCKING CUNTS? She took all her gear? What in a fucking suitcase? Or did she have two fucking suitcases? I hate these fucking lying cunts. I hate them so very very much. And look at how they pass the buck. “According to the ABC.” I bet if you went to the ABC they would be referencing some other liar.

Now how about the body? Where is the body? What about the autopsy and the coroners report? How about the funeral?

So supposing someone asks Where is the funeral? Do they say “Dog ate my homework”?

Here is how they handled it:

“Officials at the mosque where the radicalised 15-year-old Muslim shooter who killed a police accountant once frequented say they would ‘never’ hold his funeral at the place of worship.”

Someone else at the Mosque says his family should hold the funeral. What fucking family? This is a crisis actor there is no fucking family. Well so where is the family? There was a sister, but she left for Constantinople with all her belongings tied to the end of a stick like Dick Wittington. How she going to hold a funeral? But you see these guys just show up at the Mosque and get enough statements to craft all their excuses from.

So supposing you are wanting to investigate this matter and find out when his funeral is. Well you are shit out of luck. But the news stories are just an endless series of excuses for the facts not being available.

How about the autopsy. We have to believe that this autopsy is being done at Glebe and the report WILL BE handed to the coroner.

This is the answer to the question “Where is the fucking coroner report?” Even if they come up with one they are already admitting it will be as the result of something cooked up in Glebe and handed to the coroner.

Meanwhile this kid looks like he is going to spend a great deal of time in the morgue.  Since they don’t have a body to conduct a funeral with so they are busy inventing reasons why we won’t have a funeral anytime soon.   He will spend much time in the morgue, except in reality the Jew crisis actor will already be out of the country, feeling just fine and a lot richer. A nose job in his near future.

Jabbar’s sister Shadi has not returned (because she does not exist). The story is she lit out for Byzantium which explains her non-existence. Well how about her gear? Where is her stuff? The writers explain her absence of gear by claiming that she took all her stuff with her just one day before her brother decides to shoot a Chinaman. How is that for eventfulness in one family, just in 48 hours? “Well big sister is gone, lets kill a Chinese guy.”

I would say you cannot make this stuff up. But they did make it all up. So did she take all her gear in one suitcase or two? What does an extremist chick need anyhow? Two Burka’s, a Koran and a box of tampons and Shadi is good to go.  The people who are REALLY responsible for violence always ascribe super-powers to those who are filled with religious belief.  This is simply because they can use religious difference to cause trouble between two communities.  Religious belief, in and of itself, is not a cause of violence.  The history that claims it is, ignores third party incitement.

But all their jive about Shadi is the culprits admitting that there is no audit trail or evidence for family members of this crisis actor.  We ought to start a new cult of Shadi.  It appears that religions are often conjured around people who never existed.  Her flight to Istanbul can become an iconic moment in the fabricated religion.

Posted by: graemebird | September 15, 2015

Faces Of Evil

Murderous Jews

Here is Danny Lewin.  Murderer of innocent passengers during 9/11.  Trained killer, he did not go into 9/11 green.  So he has killed before, killed during 9/11 and is still at large, and has to be assumed to be killing still.  So the Jews name streets after him.


Of course he will look different now.  He will be 14 years older and he will have had some plastic surgery to hide his identity.  But he’s still the same scumbag and he will need to be brought to justice.  He’s easy to find also.  Because all you do is follow his wife and children around. Easy to find but hard to take down.  He is a living weapon.  Which is why this Jew story of him being killed by midget Arabs with boxcutters is just ridiculous.  We may as well say he was taken out by Smurfs using feathers.  He was actually a specialist in foiling hijackings.  If the situation had been real he could have colluded with the flight staff to sort things out.  But the actual situation was for him to get the phone calls and then murder the innocent passengers.

From one evil bitch to the next:

This evil twat had a shady background in Hollywood.  Enough time in that Jew citadel to be fully trained as an agent.  She then went to a Jewish law school for two years.   Both her parents were Jews.  After school she was promoted to be a partner in a zionist law firm. No need to work for 20 years to become a partner if you are a Mossad agent. This law firm goes under three names but its really just one den of evil.  It had a hand in stitching up Senator McCarthy on television back in the day.  So its always been an instrument for Jew plotting. Anyway this bitch was a handler on one of the planes during 9/11.  So she has to be considered one of the murderers of the passengers.  Her public image was that of a conservative.  One of the people who stuck up for Clarence Thomas when he was getting rained on.  This is just Jew deep cover.  They are cuckoo babies, and a lot of trouble is made to set them up as beloved in the eyes of the people who really matter.

The idea of the Jewish handlers was to arm-twist phone calls out of people then see to it that they went smoothly to their deaths. They make us conservatives fall in love with these people so that we want to go to war.  Think of how many years this Jew was posing as a conservative.  Its a bit like the Jew Hitler posing as a German nationalist when what he was really doing is setting up Germany for the takedown and founding the state of Israel.  So these are tricks these people use again and again and again.

Posted by: graemebird | September 6, 2015

Galaxies: How are spiral arms formed and why do they exist?

The answer that I gave is perhaps a little thin on the electrical effects that go into the formation of galaxies.  The reason is that I do not understand much about how this side of things works. I need to go and read the old guys on the subject of electricity.  People like J J Thomson and Steinmetz.   People operating before the influence of team-Einstein and the Jew takeover ruined all our understanding of electricity and physics generally.  Here is my answer:

The important thing to understand is that gravity has not had a scientifically valid update in more than 300 years. Its very evident now that it does not operate as advertised. In reality gravity is such that large objects like to orbit and not to crash. There are hundreds of millions of large objects all having some sort of gravitational attraction to each other. Yet no known crashes.

So orbits are very robust. Moons grow to planets grow to stars. Stars to bigger stars. Our sun may have been once a planet revolving around one of the big Orion stars. Looking at a single spiral arm I would assume that the very largest stars are in the centre of these bands. With generally smaller stars revolving around them.  And these smaller stars, at any one time, being toward the outside of the spiral arm.  So its kind of natural that over time that these bands would form. The spiral arms will never unwind. Because the velocity will be equalised between adjacent bands, because of these gravitational tendencies towards robust orbits and non-collision.

The solar wind amounts to an electrical current with a powerful positive charge. So there ought to be an electrical repulsive force between two stars that is not present between a star and a planet. This could well have a segregating effect on these bands.

Posted by: graemebird | September 4, 2015

Do Galaxies Grow?

Is the diameter of our galaxy increasing over time? Are any other galaxies expanding?
The orbits of two or more large bodies always get further apart. The orbits gain energy. They accelerate and the bodies gain mass. Some contemplation will tell you why this has to be the case for a meaningful reality to exist.

Matter has a great deal of complexity. The construction of anything complex requires tasks in parallel and in series. It takes time. Therefore it must be ongoing. Old matter must assist in the construction of new matter or else new matter creation would be a separate miracle every moment. New matter creation therefore takes place inside of large objects. Therefore we see why the orbits of two large bodies must always grow larger and accelerate. Or matter would amalgamate, rather than orbit, meaning that no serious reality could ever have gotten started.

So yes galaxies grow larger.  But if this process continued forever the universe would be crowded with mass. There is periodic culling. Every so often we expect Sagittarius A* to send out a shockwave culling moons, planets and stars.

Moons grow to planets grow to gas giants grow to stars and on to larger stars. But at any stage a shockwave from the centre can cause any of these to explode.


Why Newton’s laws of motion explain correctly the earth’s orbit but not mercury’s?


Where Mercury is concerned, Newtons formulation succeeded on one level and failed on another.  Newtons formulation implied that there was a more oblate inner sun. A flatter inner sun means a faster spinning oceanic sun. Faster spinning and more dense. But Newtons formulation failed in terms of its projection of the relative mass of the sun. The formulae suggested that the sun was not particularly dense overall and so must have been made mostly of hydrogen.

The hydrogen sun thesis was a grave error. Since it lead to the fantasy of hydrogen self-compression. The problem is that we were probably still six decades or more away from being able to collect the necessary data to do a second draft on Newton’s good works at the turn of the century.

Its not so much that the situation was ripe for opportunistic abuse. Because what team Einstein got going went way beyond mere opportunism. It would be good if Einstein could simply be forgotten so we could get on with it. But we are not talking about yesterdays scandal.

So anyway Newtons setup did not do too badly. 50/50 with regards to Mercury. There is an inner water ocean. But the sun is not made of hydrogen.

Posted by: graemebird | September 2, 2015

What Is The Cosmic Radiation Mystery All About?


In what way can the cosmic background radiation be construed as evidence for the big bang?


The CMBR cannot possibly be construed as some remnant of the Big Bang. This mantra is drummed into people with such ferocity because the CMBR is definitely proof of something. If NASA is reading things right and not accidentally reading something else, then the CMBR is proof of the aether.

Now this is not to say we need further proof of the aether. The existence of the aether is proven by the wave nature of light.  But that the CMBR proves the aether and makes no possible logical inference for the Big Bang tells us why the oligarchy seeks to pummel everyone with the anti-logic mantra, to whit; CMBR implies Big Bang.

You see the pummelling has to go so far as to override the very logical faculties of the meme-disease spreader. There can be no letup. The denial of aether is the kingpin of science fraud. The mother of all science lies. The Big Bang is the most ambitious fairy tale ever told. So the oligarchy wants the Big Bang. The oligarchy does NOT want the aether.

So this meme-disease must be hammered in with extreme prejudice because its dual purpose. One mantra doing double duty nailing in two of the most important science lies the bigshots have.

The CMBR shines on all of us. It will hold you and your Andromeda girlfriend together when you are far apart. But I ask you:  If the cosmic radiation is not the RESONANT FREQUENCY of the aether itself, then where the hell is this light shining from?


What is the cosmic background radiation


The CMBR is the luminiferous aether resonating.

True story. Accept no science lies.

Posted by: graemebird | September 1, 2015

What Is The Dark Matter Mystery All About?


I’ve often wondered if an extension on our laws of gravity wouldn’t be sufficient to explain the discrepancies in mass that we see in galaxies etc. but many Quorians have posted saying that we’ve done experiments that show that DM is more likely- what are those experiments? How do they work?


Your instincts are correct. Dark matter is just a fudge factor. The anti-scientists will not allow for real science to go ahead. Real science would entail going back to the drawing board and systematically re-investigating Gravity for the first time in three centuries. The leadership is treating gravity as a personal secret. They have these physicists jumping through hoops to avoid anyone doing actual science. Its not just dark matter that proves they have gravity wrong. Before that we had the insane doctrine that the largest objects are made out of lifting gases that defied everything we know about the behaviour of these gases and self-compressed, leaving the rocks to amalgamate separately. Only extreme control and abuse could lead to these outcomes.

They have not done the experiments you have suggested. The physics-boy 101 types are belligerent against the suggestion that physicists ought to indulge in due diligence as opposed to propaganda.

It is not so much modified Newtonian gravity that is needed here. “Modified” does not capture it. What is required is a systematic overhaul. But the specific problem of the outer stars rotating at similar velocity can be handled as follows;

Imagine  our new formulation has matter less “clumpy” than the heritage formulae suggest. Less clumpy, more tightly held, and far more “forgiving.”  (Even before the work is done these tendencies should be apparent).

So big objects really “wish” to orbit and not to collide. But still the Galaxy is not tied together like a cartwheel. Its just that the mechanism is more geared to strong orbits. Since these orbits are developing over billions of years it seems only natural that the velocities will wind up synchronised with that of stars in the adjacent spiral arms.

Posted by: graemebird | August 29, 2015

Key Motives Behind Physics Fraud


Why is gravity such a mystery in modern day physics? Why can’t we just nail this bitch down? I mean what are the fundamental blockades in unlocking a ‘theory of gravity.’


It seems that its in the natural order of things that mastery of electricity leads to mastery of gravity. So there must be some connection between the timing of the misinformation explosion headed up by the conman Einstein and developments in electricity.

What I am saying is its deliberate. And the explosion of lies and garish idiocy is such a huge effort that it can be inferred that gravity is very straightforward and easy to manipulate. Townsend Brown discovered how to manipulate gravity by accident as a child. That is how easy gravity is to toy with. His families workshop had spinning lathes and things.

Consider the scope of the coverup. This constant brainwashing of the public to do with just how smart the charlatan Einstein was. All these lies about black holes. The compulsory dogma of the self-compression of hydrogen to make stars. The portrayal of a cripple as some sort of physics genius. The cult of Feynman. The brain drain of string theory.

Reverse engineering junk physics we see what they are really hiding. Their main target is our understanding of gravity, the second is our understanding of fusion and the third is the denial of the reality that the solar wind represents infinite electrical energy there for the taking. But its the understanding of gravity that is the central organising target for all these science-lies.

Consider the scope and gaudiness of the misdirection and compare it to what they refuse to do?

They will fund people to look for make-believe gravity waves. But they won’t send a balloon up with a robotic weighing machine to collect data. They won’t compare this to weighing exercises in a jet.  They won’t get a 5 tonne tungsten sphere and use a prospectors gravity meter to get together a database of the gravitational effects of the ball in order to refine our understanding of gravity.  They won’t fund an electrical anti-gravity workshop, and hire the well-known and impoverished Canadian anti-gravity expert to teach researchers the basics. They won’t pay for computer modellers to come up with visual interpretations of the role of the aether in electricity and gravity ……….. That is to say they will not do real science.

In fact they go so far as to pervert our understanding of what constitutes real science by virtue of the vigorous use of personality cults. They portray greatness in science as being acts of alchemical conjuring. Where the “great scientist” makes inferences he cannot possibly make, given his access to data, and then they mystically turn out to be right. Whereas real science is about getting the damn work done.

More Later

Posted by: graemebird | August 28, 2015

Newtonian Physics And The Cult Of Self-Compressing Hydrogen.

So you are sitting in your room and all the air molecules collect in the corner and you suffocate.  How often does such an improbable event take place? Well there is something more improbable than that.  And yet the mainstream dogmatists demand we believe that this more improbable thing happened every-time a star is born.  Rather than realise that its way past time for an update of Jewtonian gravity, they are expecting all the hydrogen from all around to just sort of gather together in one place,  and then START COMPRESSING ITSELF into a star.   But where do we see any gravitational body being able to keep hydrogen together? Indeed when do we ever see a naked hydrogen molecule in space? We don’t.  We see protons.  Space splits up the hydrogen. It may be that hydrogen, for the most part, needs other substances, just to stay together as a proper atom or molecule.  That is how elusive hydrogen is.  Hydrogen seems to need strong gravity, or other substances, just to hold together at all.

Even a big comet cannot really hold hydrogen.  It can hold water vapour sure.  But not hydrogen on its own.  So how does hydrogen ever gather together? It can only gather together in rock fields wherein the collected gravitational pull is far higher than any comets that we have seen come through our way in modern times.  So we expect hydrogen to gather if we have something like the asteroid belt times one million.  Imagine a truly gigantic asteroid belt.  Maybe then hydrogen could gather around.

Or otherwise hydrogen will accumulate in a large planet that already has a fat CO2 atmosphere.  But it will only stick around in water.   That is my story anyway.  But what does mainstream astronomy force-feed the profession?  Well I ask around with stuff like this.  So I asked a few people and here are the more intelligent responses.  You see they have to believe in self-compressing hydrogen because its what Jewtonian gravity tells them.  Because Jewtonian gravity makes it clear that the sun is mostly made of hydrogen.  Well how did the hydrogen get there? Goodness me, it must have self-compressed into a star.  Well thats their story and they must stick to it because of Jewtonian physics.

So here are some of my questions and here are some of the better answers:

Question 1.

When astronomers claim to see “dust” hundreds of light-years away; do they seriously believe its dust they are looking at?

How about fields of massive asteroids aggregating and scooping up gases? Why dust? There appears to be an attempt to get young astronomers to believe in hydrogen self-compression. They point you towards all this “dust” and tell you that you are looking at a “star nursery.” This appears to me to be a cult of hydrogen self-compression.


If by dust you’re imagining that stuff that collects under your bed or in the corner of your living room, that’s not what they mean. They really mean anything that is not gas.

Astronomers, like all people in technical fields, appropriate common words for new and sometimes very specific purposes that may be but tenuously connected to their common meaning. E.g., astronomers use the term “metal” for any element with more than two protons (heavier than helium).

Question 2.

Is the accretion theory for solar system formation just mean-spirited propaganda?

What evidence can be marshalled for such a farcical scenario?


This is where astronomy comes handy as an observational science. See we have not seen our own history. But by looking into deep space and hence into the past of universe we can see various stages of star system formations across various galaxies in the universe.

From here we have inferred how our own solar system may have formed. Similarly the celestial mechanics when spiraled backwards we can see that mathematical and computer models also point in the same direction.  So just because we have not seen something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. There are indirect ways of deducing facts.

Science Auditor

You mean somewhere in a galaxy far far away you think you see hydrogen self-compressing. And somehow you just know there are no aggregations of massive rocks involved


Yup. That’s where tools of physics like spectral analysis is used. Spectroscopy, gravitational red shift, gravitational lensing, celestial mechanics etc are the main tools we use to analyse the data we get.
At least we know that no God is there who out of no where creates things out of whims.

Science Auditor

They must brainwash you guys. When they tell you it’s dust you are looking at you must believe then in error. Hydrogen can congregate around clouds of asteroids. Its not about to self-compress. They showed you “dust” and told you it was a “star nursery” and you believed them right?


So what is your take on it. What’s the grand propaganda you are talking about?

Science Auditor

Gravity. They will not update gravity. So stars have to self compress. Because to fit the required mass they need to be hydrogen balls. Then they need to have the ludicrous creation myth. Then they need the gigantic rock fields to be “dust.” Ever since Einstein showed up with his synagogue buddies team banker have been crafting a perfect circle of Bolshevik pseudoscience.


My best wishes with you. Come up with an earth shattering idea. And the Nobel is just waiting for you.

All the best.

Science Auditor

Hilarious. Which tribe do you think gives out the prizes? You let me know when you can see dust smaller than Phobos at 100 light-years. It ain’t the same as 100 paces.

Older Posts »



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.